1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
|
From 9395e8b4c5d57aab8fe60e0a73a1e558c3f3b691 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 16:33:32 +0200
Subject: qcow2: Fix refcount table size calculation
Bug-Debian: http://bugs.debian.org/691569
A missing factor for the refcount table entry size in the calculation
could mean that too little memory was allocated for the in-memory
representation of the table, resulting in a buffer overflow.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Tested-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
(cherry picked from commit a3548077062dd9dc2701ebffd931ba6eaef40bec)
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
---
block/qcow2-refcount.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/block/qcow2-refcount.c b/block/qcow2-refcount.c
index 443c021..645c7c5 100644
--- a/block/qcow2-refcount.c
+++ b/block/qcow2-refcount.c
@@ -301,7 +301,8 @@ static int alloc_refcount_block(BlockDriverState *bs,
uint64_t last_table_size;
uint64_t blocks_clusters;
do {
- uint64_t table_clusters = size_to_clusters(s, table_size);
+ uint64_t table_clusters =
+ size_to_clusters(s, table_size * sizeof(uint64_t));
blocks_clusters = 1 +
((table_clusters + refcount_block_clusters - 1)
/ refcount_block_clusters);
--
1.7.10.4
|
