File: wal-configuration.html

package info (click to toggle)
pgadmin3 1.4.3-2
  • links: PTS
  • area: main
  • in suites: etch, etch-m68k
  • size: 29,796 kB
  • ctags: 10,758
  • sloc: cpp: 55,356; sh: 6,164; ansic: 1,520; makefile: 576; sql: 482; xml: 100; perl: 18
file content (142 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 9,744 bytes parent folder | download
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title>26.3.WAL Configuration</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="stylesheet.css" type="text/css">
<link rev="made" href="pgsql-docs@postgresql.org">
<meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets V1.70.0">
<link rel="start" href="index.html" title="PostgreSQL 8.1.4 Documentation">
<link rel="up" href="wal.html" title="Chapter26.Reliability and the Write-Ahead Log">
<link rel="prev" href="wal-intro.html" title="26.2.Write-Ahead Logging (WAL)">
<link rel="next" href="wal-internals.html" title="26.4.WAL Internals">
<link rel="copyright" href="ln-legalnotice.html" title="Legal Notice">
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" text="black" link="#0000FF" vlink="#840084" alink="#0000FF"><div class="sect1" lang="en">
<div class="titlepage"><div><div><h2 class="title" style="clear: both">
<a name="wal-configuration"></a>26.3.<acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym> Configuration</h2></div></div></div>
<p>   There are several <acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym>-related configuration parameters that
   affect database performance. This section explains their use.
   Consult <a href="runtime-config.html" title="Chapter17.Server Configuration">Chapter17, <i>Server Configuration</i></a> for general information about
   setting server configuration parameters.
  </p>
<p>   <em class="firstterm">Checkpoints</em><a name="id673773"></a>
   are points in the sequence of transactions at which it is guaranteed
   that the data files have been updated with all information written before
   the checkpoint.  At checkpoint time, all dirty data pages are flushed to
   disk and a special checkpoint record is written to the log file.
   In the event of a crash, the crash recovery procedure looks at the latest
   checkpoint record to determine the point in the log (known as the redo
   record) from which it should start the REDO operation.  Any changes made to
   data files before that point are known to be already on disk.  Hence, after
   a checkpoint has been made, any log segments preceding the one containing
   the redo record are no longer needed and can be recycled or removed. (When
   <acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym> archiving is being done, the log segments must be
   archived before being recycled or removed.)
  </p>
<p>   The server's background writer process will automatically perform
   a checkpoint every so often.  A checkpoint is created every <a href="runtime-config-wal.html#guc-checkpoint-segments">checkpoint_segments</a> log segments, or every <a href="runtime-config-wal.html#guc-checkpoint-timeout">checkpoint_timeout</a> seconds, whichever comes first.
   The default settings are 3 segments and 300 seconds respectively.
   It is also possible to force a checkpoint by using the SQL command
   <code class="command">CHECKPOINT</code>.
  </p>
<p>   Reducing <code class="varname">checkpoint_segments</code> and/or
   <code class="varname">checkpoint_timeout</code> causes checkpoints to be done
   more often. This allows faster after-crash recovery (since less work
   will need to be redone). However, one must balance this against the
   increased cost of flushing dirty data pages more often. If 
   <a href="runtime-config-wal.html#guc-full-page-writes">full_page_writes</a> is set (as is the default), there is 
   another factor to consider. To ensure data page consistency, 
   the first modification of a data page after each checkpoint results in 
   logging the entire page content. In that case,
   a smaller checkpoint interval increases the volume of output to the WAL log,
   partially negating the goal of using a smaller interval, 
   and in any case causing more disk I/O.
  </p>
<p>   Checkpoints are fairly expensive, first because they require writing
   out all currently dirty buffers, and second because they result in
   extra subsequent WAL traffic as discussed above.  It is therefore
   wise to set the checkpointing parameters high enough that checkpoints
   don't happen too often.  As a simple sanity check on your checkpointing
   parameters, you can set the <a href="runtime-config-wal.html#guc-checkpoint-warning">checkpoint_warning</a>
   parameter.  If checkpoints happen closer together than
   <code class="varname">checkpoint_warning</code> seconds, 
   a message will be output to the server log recommending increasing 
   <code class="varname">checkpoint_segments</code>.  Occasional appearance of such
   a message is not cause for alarm, but if it appears often then the
   checkpoint control parameters should be increased. Bulk operations such
   as large <code class="command">COPY</code> transfers may cause a number of such warnings
   to appear if you have not set <code class="varname">checkpoint_segments</code> high
   enough.
  </p>
<p>   There will be at least one WAL segment file, and will normally
   not be more than 2 * <code class="varname">checkpoint_segments</code> + 1
   files.  Each segment file is normally 16 MB (though this size can be
   altered when building the server).  You can use this to estimate space
   requirements for <acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym>.
   Ordinarily, when old log segment files are no longer needed, they
   are recycled (renamed to become the next segments in the numbered
   sequence). If, due to a short-term peak of log output rate, there
   are more than 2 * <code class="varname">checkpoint_segments</code> + 1
   segment files, the unneeded segment files will be deleted instead
   of recycled until the system gets back under this limit.
  </p>
<p>   There are two commonly used internal <acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym> functions:
   <code class="function">LogInsert</code> and <code class="function">LogFlush</code>.
   <code class="function">LogInsert</code> is used to place a new record into
   the <acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym> buffers in shared memory. If there is no
   space for the new record, <code class="function">LogInsert</code> will have
   to write (move to kernel cache) a few filled <acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym>
   buffers. This is undesirable because <code class="function">LogInsert</code>
   is used on every database low level modification (for example, row
   insertion) at a time when an exclusive lock is held on affected
   data pages, so the operation needs to be as fast as possible.  What
   is worse, writing <acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym> buffers may also force the
   creation of a new log segment, which takes even more
   time. Normally, <acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym> buffers should be written
   and flushed by a <code class="function">LogFlush</code> request, which is
   made, for the most part, at transaction commit time to ensure that
   transaction records are flushed to permanent storage. On systems
   with high log output, <code class="function">LogFlush</code> requests may
   not occur often enough to prevent <code class="function">LogInsert</code>
   from having to do writes.  On such systems
   one should increase the number of <acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym> buffers by
   modifying the configuration parameter <a href="runtime-config-wal.html#guc-wal-buffers">wal_buffers</a>.  The default number of <acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym>
   buffers is 8.  Increasing this value will
   correspondingly increase shared memory usage.  When 
   <a href="runtime-config-wal.html#guc-full-page-writes">full_page_writes</a> is set and the system is very busy, 
   setting this value higher will help smooth response times during the 
   period immediately following each checkpoint.
  </p>
<p>   The <a href="runtime-config-wal.html#guc-commit-delay">commit_delay</a> parameter defines for how many
   microseconds the server process will sleep after writing a commit
   record to the log with <code class="function">LogInsert</code> but before
   performing a <code class="function">LogFlush</code>. This delay allows other
   server processes to add their commit records to the log so as to have all
   of them flushed with a single log sync. No sleep will occur if
   <a href="runtime-config-wal.html#guc-fsync">fsync</a>
   is not enabled, nor if fewer than <a href="runtime-config-wal.html#guc-commit-siblings">commit_siblings</a>
   other sessions are currently in active transactions; this avoids
   sleeping when it's unlikely that any other session will commit soon.
   Note that on most platforms, the resolution of a sleep request is
   ten milliseconds, so that any nonzero <code class="varname">commit_delay</code>
   setting between 1 and 10000 microseconds would have the same effect.
   Good values for these parameters are not yet clear; experimentation
   is encouraged.
  </p>
<p>   The <a href="runtime-config-wal.html#guc-wal-sync-method">wal_sync_method</a> parameter determines how
   <span class="productname">PostgreSQL</span> will ask the kernel to force
    <acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym> updates out to disk. 
   All the options should be the same as far as reliability goes,
   but it's quite platform-specific which one will be the fastest.
   Note that this parameter is irrelevant if <code class="varname">fsync</code>
   has been turned off.
  </p>
<p>   Enabling the <a href="runtime-config-developer.html#guc-wal-debug">wal_debug</a> configuration parameter
   (provided that <span class="productname">PostgreSQL</span> has been
   compiled with support for it) will result in each
   <code class="function">LogInsert</code> and <code class="function">LogFlush</code>
   <acronym class="acronym">WAL</acronym> call being logged to the server log. This
   option may be replaced by a more general mechanism in the future.
  </p>
</div></body>
</html>