1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209
|
from django.db import models
class Building(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=10)
def __unicode__(self):
return u"Building: %s" % self.name
class Device(models.Model):
building = models.ForeignKey('Building')
name = models.CharField(max_length=10)
def __unicode__(self):
return u"device '%s' in building %s" % (self.name, self.building)
class Port(models.Model):
device = models.ForeignKey('Device')
port_number = models.CharField(max_length=10)
def __unicode__(self):
return u"%s/%s" % (self.device.name, self.port_number)
class Connection(models.Model):
start = models.ForeignKey(Port, related_name='connection_start',
unique=True)
end = models.ForeignKey(Port, related_name='connection_end', unique=True)
def __unicode__(self):
return u"%s to %s" % (self.start, self.end)
# Another non-tree hierarchy that exercises code paths similar to the above
# example, but in a slightly different configuration.
class TUser(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=200)
class Person(models.Model):
user = models.ForeignKey(TUser, unique=True)
class Organizer(models.Model):
person = models.ForeignKey(Person)
class Student(models.Model):
person = models.ForeignKey(Person)
class Class(models.Model):
org = models.ForeignKey(Organizer)
class Enrollment(models.Model):
std = models.ForeignKey(Student)
cls = models.ForeignKey(Class)
# Models for testing bug #8036.
class Country(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
class State(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
country = models.ForeignKey(Country)
class ClientStatus(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
class Client(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
state = models.ForeignKey(State, null=True)
status = models.ForeignKey(ClientStatus)
class SpecialClient(Client):
value = models.IntegerField()
# Some model inheritance exercises
class Parent(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=10)
def __unicode__(self):
return self.name
class Child(Parent):
value = models.IntegerField()
class Item(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=10)
child = models.ForeignKey(Child, null=True)
def __unicode__(self):
return self.name
__test__ = {'API_TESTS': """
Regression test for bug #7110. When using select_related(), we must query the
Device and Building tables using two different aliases (each) in order to
differentiate the start and end Connection fields. The net result is that both
the "connections = ..." queries here should give the same results without
pulling in more than the absolute minimum number of tables (history has
shown that it's easy to make a mistake in the implementation and include some
unnecessary bonus joins).
>>> b=Building.objects.create(name='101')
>>> dev1=Device.objects.create(name="router", building=b)
>>> dev2=Device.objects.create(name="switch", building=b)
>>> dev3=Device.objects.create(name="server", building=b)
>>> port1=Port.objects.create(port_number='4',device=dev1)
>>> port2=Port.objects.create(port_number='7',device=dev2)
>>> port3=Port.objects.create(port_number='1',device=dev3)
>>> c1=Connection.objects.create(start=port1, end=port2)
>>> c2=Connection.objects.create(start=port2, end=port3)
>>> connections=Connection.objects.filter(start__device__building=b, end__device__building=b).order_by('id')
>>> [(c.id, unicode(c.start), unicode(c.end)) for c in connections]
[(1, u'router/4', u'switch/7'), (2, u'switch/7', u'server/1')]
>>> connections=Connection.objects.filter(start__device__building=b, end__device__building=b).select_related().order_by('id')
>>> [(c.id, unicode(c.start), unicode(c.end)) for c in connections]
[(1, u'router/4', u'switch/7'), (2, u'switch/7', u'server/1')]
# This final query should only join seven tables (port, device and building
# twice each, plus connection once).
>>> connections.query.count_active_tables()
7
Regression test for bug #8106. Same sort of problem as the previous test, but
this time there are more extra tables to pull in as part of the
select_related() and some of them could potentially clash (so need to be kept
separate).
>>> us = TUser.objects.create(name="std")
>>> usp = Person.objects.create(user=us)
>>> uo = TUser.objects.create(name="org")
>>> uop = Person.objects.create(user=uo)
>>> s = Student.objects.create(person = usp)
>>> o = Organizer.objects.create(person = uop)
>>> c = Class.objects.create(org=o)
>>> e = Enrollment.objects.create(std=s, cls=c)
>>> e_related = Enrollment.objects.all().select_related()[0]
>>> e_related.std.person.user.name
u"std"
>>> e_related.cls.org.person.user.name
u"org"
Regression test for bug #8036: the first related model in the tests below
("state") is empty and we try to select the more remotely related
state__country. The regression here was not skipping the empty column results
for country before getting status.
>>> australia = Country.objects.create(name='Australia')
>>> active = ClientStatus.objects.create(name='active')
>>> client = Client.objects.create(name='client', status=active)
>>> client.status
<ClientStatus: ClientStatus object>
>>> Client.objects.select_related()[0].status
<ClientStatus: ClientStatus object>
>>> Client.objects.select_related('state')[0].status
<ClientStatus: ClientStatus object>
>>> Client.objects.select_related('state', 'status')[0].status
<ClientStatus: ClientStatus object>
>>> Client.objects.select_related('state__country')[0].status
<ClientStatus: ClientStatus object>
>>> Client.objects.select_related('state__country', 'status')[0].status
<ClientStatus: ClientStatus object>
>>> Client.objects.select_related('status')[0].status
<ClientStatus: ClientStatus object>
Exercising select_related() with multi-table model inheritance.
>>> c1 = Child.objects.create(name="child1", value=42)
>>> _ = Item.objects.create(name="item1", child=c1)
>>> _ = Item.objects.create(name="item2")
>>> Item.objects.select_related("child").order_by("name")
[<Item: item1>, <Item: item2>]
# Regression for #12851 - Deferred fields are used correctly if you
# select_related a subset of fields.
>>> wa = State.objects.create(name="Western Australia", country=australia)
>>> _ = Client.objects.create(name='Brian Burke', state=wa, status=active)
>>> burke = Client.objects.select_related('state').defer('state__name').get(name='Brian Burke')
>>> burke.name
u'Brian Burke'
>>> burke.state.name
u'Western Australia'
# Still works if we're dealing with an inherited class
>>> _ = SpecialClient.objects.create(name='Troy Buswell', state=wa, status=active, value=42)
>>> troy = SpecialClient.objects.select_related('state').defer('state__name').get(name='Troy Buswell')
>>> troy.name
u'Troy Buswell'
>>> troy.value
42
>>> troy.state.name
u'Western Australia'
# Still works if we defer an attribute on the inherited class
>>> troy = SpecialClient.objects.select_related('state').defer('value', 'state__name').get(name='Troy Buswell')
>>> troy.name
u'Troy Buswell'
>>> troy.value
42
>>> troy.state.name
u'Western Australia'
# Also works if you use only, rather than defer
>>> troy = SpecialClient.objects.select_related('state').only('name').get(name='Troy Buswell')
>>> troy.name
u'Troy Buswell'
>>> troy.value
42
>>> troy.state.name
u'Western Australia'
"""}
|