File: pubmed2.xml

package info (click to toggle)
python-biopython 1.68%2Bdfsg-3
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: stretch
  • size: 46,860 kB
  • ctags: 13,237
  • sloc: python: 160,306; xml: 93,216; ansic: 9,118; sql: 1,208; makefile: 155; sh: 63
file content (282 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 14,341 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (9)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE PubmedArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMedArticle, 1st January 2008//EN" "http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query/DTD/pubmed_080101.dtd">
<PubmedArticleSet>
<PubmedArticle>
    <MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE">
        <PMID>11748933</PMID>
        <DateCreated>
            <Year>2001</Year>
            <Month>12</Month>
            <Day>25</Day>
        </DateCreated>
        <DateCompleted>
            <Year>2002</Year>
            <Month>03</Month>
            <Day>04</Day>
        </DateCompleted>
        <DateRevised>
            <Year>2006</Year>
            <Month>11</Month>
            <Day>15</Day>
        </DateRevised>
        <Article PubModel="Print">
            <Journal>
                <ISSN IssnType="Print">0011-2240</ISSN>
                <JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
                    <Volume>42</Volume>
                    <Issue>4</Issue>
                    <PubDate>
                        <Year>2001</Year>
                        <Month>Jun</Month>
                    </PubDate>
                </JournalIssue>
                <Title>Cryobiology</Title>
                <ISOAbbreviation>Cryobiology</ISOAbbreviation>
            </Journal>
            <ArticleTitle>Is cryopreservation a homogeneous process? Ultrastructure and motility of untreated, prefreezing, and postthawed spermatozoa of Diplodus puntazzo (Cetti).</ArticleTitle>
            <Pagination>
                <MedlinePgn>244-55</MedlinePgn>
            </Pagination>
            <Abstract>
                <AbstractText>This study subdivides the cryopreservation procedure for Diplodus puntazzo spermatozoa into three key phases, fresh, prefreezing (samples equilibrated in cryosolutions), and postthawed stages, and examines the ultrastructural anomalies and motility profiles of spermatozoa in each stage, with different cryodiluents. Two simple cryosolutions were evaluated: 0.17 M sodium chloride containing a final concentration of 15% dimethyl sulfoxide (Me(2)SO) (cryosolution A) and 0.1 M sodium citrate containing a final concentration of 10% Me(2)SO (cryosolution B). Ultrastructural anomalies of the plasmatic and nuclear membranes of the sperm head were common and the severity of the cryoinjury differed significantly between the pre- and the postfreezing phases and between the two cryosolutions. In spermatozoa diluted with cryosolution A, during the prefreezing phase, the plasmalemma of 61% of the cells was absent or damaged compared with 24% in the fresh sample (P &lt; 0.001). In spermatozoa diluted with cryosolution B, there was a pronounced increase in the number of cells lacking the head plasmatic membrane from the prefreezing to the postthawed stages (from 32 to 52%, P &lt; 0.01). In both cryosolutions, damages to nuclear membrane were significantly higher after freezing (cryosolution A: 8 to 23%, P &lt; 0.01; cryosolution B: 5 to 38%, P &lt; 0.001). With cryosolution A, the after-activation motility profile confirmed a consistent drop from fresh at the prefreezing stage, whereas freezing and thawing did not affect the motility much further and 50% of the cells were immotile by 60-90 s after activation. With cryosolution B, only the postthawing stage showed a sharp drop of motility profile. This study suggests that the different phases of the cryoprocess should be investigated to better understand the process of sperm damage.</AbstractText>
                <CopyrightInformation>Copyright 2001 Elsevier Science.</CopyrightInformation>
            </Abstract>
            <Affiliation>Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Università degli Studi della Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.</Affiliation>
            <AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
                <Author ValidYN="Y">
                    <LastName>Taddei</LastName>
                    <ForeName>A R</ForeName>
                    <Initials>AR</Initials>
                </Author>
                <Author ValidYN="Y">
                    <LastName>Barbato</LastName>
                    <ForeName>F</ForeName>
                    <Initials>F</Initials>
                </Author>
                <Author ValidYN="Y">
                    <LastName>Abelli</LastName>
                    <ForeName>L</ForeName>
                    <Initials>L</Initials>
                </Author>
                <Author ValidYN="Y">
                    <LastName>Canese</LastName>
                    <ForeName>S</ForeName>
                    <Initials>S</Initials>
                </Author>
                <Author ValidYN="Y">
                    <LastName>Moretti</LastName>
                    <ForeName>F</ForeName>
                    <Initials>F</Initials>
                </Author>
                <Author ValidYN="Y">
                    <LastName>Rana</LastName>
                    <ForeName>K J</ForeName>
                    <Initials>KJ</Initials>
                </Author>
                <Author ValidYN="Y">
                    <LastName>Fausto</LastName>
                    <ForeName>A M</ForeName>
                    <Initials>AM</Initials>
                </Author>
                <Author ValidYN="Y">
                    <LastName>Mazzini</LastName>
                    <ForeName>M</ForeName>
                    <Initials>M</Initials>
                </Author>
            </AuthorList>
            <Language>eng</Language>
            <PublicationTypeList>
                <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
                <PublicationType>Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType>
            </PublicationTypeList>
        </Article>
        <MedlineJournalInfo>
            <Country>United States</Country>
            <MedlineTA>Cryobiology</MedlineTA>
            <NlmUniqueID>0006252</NlmUniqueID>
        </MedlineJournalInfo>
        <CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
        <MeshHeadingList>
            <MeshHeading>
                <DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName>
            </MeshHeading>
            <MeshHeading>
                <DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N">Cell Membrane</DescriptorName>
                <QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N">ultrastructure</QualifierName>
            </MeshHeading>
            <MeshHeading>
                <DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N">Cryopreservation</DescriptorName>
                <QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
            </MeshHeading>
            <MeshHeading>
                <DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N">Male</DescriptorName>
            </MeshHeading>
            <MeshHeading>
                <DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N">Microscopy, Electron</DescriptorName>
            </MeshHeading>
            <MeshHeading>
                <DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N">Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</DescriptorName>
            </MeshHeading>
            <MeshHeading>
                <DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N">Nuclear Envelope</DescriptorName>
                <QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N">ultrastructure</QualifierName>
            </MeshHeading>
            <MeshHeading>
                <DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N">Sea Bream</DescriptorName>
                <QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y">anatomy &amp; histology</QualifierName>
                <QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
            </MeshHeading>
            <MeshHeading>
                <DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N">Semen Preservation</DescriptorName>
                <QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N">adverse effects</QualifierName>
                <QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName>
            </MeshHeading>
            <MeshHeading>
                <DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y">Sperm Motility</DescriptorName>
            </MeshHeading>
            <MeshHeading>
                <DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N">Spermatozoa</DescriptorName>
                <QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N">physiology</QualifierName>
                <QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y">ultrastructure</QualifierName>
            </MeshHeading>
        </MeshHeadingList>
    </MedlineCitation>
    <PubmedData>
        <History>
            <PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
                <Year>2001</Year>
                <Month>12</Month>
                <Day>26</Day>
                <Hour>10</Hour>
                <Minute>0</Minute>
            </PubMedPubDate>
            <PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
                <Year>2002</Year>
                <Month>3</Month>
                <Day>5</Day>
                <Hour>10</Hour>
                <Minute>1</Minute>
            </PubMedPubDate>
        </History>
        <PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
        <ArticleIdList>
            <ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11748933</ArticleId>
            <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1006/cryo.2001.2328</ArticleId>
            <ArticleId IdType="pii">S0011-2240(01)92328-4</ArticleId>
        </ArticleIdList>
    </PubmedData>
</PubmedArticle>


<PubmedArticle>
    <MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="PubMed-not-MEDLINE">
        <PMID>11700088</PMID>
        <DateCreated>
            <Year>2001</Year>
            <Month>11</Month>
            <Day>08</Day>
        </DateCreated>
        <DateCompleted>
            <Year>2001</Year>
            <Month>12</Month>
            <Day>20</Day>
        </DateCompleted>
        <DateRevised>
            <Year>2003</Year>
            <Month>10</Month>
            <Day>31</Day>
        </DateRevised>
        <Article PubModel="Print">
            <Journal>
                <ISSN IssnType="Print">1090-7807</ISSN>
                <JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print">
                    <Volume>153</Volume>
                    <Issue>1</Issue>
                    <PubDate>
                        <Year>2001</Year>
                        <Month>Nov</Month>
                    </PubDate>
                </JournalIssue>
                <Title>Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997)</Title>
                <ISOAbbreviation>J. Magn. Reson.</ISOAbbreviation>
            </Journal>
            <ArticleTitle>Proton MRI of (13)C distribution by J and chemical shift editing.</ArticleTitle>
            <Pagination>
                <MedlinePgn>117-23</MedlinePgn>
            </Pagination>
            <Abstract>
                <AbstractText>The sensitivity of (13)C NMR imaging can be considerably favored by detecting the (1)H nuclei bound to (13)C nuclei via scalar J-interaction (X-filter). However, the J-editing approaches have difficulty in discriminating between compounds with similar J-constant as, for example, different glucose metabolites. In such cases, it is almost impossible to get J-edited images of a single-compound distribution, since the various molecules are distinguishable only via their chemical shift. In a recent application of J-editing to high-resolution spectroscopy, it has been shown that a more efficient chemical selectivity could be obtained by utilizing the larger chemical shift range of (13)C. This has been made by introducing frequency-selective (13)C pulses that allow a great capability of indirect chemical separation. Here a double-resonance imaging approach is proposed, based on both J-editing and (13)C chemical shift editing, which achieves a powerful chemical selectivity and is able to produce full maps of specific chemical compounds. Results are presented on a multicompartments sample containing solutions of glucose and lactic and glutamic acid in water.</AbstractText>
                <CopyrightInformation>Copyright 2001 Academic Press.</CopyrightInformation>
            </Abstract>
            <Affiliation>INFM and Department of Physics, University of L'Aquila, I-67100 L'Aquila, Italy.</Affiliation>
            <AuthorList CompleteYN="Y">
                <Author ValidYN="Y">
                    <LastName>Casieri</LastName>
                    <ForeName>C</ForeName>
                    <Initials>C</Initials>
                </Author>
                <Author ValidYN="Y">
                    <LastName>Testa</LastName>
                    <ForeName>C</ForeName>
                    <Initials>C</Initials>
                </Author>
                <Author ValidYN="Y">
                    <LastName>Carpinelli</LastName>
                    <ForeName>G</ForeName>
                    <Initials>G</Initials>
                </Author>
                <Author ValidYN="Y">
                    <LastName>Canese</LastName>
                    <ForeName>R</ForeName>
                    <Initials>R</Initials>
                </Author>
                <Author ValidYN="Y">
                    <LastName>Podo</LastName>
                    <ForeName>F</ForeName>
                    <Initials>F</Initials>
                </Author>
                <Author ValidYN="Y">
                    <LastName>De Luca</LastName>
                    <ForeName>F</ForeName>
                    <Initials>F</Initials>
                </Author>
            </AuthorList>
            <Language>eng</Language>
            <PublicationTypeList>
                <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
            </PublicationTypeList>
        </Article>
        <MedlineJournalInfo>
            <Country>United States</Country>
            <MedlineTA>J Magn Reson</MedlineTA>
            <NlmUniqueID>9707935</NlmUniqueID>
        </MedlineJournalInfo>
    </MedlineCitation>
    <PubmedData>
        <History>
            <PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed">
                <Year>2001</Year>
                <Month>11</Month>
                <Day>9</Day>
                <Hour>10</Hour>
                <Minute>0</Minute>
            </PubMedPubDate>
            <PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline">
                <Year>2001</Year>
                <Month>11</Month>
                <Day>9</Day>
                <Hour>10</Hour>
                <Minute>1</Minute>
            </PubMedPubDate>
        </History>
        <PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
        <ArticleIdList>
            <ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11700088</ArticleId>
            <ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1006/jmre.2001.2429</ArticleId>
            <ArticleId IdType="pii">S1090-7807(01)92429-2</ArticleId>
        </ArticleIdList>
    </PubmedData>
</PubmedArticle>


</PubmedArticleSet>