1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274
|
Each snapshot change is assigned to a different category. This is done because inline-snapshot supports more than just `==` checks.
There are changes which:
* [create](#create) new snapshot values
* [fix](#fix) your tests
* [update](#update) only the syntax to a new representation
* [trim](#trim) unused pieces from your snapshots
*Create* and *fix* are mainly used, but it is good to know what type of change you are approving, because it helps with the decision if this changes should be applied.
## Categories
### Create
These changes are made when new snapshots are created.
The result of each comparison is `True`, which allows to run the whole test to fill all new snapshots with values.
Example:
<div class="grid" markdown>
<!-- inline-snapshot: first_block outcome-passed=1 outcome-errors=1 -->
``` python
from inline_snapshot import snapshot
def test_something():
assert 5 == snapshot()
assert 5 <= snapshot()
assert 5 in snapshot()
s = snapshot()
assert 5 == s["key"]
```
<!-- inline-snapshot: create outcome-passed=1 outcome-errors=1 -->
``` python hl_lines="5 7 9 11"
from inline_snapshot import snapshot
def test_something():
assert 5 == snapshot(5)
assert 5 <= snapshot(5)
assert 5 in snapshot([5])
s = snapshot({"key": 5})
assert 5 == s["key"]
```
</div>
### Fix
These changes are made when the snapshots comparison does not return `True` any more (depending on the operation `==`, `<=`, `in`).
The result of each comparison is `True` if you change something from this category, which allows to run the whole test and to fix other snapshots.
<div class="grid" markdown>
<!-- inline-snapshot: first_block outcome-failed=1 outcome-errors=1 -->
``` python
from inline_snapshot import snapshot
def test_something():
assert 8 == snapshot(5)
assert 8 <= snapshot(5)
assert 8 in snapshot([5])
s = snapshot({"key": 5})
assert 8 == s["key"]
```
<!-- inline-snapshot: fix outcome-passed=1 outcome-errors=1 -->
``` python hl_lines="5 7 9 11"
from inline_snapshot import snapshot
def test_something():
assert 8 == snapshot(8)
assert 8 <= snapshot(8)
assert 8 in snapshot([5, 8])
s = snapshot({"key": 8})
assert 8 == s["key"]
```
</div>
!!! info
The main reason for the different categories is to make the number of changes in the **fix** category as small as possible.
The changes in the **fix** category are the only changes which change the value of the snapshots and should be reviewed carefully.
### Trim
These changes are made when parts of the snapshots are removed which are no longer needed, or if limits can be reduced.
<div class="grid" markdown>
<!-- inline-snapshot: first_block outcome-passed=1 -->
``` python
from inline_snapshot import snapshot
def test_something():
assert 2 <= snapshot(8)
assert 8 in snapshot([5, 8])
s = snapshot({"key1": 1, "key2": 2})
assert 2 == s["key2"]
```
<!-- inline-snapshot: trim outcome-passed=1 -->
``` python hl_lines="5 7 9"
from inline_snapshot import snapshot
def test_something():
assert 2 <= snapshot(2)
assert 8 in snapshot([8])
s = snapshot({"key2": 2})
assert 2 == s["key2"]
```
</div>
There might be problems in cases where you use the same snapshot in different tests, run only one test and trim the snapshot with `pytest -k test_a --inline-snapshot=trim` in this case:
<div class="grid" markdown>
<!-- todo-inline-snapshot: first_block outcome-passed=2 -->
``` python
from inline_snapshot import snapshot
s = snapshot(5)
def test_a():
assert 2 <= s
def test_b():
assert 5 <= s
```
<!-- todo-inline-snapshot: trim outcome-passed=2 -->
``` python hl_lines="1"
from inline_snapshot import snapshot
s = snapshot(2)
def test_a():
assert 2 <= s
def test_b():
assert 5 <= s
```
</div>
The value of the snapshot is reduced to `2`, because `test_a()` was the only test running and inline-snapshot does not know about `5 <= s`.
It is recommended to use trim only if you run your complete test suite.
### Update
Changes in the update category do not change the value of the snapshot, just its representation.
These updates are not shown by default in your reports and can be enabled with [show-updates](configuration.md/#show-updates).
The reason might be that `#!python repr()` of the object has changed or that inline-snapshot provides some new logic which changes the representation. Like with the strings in the following example:
=== "original"
<!-- inline-snapshot: first_block outcome-passed=1 -->
``` python
from inline_snapshot import snapshot
class Vector:
def __init__(self, x, y):
self.x = x
self.y = y
def __eq__(self, other):
if not isinstance(other, Vector):
return NotImplemented
return self.x == other.x and self.y == other.y
def __repr__(self):
# return f"Vector(x={self.x}, y={self.y})"
return f"Vector({self.x}, {self.y})"
def test_something():
assert "a\nb\nc\n" == snapshot("a\nb\nc\n")
assert 5 == snapshot(4 + 1)
assert Vector(1, 2) == snapshot(Vector(x=1, y=2))
```
=== "--inline-snapshot=update"
<!-- inline-snapshot: update outcome-passed=1 -->
``` python hl_lines="20 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 30"
from inline_snapshot import snapshot
class Vector:
def __init__(self, x, y):
self.x = x
self.y = y
def __eq__(self, other):
if not isinstance(other, Vector):
return NotImplemented
return self.x == other.x and self.y == other.y
def __repr__(self):
# return f"Vector(x={self.x}, y={self.y})"
return f"Vector({self.x}, {self.y})"
def test_something():
assert "a\nb\nc\n" == snapshot(
"""\
a
b
c
"""
)
assert 5 == snapshot(5)
assert Vector(1, 2) == snapshot(Vector(1, 2))
```
The approval of this type of changes is easier, because inline-snapshot assures that the value has not changed.
The goal of inline-snapshot is to generate the values for you in the correct format so that no manual editing is required.
This improves your productivity and saves time.
Keep in mind that any changes you make to your snapshots will likely need to be redone if your program's behaviour (and expected values) change.
Inline-snapshot uses the *update* category to let you know when it has a different opinion than you about how the code should look.
You can agree with inline-snapshot and accept the changes or you can use one of the following options to tell inline-snapshot what the code should look like:
1. change the `__repr__` implementation of your object or use [customize repr](customize_repr.md) if the class is not part of your codebase.
2. define a [format-command](configuration.md#format-command) if another tool has a different opinion about how your code should look. Inline-snapshot will apply this formatting before reporting an update.
3. inline-snapshot manages everything within `snapshot(...)`, but you can take control by using [Is()](eq_snapshot.md#is) in cases where you want to use custom code (like local variables) in your snapshots.
4. you can also open an [issue](https://github.com/15r10nk/inline-snapshot/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20label%3Aupdate_related) if you have a specific problem with the way inline-snapshot generates the code.
!!! note:
[#177](https://github.com/15r10nk/inline-snapshot/issues/177) will give the developer more control about how snapshots are created. *update* will them become much more useful.
|