1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392
|
Extending Cerberus
==================
Though you can use functions in conjunction with the ``coerce`` and the
``check_with`` rules, you can easily extend the :class:`~cerberus.Validator`
class with custom ``rules``, ``types``, ``check_with`` handlers, ``coercers``
and ``default_setters``.
While the function-based style is more suitable for special and one-off uses,
a custom class leverages these possibilities:
* custom rules can be defined with constrains in a schema
* extending the available :ref:`type` s
* use additional contextual data
* schemas are serializable
The references in schemas to these custom methods can use space characters
instead of underscores, e.g. ``{'foo': {'check_with': 'is odd'}}`` is an alias
for ``{'foo': {'check_with': 'is_odd'}}``.
Custom Rules
------------
Suppose that in our use case some values can only be expressed as odd integers,
therefore we decide to add support for a new ``is_odd`` rule to our validation
schema:
.. testcode::
schema = {'amount': {'is odd': True, 'type': 'integer'}}
This is how we would go to implement that:
.. testcode::
from cerberus import Validator
class MyValidator(Validator):
def _validate_is_odd(self, constraint, field, value):
""" Test the oddity of a value.
The rule's arguments are validated against this schema:
{'type': 'boolean'}
"""
if constraint is True and not bool(value & 1):
self._error(field, "Must be an odd number")
By subclassing Cerberus :class:`~cerberus.Validator` class and adding the custom
``_validate_<rulename>`` method, we just enhanced Cerberus to suit our needs.
The custom rule ``is_odd`` is now available in our schema and, what really
matters, we can use it to validate all odd values:
.. doctest::
>>> v = MyValidator(schema)
>>> v.validate({'amount': 10})
False
>>> v.errors
{'amount': ['Must be an odd number']}
>>> v.validate({'amount': 9})
True
As schemas themselves are validated, you can provide constraints as literal
Python expression in the docstring of the rule's implementing method to
validate the arguments given in a schema for that rule. Either the docstring
contains solely the literal or the literal is placed at the bottom of the
docstring preceded by
``The rule's arguments are validated against this schema:``
See the source of the contributed rules for more examples.
.. _new-types:
Custom Data Types
-----------------
Cerberus supports and validates several standard data types (see :ref:`type`).
When building a custom validator you can add and validate your own data types.
Additional types can be added on the fly by assigning a
:class:`~cerberus.TypeDefinition` to the designated type name in
:attr:`~cerberus.Validator.types_mapping`:
.. testcode::
from decimal import Decimal
decimal_type = cerberus.TypeDefinition('decimal', (Decimal,), ())
Validator.types_mapping['decimal'] = decimal_type
.. caution::
As the ``types_mapping`` property is a mutable type, any change to its
items on an instance will affect its class.
They can also be defined for subclasses of :class:`~cerberus.Validator`:
.. testcode::
from decimal import Decimal
decimal_type = cerberus.TypeDefinition('decimal', (Decimal,), ())
class MyValidator(Validator):
types_mapping = Validator.types_mapping.copy()
types_mapping['decimal'] = decimal_type
.. versionadded:: 0.0.2
.. versionchanged:: 1.0
The type validation logic changed, see :doc:`upgrading`.
.. versionchanged:: 1.2
Added the :attr:`~cerberus.Validator.types_mapping` property and marked
methods for testing types as deprecated.
.. _check-with-rule-methods:
Methods that can be referenced by the check_with rule
-----------------------------------------------------
If a validation test doesn't depend on a specified constraint from a schema or
needs to be more complex than a rule should be, it's possible to rather define
it as *value checker* than as a rule. There are two ways to use the
:ref:`check_with rule <check-with-rule>`.
One is by extending :class:`~cerberus.Validator` with a method prefixed with
``_check_with_``. This allows to access the whole context of the validator
instance including arbitrary configuration values and state. To reference such
method using the ``check_with`` rule, simply pass the unprefixed method name as
a string constraint.
For example, one can define an ``oddity`` validator method as follows:
.. testcode::
class MyValidator(Validator):
def _check_with_oddity(self, field, value):
if not value & 1:
self._error(field, "Must be an odd number")
Usage would look something like:
.. testcode::
schema = {'amount': {'type': 'integer', 'check_with': 'oddity'}}
The second option to use the rule is to define a standalone function and pass
it as the constraint. This brings with it the benefit of not having to extend
``Validator``. To read more about this implementation and see examples check
out the rule's documentation.
.. _custom-coercer:
Custom Coercers
---------------
You can also define custom methods that return a ``coerce`` d value or point to
a method as ``rename_handler``. The method name must be prefixed with
``_normalize_coerce_``.
.. testcode::
class MyNormalizer(Validator):
def __init__(self, multiplier, *args, **kwargs):
super(MyNormalizer, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
self.multiplier = multiplier
def _normalize_coerce_multiply(self, value):
return value * self.multiplier
.. doctest::
>>> schema = {'foo': {'coerce': 'multiply'}}
>>> document = {'foo': 2}
>>> MyNormalizer(multiplier=2).normalized(document, schema)
{'foo': 4}
Custom Default Setters
----------------------
Similar to custom rename handlers, it is also possible to create custom default
setters.
.. testcode::
from datetime import datetime
class MyNormalizer(Validator):
def _normalize_default_setter_utcnow(self, document):
return datetime.utcnow()
.. doctest::
>>> schema = {'creation_date': {'type': 'datetime', 'default_setter': 'utcnow'}}
>>> MyNormalizer().normalized({}, schema)
{'creation_date': datetime.datetime(...)}
Limitations
-----------
It may be a bad idea to overwrite particular contributed rules.
Attaching Configuration Data And Instantiating Custom Validators
----------------------------------------------------------------
It's possible to pass arbitrary configuration values when instantiating a
:class:`~cerberus.Validator` or a subclass as keyword arguments (whose names
are not used by Cerberus). These can be used in all of the handlers described
in this document that have access to the instance.
Cerberus ensures that this data is available in all child instances that may
get spawned during processing. When you implement an ``__init__`` method on
a customized validator, you must ensure that all positional and keyword
arguments are also passed to the parent class' initialization method. Here's
an example pattern:
.. testcode::
class MyValidator(Validator):
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
# assign a configuration value to an instance property
# for convenience
self.additional_context = kwargs.get('additional_context')
# pass all data to the base classes
super(MyValidator, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
# alternatively a dynamic property can be defined, rendering
# the __init__ method unnecessary in this example case
@property
def additional_context(self):
return self._config.get('additional_context', 'bar')
# an optional property setter if you deal with state
@additional_context.setter
def additional_context(self, value):
self._config["additional_context"] = value
def _check_with_foo(self, field, value):
make_use_of(self.additional_context)
.. warning::
It is neither recommended to access the ``_config`` property in other
situations than outlined in the sketch above nor to to change its contents
during the processing of a document. Both cases are not tested and are
unlikely to get officially supported.
.. versionadded:: 0.9
There's a function :func:`~cerberus.utils.validator_factory` to get a
:class:`Validator` mutant with concatenated docstrings.
.. versionadded:: 1.0
Relevant `Validator`-attributes
-------------------------------
There are some attributes of a :class:`~cerberus.Validator` that you should be
aware of when writing custom Validators.
`Validator.document`
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A validator accesses the :attr:`~cerberus.Validator.document` property when
fetching fields for validation. It also allows validation of a field to happen
in context of the rest of the document.
.. versionadded:: 0.7.1
`Validator.schema`
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Alike, the :attr:`~cerberus.Validator.schema` property holds the used schema.
.. note::
This attribute is not the same object that was passed as ``schema`` to the
validator at some point. Also, its content may differ, though it still
represents the initial constraints. It offers the same interface like a
:class:`dict`.
`Validator._error`
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There are three signatures that are accepted to submit errors to the
``Validator``'s error stash. If necessary the given information will be parsed
into a new instance of :class:`~cerberus.errors.ValidationError`.
Full disclosure
...............
In order to be able to gain complete insight into the context of an error at a
later point, you need to call :meth:`~cerberus.Validator._error` with two
mandatory arguments:
- the field where the error occurred
- an instance of a :class:`~cerberus.errors.ErrorDefinition`
For custom rules you need to define an error as ``ErrorDefinition`` with a
unique id and the causing rule that is violated. See :mod:`~cerberus.errors`
for a list of the contributed error definitions. Keep in mind that bit 7 marks
a group error, bit 5 marks an error raised by a validation against different
sets of rules.
Optionally you can submit further arguments as information. Error handlers
that are targeted for humans will use these as positional arguments when
formatting a message with :py:meth:`str.format`. Serializing handlers will keep
these values in a list.
.. versionadded:: 1.0
Simple custom errors
....................
A simpler form is to call :meth:`~cerberus._error` with the field and a string
as message. However the resulting error will contain no information about the
violated constraint. This is supposed to maintain backward compatibility, but
can also be used when an in-depth error handling isn't needed.
Multiple errors
...............
When using child-validators, it is a convenience to submit all their errors
; which is a list of :class:`~cerberus.errors.ValidationError` instances.
.. versionadded:: 1.0
`Validator._get_child_validator`
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you need another instance of your :class:`~cerberus.Validator`-subclass, the
:meth:`~cerberus.Validator._get_child_validator`-method returns another
instance that is initiated with the same arguments as ``self`` was. You can
specify overriding keyword-arguments.
As the properties ``document_path`` and ``schema_path`` (see below) are
inherited by the child validator, you can extend these by passing a single
value or values-tuple with the keywords ``document_crumb`` and
``schema_crumb``.
Study the source code for example usages.
.. versionadded:: 0.9
.. versionchanged:: 1.0
Added ``document_crumb`` and ``schema_crumb`` as optional keyword-
arguments.
`Validator.root_document`, `.root_schema`, `.root_allow_unknown` & `.root_require_all`
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A child-validator - as used when validating a ``schema`` - can access the first
generation validator's document and schema that are being processed as well as
the constraints for unknown fields via its ``root_document``, ``root_schema``,
``root_allow_unknown`` and ``root_require_all`` properties.
.. versionadded:: 1.0
.. versionchanged:: 1.3
Added ``root_require_all``
`Validator.document_path` & `Validator.schema_path`
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
These properties maintain the path of keys within the document respectively the
schema that was traversed by possible parent-validators. Both will be used as
base path when an error is submitted.
.. versionadded:: 1.0
`Validator.recent_error`
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The last single error that was submitted is accessible through the
``recent_error``-attribute.
.. versionadded:: 1.0
`Validator.mandatory_validations`, `Validator.priority_validations` & `Validator._remaining_rules`
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You can use these class properties and instance instance property if you want
to adjust the validation logic for each field validation.
``mandatory_validations`` is a tuple that contains rules that will be validated
for each field, regardless if the rule is defined for a field in a schema or
not.
``priority_validations`` is a tuple of ordered rules that will be validated
before any other.
``_remaining_rules`` is a list that is populated under consideration of these
and keeps track of the rules that are next in line to be evaluated. Thus it can
be manipulated by rule handlers to change the remaining validation for the
current field.
Preferably you would call :meth:`~cerberus.Validator._drop_remaining_rules`
to remove particular rules or all at once.
.. versionadded:: 1.0
.. versionchanged:: 1.2
Added ``_remaining_rules`` for extended leverage.
|