File: captureOutput.Rd

package info (click to toggle)
r-cran-r.utils 2.13.0-1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid, trixie
  • size: 2,864 kB
  • sloc: sh: 18; makefile: 6
file content (91 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 2,773 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (3)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% Do not modify this file since it was automatically generated from:
% 
%  captureOutput.R
% 
% by the Rdoc compiler part of the R.oo package.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

\name{captureOutput}
\alias{captureOutput}


\title{Evaluate an R expression and captures the output}

\description{
 Evaluate an R expression and captures the output.
}

\usage{
captureOutput(expr, file=NULL, append=FALSE, collapse=NULL, envir=parent.frame())
}

\arguments{
  \item{expr}{The R expression to be evaluated.}
  \item{file}{A file name or a \code{\link[base:connections]{connection}} to where the output is
     directed.  Alternatively, if \code{\link[base]{NULL}} the output is captured to
     and returned as a \code{\link[base]{character}} \code{\link[base]{vector}}.}
  \item{append}{If \code{\link[base:logical]{TRUE}}, the output is appended to the file or
     the (unopened) connection, otherwise it overwrites.}
  \item{collapse}{A \code{\link[base]{character}} string used for collapsing the captured
     rows. If \code{\link[base]{NULL}}, the rows are not collapsed.}
  \item{envir}{The \code{\link[base]{environment}} in which the expression is evaluated.}
}

\value{
 Returns captured output as a \code{\link[base]{character}} \code{\link[base]{vector}}.
}

\details{
 This method imitates \code{\link[utils]{capture.output}} with the major
 difference that it captures strings via a \code{\link[base]{raw}} connection rather
 than via internal strings.  The latter becomes exponentially slow
 for large outputs [1,2].
}

\examples{
# captureOutput() is much faster than capture.output()
# for large outputs when capturing to a string.
for (n in c(10e3, 20e3, 30e3, 40e3)) {
  printf("n=\%d\n", n)

  x <- rnorm(n)

  t0 <- system.time({
    bfr0 <- capture.output(print(x))
  })
  print(t0)

  t1 <- system.time({
    bfr <- captureOutput(print(x))
  })
  print(t1)
  print(t1/t0)

  bfr2n <- captureOutput(print(x), collapse="\n")
  bfr2r <- captureOutput(print(x), collapse="\r")

  stopifnot(identical(bfr, bfr0))
} # for (n ...)
}

\author{Henrik Bengtsson}

\seealso{
  Internally, \code{\link[base]{eval}}() is used to evaluate the expression.
  and \code{\link[utils]{capture.output}} to capture the output.
}

\references{
 [1] R-devel thread 'capture.output(): Using a rawConnection() [linear]
     instead of textConnection() [exponential]?', 2014-02-04.
     \url{https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2014-February/068349.html}
 [2] JottR blog post 'PERFORMANCE: captureOutput() is much faster than
     capture.output()', 2015-05-26.
     \url{https://www.jottr.org/2014/05/26/captureoutput/}
}



\keyword{IO}
\keyword{programming}