1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270
|
.. highlightlang:: c
.. _cporting-howto:
********************************
Porting Extension Modules to 3.0
********************************
:author: Benjamin Peterson
.. topic:: Abstract
Although changing the C-API was not one of Python 3.0's objectives, the many
Python level changes made leaving 2.x's API intact impossible. In fact, some
changes such as :func:`int` and :func:`long` unification are more obvious on
the C level. This document endeavors to document incompatibilities and how
they can be worked around.
Conditional compilation
=======================
The easiest way to compile only some code for 3.0 is to check if
:c:macro:`PY_MAJOR_VERSION` is greater than or equal to 3. ::
#if PY_MAJOR_VERSION >= 3
#define IS_PY3K
#endif
API functions that are not present can be aliased to their equivalents within
conditional blocks.
Changes to Object APIs
======================
Python 3.0 merged together some types with similar functions while cleanly
separating others.
str/unicode Unification
-----------------------
Python 3.0's :func:`str` (``PyString_*`` functions in C) type is equivalent to
2.x's :func:`unicode` (``PyUnicode_*``). The old 8-bit string type has become
:func:`bytes`. Python 2.6 and later provide a compatibility header,
:file:`bytesobject.h`, mapping ``PyBytes`` names to ``PyString`` ones. For best
compatibility with 3.0, :c:type:`PyUnicode` should be used for textual data and
:c:type:`PyBytes` for binary data. It's also important to remember that
:c:type:`PyBytes` and :c:type:`PyUnicode` in 3.0 are not interchangeable like
:c:type:`PyString` and :c:type:`PyUnicode` are in 2.x. The following example
shows best practices with regards to :c:type:`PyUnicode`, :c:type:`PyString`,
and :c:type:`PyBytes`. ::
#include "stdlib.h"
#include "Python.h"
#include "bytesobject.h"
/* text example */
static PyObject *
say_hello(PyObject *self, PyObject *args) {
PyObject *name, *result;
if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "U:say_hello", &name))
return NULL;
result = PyUnicode_FromFormat("Hello, %S!", name);
return result;
}
/* just a forward */
static char * do_encode(PyObject *);
/* bytes example */
static PyObject *
encode_object(PyObject *self, PyObject *args) {
char *encoded;
PyObject *result, *myobj;
if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "O:encode_object", &myobj))
return NULL;
encoded = do_encode(myobj);
if (encoded == NULL)
return NULL;
result = PyBytes_FromString(encoded);
free(encoded);
return result;
}
long/int Unification
--------------------
In Python 3.0, there is only one integer type. It is called :func:`int` on the
Python level, but actually corresponds to 2.x's :func:`long` type. In the
C-API, ``PyInt_*`` functions are replaced by their ``PyLong_*`` neighbors. The
best course of action here is using the ``PyInt_*`` functions aliased to
``PyLong_*`` found in :file:`intobject.h`. The abstract ``PyNumber_*`` APIs
can also be used in some cases. ::
#include "Python.h"
#include "intobject.h"
static PyObject *
add_ints(PyObject *self, PyObject *args) {
int one, two;
PyObject *result;
if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "ii:add_ints", &one, &two))
return NULL;
return PyInt_FromLong(one + two);
}
Module initialization and state
===============================
Python 3.0 has a revamped extension module initialization system. (See
:pep:`3121`.) Instead of storing module state in globals, they should be stored
in an interpreter specific structure. Creating modules that act correctly in
both 2.x and 3.0 is tricky. The following simple example demonstrates how. ::
#include "Python.h"
struct module_state {
PyObject *error;
};
#if PY_MAJOR_VERSION >= 3
#define GETSTATE(m) ((struct module_state*)PyModule_GetState(m))
#else
#define GETSTATE(m) (&_state)
static struct module_state _state;
#endif
static PyObject *
error_out(PyObject *m) {
struct module_state *st = GETSTATE(m);
PyErr_SetString(st->error, "something bad happened");
return NULL;
}
static PyMethodDef myextension_methods[] = {
{"error_out", (PyCFunction)error_out, METH_NOARGS, NULL},
{NULL, NULL}
};
#if PY_MAJOR_VERSION >= 3
static int myextension_traverse(PyObject *m, visitproc visit, void *arg) {
Py_VISIT(GETSTATE(m)->error);
return 0;
}
static int myextension_clear(PyObject *m) {
Py_CLEAR(GETSTATE(m)->error);
return 0;
}
static struct PyModuleDef moduledef = {
PyModuleDef_HEAD_INIT,
"myextension",
NULL,
sizeof(struct module_state),
myextension_methods,
NULL,
myextension_traverse,
myextension_clear,
NULL
};
#define INITERROR return NULL
PyObject *
PyInit_myextension(void)
#else
#define INITERROR return
void
initmyextension(void)
#endif
{
#if PY_MAJOR_VERSION >= 3
PyObject *module = PyModule_Create(&moduledef);
#else
PyObject *module = Py_InitModule("myextension", myextension_methods);
#endif
if (module == NULL)
INITERROR;
struct module_state *st = GETSTATE(module);
st->error = PyErr_NewException("myextension.Error", NULL, NULL);
if (st->error == NULL) {
Py_DECREF(module);
INITERROR;
}
#if PY_MAJOR_VERSION >= 3
return module;
#endif
}
CObject replaced with Capsule
=============================
The :c:type:`Capsule` object was introduced in Python 3.1 and 2.7 to replace
:c:type:`CObject`. CObjects were useful,
but the :c:type:`CObject` API was problematic: it didn't permit distinguishing
between valid CObjects, which allowed mismatched CObjects to crash the
interpreter, and some of its APIs relied on undefined behavior in C.
(For further reading on the rationale behind Capsules, please see :issue:`5630`.)
If you're currently using CObjects, and you want to migrate to 3.1 or newer,
you'll need to switch to Capsules.
:c:type:`CObject` was deprecated in 3.1 and 2.7 and completely removed in
Python 3.2. If you only support 2.7, or 3.1 and above, you
can simply switch to :c:type:`Capsule`. If you need to support 3.0 or
versions of Python earlier than 2.7 you'll have to support both CObjects
and Capsules.
The following example header file :file:`capsulethunk.h` may
solve the problem for you;
simply write your code against the :c:type:`Capsule` API, include
this header file after ``"Python.h"``, and you'll automatically use CObjects
in Python 3.0 or versions earlier than 2.7.
:file:`capsulethunk.h` simulates Capsules using CObjects. However,
:c:type:`CObject` provides no place to store the capsule's "name". As a
result the simulated :c:type:`Capsule` objects created by :file:`capsulethunk.h`
behave slightly differently from real Capsules. Specifically:
* The name parameter passed in to :c:func:`PyCapsule_New` is ignored.
* The name parameter passed in to :c:func:`PyCapsule_IsValid` and
:c:func:`PyCapsule_GetPointer` is ignored, and no error checking
of the name is performed.
* :c:func:`PyCapsule_GetName` always returns NULL.
* :c:func:`PyCapsule_SetName` always throws an exception and
returns failure. (Since there's no way to store a name
in a CObject, noisy failure of :c:func:`PyCapsule_SetName`
was deemed preferable to silent failure here. If this is
inconveient, feel free to modify your local
copy as you see fit.)
You can find :file:`capsulethunk.h` in the Python source distribution
in the :file:`Doc/includes` directory. We also include it here for
your reference; here is :file:`capsulethunk.h`:
.. literalinclude:: ../includes/capsulethunk.h
Other options
=============
If you are writing a new extension module, you might consider `Cython
<http://www.cython.org>`_. It translates a Python-like language to C. The
extension modules it creates are compatible with Python 3.x and 2.x.
|