File: README-tek

package info (click to toggle)
plotutils 2.6-15
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid
  • size: 14,040 kB
  • sloc: ansic: 68,670; sh: 20,086; cpp: 12,382; yacc: 2,588; makefile: 838; lex: 137
file content (32 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,739 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (12)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
These are some comments on the interface provided by GNU libplot to
Tektronix emulators.

The Tektronix device driver included in libplot produces output for several
types of Tektronix-compatible display.  This includes the Tektronix
emulators built into `xterm' (the X Window System terminal emulator) and
the MS-DOS version of `kermit'.  They are recognized by the environment
variable TERM equalling "xterm" (or "xterms" or "kterm"), and "kermit" (or
"ansi.sys, "ansi.sysk", "ansisys", or "ansisysk"), respectively.

Some historical comments on the Tektronix 4010/4014 follow. 

A Tektronix 4010 had what was effectively a 1024x780 display, as did the
first Tektronix 4014 models.  Effective coordinate space was
[0..1023]x[0..779].  Extended resolution, available for Tektronix 4014's
equipped with the Enhanced Graphics Module [EGM], yielded
[0..4095]x[0..3119] as coordinate space.  Actually the range of the two
position registers was always [0..4095], even before the EGM was
introduced.  (On displays without EGM, the low two bits in each coordinate
were dropped.)  So the upgrade path to the 4014-with-EGM was smooth.

In pre-EGM days a Tekpoint increment (display measurement unit) equalled
four increments of the x or y position register.  `Home cursor position'
was (0,767) in terms of Tekpoints, since the character matrix was 7x9.
After the introduction of the EGM, a Tekpoint increment equalled one
increment of the x or y position register, not four.  Home position became
(0,3071).

There were approximately 70 Tekpoints/inch in pre-EGM days, 280/inch with
EGM.  In other words, the resolution was better than that of high-end
workstation displays today.  Who says raster graphics is an improvement
over vector graphics?