1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
|
% Generated by roxygen2: do not edit by hand
% Please edit documentation in R/measurementInvarianceCat.R
\name{measurementInvarianceCat-deprecated}
\alias{measurementInvarianceCat-deprecated}
\title{Measurement Invariance Tests for Categorical Items}
\usage{
measurementInvarianceCat(..., std.lv = FALSE, strict = FALSE,
quiet = FALSE, fit.measures = "default",
baseline.model = NULL, method = "default")
}
\arguments{
\item{...}{The same arguments as for any lavaan model. See
\code{\link[lavaan:cfa]{lavaan::cfa()}} for more information.}
\item{std.lv}{If \code{TRUE}, the fixed-factor method of scale
identification is used. If \code{FALSE}, the first variable for each
factor is used as marker variable.}
\item{strict}{If \code{TRUE}, the sequence requires `strict' invariance.
See details for more information.}
\item{quiet}{If \code{FALSE} (default), a summary is printed out containing
an overview of the different models that are fitted, together with some
model comparison tests. If \code{TRUE}, no summary is printed.}
\item{fit.measures}{Fit measures used to calculate the differences between
nested models.}
\item{baseline.model}{custom baseline model passed to
\code{\link[lavaan:fitMeasures]{lavaan::fitMeasures()}}}
\item{method}{The method used to calculate likelihood ratio test. See
\code{\link[lavaan:lavTestLRT]{lavaan::lavTestLRT()}} for available options}
}
\value{
Invisibly, all model fits in the sequence are returned as a list.
}
\description{
Testing measurement invariance across groups using a typical sequence of
model comparison tests.
}
\details{
Theta parameterization is used to represent SEM for categorical items. That
is, residual variances are modeled instead of the total variance of
underlying normal variate for each item. Five models can be tested based on
different constraints across groups.
\enumerate{
\item Model 1: configural invariance. The same factor structure is imposed
on all groups.
\item Model 2: weak invariance. The factor loadings are constrained to be
equal across groups.
\item Model 3: strong invariance. The factor loadings and thresholds are
constrained to be equal across groups.
\item Model 4: strict invariance. The factor loadings, thresholds and
residual variances are constrained to be equal across groups.
For categorical variables, all residual variances are fixed as 1.
\item Model 5: The factor loadings, threshoulds, residual variances and
means are constrained to be equal across groups.
}
However, if all items have two items (dichotomous), scalar invariance and
weak invariance cannot be separated because thresholds need to be equal
across groups for scale identification. Users can specify \code{strict}
option to include the strict invariance model for the invariance testing.
See the further details of scale identification and different
parameterization in Millsap and Yun-Tein (2004).
}
\examples{
\donttest{
syntax <- ' f1 =~ u1 + u2 + u3 + u4'
measurementInvarianceCat(model = syntax, data = datCat, group = "g",
parameterization = "theta", estimator = "wlsmv",
ordered = c("u1", "u2", "u3", "u4"))
}
}
\references{
Millsap, R. E., & Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial
invariance in ordered-categorical measures. \emph{Multivariate Behavioral
Research, 39}(3), 479--515. \doi{10.1207/S15327906MBR3903_4}
}
\seealso{
\code{\link[=semTools-deprecated]{semTools-deprecated()}}
}
\author{
Sunthud Pornprasertmanit (\email{psunthud@gmail.com})
Yves Rosseel (Ghent University; \email{Yves.Rosseel@UGent.be})
Terrence D. Jorgensen (University of Amsterdam; \email{TJorgensen314@gmail.com})
}
\keyword{internal}
|
