File: 1701.00006.txt

package info (click to toggle)
python-pattern 2.6%2Bgit20180818-2
links: PTS
area: main
in suites: bullseye
size: 93,888 kB
sloc: python: 28,119; xml: 15,085; makefile: 194
file content (4271 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 63,168 bytes
parent folder | download | duplicates (3)
arXiv:1701.00006v1 [hep-th] 30 Dec 2016

Time Machines and AdS Solitons with Negative Mass
Xing-Hui Feng, Wei-Jian Geng  and H. Lu Center for Advanced Quantum Studies, Department of Physics,
Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
ABSTRACT We show that in D = 2n+1 dimensions, when mass is negative and all angular momenta are non-vanishing, Kerr and Kerr-AdS metrics describe smooth time machines, with no curvature singularity. Turning off the angular momenta appropriately can lead to static AdS solitons with negative mass. Setting zero the cosmological constant yields a class of Ricci-flat Kahler metrics in D = 2n dimensions. We also show that Euclidean-signatured AdS solitons with negative mass can also arise in odd dimensions. We then construct time machines in D = 5 minimal gauged supergravity that carry only magnetic dipole charges. Turning off the cosmological constant, the time machine becomes massless and asymptotically flat. It can be described as a constant time bundle over the Eguchi-Hanson instanton.
xhfengp@mail.bnu.edu.cn gengwj@mail.bnu.edu.cn mrhonglu@gmail.com

Contents

1 Introduction

2

2 Time machines with negative mass

4

2.1 D = 5 time machines with equal angular momenta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2.2 D = 2n + 1 time machines with equal angular momenta . . . . . . . . . . . 8

2.3 Time machines with unequal angular momenta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

2.4 Further time machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

3 AdS Solitons with negative mass

13

3.1 Cohomogeneity-one metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

3.2 First-order equations without superpotential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

3.3 Higher-cohomogeneity solitons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

4 Ricci-flat instantons in D = 2n dimensions

19

4.1 D = 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

4.2 D = 2n . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

5 Euclidean AdS solitons with negative mass

22

6 Time machine with a dipole charge

24

6.1 Asymptotic to AdS5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

6.2 Asymptotic to flat spacetime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

7 Conclusions

26

1 Introduction
This paper studies the properties of the general Kerr metrics with or without a cosmological constant, when they do not describe rotating black holes. The Kerr metric [1] of a rotating black hole that is asymptotic to four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime is far more subtle to construct than the static Schwarzschild metric [2] with spherical symmetry. The solution was generalized by Carter [3] to include a cosmological constant and the metric describes a rotating back hole in de Sitter (dS) or anti-de Sitter (AdS) spacetimes for positive or negative cosmological constants respectively. Inspired by string theory, Kerr metrics in higher dimensions were constructed in [4]. Kerr-(A)dS metric in five dimensions were constructed

2

in [5], motivated by the AdS/CFT correspondence [6]. The Kerr-(A)dS metrics in general dimensions were later constructed in [7, 8].
One fascinating feature of Riemannian geometry is that a local metric may extend onto very different manifolds in different coordinate patches. For example, a five-dimensional Kerr-AdS "over-rotating" metric is equivalent, after performing a coordinate transformation, to an under-rotating Kerr-AdS metric [9]. Kerr and particularly Kerr-AdS metrics are very complicated in general dimensions and it is quite possible that these local metrics can describe spacetimes other than rotating black holes. Indeed, we find that when the mass is negative, the local metrics in D = 2n + 1 can describe a smooth time machine, provided that all independent orthogonal angular momenta are turned on. In this paper we adopt the definition of time machine in [10]. In such a time machine, the spacetime closes off at some Euclidean pseudo horizon at the price that the real time coordinate becomes periodic. The curvature power-law singularity is outside the spacetime. The conclusion holds for both asymptotically-flat or AdS solutions.
Turning off the angular momenta appropriately, we obtain AdS solitons with negative mass. These solutions with general parameters are of multi-cohomogeneity. If the starting Kerr-AdS metrics have equal angular momenta and hence are cohomogeneity one, the corresponding AdS solitons are also cohomogeneity one, with level surfaces as S2n-1/Zk. Such a five-dimensional AdS soliton was previously constructed in [11, 12]. Ours generalize to arbitrary 2n + 1 dimensions and multi-comohogeneity.
We can set the cosmological constants of the AdS solitons to zero, and the resulting solutions are direct products of time and a class of D = 2n Ricci-flat metrics. The special case of cohomogeneity-one solutions are the Eguchi-Hanson (EH) instanton and its higherdimensional generalizations.
The paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we begin with the D = 5 example, and then demonstrate that all Kerr or Kerr-AdS metrics in odd dimensions with negative mass can have the smooth time-machine configuration when all the angular momenta are turned on. In section 3, we concentrate on Kerr-AdS metrics in odd dimensions and obtain the static limit that describes soliton configruations with negative mass. In section 4, we turn off the cosmological constant of the soliton configurations and obtain a class of Ricciflat metrics in D = 2n dimensions. In section 5, we perform Wick rotation on the Kerr metrics and find that in odd dimensions, the Euclidean-signatured solitons can also have negative mass. In section 6, we consider charged Kerr-AdS solution in five-dimensional minimal gauged supergravity and obtain the analogous limit of time machines that carry
3

magnetic dipole charges. Turning off the gauging, we obtain a massless asymptotically-flat time machine that is a constant time bundle over the EH instanton. We conclude the paper in section 7.

2 Time machines with negative mass
In this section, we consider Kerr and Kerr-AdS metrics in odd D = 2n + 1 dimensions. We show that when mass is negative, the metrics can describe smooth time machines where geodesic complete on some Euclidean Killing horizons, provided that all angular momenta are turned on. The conclusion is true for both asymptotically flat or AdS metrics. For this reason, we focus on the discussion on Kerr-AdS metrics to avoid the repetition of discussing the Kerr and Kerr-AdS metrics separately. However, since our results are applicable for both types of metrics, we shall not emphasise the word AdS.

2.1 D = 5 time machines with equal angular momenta

2.1.1 Local metrics in D = 5

We start with a class of rotating metrics in five dimensions with the level surfaces as

squashed S3 written as a U (1) bundle over S2:

ds25 f

= =

dr2 f

-

f W

dt2

+

(1 + g2r2)W -

1 4

r2

W

(3

+

)2

+

1 4

r2d22

,

 r2

,

,

W

=

1

+

 r4

,



=

2 r4W

dt .

(2.1)

Here the metric d22 and 1-form 3 are given by

d22 = d2 + sin2  d2 ,

3 = d + cos d .

(2.2)

The metric for the unit round S3 is given by

d23

=

1 4

32 + d22

.

(2.3)

Thus the metric (2.1) for constant t and r describes squashed S3 with W as the squashing

parameter. Metrics (2.1) are all Einstein with R = -4g2g , where constant 1/g is the AdS
radius. The solutions are specified by two integration constants (, ). (There should be

no confusion between (, ) as the spacetime indices and as integration constants of the

solutions.) The invariant Riemann tensor squared is

Riem2

=

40g4

+

72(

- g2)2 r8

-

384( - r10

g2)

+

384 2 r12

.

(2.4)

4

Thus there is only one power-law curvature singularity at r = 0. Depending on the values of the constants (, ), the metrics can extend smoothly onto very different manifolds. When  = 0 = , the metrics become the AdS5 vacuum in global coordinates. Thus the metrics all approach AdS asymptotically at the r   region. In particular, when  > 0 and  = 0, the metric is the well-known Schwarzschild-AdS solution. We now give the list of (, ) values for which the power-law curvature singularity at r = 0 can be either unreachable geodesically or hidden inside an event horizon
  > 0 and  > 0: Rotating black hole with equal angular momenta and positive mass, which we shall give a quick review in the next subsection 2.1.2.
  < 0 and  < 0: Time machine with equal angular momenta and negative mass, which we shall discuss in 2.1.3.
  = 0 and  < 0: AdS static soliton with negative mass, which we shall discuss in section 3.
  < 0, the metric becomes real if we make a Wick rotation t = i  , giving rise to Einstein-Riemannian geometry. We shall discuss this in section 5.

2.1.2 Rotating black hole

We first consider the case with  > 0 and  > 0. The metric describes a rotating black

hole that is non-rotating asymptotically. The event horizon is located at r = r0 > 0 that is the largest real root of f (r). A necessary condition for the existence of such a root is 1 - g2/ > 0. We can express  in terms of r0 and :



=

(r04

+

)(1 r02

+

g2r02)

.

(2.5)

Following the standard technique, we obtain the thermodynamical quantities including the

mass M , angular momentum J, angular velocity +, temperature T and entropy S.

M

=

1 8

(3

+

g2

)

,

T = 2g2r06 + r04 -  . , 2r03 r04 + 

J

=

1 4



,

S

=

1 2

2r0

+

=

2

(1 + g2r02) r0 r04 + 

,

r04 +  .

(2.6)

These quantities satisfy the first law of black hole thermodynamics

dM = T dS + +dJ .

(2.7)

5

Note that in five dimensions, there are in general two independent angular momenta and

the corresponding Kerr-AdS metric was constructed in [5]. The above solution describes

the one with equal angular momenta. An important difference between the black hole and the time machine to be studied in

the next subsection is the characteristics of the Killing horizon at r = r0. The null Killing vector on the horizon, which is a degenerate surface, is given by



=

 t

+

+

 

.

(2.8)

The surface gravity  on the horizon can be obtained from the null Killing vector as

2

=

-

g

2 42

2

= (2T )2 .

(2.9)

The surface gravity defined above with a minus sign implies that the imaginary time is periodic leading to black hole temperature. It also implies that geodesics do not complete

on the event horizon and there is an interior region.

2.1.3 Time machine
The thermodynamical quantities (2.6) imply that for the metric (2.1) to describe a black hole, we must have that  and  are both non-negative. However, the local solution (2.1) is real as long as we have   0. It is thus of interest to study the global structure of (2.1) when  and  are both negative instead. Let

-  =   0 , - =   0 .

(2.10)

The solution (2.1) becomes

ds25

=

dr2 f

-

f W

dt2

+

1 4

r2W

(3

+

)2

+

1 4

r2d22

,



f

=

(1 + g2r2)W

+

 r2

,

,

W

=

1-

 r4

,



=

2  r4W

dt

.

(2.11)

The metric is still asymptotic to AdS5, but with mass and angular momentum given by

M

=

-

1 8

(3

+

g2) ,

J

=

1 4



 .

(2.12)

Thus the solution has negative mass, with no lower bound. Naively, one would expect that the metric would then have naked curvature singularity. This is indeed the case when  = 0, corresponding to the Schwarzschild-AdS solution with negative mass. However, if  is non-vanishing, the manifold described by this metric is smooth, with the local r = 0 power-law singularity outside the manifold.

6

As the radial coordinate r decreases from the asymptotic infinity, we come across a

special

point

r

=



1 4

for

which

W

=

0.

This

is

neither

coordinate

nor

curvature

singularity,

but a velocity of light surface (VLS). Inside the VLS, we have g < 0. In other words,

the periodic coordinate  becomes time like, giving rise to naked CTCs. Thus the metric

describes a time machine, with the VLS as its boundary.

As r decreases further, at r = r0 > 0, we have f (r0) = 0. This corresponds to a Killing

horizon. The null Killing vector (of zero length) is given by



=

r02 (1 + g2r02)  + 2r02(1 + g2r02)2

,

1 = 

 t

+



 





=

2  r04W (r0)

=

2

, (1 + g2r02)(+ r02(1 + g2r02)) .
r0 

(2.13)

It is easy to verify that the surface gravity  defined in (2.9) is negative, giving rise to

imaginary temperature

T

=

i 2

.

(2.14)

It is thus more natural to define a "Euclidean surface gravity" E as

2E

=

+

g

2 42

2

.

(2.15)

The Killing horizon with a real Euclidean surface gravity is called Euclidean pseudo horizon,

on which conical singularity can arise potentially.

A simplest example of Euclidean pseudo horizon occurs in two-dimensional flat space

written in polar coordinates ds2 = d2 + 2d2. The Killing vector  =  is null, i.e. having zero length, in the middle  = 0, with E = 1. The metric describes Euclidean R2 if  = 2, in which case  = 0 is just an ordinary point in R2. If  = 2, the metric is

of a cone with the tip at  = 0.

It is easy to verify that for the Killing vector 1, we have 2E = 1. Thus, for the time machine to avoid conic singularity, 1 must likewise generate 2 period. In other words, it is the real time coordinate rather than the imaginary time coordinate that must be periodic.

Once this is imposed, the geodesic completes and spacetime closes off at the Killing horizon.

The local r = 0 singularity is then outside the manifold. It should be emphasized that the

existence of the Killing horizon r = r0 is independent of whether the cosmological constant  = -4g2 vanishes or not. It follows that the above result is applicable also for the

asymptotically-flat cases.

In the standard embedding of AdS5 in the (4 + 2) flat spacetime, time t in global

coordinates

is

periodic.

The

Killing

vectors

0

=

1 g

 t

and

2

=

2

 

both

generate

2

period.

7

It follows from (2.13) that (0, 1, 2) are linearly dependent. The consistency requires that coefficients are co-prime integers, namely

n00 = n11 + n22 .

(2.16)

Comparing this to (2.13), we conclude that the dimensionless parameters (gr0, g2) or the original (g4, g2) of the asymptotically-AdS time machines can be expressed in terms of

two rational numbers. Note that the period of 1 has to be strictly 2 to avoid conic singularity. The period of  can be further divided by integer k without introducing singularity,

corresponding to AdS5/Zk. We can also divide or multiply the period t by an integer, corresponding to the quotient or multi-covering of the AdS.

When g = 0, we have an asymptotically-flat time machine with equal angular momenta.

In

this

case,

the

Killing

vector

 t

is

not

periodic

a

priori,

and

hence

there

is

no

extra

constraint such as (2.16).

It is worth commenting that in the case of the rotating black hole discussed in subsection

2.1.2, the event-horizon topology is 3-sphere. To be specific, the horizon geometry is a squashed 3-sphere, written as a U (1) bundle over S2. For the time machine discussed in

this section, the Euclidean pseudo horizon is Minkowski signatured, and it is a constant

time bundle over S2. It is also rather counterintuitive that not only the time-machine mass

is negative, it has no lower bound.

Finally it is also worth commenting that if the function f (r) had a double zero, there

would be no need for periodic identification of the real time coordinate. The resulting

spacetime is called a repulson [14]. None of the examples studied in detail in this paper

exhibits repulson-like behavior.

2.2 D = 2n + 1 time machines with equal angular momenta

The five-dimensional time machine discussed in the previous subsection can be easily gen-

eralized to all D = 2n + 1 dimensions. We start with the Kerr-AdS black holes with all

equal angular momenta. The Kerr-Schild form was given in [7]. The Boyer-Lindquist form

was presented in [16], given by

ds22n+1

=

-1

+ g2r2 

dt2

+

U dr2 V - 2m

+

r2

+ 

a2 (2

+

d2n-1)

+

2m U 2

(dt

+

a)2

,

 = d + A ,

U = (r2 + a2)n-1 ,

V

=

1 r2

(1

+

g2r2)(r2

+

a2)n

,

(2.17)

where  = 1-a2g2, and d2n-1 is the standard Fubini-Study metric on CPn-1, and the fibre 1-form is  = d + A, with dA = J being the Kahler form. The coordinate  has period 2

8

and the terms (2 + d2n-1) in the metric are nothing but the metric on the round sphere S2n-1. The mass and angular momentum are given by

M

=

m(2n - )A2n-1 8n+1

,

J

=

maA2n-1 4n+1

,

(2.18)

where Ak is the volume of a unit round Sk, given by

Ak

=

2

1 2

(k+1)

[

1 2

(k

+

1)]

.

(2.19)

It is instructive to define a new coordinate r^ that measures the radius of the S2n-1 sphere.

Thus we make a coordinate transformation

r2

+ a2 

=

r^2 .

(2.20)

The metric (2.17) can be written, after dropping the hat, as

ds22n+1

=

dr2 f

-

f W

dt2

+

r2W

(

+

)2

+

r2d2n-1

,

f

=

(1 + g2r2)W

-

 r2(n-1)

,

W

=

1+

 r2n

,

  = r2n +  dt . (2.21)

where the constants  and  are related to original (m, a) parameters as

a=

 

,

m

=

1 2



1

-

 

g2

n+1
.

(2.22)

The solutions describe rotating black holes in D = 2n + 1 dimensions when both (, ) are

positive. When n = 1, the metric reduces to the BTZ black hole [15] after making a trivial

coordinate transformation r2 + 2  r2, and hence all our statements apply also to three

dimensions. When n = 2, the solution reduces to (2.1).

As in the previous D = 5 example, when (, ) both take negative values, as in (2.10),

the corresponding metric becomes

ds22n+1

=

dr2 f

-

f W

dt2

+

r2W

(

+

)2

+

r2

d2n-1

,

f

=

(1 + g2r2)W

+

 r2(n-1)

,

W

=

1

-

 r2n

,





=

 r2nW

dt .

(2.23)

The mass and angular momentum are given by

M

=

-

A2n-1 16

((2n

-

1)

+

g2) ,

J

=

A2n-1 8

 .

(2.24)

Since  and  are positive, the solutions all have negative mass, with no lower bound. When  = 0, the solution becomes the Schwarzschild-AdS metric with negative mass,
and hence the power-law curvature singularity at r = 0 is naked. If on the other hand

9

 > 0, no matter how small or big, there is a Killing horizon at r = r0 > 0 where f (r0) = 0.

The corresponding null Killing vector takes the form



=

r0n(1 + g2r02) nr02n(1 + g2r02)2 +

r02

r02 1 + g2r02

 t

+

r02n(1

+

g2r02)

+

r02

 

.

(2.25)

The overall scaling of the Killing vector is chosen such that the Euclidean surface gravity

is unit, as in (2.15). Consequently, r = r0 is a pseudo horizon where geodesic completes

provided that  generates 2 period. It is easy to see that on the Killing horizon, g =

r0W (r0)

<

0.

In

fact,

naked

CTCs

arise

inside

the

VLS

located

r

=

1 2n

>

r0.

The

metrics

describe smooth time machines with negative mass, provided that  > 0. The geometry of

the Euclidean pseudo horizon is a constant time bundle over CPn. The conclusion is valid

for both asymptotically-flat (g2 = 0) or AdS solutions.

2.3 Time machines with unequal angular momenta

In D = 2n + 1 dimensions, there can be n independent rotations. We again start with the

Kerr-AdS metrics, but with now arbitrary non-zero rotations. The metrics were constructed in [7, 8]. In analogous notations, they are given by

ds22n+1

=

-W (1

+

g2r2)dt2

+

U dr2 V - 2m

+

2m U

dt

-

n i=1

ai2i di i

2

+

n i=1

r2

+ a2i i

d2i + 2i (di + aig2dt)2

-

(1

+

g2 g2r2)W

n i=1

r2

+ i

a2i

i

di

2
,

(2.26)

where

i 2i = 1 and

i = 1 - a2i g2 ,

W

=

n i=1

2i i

,

U

=

n i=1

2i r2 + a2i

n
(r2 + a2j ) ,
j=1

V

=

1 r2

(1

+

g2

r2)

n

(r2 + a2i ) =

U F

,

i=1

F

=

1

r2 + g2r2

n i=1

2i r2 + a2i

.

(2.27)

For positive m and i's, the metrics describe general rotating black holes with mass and angular momenta [16]

D = 2n + 1 :

M

=

m AD-2 4( j j)

n i=1

1 i

-

1 2

,

Ji

=

mai AD-2 4i( j j)

.

(2.28)

The event horizon is located at V - 2m = 0. Indeed the determinant of the sub-manifold

of constant r slice has a factor of (V - 2m), but Riemann tensor invariants are regular at

10

V - 2m = 0. These show that V - 2m = 0 gives a degenerate surface, with only coordinate

singularity.

We now consider the case with m < 0. Naively, one might expect that the solutions

have a naked power-law curvature singularity, since it is clear that V - 2m = 0 cannot

be satisfied for any real r. However, the fact is that as long as rotating parameters ai's

are all non-vanishing, the geodesic does complete at some Euclidean Killing horizon before

reaching the singularity. To see this, it is important to note that r = 0 is not a curvature

singularity when all ai = 0. Instead curvature singularities are located at r2 + a2i = 0, together with appropriate j's for each i. In other words, there is nothing special at r = 0 and the geodesic can extend further into the r2 < 0 region. Then it is easy to see that

when all ai = 0 and m is negative, no matter how small or big |m| is, there exists a pure

imaginary r0 with

- a2i < r02 < 0 , for all i = 1, 2, . . . n,

(2.29)

such that V - 2m = 0. The r = r0 surface gives rise to a Killing horizon. It is also straightforward to verify that on the Killing horizon there are CTCs. For example,

gii

i =1

=

(r02 + a2)2 2i r02

<

0,

for all i = 1, 2, . . . n.

(2.30)

This implies that the Killing horizon is a pseudo horizon where geodesic completes provided

that the appropriate null Killing vector generates 2 period, as was discussed in the case of

equal angular momenta. It is also important to note that from the definition of V in (2.27)

we conclude that the existence of the Euclidean Killing horizon is independent of whether

the cosmological constant parameter g2 vanishes or not. Hence the conclusion is applicable

for both asymptotically-flat or AdS solutions.

It is perhaps convenient to introduce n + 1 new parameters, (, 1, . . . , n), and express m and ai in terms of these parameters

ai =

i 

,

n

n+1

m=

i n ,

i=1

i

=

1

-

i 

g2

.

(2.31)

The mass and angular momenta become

M =

1
j n
j

n i=1

1 i

-

1 2

,

Ji

=

i i

1
j n .
j

(2.32)

For the metric to describe a rotating black hole, the parameters (, i) must be non-negative. However, the reality condition of the metric only requires that i  0 for all i. Thus we can take all the parameters (, i) to be negative. The solutions then describe a general

11

class of time machines with negative mass. When i =  for all i, they reduce to the cohomogeneity-one metrics discussed earlier.
The situation is very different in D = 2n even dimensions, for which there are only (n - 1) independent orthogonal rotations. The Kerr-AdS metrics are [7, 8]

ds22n

=

-W (1

+

g2r2)dt2

+

U dr2 V - 2m

+

2m U

dt

-

n-1 i=1

ai2i di i

2

+

n i=1

r2

+ i

a2i

d2i

+

n-1 i=1

r2

+ i

a2i

2i (di

+

aig2dt)2

-

(1

+

g2 g2r2)W

n i=1

r2

+ i

a2i

idi

2
,

(2.33)

where i, W and U take the same for as those in D = 2n + 1 dimensions, except that an = 0 since in D = 2n dimensions, there is no azimuthal coordinate n and hence there is no associated rotation parameter an. For positive m and 0 < i  1, the metrics describe rotating AdS black holes with mass and angular momenta [16]

D = 2n :

M

=

m AD-2 4( j j)

n-1 i=1

1 i

,

Ji

=

mai AD-2 4i( j j)

.

(2.34)

As in the case of odd dimensions, the determinant of the submanifold of constant r slice

also has a factor of (V - 2m). However, there is a crucial difference in even dimensions.

The function V is now given by

V

=

1 r

(1

+

g2r2)

n-1
(r2

+

a2i )

i=1

(2.35)

Thus in even dimensions, the coordinate r cannot be purely imaginary. The r = 0 is a

spacetime power-law curvature singularity. It follows that for m < 0, the quantity (V - 2m)

cannot vanish for any r > 0 and hence there is no degenerate surface. The singularity at

r = 0 is thus naked.

2.4 Further time machines
For the time machine metric (2.23) to be Einstein, the CPn-1 metric d2n-1 can be replaced by any Einstein-Kalher metrics, at the expense that the asymptotic regions are no longer AdS. When the base is a direct product of multiple Einstein-Kahler spaces, there is a subtlety that the period associated with the fibre 1-form  must be consistent with all these factors of the base [17]. Here we present an example in seven dimensions where d22 is

12

replaced by the metric of S2  S2:

ds2

=

dr2 f

-

f dt2 + W

1 9

r2

W

( + )2 +

1 6

r2(d12 

+

sin2

1d21

+

d22

+

sin2

2d22)

,

 = d + cos 1 d1 + cos 2d2 ,



=

 r6W

dt .

(2.36)

The metric is Einstein with R = -6g2g , provided that functions W and f are

W

=

1

-

 r6

,

f

=

(1

+

g2r2)W

+

 9r4

.

(2.37)

For this solution, the level surfaces are not of S5 but the T 1,1 space. The asymptotic region is no longer AdS7, and boundary is T  T 1,1, instead of T  S5. The Killing horizon and the period of associated null Killing vector can be easily determined.

3 AdS Solitons with negative mass
In the previous sections, we find that in odd dimensions, when mass is negative, Kerr or Kerr-AdS metrics with all angular momenta turned on describe smooth time machines. We now consider the possibility of turning off all the angular momenta. There are two ways of doing this. The trivial way leads simply to the Schwarzschild metrics with negative mass. An alternative limit can lead to static solitons. Negative mass solitons emerge only when there is a cosmological constant. When the cosmological constant is zero, the mass vanishes, and we shall study this in section 4.

3.1 Cohomogeneity-one metrics

In the typical way of writing Kerr-AdS black holes, the mass M and angular momentum J are expressed in terms of m and a. Turning off the angular momentum parameter a has the effect of reducing the metric to the Schwarzschild black hole. In our parametrization (2.6), we can have two manifest ways of turning off the angular momentum. The first is to set  = 0, corresponding to setting a = 0, giving rise to the usual Schwarzschild black hole. The alternative is to set  = 0, corresponding to setting a  , and we have a new non-trivial static configuration. It follows from (2.1) that when  = 0 and  = - is negative, we obtain a static soliton in five dimensions. For general dimensions, we start with the time-machine solution (2.23) and set  = 0, we have

ds2

=

dr2 (1 + g2r2)W

- (1 + g2r2)dt2

+ r2W 2 + r2d2n-1 ,

W

=

1

-

 r2n

,

(3.1)

13

where the 1-form  and the metric d2n-1 are defined under (2.17). For positive , the

metric

becomes

singular

at

r

=

r0

=



1 2n

.

The

absence

of

the

conical

singularity

requires

a

specific period for coordinate  associated with , namely

 = n

2 g2r02

+

1

.

(3.2)

On the other hand, for the metric (2 + d2n-1) to describe a round S2n-1, the period for  is 2. If we consider instead more general S2n-1/Zk, then we have



=

2 k

.

(3.3)

This implies that

g2r02

=

k2 n2

-1,





=

1 g2n

k2 n2

-

1

n
.

(3.4)

Thus we have k > n and the mass of the soliton is discretized and negative, given by

M

=

-

A2n-1 16g2(n-1)

k

k2 n2

-

1

2
.

(3.5)

Note that when n = k, the solution becomes simply the AdS vacuum and  = 2. As k  , the mass reaches a negative lower bound.
In five dimensions, the metric can be written as

ds2

= -(g2r2 + 1)dt2 +

dr2 (g2r2 + 1)W

+

1 4

W

r232

+

1 4

r2d22

,

W

=

1

-

 r4

.

(3.6)

This solution was first obtained in [11, 12]. (The local metric with a positive cosmological constant in Euclidean signature was constructed earlier in [18], which can describe smooth compact manifolds.) When the cosmological constant vanish, i.e. g = 0, the metric is a direct product of time and the EH instanton [13]. The global analysis for (3.6) was performed and descretized negative mass was obtained. The negativeness of the soliton mass was demonstrated also using holographic stress energy in [11, 12] and the Noether procedure [19]. In our approach, the solutions were obtained in some special limit of KerrAdS metrics, and hence the mass formula is a direct consequence of that of Kerr-AdS black holes.

3.2 First-order equations without superpotential
It is well-known that EH instanton can be obtained from a set of first-order equations associated with some superpotential. It turns out that the solitons (3.1) in general odd dimensions can also arise from a set of first-order equations. For simplicity, we demonstrate
14

this explicitly in five dimensions and show that the static soliton (3.6) can arise as solutions

of some first-order differential equations, instead of Einstein's second-order equations of

motion. However, we also demonstrate that there is no superpotential associated with this

first-order system.

The most general ansatz for static metrics with the SU (2)  U (1) isometry of squashed

S3 is

ds2 = d2 - a2dt2 + b232 + c2d22 ,

(3.7)

where the metric d2 and 1-form 3 are given in (2.2) and (a, b, c) are functions of the radial

coordinate . A dot denotes a derivative with respect to . For the metric to be Einstein

with R + 4g2g = 0, the (a, b, c) functions satisfy

-

a a

-

b b

-

2c c

=

4g2

,

a a

+

2a c ac

+

a b ab

=

4g2 ,

b b

+

2b c bc

+

a b ab

-

b2 2c4

=

4g2 ,

c c

+

c2 c2

+

b c bc

+

a c ac

-

1 c2

+

b2 2c4

=

4g2 ,

(3.8)

We find that there exists a set of first-order equations that can solve the above second-order

equations of motion, namely

a = 2g2ab , 1 + 4g2c2

b

=

(2c2

-

b2) 1 2c2

+

4g2 c2

,

c = b

1

+ 4g2c2 2c

.

(3.9)

It is easy to verify that these first-order equations yield precisely the soliton solution (3.6).

We now demonstrate that this first-order system is not associated with any superpo-

tential. To see this, it is convenient to define a new radial coordinate , related to  by

d = abc2d. In this system, the effective Lagrangian is given by L = T - V where

T

=

2ab 2ab

+

4ac ac

+

4bc bc

+

2c2 c2

,

V

=

1 2

a2b2

(b2

-

4c2

-

24g2c4)

.

(3.10)

Here a prime denotes a derivative with respect to . Thus we have abc2f = f  for any

function f . Following the prescription of [20], we may define Xi = (a, b, c) and write the

kinetic

energy

as

T

=

1 2

gij

X

i

X

j

.

If

there

would

exist

a

superpotential

U

=

U (a, b, c)

such

that

V

=

1 2

gij

U U Xi Xj

,

(3.11)

then there would be a first-order system

abc2

X i

=

gij

U Xj

.

(3.12)

15

Substituting the first-order equations (3.9) into the above, and we find

U = (b2 + 2c2) 1 + 4c2g2 , a

U b

=

2ab(1 + 6c2g2) , 1 + 4c2g2

U c

=

4ac

1 + 2(b2 + 2c2)g2 1 + 4c2g2

.

(3.13)

It is easy to verify that the above equations do not satisfy the integrability condition unless g = 0, in which case we have U = a(b2 + 2c2). This is precisely the superpotential for generating the EH instanton. For non-vanishing g, on the other hand, although we have the first-order equation (3.9), there is no superpotential associated with the system.

3.3 Higher-cohomogeneity solitons

3.3.1 D = 5

The local solutions of the static solitons were obtained by taking a limit from Kerr-AdS metrics such that the two equal angular momenta vanish whilst the mass is non-vanishing. Such a limit typically leads to the Schwarzschild-AdS black holes. However, as we have shown in the previous subsection, there can be an alternative limit. This new limit can be performed also for the Kerr-AdS metrics with two general angular momenta. We start with the five-dimensional Kerr-AdS black hole constructed in [5], which involves three parameters, (m, a, b). Since we shall use the exact convention for the metric presented in [5], we shall not give it here. The mass and angular momenta are given by [16]

M

=

m(2a

+ 2b - 42a2b

ab)

,

Ja

=

ma 22ab

,

Jb

=

mb 22b a

,

(3.14)

where a = 1 - a2g2 and b = 1 - b2g2. Setting a = b = 0 turns off the angular momenta

and

gives

rise

to

the

Schwarzschild-AdS

black

hole

of

mass

M

=

3 4

m.

We would like

instead to send a, b, m to infinity such that we have Ja, Jb  0 while keeping M finite and

non-vanishing. To be specific, we scale the parameters

a = a~ ,

b = ~b

m

=

1 2

4

g6

a~2~b2



,

(3.15)

and then send   . The mass and angular momenta become

M

=

-

1 8

g2

,

Ja = Jb = 0 .

(3.16)

16

Thus we arrive at a static solution with negative mass. Making a coordinate transformation

r = ir~, (with   ,), the Kerr-AdS metric of [5] becomes

ds25

=

-

r2  dt2 a2b2

+

2d2 g2

+

2dr2 r

+

r g22

sin2



d1 ag

+

cos2



d2 bg

2

+

sin2

 cos2 2



(r2

-

a2)

d1 ag

-

(r2

-

b2

)

d2 bg

2
,

r = g2 (r2 - a2)(r2 - b2) - a2b2g4 ,  = a2 cos2  + b2 sin2  ,

2 = r2 -  .

(3.17)

Here we have dropped all the tildes. If we set the parameter  = 0, the metric is exact AdS.

At large r, the -term in the metric can be neglected. Thus the metric with non-vanishing

 is asymptotic to the AdS spacetime. The Riemann tensor squared is given by

Riem2

=

40g4

+

242 a4 b4 g12 12

(r2

+

3a2

cos2



+

3b2

sin2

)(3r2

+

a2

cos2



+

b2

sin2

)

,

(3.18)

indicating the metric has a curvature singularity at  = 0. We shall see presently that

this curvature singularity is outside the soliton manifold. When b = a, we make a further

coordinate transformation

1

=

1 2

(

-

) ,

2

=

1 2

(

+

) ,

r2 - a2 a2g2



r2 ,





1 2



.

(3.19)

the metric (3.17) reduces precisely to (3.6).

The power-law curvature singularity  = 0 can be avoided for  > 0 because there is a

Euclidean Killing horizon at r = r0 > max{a, b} for which r(r0) = 0. The condition for

existing such r0 is that



>

-

(a2 - b2)2 4a2b2g4

,



M

<

(a2 - b2)2 32a2b2g2

.

(3.20)

If the inequality is saturated, (r) has a double zero and the metric has a power-law

curvature singularity at r = (a2 + b2)/2 and  = /4. It is of interest to note that not

only the mass can be negative, but also there is no lower bound.

The metric (3.17) is degenerated at three places with three null Killing vectors



=

1 2



:

=0:

r = r0 :

1

=

 1

,

2

=

 2

,

3

=

r0(2r02

1 - a2

- b2)

a(r02

-

b2

)

 1

+

b(r02

-

a2)

 2

.

(3.21)

All three Killing vectors must generate 2 period in order to avoid conical singularity. On

the other hand, 3, 1, 2 are linearly dependent. Therefore they must satisfy

n33 = n11 + n22 , where n1, n2, n3 are co-prime integers

(3.22)

17

Thus

 r0 n2x - n1 = b x(n2 - n1x) ,

n3

=

n1

+ n2x bx

r0

,

(3.23)

where

x



a b

.

With

this

parametrization,

the

mass

parameter

m

becomes



=

n1n2(x2 - 1)2 g4x(n2x - n1)2

.

(3.24)

We shall not classify all possible (n1, n2, n3) that could arise. Instead, we present an exam-

ple: (n1, n2, n3) = (1, 2, 5), which implies that a = 0.713b and m = 3.77/g4 and r0 = 1.47b.

In fact there is a further subtle conic singularity. As was noted in [21], the Killing vectors

(1, 3)

and

(2, 3)

can

be

simultaneously

null

at

(r,

)

=

(r0,

1 2

)

or

(r0, 0)

respectively.

In

Euclidean signature, any linear combination of two null Killing vectors is also null, and

hence (n33 - n11) or (n33 - n22) must generate also 2 period. The consistency then

requires that n1 = n2 = 1. This corresponds to the cohomogeneity-one solutions with

a = b, discussed earlier. The example of (n1, n2, n3) = (1, 2, 5) still have a conic singularity

of

ADE

type

at

(r, )

=

(r0, 

=

1 2

).

The

cone

is

not

2-dimensional

like

d2 + 2d2,

but

four dimensional with d2 + 2d~ 2, where d~ 2 is not a round S3, but a lens space. For the

specific (n1, n2, n3) = (1, 2, 5) example, the lens space is S3/Z2, giving rise to the R4/Z2

orbifold singularity. Such singularity can be resolved by an EH instanton whose asymptotic

region is precisely R4/Z2 [22].

3.3.2 D = 2n + 1

We obtain some non-trivial static soliton solutions from Kerr-AdS5 metrics by taking some

appropriate limit (3.15). Under this limit, all angular momenta vanish, whilst the mass

becomes a finite negative number. The resulting metric is specified by three integration

constants. This procedure can be generalized to general odd dimensions. Kerr-AdS metrics

in general dimensions were constructed in [7, 8], involving a mass parameter m and n =

[(D - 1)/2] parameters ai for angular momenta. The mass and angular momenta are given

in (2.28) and (2.34) for odd and even dimensions.

We can turn off the angular momenta by setting ai = 0, leading to the Schwarzschild-

AdS black hole. We now would like to turn off the angular momenta while keeping mass

constant by sending ai   and hence i  -. This is not possible in even dimensions

because of the relation

n i=1

Ji ai

=M,

(3.25)

which can be derived from (2.34). In odd dimensions, this can be achieved indeed, because

there

is

the

less

convergent

"

1 2

"

term

in

(2.28)

in

this

limit.

Thus, following the D = 5

18

example, we make the constant scaling of the parameters

ai = a~i ,

n

m

=

1 2

(-2)ng2



(a~ig)2 ,

i

(3.26)

and then take the    limit. Dropping the tildes, we find that the Kerr-AdS metric (2.26) becomes

where

ds22n+1 = -r2

n 2i i=1 a2i

dt2

+

X Y

dr2

+

n i=1

r2 - a2i a2i g2

(d2i

+

2i d2i )

-

1 r2Z

n i=1

r2 - a2i a2i g2

i

di

2

-

g2 X

(

n

(aig)2)

i=1

n 2i di i=1 aig2

2
,

n i

u2i

=

1

and

X=

n
(r2 - a2i )
i=1

n i=1

2i r2 - a2i

,

n

n

Y = g2 (r2 - a2i ) - g2 (aig)2 ,

i=1

i=1

Z

=

n i=1

2i a2i g2

.

(3.27) (3.28)

The metrics are static and hence there is no angular momentum. The mass of the soliton

is negative, given by

M

=

-

AD-2 16

g2



.

(3.29)

We shall not discuss the global structure of this general class of AdS solitons in this paper.

4 Ricci-flat instantons in D = 2n dimensions
In the previous section, we obtained large classes of static AdS solitons in D = 2n + 1 dimensions. For the cohomogeneity-one metrics (3.1), it can be easily seen that in the g = 0 limit, the resulting spacetime is a direct product of time and the D = 2n gravitational instanton that is a higher-dimensional generalization of the EH instanton. The metric (3.1) was generalized to multi-cohomogeneity metrics (3.17) in D = 5 and (3.27) in D = 2n + 1. In this section, we perform a further g = 0 limit on (3.17) and (3.27) and obtain Ricci-flat gravitational instantons in D = 2n dimensions.

19

4.1 D = 4

We start with the five-dimensional Einstein metric (3.17) and reparameterize the (a, b, ) constants as

a2 = a20(1 - g22) ,

b2 = a20(1 + g22) ,

   - 4 .

(4.1)

Making first the coordinate transformation,

1

=

1 2

(

-

) ,

2

=

1 2

(

+

) ,

r2 - a20 a20g2



r2 ,





1 2



.

(4.2)

and then sending g  0, we obtain a smooth limit of (3.17), whose D = 4 spatial section is

ds24

=

U dr2 W

+

W 4U

r2

(d

+

cos

d)2

+

1 4

r2

U d2

+

1 U

sin2



d -

2 r2

d

2

,

W

=

1-

 r4

,

U

=

1

+

2 cos  r2

.

(4.3)

Note that the constant a0 is trivial and drops out. The metric is Ricci-flat and Kahler. The Kahler structure can be easily seen by constructing the covariant Kahler 2-form

J = e0  e3 + e1  e2 ,

(4.4)

where the vielbein are

e0 =

U W

dr ,

e1

=



1 2

r

U d ,

e3 =

W 4U

r

(d

+

cos

d)

,

e2 = - r sin  2U

d

-

2 r2

d

.

(4.5)

Thus the metric is the Ricci-flat and BPS limit of the general Plebanski solutions [23].

When  = 0, the metric is the EH instanton. For  = 0, the curvature singularity is located

at

U

=

0,

which

can

be

avoided

if



<



1 4

.

There

are

three

degenerate

surfaces

whose

null

Killing vectors are

=0:

=:

r

=



1 4

:

1

=

 

-

 

,

2

=

 

+

 

,

3

=

 

+

2 

 

,

(4.6)

all of which have unit Euclidean surface gravity E . When 2/ = p/q < 1 is a rational

number, then we have

2q3 = (q - p)1 + (q + p)2 .

(4.7)

20

It follows from (3.22) that n1 = (q - p), n2 = q + p and n3 = 2q. Further regularity conditions follow the same procedure described in subsection 3.3.1. The existence of the ADE-type conical codimension-3 singularity, albeit may be resolved, suggests that these metrics are outside the classes of Gibbons-Hawking instantons [24, 25]. Furthermore, the relation (4.7) implies that the asymptotic regions are cones of more general lens spaces, rather than the S3/Zk+1 for k number of EH instantons.

4.2 D = 2n

For general even dimensions, we start with the Einstein metric (3.27) and reparameterize the integration constants

a2i = a20(1 + g2b2i ) ,

n
b2i = 0 .
i=1

(4.8)

(Note that the resulting metric is real as long as bi's are either real or purely imaginary numbers.) Making a coordinate transformation

r2 - a20 a20g2



r2 ,

(4.9)

and then sending the cosmological constant parameter g to zero, we find that the metric

(3.27) has a smooth limit and it is a direct product of time and a D = 2n Ricci-flat metric

ds22n

=

U W

r2

dr2

+

n
(r2 - b2i )(d2i + 2i d2i ) -
i=1

 U

(

n i=1

2i di)2

,

n
W = (r2 - b2i ) -  ,
i=1

U

=

n
(r2
i=1

-

b2i )

n j=1

2j r2 - b2j

.

(4.10)

The curvature power-law singularity is at U = 0, which can be avoided if the geodesics complete in the r region r  [r0, ) where W (r0) = 0. There are n + 1 degenerate surfaces and the corresponding null Killing vectors are

r = r0 : i = 0 :

0

=

n i=1

j(r02 - b2j ) P (r0)(r02 - b2i )

 i

,

i

=

 i

,

i = 1, 2, . . . , n .

(4.11)

Here P (r0) is an 2(n - 1)-order polynomial of r0 with the leading term as nr02(n-1). For

example, we have P

= 2r02

for n = 2 and P

=

3r04

+

1 2

(b41

+

b42

+

b43)

for

n

=

3.

All these

Killing vectors are scaled such that they have unit Euclidean surface gravity. Therefore

they must all generate 2 period to avoid conical singularities. We shall study the global

21

structure of these metrics in a future publication since these massless solutions are outside the scope of this paper. We expect all these metrics are Ricci-flat Kaher, locally the same as those BPS limits of Kerr-AdS-NUT solutions obtained in [26]. In particular when all bi's vanish, the metric reduces to the spatial section of (3.1) with g = 0, which is on a smooth manifold of Ricci-flat Kahler. In general, the metrics are cones of Einstein-Sasaki spaces in the asymptotic regions and isolated examples smooth metrics with higher cohomogeneity were found in [27, 28].

5 Euclidean AdS solitons with negative mass

For a Schwarzschild black hole, we can Wick rotate the time coordinate t so that the solution becomes a Euclidean-signatured soliton that is asymptotic to RD-1 S. For Kerr metrics or Kerr-(A)dS metrics, the reality condition requires that the rotation parameters ai become pure imaginary after the Wick rotation. In other words, we must have

t = i  , ai  i ai .

(5.1)

For positive cosmological constant, the resulting metric becomes compact and the absence of conical singularities on the Euclidean Killing horizons put strong constraints on the parameter spaces. Consequently the complete manifolds are classified by a set of integer values. This was done in general for Kerr-dS metrics in [7]. Einstein-Sasaki metrics Y pq [29] and more general Lpqr [30, 31] can also be constructed in this procedure.
In this section, we consider a negative or zero cosmological constant, and hence the manifolds are non-compact. An interesting phenomenon occurs in odd dimensions. Before the Wick rotation, we have 0 < i  1 for i, it follows from (2.34) and (2.28) that the mass are positive definite, provided that m > 0. Under ai  iai, we have

i = 1 + a2i g2  1 .

(5.2)

It follows from (2.28) that the mass for even dimensions remain positive definite. However,

in odd dimensions, the mass for Euclidean solitons can become negative provided that none

of the ai vanishes and they are all sufficiently large so that

n i=1

1 i

<

1 2

.

(5.3)

When the above bound is saturated, we obtain a massless soliton. Of course, when the

above bound is violated, we get solitons with positive mass. It is clear that the cosmological

22

constant g2 plays a crucial role in the above discussion and hence the solitons can only have negative mass for asymptotic AdS spacetimes.
To demonstrate this explicitly, we start with the cohomogeneity-one Kerr-AdS metric with all equal angular momenta. In five dimensions, the metric can be written as (2.1). We can perform Wick rotation and choose the parameters

t = i ,  = b > 0 ,  = -a < 0 .

(5.4)

In general D = 2n + 1 dimensions, we can start with (2.23) and perform Wick rotation and

set  = -b and  = a, we find that the Euclidean soliton is

ds2

=

dr2 f

+

f W

d 2

+

r2W





+

ab r2nW

d

2 + r2d2n-1 ,

f

=

(1 + g2r2)W

-

b r2(n-1)

,

W

=

1-

a r2n

,

(5.5)

where a > 0 and b > 0. If follows from (2.24) that we can define the "Euclidean mass",

given by

M

=

A2n-1 16

(2n - 1)b - g2a

.

(5.6)

The metric has a Killing horizon at r = r0 which is the largest real root of f . We can express b in terms of (r0, a), given by

b

=

1 r02

(1

+

g2r02)(r02n

-

a) .

(5.7)

The coordinate  then must have period



=

4 W (r0) f (r0)

,

(5.8)

 provided that we let    - ab/(r0W (r0)) d . Note that the condition b  0 implies

a  r02(n-1). It follows that there is a lower bound of the mass

M



-

A2n-1 16

g2r02n

.

(5.9)

(This should be compared to the Minkowski-signatured AdS soliton, whose mass has an

upper bound (3.20).) Thus mass can be also negative for Euclidean AdS solitons in odd

dimensions. In particular, the parameter region

(2n - 1)(1 + g2r02) 2n(1 + g2r02) - 1



a r02n



1

(5.10)

corresponds to 0  M  -g2r02n. Thus when the lower bound is saturated we have a massless soliton. When a is sufficiently small so that the above lower bound is violated,

23

then the mass becomes positive. It is worth commenting that in the extremal case where f has a double root, the mass is positive.
The existence of negative mass in Euclidean-signatured space is not uncommon. The Atiyah-Hitchin metric is a solution of the Euclidean Taub-NUT with negative mass [32,33], where the asymptotic region is R3  S. Analogous solutions exist also in higher dimensions [34].

6 Time machine with a dipole charge
In the previous sections, we have focused on the Einstein metrics with R = -2ng2 g in D = 2n + 1 dimensions. We now consider charged rotating solutions. Exact solutions of charged Kerr-AdS black holes in higher dimensions are known only in supergravities. In five dimensions, notable examples include ones in supergravities [35] and gauged supergravities [36, 37]. BPS solutions are somewhat simpler and global analysis indicates that both black holes or time machines can arise, see e.g. [10,3842]. In this section we consider the charged Kerr-AdS black hole in minimal gauged supergravity in five dimensions [36]. Soliton limits of this solution were studied in [43]. We consider a very different limit such that the resulting solution carries no electric charge, but only the magnetic dipole charge.

6.1 Asymptotic to AdS5

We follow the same parametrization of [36], and make redefinitions on the parameters as well as the coordinate r

a = a~ ,

b = ~b ,

m

=

1 2

4a~2~b2g6

,

q = -3gq~,

r = ir~ .

(6.1)

We then send the scaling parameter    and find that the charged Kerr-AdS metric

of [36] has a smooth limit. Dropping all the tildes, the solution can be written as

ds2

=

2 r

dr2

+

2 g2

d2

-

(abq - gr22dt)2 a2b2g2r24

+

r g22

2

A

=

+ sin2 

 cos2 2

3q 2



,

 

(r2

-

a2)

d1 ag

-

(r2

-

b2)

d2 bg

=

sin2 ag



d1

+

cos2 bg



d2

,

2
,

(6.2)

where

r = g2

(r2

-

a2)(r2

-

b2)

-

a2b2g4

-

q2 r2

,

 = a2 cos2  + b2 sin2  , 2 = r2 -  .

(6.3)

24

Under the limit (6.1) with   , the electric charge vanishes, but mass, angular momenta

are given by

M

=

-

1 8

g2

,

Ja

=

q 4ab2g3

,

Jb

=

q 4a2bg3

.

(6.4)

The rotating is generated by the magnetic flux whose strength is characterized by the

parameter q. When q = 0, the solution becomes static and reduces to (3.17). There is a

Euclidean Killing horizon at r = r0 for which r(r0) = 0 and the corresponding null vector



=

q2

+

abqr0 r04(2r02 - a2

-

b2)

1 g

 t

+

r02(r02 - bq

b2)

 1

+

r02(r02 - aq

a2)

 2

,

(6.5)

must generate 2 period to avoid conical singularity. The existence of naked CTCs can

be seen, for example,

from g11

which is obviously negative at r = r0

and  =

1 2

.

For

non-vanshing q, the existence of the Killing horizon is independent of the value and sign of

the constant . It follows (6.4) that the mass can be either positive or negative, without

upper or lower bounds. On the Killing horizon, there is a magnetic dipole charge, given by

D

=

1 8



F

=

1 8

3q

r0

1 ag(r02 -

b2)

+

2 bg(r02 -

a2)

.

(6.6)

The reason why dipole charge is consistent with a time machine is that the topology of the

Killing horizon is a time bundle over S2.

The solution becomes much simpler when b = a. Making coordinate transformations

1

=

1 2

(

- ) ,

2

=

1 2

(

+

) ,

r2 - a2 a2g2

=

r~2 ,



=

1 2

~

,

q = a3g3q~, (6.7)

and then dropping the tildes, we have

ds2 = -g2r2dt2 -

dt

+

q 2r2

3

2

+

dr2 f

+

1 4

W

r2

32

+

1 4

r2d22

,

W

=

1-

 r4

,

f

=

(1

+

g2r2)W

-

g2q2 r4

.



A=

3q 2r2

3

,

(6.8)

Mass and angular momentum are

M

=

-

1 8

g2

,

J

=

1 4

q

.

(6.9)

The solution reduces to the static soliton (3.6) when q = 0. In order for the spacetime to avoid curvature singularity at r = 0, there should be a Killing horizon at some r0 > 0 such that f (r0) = 0. Such a Killing horizon is guaranteed to exist if we have  > -g2q2). It follows that for given q, the mass of the solution has an upper bound, but no lower bound

M

<

1 8

g4

q2

.

(6.10)

25

This upper bound is analogous to (3.20).

It is clear that at the Killing horizon at f = 0, we must have W > 0. It follows that

there must be naked CTCs since

g

=

1 4g2

(f

-

W)

=

1 4

r2W

-

q2 r4

.

(6.11)

The manifold closes off at the Killing horizon provided that the null Killing vector on the

horizon



=

2r02(1

1 + g2r02 + g2r02)2 +

g4q2

q

 t

+

2r02(1

+

g2r02)

 

,

(6.12)

generates 2 period. Note that in this time machine, then mass can be both positive and

negative. The electric charge vanishes, but there is a magnetic dipole charge on the Killing

horizon



1

3q

D=

F=

8 r0

4r02

.

(6.13)

6.2 Asymptotic to flat spacetime

We can turn off the cosmological constant and the solution becomes

ds2 = -

dt

-

q 2r2

3

2

+

dr2 W

+

1 4

W

r232

+

1 4

r2d22

,



A

=

-

3q 2r2

3

.

(6.14)

This is a solution to field equations of five-dimensional minimal supergravity. The solution has zero mass but non-vanishing angular momentum

M = 0,

J

=

1 4

q

.

(6.15)

The dipole charge takes the same form as (6.13). The metric describes a constant time

bundle

over

the

EH

instanton,

where

the

null

Killing

vector

at

r

=

r0

=



1 4

,

namely



=

q 2r02

 t

+

 

,

(6.16)

must generate 2 period. Thus the spatial section is not asymptotic R4, but R4/Z2.

7 Conclusions
In this paper, we studied the properties of Kerr and Kerr-AdS metrics in D = 2n + 1 dimensions when they do not describe rotating black holes. We found that when the mass was negative and all angular momenta turned on, the metrics could describe smooth time machines where spacetime closes off on some Euclidean pseudo horizon, which is Minkowski signatured, a time bundle over some base space. The absence of conical singularity of
26

the degenerate surface of the horizon requires the periodic identification of the real time coordinate. Such negative-mass time machines can arise for both asymptotically-flat or AdS spacetimes. We also constructed analogous time machines in gauged and ungauged minimal supergravity in five dimensions, where the time machines carry no electric but dipole charges.
Turning off the angular momenta appropriately, the aforementioned AdS time machines reduce to static solitons with negative mass. Furthermore, Euclideanization of Kerr-AdS metrics in odd dimensions can also lead to solitons with negative mass. For those that are solutions to Einstein's vacuum field equations with or without a cosmological constant, the absence of any singularity implies that the origin of the spacetime curvature is purely gravitational without any matter energy-momentum tensor. This is very different from Schwarzschild or Kerr black holes where singular matter source is located at the singularity. Thus our solutions are the manifestations of pure-gravity states. Such states are not unusual in Euclidean signatured gravity; they are described by gravitational instantons. Our work demonstrates that pure gravitational states can arise in Minkowski signatured gravity in D = 2n + 1. In addition, we find that taking the cosmological constant to zero, the AdS solitons solutions reduce to a class of Ricci-flat Kahler metrics in D = 2n dimensions.
Time machines are not unusual in supergravities where BPS time machines have been constructed. What is unusual is perhaps that all these solutions carry negative energies. It is thus of interest to examine the positive-mass conjecture. Having naked CTCs can be perfectly consistent with the energy conditions. In fact the naked CTCs in Godel-type metrics [44] emerge precisely because of the null-energy condition [45].
Positive-mass conjecture states that mass of asymptotically Minkowski spacetime is nonnegative. In our time-machine solutions, the time is required to be periodic. Although the asymptotic spacetime is flat for the  = 0 solutions, it is not quite Minkowski, where time is isomorphic to a real line. For the AdS solitons with negative mass, the EH instaton-like requirement of the period of  coordinate implies that the asymptotic spacetime is AdS/Zk rather than AdS.
Concrete examples of violating the positive-mass conjecture are perhaps those negativemass AdS time machines. This is because in the flat-spacetime embedding of AdS, time in global coordinates are already periodic. The further periodic identification of the null Killing vector on the Euclidean pseudo horizon can be perfectly consistent with the time period of global AdS provided that the constraint (2.16) is satisfied. This implies that the mass and angular momenta are discretized and are functions of rational numbers. This
27

phenomenon is analogous to the discretization of compact manifolds. It can be argued that in the "real world setting," spacetime configurations with discretized mass and angular momentum are so fine tuned and hence it is unlikely for the time machine to be created. Of course, one can hardly call the AdS2n+1 spacetime as the real world. On the other hand, the discrete nature of the time-machine configurations suggests topological structures that imply that these solutions, although having negative mass, are stable.1 It is of great interest to investigate the corresponding states in the boundary conformal field theory.
Acknowledgement
We are grateful to Jianxin Lu, Chris Pope, Yi Wang, Zhao-Long Wang and Yu-Liang Wu for useful discussions. The work is supported in part by NSFC grants NO. 11475024, NO. 11175269 and NO. 11235003.
References
[1] R.P. Kerr, Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 237 (1963). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.11.237
[2] K. Schwarzschild, On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein's theory, Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. ) 1916, 189 (1916) [physics/9905030].
[3] B. Carter, Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger separable solutions of Einstein's equations, Commun. Math. Phys. 10, 280 (1968).
[4] R.C. Myers and M.J. Perry, Black holes in higher dimensional space-times, Annals Phys. 172, 304 (1986). doi:10.1016/0003-4916(86)90186-7
[5] S.W. Hawking, C.J. Hunter and M. Taylor, Rotation and the AdS/CFT correspondence, Phys. Rev. D 59, 064005 (1999) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.064005 [hep-th/9811056].
[6] J.M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999) [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998)] doi:10. 1023/A:1026654312961 [hep-th/9711200].
1We are grateful to Yi Wang for pointing this out.
28

[7] G.W. Gibbons, H. Lu, D.N. Page and C.N. Pope, The General Kerr-de Sitter metrics in all dimensions, J. Geom. Phys. 53, 49 (2005) doi:10.1016/j.geomphys.2004.05.001 [hep-th/0404008].
[8] G.W. Gibbons, H. Lu, D.N. Page and C.N. Pope, Rotating black holes in higher dimensions with a cosmological constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 171102 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.171102 [hep-th/0409155].
[9] W. Chen, H. Lu and C.N. Pope, Kerr-de Sitter black holes with NUT charges, Nucl. Phys. B 762, 38 (2007) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.07.022 [hep-th/0601002].
[10] M. Cvetic, G.W. Gibbons, H. Lu and C.N. Pope, Rotating black holes in gauged supergravities: Thermodynamics, supersymmetric limits, topological solitons and time machines," hep-th/0504080.
[11] R. Clarkson and R.B. Mann, Eguchi-Hanson solitons in odd dimensions, Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 1507 (2006) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/5/005 [hep-th/0508200].
[12] R. Clarkson and R.B. Mann, Soliton solutions to the Einstein equations in five dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 051104 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.051104 [hep-th/0508109].
[13] T. Eguchi and A.J. Hanson, Asymptotically flat selfdual solutions to Euclidean gravity, Phys. Lett. 74B, 249 (1978). doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90566-X
[14] G.W. Gibbons and C.A.R. Herdeiro, Supersymmetric rotating black holes and causality violation, Class. Quant. Grav. 16, 3619 (1999) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/16/11/311 [hep-th/9906098].
[15] M. Banados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, The black hole in three-dimensional space-time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1849 (1992) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.1849 [hep-th/9204099].
[16] G.W. Gibbons, M.J. Perry and C.N. Pope, The First law of thermodynamics for Kerr-anti-de Sitter black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 22, 1503 (2005) doi:10.1088/02649381/22/9/002 [hep-th/0408217].
[17] M. Cvetic, G.W. Gibbons, H. Lu and C.N. Pope, Supersymmetric nonsingular fractional D2-branes and NS-NS 2-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 606, 18 (2001) doi:10.1016/S05503213(01)00236-X [hep-th/0101096].
29

[18] H. Lu, D.N. Page and C.N. Pope, New inhomogeneous Einstein metrics on sphere bundles over Einstein-Kahler manifolds, Phys. Lett. B 593, 218 (2004) doi:10.1016/ j.physletb.2004.04.068 [hep-th/0403079].
[19] H. Cebeci, O. Sarioglu and B. Tekin, Negative mass solitons in gravity, Phys. Rev. D 73, 064020 (2006) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.064020 [hep-th/0602117].
[20] M. Cvetic, G.W. Gibbons, H. Lu and C.N. Pope, Ricci flat metrics, harmonic forms and brane resolutions, Commun. Math. Phys. 232, 457 (2003) doi:10.1007/s00220-0020730-3 [hep-th/0012011].
[21] D. Martelli and J. Sparks, Toric Sasaki-Einstein metrics on S2  S3, Phys. Lett. B 621, 208 (2005) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2005.06.059 [hep-th/0505027].
[22] D.N. Page, A physical picture of the K3 gravitational instanton, Phys. Lett. 80B, 55 (1978). doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90305-2
[23] J.F. Plebanski, A class of solutions of Einstein-Maxwell equations, Ann. Phys. 90, 196 (1975).
[24] G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking, Gravitational multi-instantons, Phys. Lett. 78B, 430 (1978). doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78)90478-1
[25] G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking, Classification of gravitational instanton symmetries, Commun. Math. Phys. 66, 291 (1979). doi:10.1007/BF01197189
[26] W. Chen, H. Lu and C.N. Pope, General Kerr-NUT-AdS metrics in all dimensions, Class. Quant. Grav. 23, 5323 (2006), hep-th/0604125 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/17/ 013.
[27] T. Oota and Y. Yasui, Explicit toric metric on resolved Calabi-Yau cone, Phys. Lett. B 639, 54 (2006) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2006.06.021 [hep-th/0605129].
[28] H. Lu and C.N. Pope, Resolutions of cones over Einstein-Sasaki spaces, Nucl. Phys. B 782, 171 (2007) doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.04.017 [hep-th/0605222].
[29] J.P. Gauntlett, D. Martelli, J. Sparks and D. Waldram, Sasaki-Einstein metrics on S2S3, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 8, no. 4, 711 (2004) doi:10.4310/ATMP.2004.v8.n4.a3 [hep-th/0403002].
30

[30] M. Cvetic, H. Lu, D.N. Page and C.N. Pope, New Einstein-Sasaki spaces in five and higher dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 071101 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 95.071101 [hep-th/0504225].
[31] M. Cvetic, H. Lu, D.N. Page and C.N. Pope, New Einstein-Sasaki and Einstein spaces from Kerr-de Sitter, JHEP 0907, 082 (2009) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/07/082 [hep-th/0505223].
[32] M.F. Atiyah and N.J. Hitchin, Low-energy scattering of nonabelian monopoles, Phys. Lett. A 107, 21 (1985). doi:10.1016/0375-9601(85)90238-5
[33] G.W. Gibbons and N.S. Manton, Classical and quantum dynamics of BPS monopoles, Nucl. Phys. B 274, 183 (1986). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90624-3
[34] M. Cvetic, G.W. Gibbons, H. Lu and C. N. Pope, Orientifolds and slumps in G2 and spin(7) metrics, Annals Phys. 310, 265 (2004) doi:10.1016/j.aop.2003.10.004 [hep-th/0111096].
[35] M. Cvetic and D. Youm, General rotating five-dimensional black holes of toroidally compactified heterotic string, Nucl. Phys. B 476, 118 (1996) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96) 00355-0 [hep-th/9603100].
[36] Z.-W. Chong, M. Cvetic, H. Lu and C. N. Pope, General non-extremal rotating black holes in minimal five-dimensional gauged supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 161301 (2005) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.161301 [hep-th/0506029].
[37] S.Q. Wu, General nonextremal rotating charged AdS black holes in five-dimensional U (1)3 gauged supergravity: a simple construction method, Phys. Lett. B 707, 286 (2012) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.12.031 [arXiv:1108.4159 [hep-th]].
[38] J.C. Breckenridge, R.C. Myers, A.W. Peet and C. Vafa, D-branes and spinning black holes, Phys. Lett. B 391, 93 (1997) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(96)01460-8 [hep-th/9602065].
[39] D. Klemm and W.A. Sabra, Charged rotating black holes in 5-D Einstein-Maxwell (A)dS gravity, Phys. Lett. B 503, 147 (2001) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00181-2 [hep-th/0010200].
[40] D. Klemm and W.A. Sabra, General (anti-)de Sitter black holes in five-dimensions, JHEP 0102, 031 (2001) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/02/031 [hep-th/0011016].
31

[41] J.P. Gauntlett, J.B. Gutowski, C.M. Hull, S. Pakis and H.S. Reall, All supersymmetric solutions of minimal supergravity in five-dimensions, Class. Quant. Grav. 20, 4587 (2003) doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/21/005 [hep-th/0209114].
[42] J.B. Gutowski and H.S. Reall, Supersymmetric AdS5 black holes, JHEP 0402, 006 (2004) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2004/02/006 [hep-th/0401042].
[43] G. Compere, K. Copsey, S. de Buyl and R.B. Mann, Solitons in five-dimensional minimal supergravity: local charge, exotic ergoregions, and violations of the BPS bound, JHEP 0912, 047 (2009) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/12/047 [arXiv:0909.3289 [hepth]].
[44] K. Godel, An example of a new type of cosmological solutions of Einstein's field equations of graviation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 447 (1949). doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.21.447
[45] S.L. Li, X.H. Feng, H. Wei and H. Lu, Godel universe from string theory, arXiv:1612. 02069 [hep-th].
32