1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217
|
module examples/systems/views
/*
* Model of views in object-oriented programming.
*
* Two object references, called the view and the backing,
* are related by a view mechanism when changes to the
* backing are automatically propagated to the view. Note
* that the state of a view need not be a projection of the
* state of the backing; the keySet method of Map, for
* example, produces two view relationships, and for the
* one in which the map is modified by changes to the key
* set, the value of the new map cannot be determined from
* the key set. Note that in the iterator view mechanism,
* the iterator is by this definition the backing object,
* since changes are propagated from iterator to collection
* and not vice versa. Oddly, a reference may be a view of
* more than one backing: there can be two iterators on the
* same collection, eg. A reference cannot be a view under
* more than one view type.
*
* A reference is made dirty when it is a backing for a view
* with which it is no longer related by the view invariant.
* This usually happens when a view is modified, either
* directly or via another backing. For example, changing a
* collection directly when it has an iterator invalidates
* it, as does changing the collection through one iterator
* when there are others.
*
* More work is needed if we want to model more closely the
* failure of an iterator when its collection is invalidated.
*
* As a terminological convention, when there are two
* complementary view relationships, we will give them types
* t and t'. For example, KeySetView propagates from map to
* set, and KeySetView' propagates from set to map.
*
* author: Daniel Jackson
*/
open util/ordering[State] as so
open util/relation as rel
sig Ref {}
sig Object {}
-- t->b->v in views when v is view of type t of backing b
-- dirty contains refs that have been invalidated
sig State {
refs: set Ref,
obj: refs -> one Object,
views: ViewType -> refs -> refs,
dirty: set refs
-- , anyviews: Ref -> Ref -- for visualization
}
-- {anyviews = ViewType.views}
sig Map extends Object {
keys: set Ref,
map: keys -> one Ref
}{all s: State | keys + Ref.map in s.refs}
sig MapRef extends Ref {}
fact {State.obj[MapRef] in Map}
sig Iterator extends Object {
left, done: set Ref,
lastRef: lone done
}{all s: State | done + left + lastRef in s.refs}
sig IteratorRef extends Ref {}
fact {State.obj[IteratorRef] in Iterator}
sig Set extends Object {
elts: set Ref
}{all s: State | elts in s.refs}
sig SetRef extends Ref {}
fact {State.obj[SetRef] in Set}
abstract sig ViewType {}
one sig KeySetView, KeySetView', IteratorView extends ViewType {}
fact ViewTypes {
State.views[KeySetView] in MapRef -> SetRef
State.views[KeySetView'] in SetRef -> MapRef
State.views[IteratorView] in IteratorRef -> SetRef
all s: State | s.views[KeySetView] = ~(s.views[KeySetView'])
}
/**
* mods is refs modified directly or by view mechanism
* doesn't handle possibility of modifying an object and its view at once?
* should we limit frame conds to non-dirty refs?
*/
pred modifies [pre, post: State, rs: set Ref] {
let vr = pre.views[ViewType], mods = rs.*vr {
all r: pre.refs - mods | pre.obj[r] = post.obj[r]
all b: mods, v: pre.refs, t: ViewType |
b->v in pre.views[t] => viewFrame [t, pre.obj[v], post.obj[v], post.obj[b]]
post.dirty = pre.dirty +
{b: pre.refs | some v: Ref, t: ViewType |
b->v in pre.views[t] && !viewFrame [t, pre.obj[v], post.obj[v], post.obj[b]]
}
}
}
pred allocates [pre, post: State, rs: set Ref] {
no rs & pre.refs
post.refs = pre.refs + rs
}
/**
* models frame condition that limits change to view object from v to v' when backing object changes to b'
*/
pred viewFrame [t: ViewType, v, v', b': Object] {
t in KeySetView => v'.elts = dom [b'.map]
t in KeySetView' => b'.elts = dom [v'.map]
t in KeySetView' => (b'.elts) <: (v.map) = (b'.elts) <: (v'.map)
t in IteratorView => v'.elts = b'.left + b'.done
}
pred MapRef.keySet [pre, post: State, setRefs: SetRef] {
post.obj[setRefs].elts = dom [pre.obj[this].map]
modifies [pre, post, none]
allocates [pre, post, setRefs]
post.views = pre.views + KeySetView->this->setRefs + KeySetView'->setRefs->this
}
pred MapRef.put [pre, post: State, k, v: Ref] {
post.obj[this].map = pre.obj[this].map ++ k->v
modifies [pre, post, this]
allocates [pre, post, none]
post.views = pre.views
}
pred SetRef.iterator [pre, post: State, iterRef: IteratorRef] {
let i = post.obj[iterRef] {
i.left = pre.obj[this].elts
no i.done + i.lastRef
}
modifies [pre,post,none]
allocates [pre, post, iterRef]
post.views = pre.views + IteratorView->iterRef->this
}
pred IteratorRef.remove [pre, post: State] {
let i = pre.obj[this], i' = post.obj[this] {
i'.left = i.left
i'.done = i.done - i.lastRef
no i'.lastRef
}
modifies [pre,post,this]
allocates [pre, post, none]
pre.views = post.views
}
pred IteratorRef.next [pre, post: State, ref: Ref] {
let i = pre.obj[this], i' = post.obj[this] {
ref in i.left
i'.left = i.left - ref
i'.done = i.done + ref
i'.lastRef = ref
}
modifies [pre, post, this]
allocates [pre, post, none]
pre.views = post.views
}
pred IteratorRef.hasNext [s: State] {
some s.obj[this].left
}
assert zippishOK {
all
ks, vs: SetRef,
m: MapRef,
ki, vi: IteratorRef,
k, v: Ref |
let s0=so/first,
s1=so/next[s0],
s2=so/next[s1],
s3=so/next[s2],
s4=so/next[s3],
s5=so/next[s4],
s6=so/next[s5],
s7=so/next[s6] |
({
precondition [s0, ks, vs, m]
no s0.dirty
ks.iterator [s0, s1, ki]
vs.iterator [s1, s2, vi]
ki.hasNext [s2]
vi.hasNext [s2]
ki.this/next [s2, s3, k]
vi.this/next [s3, s4, v]
m.put [s4, s5, k, v]
ki.remove [s5, s6]
vi.remove [s6, s7]
} => no State.dirty)
}
pred precondition [pre: State, ks, vs, m: Ref] {
// all these conditions and other errors discovered in scope of 6 but 8,3
// in initial state, must have view invariants hold
(all t: ViewType, b, v: pre.refs |
b->v in pre.views[t] => viewFrame [t, pre.obj[v], pre.obj[v], pre.obj[b]])
// sets are not aliases
-- ks != vs
// sets are not views of map
-- no (ks+vs)->m & ViewType.pre.views
// no iterator currently on either set
-- no Ref->(ks+vs) & ViewType.pre.views
}
check zippishOK for 6 but 8 State, 3 ViewType expect 1
/**
* experiment with controlling heap size
*/
fact {all s: State | #s.obj < 5}
|