1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296
|
.. _migration_guides:
Migration guides
================
From laspy 1.7.x to laspy 2.0.0
-------------------------------
laspy 2.0 is essentially a complete overhaul of the code base so you will probably
have a few changes to make to the parts of your code that uses laspy 1.7.
However there should not be that many, and should hopefully be worth.
The benefits of laspy 2.0 are:
- Better LAZ support: reading *and* writing of LAZ 1.1 to 1.4 (See the :ref:`installation` section)
- Support for Chunked / Streaming reading and writing of LAS/LAZ files.
- Support for reading data coming from other sources than files on disk (bytes or file-objects)
The biggest changes between 1.7 and 2.0 are how files are read and written.
laspy 1.7 had the concept of `laspy.File` with an open mode.
laspy 2.0 does not have the `laspy.File` class anymore but a :class:`.LasData`
class instead which provide access to the `header`, `vlrs` and fields/dimensions.
The `get_*` and `set_*` (eg `get_classification`) of `laspy.File` are not available in the new :class:`.LasData`.
The following sections should hopefully get you started
Reading a file
______________
.. code-block:: python
import laspy
# Opening a file in laspy 1.7
file = laspy.file.File("somepath.las", mode ="r")
# Reading a file in laspy 2.0
las = laspy.read("somepath.las")
Accessing the point fields / dimensions
_______________________________________
.. code-block:: python
# accessing a field in laspy 1.7:
classification = file.classification
# accessing a field in laspy 2.0 (names from 1.7 should be compatible with 2.0):
classification = las.classification
Writing
_______
.. code-block:: python
# laspy 1.7:
file.pt_src_id[:] = 2
file.close()
# laspy 2.0
las.pt_src_id[:] = 2
las.write("somepath.laz")
Creating a file
_______________
.. code-block:: python
import laspy
# laspy 1.7
new_file = laspy.file.File("new_path.las", header=file.header, mode="w")
new_file.X = ...
new_file.Y = ...
...
new_file.close()
# laspy 2.0
new_las = laspy.LasData(las.header)
new_las.X = ...
new_las.Y = ...
...
new_las.write("new_las.las")
# if you do not have an existing header:
new_las = laspy.create(file_version="1.2", point_format=3)
new_las.X = ...
new_las.Y = ...
...
new_las.write("new_las.las")
# or
new_header = laspy.LasHeader(version="1.2", point_format=3)
new_las = laspy.LasData(las.header)
new_las.X = ...
new_las.Y = ...
...
new_las.write("new_las.las")
Header change
_____________
The `Header` (:class:`.LasHeader`) class was modernized from laspy 1.7 to laspy 2.0,
a few of the field names in the new header class do not have the same name.
This list is non exhaustive, and for the items in this list
the backward compatibility could be kept (meaning the 1.7 name is still usable)
+--------------------+------------------------------+
| 1.7 name | 2.0 name |
+====================+==============================+
| max | maxs |
+--------------------+------------------------------+
| min | mins |
+--------------------+------------------------------+
| scale | scales |
+--------------------+------------------------------+
| offset | offsets |
+--------------------+------------------------------+
| filesource_id | file_source_id |
+--------------------+------------------------------+
| major_version | version.major |
+--------------------+------------------------------+
| minor_version | version.minor |
+--------------------+------------------------------+
| system_id | system_identifier |
+--------------------+------------------------------+
| date | creation_date |
+--------------------+------------------------------+
| point_return_count | number_of_points_by_return |
+--------------------+------------------------------+
| software_id | generating_software |
+--------------------+------------------------------+
From pylas 0.4.x to laspy 2.0.0
-------------------------------
laspy 2.0 is essentially pylas, so the core of the library is the same.
Changes in LAZ backend
______________________
With laspy 2.0.0, the lazperf backend
support was dropped, and the laszip backend
changed from using the laszip executable
to using laszip python bindings.
If you used lazperf or relied on the laszip executable
you'll have to choose between the available backends.
(see Installation section).
Changes in bit fields
_____________________
Some fields in LAS are 'bit fields'.
with laspy 0.4.x, there was a inconsistency between
'normal' fields and 'bit' fields, when getting a bit field,
laspy returned a copy of the values in a new numpy array whereas
when getting a normal field, the array you got acted as a 'view'
on the real array where the values where stored.
That meant that modifying the values of the array you got from
a bit field would no propagate to the real array.
.. code-block:: python
import laspy
import numpy as np
las = laspy.read("tests/data/simple.las")
# return number is a bit field
print(las.return_number)
# array([1, 1, 1, ..., 1, 1, 1], dtype=uint8)
ascending_order = np.argsort(las.return_number)[::-1]
print(las.return_number[ascending_order])
# array([4, 4, 4, ..., 1, 1, 1], dtype=uint8)
las.return_number[:] = las.return_number[ascending_order]
print(las.return_number)
# array([1, 1, 1, ..., 1, 1, 1], dtype=uint8) # bif oof
las.return_number[0] = 7
print(las.return_number)
# array([1, 1, 1, ..., 1, 1, 1], dtype=uint8) # again value not updated
# To actually update you have to do
las.return_number = las.return_number[ascending_order]
print(las.return_number)
# array([4, 4, 4, ..., 1, 1, 1], dtype=uint8)
rn = las.return_number[ascending_order]
rn[0] = 7
las.return_number = rn
print(las.return_number)
# array([7, 4, 4, ..., 1, 1, 1], dtype=uint8)
In order to try to solve this inconsistency, laspy >= 0.5.0
introduced the :class:`.SubFieldView` class that is meant to propagate
modifications to the real array, and tries to act like a real numpy array.
.. code-block:: python
import laspy
import numpy as np
las = laspy.read("tests/data/simple.las")
print(las.return_number)
# <SubFieldView([1 1 1 ... 1 1 1])>
ascending_order = np.argsort(las.return_number)[::-1]
las.return_number[:] = las.return_number[ascending_order]
print(las.return_number)
# <SubFieldView([4 4 4 ... 1 1 1])>
las.return_number[0] = 7
print(las.return_number)
# <SubFieldView([7 4 4 ... 1 1 1])>
It may be possible that some operation on SubFieldView fail, in that case
it is easy to copy them to numpy arrays:
.. code-block:: python
import laspy
import numpy as np
las = laspy.read("tests/data/simple.las")
print(las.return_number)
# <SubFieldView([1 1 1 ... 1 1 1])>
array = np.array(las.return_number)
# array([1, 1, 1, ..., 1, 1, 1], dtype=uint8)
The logic is also the same for 'Scaled dimensions' such as x, y, z and scaled extra bytes,
where a ScaledArrayView class has been introduced
.. code-block:: python
import laspy
import numpy as np
las = laspy.read("tests/data/simple.las")
print(las.x)
# <ScaledArrayView([637012.24 636896.33 636784.74 ... 637501.67 637433.27 637342.85])>>
# ScaledArray view should behave as much as possible as a numpy array
# However if something breaks in your code when upgrading, and / or
# you need a true numpy array you can get one by doing
array = np.array(las.x)
# array([637012.24, 636896.33, 636784.74, ..., 637501.67, 637433.27,
# 637342.85])
Changes in extra bytes creation
_______________________________
The API to create extra bytes changed slightly, now the parameters needed
(and the optional ones) are coupled into :class:`.ExtraBytesParams`
Other changes
_____________
The `points` attribute of as :class:`.LasData` used to return a numpy array
it now returns a :class:`.PackedPointRecord` to get the same array as before,
use the `array` property of the point record.
.. code-block:: python
# laspy <= 0.4.3
las = laspy.read("somefile.las")
array = las.points
# laspy 1.0.0
las = laspy.read("somefile.las")
array = las.points.array
|