File: template.md

package info (click to toggle)
rust-swc-core 35.0.0~ds-2
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid
  • size: 62,816 kB
  • sloc: javascript: 873; xml: 538; sh: 358; makefile: 35; python: 5
file content (72 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 2,294 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (2)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
# [short title of solved problem and solution]

-   Status: [proposed | rejected | accepted | deprecated | … | superseded by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md)] <!-- optional -->
-   Deciders: [list everyone involved in the decision] <!-- optional -->
-   Date: [YYYY-MM-DD when the decision was last updated] <!-- optional -->

Technical Story: [description | ticket/issue URL] <!-- optional -->

## Context and Problem Statement

[Describe the context and problem statement, e.g., in free form using two to three sentences. You may want to articulate the problem in form of a question.]

## Decision Drivers <!-- optional -->

-   [driver 1, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
-   [driver 2, e.g., a force, facing concern, …]
-   … <!-- numbers of drivers can vary -->

## Considered Options

-   [option 1]
-   [option 2]
-   [option 3]
-   … <!-- numbers of options can vary -->

## Decision Outcome

Chosen option: "[option 1]", because [justification. e.g., only option, which meets k.o. criterion decision driver | which resolves force force | … | comes out best (see below)].

### Positive Consequences <!-- optional -->

-   [e.g., improvement of quality attribute satisfaction, follow-up decisions required, …]
-   …

### Negative Consequences <!-- optional -->

-   [e.g., compromising quality attribute, follow-up decisions required, …]
-   …

## Pros and Cons of the Options <!-- optional -->

### [option 1]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->

-   Good, because [argument a]
-   Good, because [argument b]
-   Bad, because [argument c]
-   … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->

### [option 2]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->

-   Good, because [argument a]
-   Good, because [argument b]
-   Bad, because [argument c]
-   … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->

### [option 3]

[example | description | pointer to more information | …] <!-- optional -->

-   Good, because [argument a]
-   Good, because [argument b]
-   Bad, because [argument c]
-   … <!-- numbers of pros and cons can vary -->

## Links <!-- optional -->

-   [Link type] [Link to ADR] <!-- example: Refined by [ADR-0005](0005-example.md) -->
-   … <!-- numbers of links can vary -->