File: resolvers.md

package info (click to toggle)
ruby-graphql 2.2.17-1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid, trixie
  • size: 9,584 kB
  • sloc: ruby: 67,505; ansic: 1,753; yacc: 831; javascript: 331; makefile: 6
file content (212 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 6,406 bytes parent folder | download
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
---
layout: guide
doc_stub: false
search: true
section: Fields
title: Resolvers
desc: Reusable, extendable resolution logic for complex fields
index: 2
redirect_from:
  - /fields/functions
---

A {{ "GraphQL::Schema::Resolver" | api_doc }} is a container for field signature and resolution logic. It can be attached to a field with the `resolver:` keyword:

```ruby
# Use the resolver class to execute this field
field :pending_orders, resolver: PendingOrders
```

Under the hood, {{ "GraphQL::Schema::Mutation" | api_doc }} is a specialized subclass of `Resolver`.

## First, ask yourself ...

Do you really need a `Resolver`? Putting logic in a Resolver has some downsides:

- Since it's coupled to GraphQL, it's harder to test than a plain ol' Ruby object in your app
- Since the base class comes from GraphQL-Ruby, it's subject to upstream changes which may require updates in your code

Here are a few alternatives to consider:

- Put display logic (sorting, filtering, etc.) into a plain ol' Ruby class in your app, and test that class
- Hook up that object with a method, for example:

```ruby
field :recommended_items, [Types::Item], null: false
def recommended_items
  ItemRecommendation.new(user: context[:viewer]).items
end
```

- If you have lots of arguments to share, use a class method to generate fields, for example:

```ruby
# Generate a field which returns a filtered, sorted list of items
def self.items_field(name, override_options, &block)
  # Prepare options
  default_field_options = { type: [Types::Item], null: false }
  field_options = default_field_options.merge(override_options)
  # Create the field
  field(name, **field_options) do
    argument :order_by, Types::ItemOrder, required: false
    argument :category, Types::ItemCategory, required: false
    # Allow an override block to add more arguments
    instance_eval(&block) if block_given?
  end
end

# Then use the generator to create a field:
items_field(:recommended_items) do |field|
  field.argument :similar_to_product_id, ID, required: false
end
# Implement the field
def recommended_items
  # ...
end
```

As a matter of code organization, that class method could be put in a module and shared between different classes that need it.

- If you need the _same_ logic shared between several objects, consider using a Ruby module and its `self.included` hook, for example:

```ruby
module HasRecommendedItems
  def self.included(child_class)
    # attach the field here
    child_class.field(:recommended_items, [Types::Item], null: false)
  end

  # then implement the field
  def recommended_items
    # ...
  end
end

# Add the field to some objects:
class Types::User < BaseObject
  include HasRecommendedItems # adds the field
end
```

- If the module approach looks good to you, also consider {% internal_link "Interfaces", "/type_definitions/interfaces" %}. They also share behavior between objects (since they're just modules that get included, after all), and they expose that commonality to clients via introspection.

## When do you really need a resolver?

So, if there are other, better options, why does `Resolver` exist? Here are a few specific advantages:

- __Isolation__. A `Resolver` is instantiated for each call to the field, so its instance variables are private to that object. If you need to use instance variables for some reason, this helps. You have a guarantee that those values won't hang around when the work is done.
- __Complex Schema Generation__. `RelayClassicMutation` (which is a `Resolver` subclass) generates input types and return types for each mutation. Using a `Resolver` class makes it easier to implement, share and extend this code generation logic.

## Using `resolver`

Use the base resolver class:

```ruby
module Resolvers
  class RecommendedItems < BaseResolver
    type [Types::Item], null: false
    description "Items this user might like"

    argument :order_by, Types::ItemOrder, required: false
    argument :category, Types::ItemCategory, required: false

    def resolve(order_by: nil, category: nil)
      # call your application logic here:
      recommendations = ItemRecommendation.new(
        viewer: context[:viewer],
        recommended_for: object,
        order_by: order_by,
        category: category,
      )
      # return the list of items
      recommendations.items
    end
  end
end
```

And attach it to your field:

```ruby
class Types::User < Types::BaseObject
  field :recommended_items, resolver: Resolvers::RecommendedItems
end
```

Since the `Resolver` lifecycle is managed by the GraphQL runtime, the best way to test it is to execute GraphQL queries and check the results.

### Nesting resolvers of the same type

You may run into cyclical loading issues when using a resolver within the definition of the type the resolver returns e.g.

```ruby
# app/graphql/types/query_type.rb

module Types
  class QueryType < Types::BaseObject
    field :tasks, resolver: Resolvers::TasksResolver
  end
end

# app/graphql/types/task_type.rb

module Types
  class TaskType < Types::BaseObject
    field :title, String, null: false
    field :tasks, resolver: Resolvers::TasksResolver
  end
end

# app/graphql/resolvers/tasks_resolver.rb

module Resolvers
  class TasksResolver < BaseResolver
    type [Types::TaskType], null: false

    def resolve
      []
    end
  end
end
```

The above can produce the following error: `Failed to build return type for Task.tasks from nil: Unexpected type input:  (NilClass)`.

A simple solution is to express the type as a string in the resolver:

```ruby
module Resolvers
  class TasksResolver < BaseResolver
    type "[Types::TaskType]", null: false

    def resolve
      []
    end
  end
end
```

In doing so, you can defer the loading of the type class until the nested resolver has already been loaded.

# Extensions

In cases when you want your resolvers to add some extensions to the field they resolve, you can use `extension` method, which accepts extension class and options. Multiple extensions can be configured for a single resolver.

```ruby
class GreetingExtension < GraphQL::Schema::FieldExtension
  def resolve(object:, arguments:, **rest)
    name = yield(object, arguments)
    "#{options[:greeting]}, #{name}!"
  end
end

class ResolverWithExtension < BaseResolver
  type String, null: false

  extension GreetingExtension, greeting: "Hi"

  def resolve
    "Robert"
  end
end
```