File: expect_lint_from_macro.rs

package info (click to toggle)
rustc 1.85.0%2Bdfsg3-1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: experimental, forky, sid, trixie
  • size: 893,396 kB
  • sloc: xml: 158,127; python: 35,830; javascript: 19,497; cpp: 19,002; sh: 17,245; ansic: 13,127; asm: 4,376; makefile: 1,051; perl: 29; lisp: 29; ruby: 19; sql: 11
file content (40 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,138 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (4)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
//@ check-pass

#![warn(unused_variables)]

macro_rules! trigger_unused_variables_macro {
    () => {
        let x = 0;
        //~^ WARNING unused variable: `x` [unused_variables]
        //~| WARNING unused variable: `x` [unused_variables]
    };
}

pub fn check_macro() {
    // This should trigger the `unused_variables` from inside the macro
    trigger_unused_variables_macro!();
}

// This should be fulfilled by the macro
#[expect(unused_variables)]
pub fn check_expect_on_item() {
    trigger_unused_variables_macro!();
}

pub fn check_expect_on_macro() {
    // This should be fulfilled by the macro
    #[expect(unused_variables)]
    trigger_unused_variables_macro!();

    // FIXME: Lint attributes currently don't work directly on macros, and
    // therefore also doesn't work for the new `expect` attribute. This bug
    // is being tracked in rust#87391. The test will until then produce two
    // warnings about the unused variable x.
    //
    // The expectation is still marked as fulfilled. I'm not totally why but
    // my guess is that this will remain working when rust#87391 has been fixed.
}

fn main() {

}