1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
|
//@ revisions: stock with_negative_coherence
//@[with_negative_coherence] known-bug: unknown
// Ideally this would work, but we don't use `&'a T` to imply that `T: 'a`
// which is required for `&'a T: !MyPredicate` to hold. This is similar to the
// test `negative-coherence-placeholder-region-constraints-on-unification.explicit.stderr`
#![feature(negative_impls)]
#![cfg_attr(with_negative_coherence, feature(with_negative_coherence))]
trait MyPredicate<'a> {}
impl<'a, T> !MyPredicate<'a> for &'a T where T: 'a {}
trait MyTrait<'a> {}
impl<'a, T: MyPredicate<'a>> MyTrait<'a> for T {}
impl<'a, T> MyTrait<'a> for &'a T {}
//[stock]~^ ERROR: conflicting implementations of trait `MyTrait<'_>` for type `&_`
fn main() {}
|
