1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239
|
==============
Backend System
==============
Introduction
============
The backend system in ``oslo.service`` provides a modular architecture
that allows you to choose between different concurrency models
without modifying your service logic.
Currently, two backends are implemented and supported:
- **Eventlet backend**: The traditional concurrency backend based on green
threads and cooperative multitasking (`greenlet` library).
- **Threading backend**: A new backend using native Python threads, Cotyledon,
and Futurist, designed to be compatible with modern Python versions,
simplify debugging, and improve maintainability.
Why a Backend System?
=====================
This system was introduced to enable a
**gradual transition away from the Eventlet backend**, which has known
limitations for scaling, cooperative multitasking complexity, and debugging in
some Python environments. By using the backend system, you can test, adopt, or
migrate to the Threading backend while keeping the same public API and service
structure.
In the future, the Eventlet backend may be deprecated once the Threading
backend covers all use cases. Some related features tied to Eventlet,
like the embedded WSGI server and the backdoor shell, are also planned for
removal.
For more context, see:
- `Epoxy spec for Eventlet removal <https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/oslo-specs/specs/epoxy/remove-eventlet-from-oslo-service.html>`_
- `Eventlet removal guide <https://removal.eventlet.org/>`_
- `OpenStack Eventlet removal goal <https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/remove-eventlet.html>`_
How It Works
============
The backend system exposes the same **public components**
(``ServiceLauncher``, ``ProcessLauncher``, ``ThreadGroup``,
``LoopingCall``, etc.) through a dynamic selection mechanism.
At runtime, you select the backend you want to use by calling the
``init_backend()`` function and providing the desired ``BackendType``:
.. code-block:: python
from oslo_service.backend import init_backend, BackendType
# Use the Threading backend
init_backend(BackendType.THREADING)
If you do not explicitly initialize a backend, the system will
use the **Eventlet** backend by default.
Once the backend is initialized, it **cannot be changed**.
Trying to re-initialize it will raise a ``BackendAlreadySelected`` exception.
If you see this exception, ensure that your backend is initialized only once
early during your application startup (for example in your main() entry point).
Avoid calling ``init_backend()`` in shared libraries or multiple times.
If you need to reset the backend in unit tests, use the ``_reset_backend()``
helper to clear the backend cache:
.. code-block:: python
from oslo_service.backend import _reset_backend
_reset_backend()
How to Select a Backend
========================
There are two supported ways to select which backend to use:
1. **Explicit initialization**
Call ``init_backend()`` early in your application entry point:
.. code-block:: python
from oslo_service.backend import init_backend, BackendType
init_backend(BackendType.THREADING)
This will load the Threading backend and cache its components.
For practical usage, see how Nova does it:
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/948311
2. **Dynamic hook**
You may register a Python hook to dynamically decide the backend
if ``init_backend()`` is not called:
.. code-block:: python
from oslo_service.backend \
import register_backend_default_hook, BackendType
def my_backend_decider():
# Add custom logic here if needed
return BackendType.THREADING
register_backend_default_hook(my_backend_decider)
If no explicit backend is set, the system will call your hook
to decide which backend to load.
.. note::
There is **no automatic oslo.config option** for ``service_backend``.
If you want to make the backend configurable through your application's
config file, you need to define and parse that option yourself, then
call ``init_backend()`` with the selected value.
Accessing Backend Components
============================
Once the backend is initialized, you can access its components
via the ``get_component()`` helper function.
Example: getting a ``ProcessLauncher`` instance:
.. code-block:: python
from oslo_service.backend import get_component
ProcessLauncher = get_component("ProcessLauncher")
launcher = ProcessLauncher(conf)
launcher.launch_service(my_service)
launcher.wait()
Available components include:
- ``ServiceLauncher``
- ``ProcessLauncher``
- ``ThreadGroup``
- ``LoopingCall`` variants
- ``SignalHandler``
- And other related service utilities
If you try to access a component that does not exist
in the current backend, a ``KeyError`` will be raised.
Example Usage
=============
Here is a minimal example that shows how to initialize the Threading backend
and launch a service:
.. code-block:: python
from oslo_service.backend import (
init_backend,
get_component,
BackendType
)
def main():
# Select the Threading backend
init_backend(BackendType.THREADING)
# Get the ProcessLauncher component
ProcessLauncher = get_component("ProcessLauncher")
# Initialize your service and launch it
launcher = ProcessLauncher(conf)
launcher.launch_service(my_service)
launcher.wait()
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Understanding the Implications of Migrating from Eventlet to Threading
======================================================================
The following table is not about choosing a backend, but about understanding
the implications of migrating away from Eventlet to the Threading backend:
.. list-table::
:widths: 20 40 40
:header-rows: 1
* - Compared Aspect
- Eventlet Backend
- Threading Backend
* - Concurrency model
- Cooperative multitasking using green threads (`greenlet`)
- Native Python threads (preemptive)
* - Process management
- Uses built-in eventlet processes
- Uses Cotyledon for multi-process support
* - Looping calls
- Uses eventlet green thread pools
- Uses Futurist thread pools
* - Embedded WSGI server
- Provided (with eventlet)
- Planned for removal; use an external WSGI server instead
* - Backdoor shell
- Provided (eventlet only)
- Planned for removal
* - API compatibility
- Same public API
- Same public API
* - Debugging
- More complex due to cooperative multitasking and green threads.
See `eventlet_backdoor.py <https://opendev.org/openstack/oslo.service/src/branch/master/oslo_service/eventlet_backdoor.py>`_
- May produce clearer native thread stack traces and benefits
from recent CPython improvements (e.g. PEP 768).
* - Python compatibility
- Known issues with CPython native threads and RLocks.
May break with new Python versions.
- Fully compatible with modern CPython threading.
Test Setup in Devstack and CI Gates
====================================
If you want to test the Threading backend in Devstack or your CI gates,
refer to:
- https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/948436
- https://gibizer.github.io/posts/Eventlet-Removal-Scheduler-First-Run/
- https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/948408
References
==========
- `Eventlet removal guide <https://removal.eventlet.org/>`_
- `Epoxy spec for oslo.service <https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/oslo-specs/specs/epoxy/remove-eventlet-from-oslo-service.html>`_
- `Eventlet removal goal <https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/remove-eventlet.html>`_
For any questions, please refer to the OpenStack mailing list
or the oslo.service maintainers.
|