File: test_structseq.py

package info (click to toggle)
python2.2 2.2.3dfsg-2sarge1
  • links: PTS
  • area: main
  • in suites: sarge
  • size: 36,920 kB
  • ctags: 69,127
  • sloc: ansic: 219,839; python: 203,969; sh: 9,690; makefile: 3,468; perl: 3,454; lisp: 3,248; xml: 2,262; cpp: 106; sed: 2
file content (28 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 587 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (3) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
 
from test_support import vereq

import time

t = time.gmtime()
astuple = tuple(t)
vereq(len(t), len(astuple))
vereq(t, astuple)

# Check that slicing works the same way; at one point, slicing t[i:j] with
# 0 < i < j could produce NULLs in the result.
for i in range(-len(t), len(t)):
    for j in range(-len(t), len(t)):
        vereq(t[i:j], astuple[i:j])

# Devious code could crash structseqs' contructors
class C:
    def __getitem__(self, i):
        raise IndexError
    def __len__(self):
        return 9

try:
    repr(time.struct_time(C()))
except:
    pass

# XXX more needed