1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255
|
version: 0.2
text: smd
pdf: false
--- |
# Examples
Basic round trip of parsing YAML to Python objects, modifying and
generating YAML:
--- !python |
import sys
from ruamel.yaml import YAML
inp = """\
# example
name:
# details
family: Smith # very common
given: Alice # one of the siblings
"""
yaml = YAML()
code = yaml.load(inp)
code['name']['given'] = 'Bob'
yaml.dump(code, sys.stdout)
--- !stdout-yaml |
Resulting in:
--- |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
YAML handcrafted anchors and references as well as key merging are
preserved. The merged keys can transparently be accessed using `[]` and
`.get()`:
--- !python |
from ruamel.yaml import YAML
inp = """\
- &CENTER {x: 1, y: 2}
- &LEFT {x: 0, y: 2}
- &BIG {r: 10}
- &SMALL {r: 1}
# All the following maps are equal:
# Explicit keys
- x: 1
y: 2
r: 10
label: center/big
# Merge one map
- <<: *CENTER
r: 10
label: center/big
# Merge multiple maps
- <<: [*CENTER, *BIG]
label: center/big
# Override
- <<: [*BIG, *LEFT, *SMALL]
x: 1
label: center/big
"""
yaml = YAML()
data = yaml.load(inp)
assert data[7]['y'] == 2
--- |
The `CommentedMap`, which is the `dict` like construct one gets when
round-trip loading, supports insertion of a key into a particular
position, while optionally adding a comment:
--- !python |
import sys
from ruamel.yaml import YAML
yaml_str = """\
first_name: Art
occupation: Architect # This is an occupation comment
about: Art Vandelay is a fictional character that George invents...
"""
yaml = YAML()
data = yaml.load(yaml_str)
data.insert(1, 'last name', 'Vandelay', comment="new key")
yaml.dump(data, sys.stdout)
--- !stdout-yaml |
gives:
--- |
Please note that the comment is aligned with that of its neighbour (if
available).
The above was inspired by a
[question](http://stackoverflow.com/a/36970608/1307905) posted by
*demux* on StackOverflow.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By default `ruamel.yaml` indents with two positions in block style, for
both mappings and sequences. For sequences the indent is counted to the
beginning of the scalar, with the dash taking the first position of the
indented \"space\".
You can change this default indentation by e.g. using `yaml.indent()`:
--- !python |
import sys
from ruamel.yaml import YAML
d = dict(a=dict(b=2),c=[3, 4])
yaml = YAML()
yaml.dump(d, sys.stdout)
print('#123456789')
yaml = YAML()
yaml.indent(mapping=4, sequence=6, offset=3)
yaml.dump(d, sys.stdout)
print('#123456789')
--- !stdout-yaml |
giving:
--- |
If a block sequence or block mapping is the element of a sequence, the
are, by default, displayed
[compact](http://yaml.org/spec/1.2/spec.html#id2797686) notation. This
means that the dash of the \"parent\" sequence is on the same line as
the first element resp. first key/value pair of the child collection.
If you want either or both of these (sequence within sequence, mapping
within sequence) to begin on the next line use `yaml.compact()`:
--- !python |
import sys
from ruamel.yaml import YAML
d = [dict(b=2), [3, 4]]
yaml = YAML()
yaml.dump(d, sys.stdout)
print('='*15)
yaml = YAML()
yaml.compact(seq_seq=False, seq_map=False)
yaml.dump(d, sys.stdout)
--- !stdout-yaml |
giving:
--- |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following program uses three dumps on the same data, resulting in a
stream with three documents:
--- !python |
import sys
from ruamel.yaml import YAML
data = {1: {1: [{1: 1, 2: 2}, {1: 1, 2: 2}], 2: 2}, 2: 42}
yaml = YAML()
yaml.explicit_start = True
yaml.dump(data, sys.stdout)
yaml.indent(sequence=4, offset=2)
yaml.dump(data, sys.stdout)
def sequence_indent_four(s):
# this will fail on direclty nested lists: {1; [[2, 3], 4]}
levels = []
ret_val = ''
for line in s.splitlines(True):
ls = line.lstrip()
indent = len(line) - len(ls)
if ls.startswith('- '):
if not levels or indent > levels[-1]:
levels.append(indent)
elif levels:
if indent < levels[-1]:
levels = levels[:-1]
# same -> do nothing
else:
if levels:
if indent <= levels[-1]:
while levels and indent <= levels[-1]:
levels = levels[:-1]
ret_val += ' ' * len(levels) + line
return ret_val
yaml = YAML()
yaml.explicit_start = True
yaml.dump(data, sys.stdout, transform=sequence_indent_four)
--- !stdout-yaml |
gives as output:
--- |
The transform example, in the last document, was inspired by a [question
posted by \*nowox\*](https://stackoverflow.com/q/44388701/1307905) on
StackOverflow.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
## Output of `dump()` as a string
The single most abused "feature" of the old API is not providing the
(second) stream parameter to one of the `dump()` variants, in order to
get a monolithic string representation of the stream back.
Apart from being memory inefficient and slow, quite often people using
this did not realise that `print(round_trip_dump(dict(a=1, b=2)))` gets
you an extra, empty, line after `b: 2`.
The real question is why this functionality, which is seldom really
necessary, is available in the old API (and in PyYAML) in the first
place. One explanation you get by looking at what someone would need to
do to make this available if it weren\'t there already. Apart from
subclassing the `Serializer` and providing a new `dump` method, which
would ten or so lines, another **hundred** lines, essentially the whole
`dumper.py` file, would need to be copied and to make use of this
serializer.
The fact is that one should normally be doing
`round_trip_dump(dict(a=1, b=2)), sys.stdout)` and do away with 90% of
the cases for returning the string, and that all post-processing YAML,
before writing to stream, can be handled by using the `transform=`
parameter of dump, being able to handle most of the rest. But it is also
much easier in the new API to provide that YAML output as a string if
you really need to have it (or think you do):
--- !python |
import sys
from ruamel.yaml import YAML
from ruamel.yaml.compat import StringIO
class MyYAML(YAML):
def dump(self, data, stream=None, **kw):
inefficient = False
if stream is None:
inefficient = True
stream = StringIO()
YAML.dump(self, data, stream, **kw)
if inefficient:
return stream.getvalue()
yaml = MyYAML() # or typ='safe'/'unsafe' etc
--- |
with about one tenth of the lines needed for the old interface, you can
once more do:
--- !python-code |
print(yaml.dump(dict(a=1, b=2)))
--- |
instead of:
--- !python-code |
yaml.dump((dict(a=1, b=2)), sys.stdout)
print() # or sys.stdout.write('\n')
|