1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
|
Description: false postive for different build flags
Do not support different different dpkg-buildflags for C vs C++
In fact, there is no implicit-function-security support for cxxflags,
So add `-Werror=implicit-function-declaration` into cxxflags.
But it was still failed is following:
cxxflags: -g -O2 -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=form
at-security -fcf-protection -Wno-uninitialized -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
cflags: -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-
clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -Wno-uninitialized
so sorted them can fix the issue.
Author: Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com>
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1068158
Last-Update: 2024-04-02
---
This patch header follows DEP-3: http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/
--- a/site_scons/extractdebbuild.py
+++ b/site_scons/extractdebbuild.py
@@ -57,8 +57,9 @@
mycflags=val
if key=="CXXFLAGS":
mycxxflags=val
- if mycflags is not None and mycxxflags is not None and mycflags!=mycxxflags:
- raise RuntimeError("We do not current support different different dpkg-buildflags for C vs C++")
+ if mycflags is not None and mycxxflags is not None:
+ if sorted(mycflags.split()) != sorted(mycxxflags.split()):
+ raise RuntimeError("We do not current support different different dpkg-buildflags for C vs C++")
if usedflags[key] is None:
continue
res.append([usedflags[key],val])
|
