1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505
|
==================
Molecular dynamics
==================
.. module:: ase.md
:synopsis: Molecular Dynamics
.. contents::
Typical computer simulations involve moving the atoms around, either
to optimize a structure (energy minimization) or to do molecular
dynamics. This chapter discusses molecular dynamics, energy
minimization algorithms is discussed in the :ref:`structure_optimizations`
section.
A molecular dynamics object will operate on the atoms by moving them
according to their forces - it integrates Newton's second law
numerically. In the most basic form, this preserves the particle
number, volume (actually, the shape of the unit cell), and the energy,
generating an *NVE* or *microcanonical* ensemble. Other ensembles
(*NVT* and *NpT*) can be generated by coupling the motion of the atoms
to a simple model of the surroundings.
*Simple example:* A molecular dynamics simulation in the *NVE* ensemble will use the
`Velocity Verlet dynamics`_. You create the
:class:`ase.md.verlet.VelocityVerlet` object, giving it the atoms and a time
step, and then you perform dynamics by calling its
:meth:`~verlet.VelocityVerlet.run` method::
dyn = VelocityVerlet(atoms, dt=5.0 * units.fs,
trajectory='md.traj', logfile='md.log')
dyn.run(1000) # take 1000 steps
.. note::
Prior to ASE version 3.21.0, inconsistent units were used to
specify temperature. Some modules expected kT (in eV), others T
(in Kelvin). From ASE 3.21.0, all molecular dynamics modules
expecting a temperature take a parameter ``temperature_K`` which is
the temperature in Kelvin. For compatibility, they still accept
the ``temperature`` parameter in the same unit as previous versions
(eV or K), but using the old parameter will issue a warning.
Choosing the time step
======================
All the dynamics objects need a time step. Choosing it too small will
waste computer time, choosing it too large will make the dynamics
unstable, typically the energy increases dramatically (the system
"blows up"). If the time step is only a little to large, the lack of
energy conservation is most obvious in `Velocity Verlet dynamics`_,
where energy should otherwise be conserved.
Experience has shown that 5 femtoseconds is a good choice for most metallic
systems. Systems with light atoms (e.g. hydrogen) and/or with strong
bonds (carbon) will need a smaller time step, maybe as small as 1 or 2
fs.
All the dynamics objects documented here are sufficiently related to
have the same optimal time step.
File output
===========
The time evolution of the system can be saved in a trajectory file,
by creating a trajectory object, and attaching it to the dynamics
object. This is documented in the module :mod:`ase.io.trajectory`.
You can attach the trajectory explicitly to the dynamics object, and
you may want to use the optional ``interval`` argument, so every
time step is not written to the file.
Alternatively, you can just use the ``trajectory`` keyword when
instantiating the dynamics object as in the example above. In this
case, a ``loginterval`` keyword may also be supplied to specify the
frequency of writing to the trajectory. The loginterval keyword will
apply to both the trajectory and the logfile.
Logging
=======
A logging mechanism is provided, printing time; total, potential and
kinetic energy; and temperature (calculated from the kinetic energy).
It is enabled by giving the ``logfile`` argument when the dynamics
object is created, ``logfile`` may be an open file, a filename or the
string '-' meaning standard output. Per default, a line is printed
for each timestep, specifying the ``loginterval`` argument will chance
this to a more reasonable frequency.
The logging can be customized by explicitly attaching a
:class:`MDLogger` object to the dynamics::
from ase.md import MDLogger
dyn = VelocityVerlet(atoms, dt=2*ase.units.fs)
dyn.attach(MDLogger(dyn, atoms, 'md.log', header=False, stress=False,
peratom=True, mode="a"), interval=1000)
This example will skip the header line and write energies per atom
instead of total energies. The parameters are
``header``: Print a header line defining the columns.
``stress``: Print the six components of the stress tensor.
``peratom``: Print energy per atom instead of total energy.
``mode``: If 'a', append to existing file, if 'w' overwrite
existing file.
Despite appearances, attaching a logger like this does *not* create a
cyclic reference to the dynamics.
.. note::
If building your own logging class, be sure not to attach the dynamics
object directly to the logging object. Instead, create a weak reference
using the ``proxy`` method of the ``weakref`` package. See the
*ase.md.MDLogger* source code for an example. (If this is not done, a
cyclic reference may be created which can cause certain calculators
to not terminate correctly.)
.. autoclass:: MDLogger
Constant NVE simulations (the microcanonical ensemble)
======================================================
Newton's second law preserves the total energy of the system, and a
straightforward integration of Newton's second law therefore leads to
simulations preserving the total energy of the system (E), the number
of atoms (N) and the volume of the system (V). The most appropriate
algorithm for doing this is velocity Verlet dynamics, since it gives
very good long-term stability of the total energy even with quite
large time steps. Fancier algorithms such as Runge-Kutta may give
very good short-term energy preservation, but at the price of a slow
drift in energy over longer timescales, causing trouble for long
simulations.
In a typical NVE simulation, the temperature will remain approximately
constant, but if significant structural changes occurs they may result
in temperature changes. If external work is done on the system, the
temperature is likely to rise significantly.
Velocity Verlet dynamics
------------------------
.. module:: ase.md.verlet
.. autoclass:: VelocityVerlet
``VelocityVerlet`` is the only dynamics implementing the NVE ensemble.
It requires two arguments, the atoms and the time step. Choosing
a too large time step will immediately be obvious, as the energy will
increase with time, often very rapidly.
Example: See the tutorial :ref:`md_tutorial`.
Constant NVT simulations (the canonical ensemble)
=================================================
Since Newton's second law conserves energy and not temperature,
simulations at constant temperature will somehow involve coupling the
system to a heat bath. This cannot help being somewhat artificial.
Such algorithms can be stochastic or deterministic, and the coupling
to the atoms typically occurs through a rescaling of the velocities.
In the Langevin algorithm, a friction term and a fluctuating force is
used instead.
In the NVT ensemble both the kinetic energy and the total energy will
fluctuate. Some algorithms do not correctly reproduce these
fluctuations, this may be an issue in particular for small systems,
and is noted in the overview below.
**Recommended algorithms:**
Langevin dynamics
A friction and fluctuating force is added to the equation of
motion. *Advantages*: Simple. Correctly samples the ensemble.
*Disadvantage*: Stochastic.
Nosé-Hoover chain
In Nosé-Hoover dynamics, the velocities are rescaled at each time
step. The scaling factor is itself a dynamic variable. For
stable operation, a chain of thermostats is used. *Advantages*:
Deterministic. Well-studied by the Stat. Mek. community.
Correctly samples the ensemble. *Disadvantages*: The fluctuations
tend to show a period given by the thermostat time scale. Slow to
reach the correct temperature if started from a significantly
wrong temperature.
Bussi dynamics
Rescales the velocities at each time step, using a stochastic
algorithm to ensure the correct fluctuations, unlike the closely
related Berendsen algorithm. *Advantages*: Simple. Correctly
samples the ensemble. *Disadvantage*: Stochastic.
**Not recommended algorithms:**
Andersen dynamics
At each time step a fraction of the atoms have their velocity
replaced with one drawn from the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.
*Disadvantage*: Dramatically alters a few atoms instead of gently
perturbing them all. Velocities are artificially decorrelated over a time
corresponding to the thermalization time.
Berendsen NVT dynamics
Rescale the velocities at each time step, so the kinetic energy
exponentially approaches the correct one. *Advantage*: Very
efficient for initializing a system to the correct initial
temperature. *Disadvantage*: Almost completely supresses
fluctuations in the total energy.
Langevin dynamics
-----------------
.. module:: ase.md.langevin
.. autoclass:: Langevin
The Langevin class implements Langevin dynamics, where a (small)
friction term and a fluctuating force are added to Newton's second law
which is then integrated numerically. The temperature of the heat
bath and magnitude of the friction is specified by the user, the
amplitude of the fluctuating force is then calculated to give that
temperature. This procedure has some physical justification: in a
real metal the atoms are (weakly) coupled to the electron gas, and the
electron gas therefore acts like a heat bath for the atoms. If heat
is produced locally, the atoms locally get a temperature that is
higher than the temperature of the electrons, heat is transferred to
the electrons and then rapidly transported away by them. A Langevin
equation is probably a reasonable model for this process.
A disadvantage of using Langevin dynamics is that if significant heat
is produced in the simulation, then the temperature will stabilize at
a value higher than the specified temperature of the heat bath, since
a temperature difference between the system and the heat bath is
necessary to get a finite heat flow. Another disadvantage is that the
fluctuating force is stochastic in nature, so repeating the simulation
will not give exactly the same trajectory.
When the ``Langevin`` object is created, you must specify a time step,
a temperature (in Kelvin) and a friction coefficient.
A typical range for the friction coefficient may be 0.001–0.1 fs\ :sup:`−1`
(1–100 ps\ :sup:`−1`).
For example, you can give a friction coefficient of 0.01 fs\ :sup:`−1`
(10 ps\ :sup:`−1`) as
.. code-block:: python
dyn = Langevin(
atoms,
timestep=5.0 * units.fs,
temperature_K=300.0, # temperature in K
friction=0.01 / units.fs,
)
Both the friction and the temperature can be replaced with arrays
giving per-atom values. This is mostly useful for the friction, where
one can choose a rather high friction near the boundaries, and set it
to zero in the part of the system where the phenomenon being studied
is located.
Nosé-Hoover dynamics
--------------------
.. module:: ase.md.nose_hoover_chain
.. autoclass:: NoseHooverChainNVT
In Nosé-Hoover dynamics, an extra term is added to the Hamiltonian
representing the coupling to the heat bath. From a pragmatic point of
view one can regard Nosé-Hoover dynamics as adding a friction term to
Newton's second law, but dynamically changing the friction coefficient
to move the system towards the desired temperature. Typically the
"friction coefficient" will fluctuate around zero. To give a more
stable dynamics, the friction coefficient is itself thermalized in the
same way, leading to a chain of thermostats (a **Nosé-Hoover chain**,
in ASE per default the chain length is 3).
Bussi dynamics
--------------
.. module:: ase.md.bussi
.. autoclass:: Bussi
The Bussi class implements the Bussi dynamics, where constant
temperature is imposed by a stochastic velocity rescaling algorithm.
The thermostat is conceptually very close to the Berendsen thermostat,
but does sample the canonical ensemble correctly. Given that the thermostat
is both correct and global, it is advised to use it for production
runs.
Andersen dynamics
-----------------
.. module:: ase.md.andersen
.. autoclass:: Andersen
The Andersen class implements Andersen dynamics, where constant
temperature is imposed by stochastic collisions with a heat bath.
With a (small) probability (``andersen_prob``) the collisions act
occasionally on velocity components of randomly selected particles.
Upon a collision the new velocity is drawn from the
Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution at the corresponding temperature.
The system is then integrated numerically at constant energy
according to the Newtonian laws of motion. The collision probability
is defined as the average number of collisions per atom and timestep.
The algorithm generates a canonical distribution. [1] However, due
to the random decorrelation of velocities, the dynamics are
unphysical and cannot represent dynamical properties like e.g.
diffusion or viscosity. Another disadvantage is that the collisions
are stochastic in nature, so repeating the simulation will not give
exactly the same trajectory.
When the ``Andersen`` object is created, you must specify a time step,
a temperature (in Kelvin) and a collision probability. Typical
values for this probability are in the order of 1e-4 to 1e-1.
::
# Room temperature simulation (300 Kelvin, Andersen probability: 0.002)
dyn = Andersen(atoms, 5 * units.fs, 300, 0.002)
References:
[1] D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation
(Academic Press, London, 1996)
Berendsen NVT dynamics
-----------------------
.. module:: ase.md.nvtberendsen
.. autoclass:: NVTBerendsen
In Berendsen NVT simulations the velocities are scaled to achieve the desired
temperature. The speed of the scaling is determined by the parameter taut.
This method does not result proper NVT sampling but it usually is
sufficiently good in practice (with large taut). For discussion see
the gromacs manual at www.gromacs.org.
::
# Room temperature simulation (300K, 0.1 fs time step)
dyn = NVTBerendsen(atoms, 0.1 * units.fs, 300, taut=0.5*1000*units.fs)
Constant NPT simulations (the isothermal-isobaric ensemble)
===========================================================
Constant pressure (or for solids, constant stress) is usually obtained
by adding a barostat to one of the NVT algorithms above. ASE
currently lacks a good NPT algorithm. The following two are available.
**Algorithms:**
Berendsen NPT dynamics
This is a variation of Berendsen NVT dynamics with a barostat
added. The size of the unit cell is rescaled after each time
step, so the pressure / stress approaches the desired pressure.
It exists in two variations, one where the shape of the unit cell
is preserved and one where it is allowed to vary. *Disadvantage*:
Fluctuations in both total energy and pressure are suppressed
compared to the correct NPT ensemble. For large systems, this is
not expected to be serious.
NPT
An implementation of NPT dynamics combining a Nosé-Hoover
thermostat with a Parinello-Rahman barostat, according to
Melchionna *et al.*, see below. **Not recommended!** The
dynamics tend to be unstable, especially if started with a
temperature or pressure that is different from the desired. The
fluctuations seem to often be wrong.
Berendsen NPT dynamics
-----------------------
.. module:: ase.md.nptberendsen
.. autoclass:: NPTBerendsen
In Berendsen NPT simulations the velocities are scaled to achieve the desired
temperature. The speed of the scaling is determined by the parameter taut.
The atom positions and the simulation cell are scaled in order to achieve
the desired pressure. The time scale of this barostat is given by the
parameter taup.
This method does not result proper NPT sampling but it usually is
sufficiently good in practice (with large taut and taup). For discussion see
the gromacs manual at www.gromacs.org. or amber at ambermd.org
::
# Room temperature simulation (300K, 0.1 fs time step, atmospheric pressure)
dyn = NPTBerendsen(atoms, timestep=0.1 * units.fs, temperature_K=300,
taut=100 * units.fs, pressure_au=1.01325 * units.bar,
taup=1000 * units.fs, compressibility_au=4.57e-5 / units.bar)
Nosé-Hoover-Parinello-Rahman NPT dynamics
-----------------------------------------
.. module:: ase.md.npt
.. autoclass:: NPT
.. automethod:: run
.. automethod:: set_stress
.. automethod:: set_temperature
.. automethod:: set_mask
.. automethod:: set_fraction_traceless
.. automethod:: get_strain_rate
.. automethod:: set_strain_rate
.. automethod:: get_time
.. automethod:: initialize
.. automethod:: get_gibbs_free_energy
.. automethod:: zero_center_of_mass_momentum
.. automethod:: attach
**This module is not recommended!** There is a strong tendency for
oscillations in the temperature and/or pressure, unless the starting
configuration is chosen with great care.
Contour Exploration
===================
.. module:: ase.md.contour_exploration
.. autoclass:: ContourExploration
Contour Exploration evolves the system along constant potentials energy
contours on the potential energy surface. The method uses curvature based
extrapolation and a potentiostat to correct for potential energy errors. It is
similar to molecular dynamics but with a potentiostat rather than a thermostat.
Without changes in kinetic energy, it is more useful to automatically scale
step sizes to the curvature of the potential energy contour via an
``angle_limit`` while enforcing a ``maxstep`` to ensure potentiostatic
accuracy. [1] To escape loops on the pontential energy surface or to break
symmetries, a random drift vector parallel to the contour can be applied as a
fraction of the step size via ``parallel_drift``. Contour exploration cannot
be used at minima since the contour is a single point.
::
# Contour exploration at the current potential energy
dyn = ContourExploration(atoms)
References:
[1] M. J. Waters and J. M. Rondinelli, *Contour Exploration with Potentiostatic
Kinematics* `arXiv:2103.08054 <https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.08054>`_.
Velocity distributions
======================
A selection of functions are provided to initialize atomic velocities
to the correct temperature.
.. module:: ase.md.velocitydistribution
.. autofunction:: MaxwellBoltzmannDistribution
.. autofunction:: Stationary
.. autofunction:: ZeroRotation
.. autofunction:: PhononHarmonics
.. autofunction:: phonon_harmonics
Post-simulation Analysis
========================
Functionality is provided to perform analysis of atomic/molecular behaviour as calculation in a molecular dynamics simulation. Currently, this is presented as a class to address the Einstein equation for diffusivity.
.. module:: ase.md.analysis
.. autoclass:: DiffusionCoefficient
|