1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361
|
Coding conventions in the Samba tree
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.. contents::
===========
Quick Start
===========
Coding style guidelines are about reducing the number of unnecessary
reformatting patches and making things easier for developers to work
together.
You don't have to like them or even agree with them, but once put in place
we all have to abide by them (or vote to change them). However, coding
style should never outweigh coding itself and so the guidelines
described here are hopefully easy enough to follow as they are very
common and supported by tools and editors.
The basic style, also mentioned in prog_guide4.txt, is the Linux kernel
coding style (See Documentation/CodingStyle in the kernel source tree). This
closely matches what most Samba developers use already anyways, with a few
exceptions as mentioned below.
But to save you the trouble of reading the Linux kernel style guide, here
are the highlights.
* Maximum Line Width is 80 Characters
The reason is not about people with low-res screens but rather sticking
to 80 columns prevents you from easily nesting more than one level of
if statements or other code blocks. Use source3/script/count_80_col.pl
to check your changes.
* Use 8 Space Tabs to Indent
No whitespace fillers.
* No Trailing Whitespace
Use source3/script/strip_trail_ws.pl to clean up your files before
committing.
* Follow the K&R guidelines. We won't go through all of them here. Do you
have a copy of "The C Programming Language" anyways right? You can also use
the format_indent.sh script found in source3/script/ if all else fails.
============
Editor Hints
============
Emacs
-----
Add the follow to your $HOME/.emacs file:
(add-hook 'c-mode-hook
(lambda ()
(c-set-style "linux")
(c-toggle-auto-state)))
Vi
--
(Thanks to SATOH Fumiyasu <fumiyas@osstech.jp> for these hints):
For the basic vi editor included with all variants of \*nix, add the
following to $HOME/.exrc:
set tabstop=8
set shiftwidth=8
For Vim, the following settings in $HOME/.vimrc will also deal with
displaying trailing whitespace:
if has("syntax") && (&t_Co > 2 || has("gui_running"))
syntax on
function! ActivateInvisibleCharIndicator()
syntax match TrailingSpace "[ \t]\+$" display containedin=ALL
highlight TrailingSpace ctermbg=Red
endf
autocmd BufNewFile,BufRead * call ActivateInvisibleCharIndicator()
endif
" Show tabs, trailing whitespace, and continued lines visually
set list listchars=tab:»·,trail:·,extends:…
" highlight overly long lines same as TODOs.
set textwidth=80
autocmd BufNewFile,BufRead *.c,*.h exec 'match Todo /\%>' . &textwidth . 'v.\+/'
=========================
FAQ & Statement Reference
=========================
Comments
--------
Comments should always use the standard C syntax. C++
style comments are not currently allowed.
The lines before a comment should be empty. If the comment directly
belongs to the following code, there should be no empty line
after the comment, except if the comment contains a summary
of multiple following code blocks.
This is good:
...
int i;
/*
* This is a multi line comment,
* which explains the logical steps we have to do:
*
* 1. We need to set i=5, because...
* 2. We need to call complex_fn1
*/
/* This is a one line comment about i = 5. */
i = 5;
/*
* This is a multi line comment,
* explaining the call to complex_fn1()
*/
ret = complex_fn1();
if (ret != 0) {
...
/**
* @brief This is a doxygen comment.
*
* This is a more detailed explanation of
* this simple function.
*
* @param[in] param1 The parameter value of the function.
*
* @param[out] result1 The result value of the function.
*
* @return 0 on success and -1 on error.
*/
int example(int param1, int *result1);
This is bad:
...
int i;
/*
* This is a multi line comment,
* which explains the logical steps we have to do:
*
* 1. We need to set i=5, because...
* 2. We need to call complex_fn1
*/
/* This is a one line comment about i = 5. */
i = 5;
/*
* This is a multi line comment,
* explaining the call to complex_fn1()
*/
ret = complex_fn1();
if (ret != 0) {
...
/*This is a one line comment.*/
/* This is a multi line comment,
with some more words...*/
/*
* This is a multi line comment,
* with some more words...*/
Indention & Whitespace & 80 columns
-----------------------------------
To avoid confusion, indentations have to be tabs with length 8 (not 8
' ' characters). When wrapping parameters for function calls,
align the parameter list with the first parameter on the previous line.
Use tabs to get as close as possible and then fill in the final 7
characters or less with whitespace. For example,
var1 = foo(arg1, arg2,
arg3);
The previous example is intended to illustrate alignment of function
parameters across lines and not as encourage for gratuitous line
splitting. Never split a line before columns 70 - 79 unless you
have a really good reason. Be smart about formatting.
If, switch, & Code blocks
-------------------------
Always follow an 'if' keyword with a space but don't include additional
spaces following or preceding the parentheses in the conditional.
This is good:
if (x == 1)
This is bad:
if ( x == 1 )
Yes we have a lot of code that uses the second form and we are trying
to clean it up without being overly intrusive.
Note that this is a rule about parentheses following keywords and not
functions. Don't insert a space between the name and left parentheses when
invoking functions.
Braces for code blocks used by for, if, switch, while, do..while, etc.
should begin on the same line as the statement keyword and end on a line
of their own. You should always include braces, even if the block only
contains one statement. NOTE: Functions are different and the beginning left
brace should be located in the first column on the next line.
If the beginning statement has to be broken across lines due to length,
the beginning brace should be on a line of its own.
The exception to the ending rule is when the closing brace is followed by
another language keyword such as else or the closing while in a do..while
loop.
Good examples:
if (x == 1) {
printf("good\n");
}
for (x=1; x<10; x++) {
print("%d\n", x);
}
for (really_really_really_really_long_var_name=0;
really_really_really_really_long_var_name<10;
really_really_really_really_long_var_name++)
{
print("%d\n", really_really_really_really_long_var_name);
}
do {
printf("also good\n");
} while (1);
Bad examples:
while (1)
{
print("I'm in a loop!\n"); }
for (x=1;
x<10;
x++)
{
print("no good\n");
}
if (i < 10)
print("I should be in braces.\n");
Goto
----
While many people have been academically taught that "goto"s are
fundamentally evil, they can greatly enhance readability and reduce memory
leaks when used as the single exit point from a function. But in no Samba
world what so ever is a goto outside of a function or block of code a good
idea.
Good Examples:
int function foo(int y)
{
int *z = NULL;
int ret = 0;
if (y < 10) {
z = malloc(sizeof(int)*y);
if (!z) {
ret = 1;
goto done;
}
}
print("Allocated %d elements.\n", y);
done:
if (z) {
free(z);
}
return ret;
}
Checking Pointer Values
-----------------------
When invoking functions that return pointer values, either of the following
are acceptable. Use your best judgement and choose the more readable option.
Remember that many other persons will review it:
if ((x = malloc(sizeof(short)*10)) == NULL ) {
fprintf(stderr, "Unable to alloc memory!\n");
}
or:
x = malloc(sizeof(short)*10);
if (!x) {
fprintf(stderr, "Unable to alloc memory!\n");
}
Primitive Data Types
--------------------
Samba has large amounts of historical code which makes use of data types
commonly supported by the C99 standard. However, at the time such types
as boolean and exact width integers did not exist and Samba developers
were forced to provide their own. Now that these types are guaranteed to
be available either as part of the compiler C99 support or from
lib/replace/, new code should adhere to the following conventions:
* Booleans are of type "bool" (not BOOL)
* Boolean values are "true" and "false" (not True or False)
* Exact width integers are of type [u]int[8|16|32|64]_t
Typedefs
--------
Samba tries to avoid "typedef struct { .. } x_t;" so we do always try to use
"struct x { .. };". We know there are still such typedefs in the code,
but for new code, please don't do that anymore.
Make use of helper variables
----------------------------
Please try to avoid passing function calls as function parameters
in new code. This makes the code much easier to read and
it's also easier to use the "step" command within gdb.
Good Example:
char *name;
name = get_some_name();
if (name == NULL) {
...
}
ret = some_function_my_name(name);
...
Bad Example:
ret = some_function_my_name(get_some_name());
...
|