1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300
|
\name{RFgetMethodNames}
\alias{RFgetMethodNames}
\title{Simulation Techniques}
\description{
\command{\link{RFgetMethodNames}} prints and returns a list of currently
implemented methods for simulating Gaussian random fields
and max stable random fields
}
\usage{
RFgetMethodNames()
}
\value{
an invisible string vector of the Gaussian methods.
}
\details{
By default, \command{\link{RFsimulate}} automatically chooses an appropriate
method for simulation. The method can also be set explicitly by the
user via \command{\link{RFoptions}}, in particular by passing
\code{gauss.method=_a valid method string_} as an additional argument
to \command{\link{RFsimulate}} or by globally changing the options via
\code{\link{RFoptions}(gauss.method=_a valid method string_)}.
The following methods are available:
\itemize{
\item (random spatial) Averages\cr
-- details soon
\item Boolean functions.\cr
See marked point processes.
\item \code{circulant embedding}. \cr
Introduced by Dietrich & Newsam (1993) and Wood and Chan (1994).
Circulant embedding is a fast simulation method based on
Fourier transformations. It is garantueed to be an exact method
for covariance functions with finite support, e.g. the spherical
model.
See also \code{cutoff embedding} and \code{intrinsic embedding} for
variants of the method.
\item \code{cutoff embedding}. \cr
Modified circulant embedding method so that exact simulation is guaranteed
for further covariance models, e.g. the whittle matern model.
In fact, the circulant embedding is called with the cutoff
hypermodel, see \command{\link{RMmodel}}, and \eqn{A=B} there.
\code{cutoff embedding} halfens the maximum number of
elements models used to define the covariance function of interest
(from 10 to 5).
Here, multiplicative models are not allowed (yet).
\item \code{direct matrix decomposition}.\cr
This method is based on the well-known method for simulating
any multivariate Gaussian distribution, using the square root of the
covariance matrix. The method is pretty slow and limited to
about 8000 points, i.e. a 20x20x20 grid in three dimensions.
This implementation can use the Cholesky decomposition and
the singular value decomposition.
It allows for arbitrary points and arbitrary grids.
\item \code{hyperplane method}.\cr
The method is based on a tessellation of the space by
hyperplanes. Each cell takes a spatially constant value
of an i.i.d. random variables. The superposition of several
such random fields yields approximatively a Gaussian random field.
\item \code{intrinsic embedding}. \cr
Modified circulant embedding so that exact simulation is guaranteed
for further \emph{variogram} models, e.g. the fractal brownian one.
Note that the simulated random field is always \emph{non-stationary}.
In fact, the circulant embedding is called with the Stein
hypermodel, see \command{\link{RMmodel}}, and \eqn{A=B} there.
Here, multiplicative models are not allowed (yet).
\item Marked point processes.\cr
Some methods are based on marked point process
\eqn{\Pi=\bigcup [x_i,m_i]}{P = ([x_1,m_1], [x_2,m_2], ...)}
where the marks \eqn{m_i}{m_i}
are deterministic or i.i.d. random functions on \eqn{R^d}{R^d}.
\itemize{
\item \code{add.MPP} (Random coins).\cr
Here the functions are elements
of the intersection \eqn{L_1 \cap L_2}{(L1 cap L2)}
of the Hilbert spaces \eqn{L_1}{L1} and \eqn{L_2}{L2}.
A random field Z is obtained by adding the marks:
\deqn{ Z(\cdot) = \sum_{[x_i,m_i] \in \Pi} m_i(\cdot - x_i)}{
Z(.) = sum_i m_i( . - x_i)}
In this package, only stationary Poisson point fields
are allowed
as underlying unmarked point processes.
Thus, if the marks \eqn{m_i}{m_i}
are all indicator functions, we obtain
a Poisson random field. If the intensity of the Poisson
process is high we obtain an approximative Gaussian random
field by the central limit theorem - this is the
\code{add.mpp} method.
\item \code{max.MPP} (Boolean functions).\cr
If the random functions are multiplied by suitable,
independent random values, and then the maximum is
taken, a max-stable random field with unit Frechet margins
is obtained - this is the \code{max.mpp}
method.
}
\item \code{nugget}.\cr
The method allows for generating a random field of
independent Gaussian random variables.
This method is called automatically if the nugget
effect is positive except the method \code{"circulant embedding"}
or \code{"direct"} has been explicitly chosen.
The method has been extended to zonal anisotropies, see
also argument \code{nugget.tol} in \command{\link{RFoptions}}.
\item \code{particular} method\cr
-- details missing --
\item Random coins.\cr
See marked point processes.
\item \code{sequential}
This method is programmed for spatio-temporal models
where the field is modelled sequentially in the time direction
conditioned on the previous \eqn{k} instances.
For \eqn{k=5} the method has its limits for about 1000 spatial
points. It is an approximative method. The larger \eqn{k} the
better.
It also works for certain grids where the last dimension should
contain the highest number of grid points.
\item \code{spectral TBM} (Spectral turning bands).\cr
The principle of \code{spectral TBM}
does not differ from the other
turning bands methods. However, line simulations are performed by a
spectral technique (Mantoglou and Wilson, 1982).
The standard method
allows for the simulation of 2-dimensional random
fields defined on arbitrary points or arbitrary grids. Here, a realisation is given as the cosine with random
amplitude and random phase.
\item \code{TBM2}, \code{TBM3} (Turning bands methods; turning layers).\cr
It is generally difficult to use the turning bands method
(\code{TBM2}) directly
in the 2-dimensional space.
Instead, 2-dimensional random fields are frequently obtained
by simulating a 3-dimensional random field (using
\code{TBM3}) and taking a 2-dimensional cross-section.
TBM3 allows for multiplicative models; in case of anisotropy the
anisotropy matrices must be multiples of the first matrix or the
anisotropy matrix consists of a time component only (i.e. all
components are zero except the very last one).\cr
\code{TBM2} and \code{TBM3} allow for arbitrary points, and
arbitrary grids
(arbitrary number of points in each direction, arbitrary grid length
for each direction).
\bold{Note:} Both the precision and the simulation time
depend heavily on \code{TBM*.linesimustep} and
\code{TBM*.linesimufactor}
that can be set by \command{\link{RFoptions}}.
For covariance models with larger values of the scale parameter,
\code{TBM*.linesimufactor=2} is too small.
The turning layers are used for the simulations with time component.
Here,
if the model is a
multiplicative covariance function then the
product may contain matrices with pure time component. All
the other matrices must be equal up to a factor and the temporal
part of the anisotropy matrix (right column) may contain only
zeros, except the very last entry.
}
}
\note{Most methods possess additional arguments,
see \code{\link{RFoptions}()}
that control the precision of the result. The default arguments
are chosen such that the simulations are fine for many models
and their parameters.
The example in \code{\link{RFvariogram}()}
shows a way of checking the precision.
}
\references{
Gneiting, T. and Schlather, M. (2004)
Statistical modeling with covariance functions.
\emph{In preparation.}
Lantuejoul, Ch. (2002) \emph{Geostatistical simulation.}
\bold{New York:} Springer.
Schlather, M. (1999) \emph{An introduction to positive definite
functions and to unconditional simulation of random fields.}
Technical report ST 99-10, Dept. of Maths and Statistics,
Lancaster University.
Original work:
\itemize{
\item Circulant embedding:
Chan, G. and Wood, A.T.A. (1997)
An algorithm for simulating stationary Gaussian random fields.
\emph{J. R. Stat. Soc., Ser. C} \bold{46}, 171-181.
Dietrich, C.R. and Newsam, G.N. (1993)
A fast and exact method for multidimensional Gaussian
stochastic simulations.
\emph{Water Resour. Res.} \bold{29}, 2861-2869.
Dietrich, C.R. and Newsam, G.N. (1996)
A fast and exact method for multidimensional {G}aussian stochastic
simulations: Extensions to realizations conditioned on direct and
indirect measurement
\emph{Water Resour. Res.} \bold{32}, 1643-1652.
Wood, A.T.A. and Chan, G. (1994)
Simulation of stationary Gaussian processes in \eqn{[0,1]^d}{[0,1]^d}
\emph{J. Comput. Graph. Stat.} \bold{3}, 409-432.
The code used in \cite{RandomFields} is based on
Dietrich and Newsam (1996).
\item Intrinsic embedding and Cutoff embedding:
Stein, M.L. (2002)
Fast and exact simulation of fractional Brownian surfaces.
\emph{J. Comput. Graph. Statist.} \bold{11}, 587--599.
Gneiting, T., Sevcikova, H., Percival, D.B., Schlather, M. and
Jiang, Y. (2005)
Fast and Exact Simulation of Large Gaussian Lattice Systems in
\eqn{R^2}: Exploring the Limits
\emph{J. Comput. Graph. Statist.} Submitted.
\item Markov Gaussian Random Field:
Rue, H. (2001) Fast sampling of Gaussian Markov random fields.
\emph{J. R. Statist. Soc., Ser. B}, \bold{63} (2), 325-338.
Rue, H., Held, L. (2005) \emph{Gaussian Markov Random Fields:
Theory and Applications.}
Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, no \bold{104},
Chapman \& Hall.
\item Turning bands method (TBM), turning layers:
Dietrich, C.R. (1995) A simple and efficient space domain implementation
of the turning bands method. \emph{Water Resour. Res.} \bold{31},
147-156.
Mantoglou, A. and Wilson, J.L. (1982) The turning bands method for
simulation of random fields using line generation by a spectral
method. \emph{Water. Resour. Res.} \bold{18}, 1379-1394.
Matheron, G. (1973)
The intrinsic random functions and their applications.
\emph{Adv. Appl. Probab.} \bold{5}, 439-468.
Schlather, M. (2004)
Turning layers: A space-time extension of turning bands.
\emph{Submitted}
\item Random coins:
Matheron, G. (1967) \emph{Elements pour une Theorie des Milieux
Poreux}. Paris: Masson.
}
}
\section{Automatic selection algorithm}{
--- details coming soon ---
}
\me
\seealso{
\command{\link{RMmodel}},
\command{\link{RFsimulate}},
\link[=RandomFields-package]{RandomFields}.
}
\keyword{spatial}
% to do: max-stable beschreiben??
\examples{\dontshow{StartExample()}
RFgetMethodNames()
\dontshow{FinalizeExample()}
}
|