File: workflow.tex

package info (click to toggle)
pyutilib 6.0.0-1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bookworm
  • size: 4,924 kB
  • sloc: python: 18,448; xml: 135; perl: 75; makefile: 50; sh: 32
file content (64 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,229 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (3)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
% NOTES:
%

% TODO: should we stick with LaTeX documentation?  It might make sense
% to migrate to reStructured text, since that is a Python standard and
% since it can generate LaTeX.  We'll have to decide that sometime soon.

\documentclass[12pt]{article}

\usepackage{fullpage}
\usepackage[authoryear]{natbib}
\usepackage{listings}
\usepackage{url}
\usepackage[usenames]{color}
\usepackage{graphicx}

\bibpunct{[}{]}{,}{n}{}{}
\include{macros}
\include{example_macros}

\widowpenalty=3000
\clubpenalty=3000


\begin{document}

\title{Managing Scientific Workflows in Python with \code{pyutilib.workflow}}

\author{William E.\ Hart\footnote{Sandia National Laboratories, 
Data Analysis and Informatics Department, 
PO Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185;
{\tt wehart@sandia.gov}}
}

\date{\today}

\maketitle

\begin{abstract}
\input{abstract}
\end{abstract}


\lstset{language=Python}
\definecolor{light-gray}{gray}{0.9}
\lstset{backgroundcolor=\color{light-gray}}
\lstset{aboveskip=1em,belowskip=1em,showspaces=false,showstringspaces=false}

\newpage

\input{workflow-intro}
\input{workflow-doc}
\input{workflow-disc}

\section*{Acknowledgements} 

\input{acknow}


\bibliographystyle{siam}
\bibliography{coopr}

\end{document}