1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
1561
1562
1563
1564
1565
1566
1567
1568
1569
1570
1571
1572
1573
1574
1575
1576
1577
1578
1579
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584
1585
1586
1587
1588
1589
1590
1591
1592
1593
1594
1595
1596
1597
1598
1599
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1660
1661
1662
1663
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
1671
1672
1673
1674
1675
1676
1677
1678
1679
1680
1681
1682
1683
1684
1685
1686
1687
1688
1689
1690
1691
1692
1693
1694
1695
1696
1697
1698
1699
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1760
1761
1762
1763
1764
1765
1766
1767
1768
1769
1770
1771
1772
1773
1774
1775
1776
1777
1778
1779
1780
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
1788
1789
1790
1791
1792
1793
1794
1795
1796
1797
1798
1799
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
1878
1879
1880
1881
1882
1883
1884
1885
1886
1887
1888
1889
1890
1891
1892
1893
1894
1895
1896
1897
1898
1899
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
2054
2055
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060
2061
2062
2063
2064
2065
2066
2067
2068
2069
2070
2071
2072
2073
2074
2075
2076
2077
2078
2079
2080
2081
2082
2083
2084
2085
2086
2087
2088
2089
2090
2091
2092
2093
2094
2095
2096
2097
2098
2099
2100
2101
2102
2103
2104
2105
2106
2107
2108
2109
2110
2111
2112
2113
2114
2115
2116
2117
2118
2119
2120
2121
2122
2123
2124
2125
2126
2127
2128
2129
2130
2131
2132
2133
2134
2135
2136
2137
2138
2139
2140
2141
2142
2143
2144
2145
2146
2147
2148
2149
2150
2151
2152
2153
2154
2155
2156
2157
2158
2159
2160
2161
2162
2163
2164
2165
2166
2167
2168
2169
2170
2171
2172
2173
2174
2175
2176
2177
2178
2179
2180
2181
2182
2183
2184
2185
2186
2187
2188
2189
2190
2191
2192
2193
2194
2195
2196
2197
2198
2199
2200
2201
2202
2203
2204
2205
2206
2207
2208
2209
2210
2211
2212
2213
2214
2215
2216
2217
2218
2219
2220
2221
2222
2223
2224
2225
2226
2227
2228
2229
2230
2231
2232
2233
2234
2235
2236
2237
2238
2239
2240
2241
2242
2243
2244
2245
2246
2247
2248
2249
2250
2251
2252
2253
2254
2255
2256
2257
2258
2259
2260
2261
2262
2263
2264
2265
2266
2267
2268
2269
2270
2271
2272
2273
2274
2275
2276
2277
2278
2279
2280
2281
2282
2283
2284
2285
2286
2287
2288
2289
2290
2291
2292
2293
2294
2295
2296
2297
2298
2299
2300
2301
2302
2303
2304
2305
2306
2307
2308
2309
2310
2311
2312
2313
2314
2315
2316
2317
2318
2319
2320
2321
2322
2323
2324
2325
2326
2327
2328
2329
2330
2331
2332
2333
2334
2335
2336
2337
2338
2339
2340
2341
2342
2343
2344
2345
2346
2347
2348
2349
2350
2351
2352
2353
2354
2355
2356
2357
2358
2359
2360
2361
2362
2363
2364
2365
2366
2367
2368
2369
2370
2371
2372
2373
2374
2375
2376
2377
2378
2379
2380
2381
2382
2383
2384
2385
2386
2387
2388
2389
2390
2391
2392
2393
2394
2395
2396
2397
2398
2399
2400
2401
2402
2403
2404
2405
2406
2407
2408
2409
2410
2411
2412
2413
2414
2415
2416
2417
2418
2419
2420
2421
2422
2423
2424
2425
2426
2427
2428
2429
2430
2431
2432
2433
2434
2435
2436
2437
2438
2439
2440
2441
2442
2443
2444
2445
2446
2447
2448
2449
2450
2451
2452
2453
2454
2455
2456
2457
2458
2459
2460
2461
2462
2463
2464
2465
2466
2467
2468
2469
2470
2471
2472
2473
2474
2475
2476
2477
2478
2479
2480
2481
2482
2483
2484
2485
2486
2487
2488
2489
2490
2491
2492
2493
2494
2495
2496
2497
2498
2499
2500
2501
2502
2503
2504
2505
2506
2507
2508
2509
2510
2511
2512
2513
2514
2515
2516
2517
2518
2519
2520
2521
2522
2523
2524
2525
2526
2527
2528
2529
2530
2531
2532
2533
2534
2535
2536
2537
2538
2539
2540
2541
2542
2543
2544
2545
2546
2547
2548
2549
2550
2551
2552
2553
2554
2555
2556
2557
2558
2559
2560
2561
2562
2563
2564
2565
2566
2567
2568
2569
2570
2571
2572
2573
2574
2575
2576
2577
2578
2579
2580
2581
2582
2583
2584
2585
2586
2587
2588
2589
2590
2591
2592
2593
2594
2595
2596
2597
2598
2599
2600
2601
2602
2603
2604
2605
2606
2607
2608
2609
2610
2611
2612
2613
2614
2615
2616
2617
2618
2619
2620
2621
2622
2623
2624
2625
2626
2627
2628
2629
2630
2631
2632
2633
2634
2635
2636
2637
2638
2639
2640
2641
2642
2643
2644
2645
2646
2647
2648
2649
2650
2651
2652
2653
2654
2655
2656
2657
2658
2659
2660
2661
2662
2663
2664
2665
2666
2667
2668
2669
2670
2671
2672
2673
2674
2675
2676
2677
2678
2679
2680
2681
2682
2683
2684
2685
2686
2687
2688
2689
2690
2691
2692
2693
2694
2695
2696
2697
2698
2699
2700
2701
2702
2703
2704
2705
2706
2707
2708
2709
2710
2711
2712
2713
2714
2715
2716
2717
2718
2719
2720
2721
2722
2723
2724
2725
2726
2727
2728
2729
2730
2731
2732
2733
2734
2735
2736
2737
2738
2739
2740
2741
2742
2743
2744
2745
2746
2747
2748
2749
2750
2751
2752
2753
2754
2755
2756
2757
2758
2759
2760
2761
2762
2763
2764
2765
2766
2767
2768
2769
2770
2771
2772
2773
2774
2775
2776
2777
2778
2779
2780
2781
2782
2783
2784
2785
2786
2787
2788
2789
2790
2791
2792
2793
2794
2795
2796
2797
2798
2799
2800
2801
2802
2803
2804
2805
2806
2807
2808
2809
2810
2811
2812
2813
2814
2815
2816
2817
2818
2819
2820
2821
2822
2823
2824
2825
2826
2827
2828
2829
2830
2831
2832
2833
2834
2835
2836
2837
2838
2839
2840
2841
2842
2843
2844
2845
2846
2847
2848
2849
2850
2851
2852
2853
2854
2855
2856
2857
2858
2859
2860
2861
2862
2863
2864
2865
2866
2867
2868
2869
2870
2871
2872
2873
2874
2875
2876
2877
2878
2879
2880
2881
2882
2883
2884
2885
2886
2887
2888
2889
2890
2891
2892
2893
2894
2895
2896
2897
2898
2899
2900
2901
2902
2903
2904
2905
2906
2907
2908
2909
2910
2911
2912
2913
2914
2915
2916
2917
2918
2919
2920
2921
2922
2923
2924
2925
2926
2927
2928
2929
2930
2931
2932
2933
2934
2935
2936
2937
2938
2939
2940
2941
2942
2943
2944
2945
2946
2947
2948
2949
2950
2951
2952
2953
2954
2955
2956
2957
2958
2959
2960
2961
2962
2963
2964
2965
2966
2967
2968
2969
2970
2971
2972
2973
2974
2975
2976
2977
2978
2979
2980
2981
2982
2983
2984
2985
2986
2987
2988
2989
2990
2991
2992
2993
2994
2995
2996
2997
2998
2999
3000
3001
3002
3003
3004
3005
3006
3007
3008
3009
3010
3011
3012
3013
3014
3015
3016
3017
3018
3019
3020
3021
3022
3023
3024
3025
3026
3027
3028
3029
3030
3031
3032
3033
3034
3035
3036
3037
3038
3039
3040
3041
3042
3043
3044
3045
3046
3047
3048
3049
3050
3051
3052
3053
3054
3055
3056
3057
3058
3059
3060
3061
3062
3063
3064
3065
3066
3067
3068
3069
3070
3071
3072
3073
3074
3075
3076
3077
3078
3079
3080
3081
3082
3083
3084
3085
3086
3087
3088
3089
3090
3091
3092
3093
3094
3095
3096
3097
3098
3099
3100
3101
3102
3103
3104
3105
3106
3107
3108
3109
3110
3111
3112
3113
3114
3115
3116
3117
3118
3119
3120
3121
3122
3123
3124
3125
3126
3127
3128
3129
3130
3131
3132
3133
3134
3135
3136
3137
3138
3139
3140
3141
3142
3143
3144
3145
3146
3147
3148
3149
3150
3151
3152
3153
3154
3155
3156
3157
3158
3159
3160
3161
3162
3163
3164
3165
3166
3167
3168
3169
3170
3171
3172
3173
3174
3175
3176
3177
3178
3179
3180
3181
3182
3183
3184
3185
3186
3187
3188
3189
3190
3191
3192
3193
3194
3195
3196
3197
3198
3199
3200
3201
3202
3203
3204
3205
3206
3207
3208
3209
3210
3211
3212
3213
3214
3215
3216
3217
3218
3219
3220
3221
3222
3223
3224
3225
3226
3227
3228
3229
3230
3231
3232
3233
3234
3235
3236
3237
3238
3239
3240
3241
3242
3243
3244
3245
3246
3247
3248
3249
3250
3251
3252
3253
3254
3255
3256
3257
3258
3259
3260
3261
3262
3263
3264
3265
3266
3267
3268
3269
3270
3271
3272
3273
3274
3275
3276
3277
3278
3279
3280
3281
3282
3283
3284
3285
3286
3287
3288
3289
3290
3291
3292
3293
3294
3295
3296
3297
3298
3299
3300
3301
3302
3303
3304
3305
3306
3307
3308
3309
3310
3311
3312
3313
3314
3315
3316
3317
3318
3319
3320
3321
3322
3323
3324
3325
3326
3327
3328
3329
3330
3331
3332
3333
3334
3335
3336
3337
3338
3339
3340
3341
3342
3343
3344
3345
3346
3347
3348
3349
3350
3351
3352
3353
3354
3355
3356
3357
3358
3359
3360
3361
3362
3363
3364
3365
3366
3367
3368
3369
3370
3371
3372
3373
3374
3375
3376
3377
3378
3379
3380
3381
3382
3383
3384
3385
3386
3387
3388
3389
3390
3391
3392
3393
3394
3395
3396
3397
3398
3399
3400
3401
3402
3403
3404
3405
3406
3407
3408
3409
3410
3411
3412
3413
3414
3415
3416
3417
3418
3419
3420
3421
3422
3423
3424
3425
3426
3427
3428
3429
3430
3431
3432
3433
3434
3435
3436
3437
3438
3439
3440
3441
3442
3443
3444
3445
3446
3447
3448
3449
3450
3451
3452
3453
3454
3455
3456
3457
3458
3459
3460
3461
3462
3463
3464
3465
3466
3467
3468
3469
3470
3471
3472
3473
3474
3475
3476
3477
3478
3479
3480
3481
3482
3483
3484
3485
3486
3487
3488
3489
3490
3491
3492
3493
3494
3495
3496
3497
3498
3499
3500
3501
3502
3503
3504
3505
3506
3507
3508
3509
3510
3511
3512
3513
3514
3515
3516
3517
3518
3519
3520
3521
3522
3523
3524
3525
3526
3527
3528
3529
3530
3531
3532
3533
3534
3535
3536
3537
3538
3539
3540
3541
3542
3543
3544
3545
3546
3547
3548
3549
3550
3551
3552
3553
3554
3555
3556
3557
3558
3559
3560
3561
3562
3563
3564
3565
3566
3567
3568
3569
3570
3571
3572
3573
3574
3575
3576
3577
3578
3579
3580
3581
3582
3583
3584
3585
3586
3587
3588
3589
3590
3591
3592
3593
3594
3595
3596
3597
3598
3599
3600
3601
3602
3603
3604
3605
3606
3607
3608
3609
3610
3611
3612
3613
3614
3615
3616
3617
3618
3619
3620
3621
3622
3623
3624
3625
3626
3627
3628
3629
3630
3631
3632
3633
3634
3635
3636
3637
3638
3639
3640
3641
3642
3643
3644
3645
3646
3647
3648
3649
3650
3651
3652
3653
3654
3655
3656
3657
3658
3659
3660
3661
3662
3663
3664
3665
3666
3667
3668
3669
3670
3671
3672
3673
3674
3675
3676
3677
3678
3679
3680
3681
3682
3683
3684
3685
3686
3687
3688
3689
3690
3691
3692
3693
3694
3695
3696
3697
3698
3699
3700
3701
3702
3703
3704
3705
3706
3707
3708
3709
3710
3711
3712
3713
3714
3715
3716
3717
3718
3719
3720
3721
3722
3723
3724
3725
3726
3727
3728
3729
3730
3731
3732
3733
3734
3735
3736
3737
3738
3739
3740
3741
3742
3743
3744
3745
3746
3747
3748
3749
3750
3751
3752
3753
3754
3755
3756
3757
3758
3759
3760
3761
3762
3763
3764
3765
3766
3767
3768
3769
3770
3771
3772
3773
3774
3775
3776
3777
3778
3779
3780
3781
3782
3783
3784
3785
3786
3787
3788
3789
3790
3791
3792
3793
3794
3795
3796
3797
3798
3799
3800
3801
3802
3803
3804
3805
3806
3807
3808
3809
3810
3811
3812
3813
3814
3815
3816
3817
3818
3819
3820
3821
3822
3823
3824
3825
3826
3827
3828
3829
3830
3831
3832
3833
3834
3835
3836
3837
3838
3839
3840
3841
3842
3843
3844
3845
3846
3847
3848
3849
3850
3851
3852
3853
3854
3855
3856
3857
3858
3859
3860
3861
3862
3863
3864
3865
3866
3867
3868
3869
3870
3871
3872
3873
3874
3875
3876
3877
3878
3879
3880
3881
3882
3883
3884
3885
3886
3887
3888
3889
3890
3891
3892
3893
3894
3895
3896
3897
3898
3899
3900
3901
3902
3903
3904
3905
3906
3907
3908
3909
3910
3911
3912
3913
3914
3915
3916
3917
3918
3919
3920
3921
3922
3923
3924
3925
3926
3927
3928
3929
3930
3931
3932
3933
3934
3935
3936
3937
3938
3939
3940
3941
3942
3943
3944
3945
3946
3947
3948
3949
3950
3951
3952
3953
3954
3955
3956
3957
3958
3959
3960
3961
3962
3963
3964
3965
3966
3967
3968
3969
3970
3971
3972
3973
3974
3975
3976
3977
3978
3979
3980
3981
3982
3983
3984
3985
3986
3987
3988
3989
3990
3991
3992
3993
3994
3995
3996
3997
3998
3999
4000
4001
4002
4003
4004
4005
4006
4007
4008
4009
4010
4011
4012
4013
4014
4015
4016
4017
4018
4019
4020
4021
4022
4023
4024
4025
4026
4027
4028
4029
4030
4031
4032
4033
4034
4035
4036
4037
4038
4039
4040
4041
4042
4043
4044
4045
4046
4047
4048
4049
4050
4051
4052
4053
4054
4055
4056
4057
4058
4059
4060
4061
4062
4063
4064
4065
4066
4067
4068
4069
4070
4071
4072
4073
4074
4075
4076
4077
4078
4079
4080
4081
4082
4083
4084
4085
4086
4087
4088
4089
4090
4091
4092
4093
4094
4095
4096
4097
4098
4099
4100
4101
4102
4103
4104
4105
4106
4107
4108
4109
4110
4111
4112
4113
4114
4115
4116
4117
4118
4119
4120
4121
4122
4123
4124
4125
4126
4127
4128
4129
4130
4131
4132
4133
4134
4135
4136
4137
4138
4139
4140
4141
4142
4143
4144
4145
4146
4147
4148
4149
4150
4151
4152
4153
4154
4155
4156
4157
4158
4159
4160
4161
4162
4163
4164
4165
4166
4167
4168
4169
4170
4171
4172
4173
4174
4175
4176
4177
4178
4179
4180
4181
4182
4183
4184
4185
4186
4187
4188
4189
4190
4191
4192
4193
4194
4195
4196
4197
4198
4199
4200
4201
4202
4203
4204
4205
4206
4207
4208
4209
4210
4211
4212
4213
4214
4215
4216
4217
4218
4219
4220
4221
4222
4223
4224
4225
4226
4227
4228
4229
4230
4231
4232
4233
4234
4235
4236
4237
4238
4239
4240
4241
4242
4243
4244
4245
4246
4247
4248
4249
4250
4251
4252
4253
4254
4255
4256
4257
4258
4259
4260
4261
4262
4263
4264
4265
4266
4267
4268
4269
4270
4271
4272
4273
4274
4275
4276
4277
4278
4279
4280
4281
4282
4283
4284
4285
4286
4287
4288
4289
4290
4291
4292
4293
4294
4295
4296
4297
4298
4299
4300
4301
4302
4303
4304
4305
4306
4307
4308
4309
4310
4311
4312
4313
4314
4315
4316
4317
4318
4319
4320
4321
4322
4323
4324
4325
4326
4327
4328
4329
4330
4331
4332
4333
4334
4335
4336
4337
4338
4339
4340
4341
4342
4343
4344
4345
4346
4347
4348
4349
4350
4351
4352
4353
4354
4355
4356
4357
4358
4359
4360
4361
4362
4363
4364
4365
4366
4367
4368
4369
4370
4371
4372
4373
4374
4375
4376
4377
4378
4379
4380
4381
4382
4383
4384
4385
4386
4387
4388
4389
4390
4391
4392
4393
4394
4395
4396
4397
4398
4399
4400
4401
4402
4403
4404
4405
4406
4407
4408
4409
4410
4411
4412
4413
4414
4415
4416
4417
4418
4419
4420
4421
4422
4423
4424
4425
4426
4427
4428
4429
4430
4431
4432
4433
4434
4435
4436
4437
4438
4439
4440
4441
4442
4443
4444
4445
4446
4447
4448
4449
4450
4451
4452
4453
4454
4455
4456
4457
4458
4459
4460
4461
4462
4463
4464
4465
4466
4467
4468
4469
4470
4471
4472
4473
4474
4475
4476
4477
4478
4479
4480
4481
4482
4483
4484
4485
4486
4487
4488
4489
4490
4491
4492
4493
4494
4495
4496
4497
4498
4499
4500
4501
4502
4503
4504
4505
4506
4507
4508
4509
4510
4511
4512
4513
4514
4515
4516
4517
4518
4519
4520
4521
4522
4523
4524
4525
4526
4527
4528
4529
4530
4531
4532
4533
4534
4535
4536
4537
4538
4539
4540
4541
4542
4543
4544
4545
4546
4547
4548
4549
4550
4551
4552
4553
4554
4555
4556
4557
4558
4559
4560
4561
4562
4563
4564
4565
4566
4567
4568
4569
4570
4571
4572
4573
4574
4575
4576
4577
4578
4579
4580
4581
4582
4583
4584
4585
4586
4587
4588
4589
4590
4591
4592
4593
4594
4595
4596
4597
4598
4599
4600
4601
4602
4603
4604
4605
4606
4607
4608
4609
4610
4611
4612
4613
4614
4615
4616
4617
4618
4619
4620
4621
4622
4623
4624
4625
4626
4627
4628
4629
4630
4631
4632
4633
4634
4635
4636
4637
4638
4639
4640
4641
4642
4643
4644
4645
4646
4647
4648
4649
4650
4651
4652
4653
4654
4655
4656
4657
4658
4659
4660
4661
4662
4663
4664
4665
4666
4667
4668
4669
4670
4671
4672
4673
4674
4675
4676
4677
4678
4679
4680
4681
4682
4683
4684
4685
4686
4687
4688
4689
4690
4691
4692
4693
4694
4695
4696
4697
4698
4699
4700
4701
4702
4703
4704
4705
4706
4707
4708
4709
4710
4711
4712
4713
4714
4715
4716
4717
4718
4719
4720
4721
4722
4723
4724
4725
4726
4727
4728
4729
4730
4731
4732
4733
4734
4735
4736
4737
4738
4739
4740
4741
4742
4743
4744
4745
4746
4747
4748
4749
4750
4751
4752
4753
4754
4755
4756
4757
4758
4759
4760
4761
4762
4763
4764
4765
4766
4767
4768
4769
4770
4771
4772
4773
4774
4775
4776
4777
4778
4779
4780
4781
4782
4783
4784
4785
4786
4787
4788
4789
4790
4791
4792
4793
4794
4795
4796
4797
4798
4799
4800
4801
4802
4803
4804
4805
4806
4807
4808
4809
4810
4811
4812
4813
4814
4815
4816
4817
4818
4819
4820
4821
4822
4823
4824
4825
4826
4827
4828
4829
4830
4831
4832
4833
4834
4835
4836
4837
4838
4839
4840
4841
4842
4843
4844
4845
4846
4847
4848
4849
4850
4851
4852
4853
4854
4855
4856
4857
4858
4859
4860
4861
4862
4863
4864
4865
4866
4867
4868
4869
4870
4871
4872
4873
4874
4875
4876
4877
4878
4879
4880
4881
4882
4883
4884
4885
4886
4887
4888
4889
4890
4891
4892
4893
4894
4895
4896
4897
4898
4899
4900
4901
4902
4903
4904
4905
4906
4907
4908
4909
4910
4911
4912
4913
4914
4915
4916
4917
4918
4919
4920
4921
4922
4923
4924
4925
4926
4927
4928
4929
4930
4931
4932
4933
4934
4935
4936
4937
4938
4939
4940
4941
4942
4943
4944
4945
4946
4947
4948
4949
4950
4951
4952
4953
4954
4955
4956
4957
4958
4959
4960
4961
4962
4963
4964
4965
4966
4967
4968
4969
4970
4971
4972
4973
4974
4975
4976
4977
4978
4979
4980
4981
4982
4983
4984
4985
4986
4987
4988
4989
4990
4991
4992
4993
4994
4995
4996
4997
4998
4999
5000
5001
5002
5003
5004
5005
5006
5007
5008
5009
5010
5011
5012
5013
5014
5015
5016
5017
5018
5019
5020
5021
5022
5023
5024
5025
5026
5027
5028
5029
5030
5031
5032
5033
5034
5035
5036
5037
5038
5039
5040
5041
5042
5043
5044
5045
5046
5047
5048
5049
5050
5051
5052
5053
5054
5055
5056
5057
5058
5059
5060
5061
5062
5063
5064
5065
5066
5067
5068
5069
5070
5071
5072
5073
5074
5075
5076
5077
5078
5079
5080
5081
5082
5083
5084
5085
5086
5087
5088
5089
5090
5091
5092
5093
5094
5095
5096
5097
5098
5099
5100
5101
5102
5103
5104
5105
5106
5107
5108
5109
5110
5111
5112
5113
5114
5115
5116
5117
5118
5119
5120
5121
5122
5123
5124
5125
5126
5127
5128
5129
5130
5131
5132
5133
5134
5135
5136
5137
5138
5139
5140
5141
5142
5143
5144
5145
5146
5147
5148
5149
5150
5151
5152
5153
5154
5155
5156
5157
5158
5159
5160
5161
5162
5163
5164
5165
5166
5167
5168
5169
5170
5171
5172
5173
5174
5175
5176
5177
5178
5179
5180
5181
5182
5183
5184
5185
5186
5187
5188
5189
5190
5191
5192
5193
5194
5195
5196
5197
5198
5199
5200
5201
5202
5203
5204
5205
5206
5207
5208
5209
5210
5211
5212
5213
5214
5215
5216
5217
5218
5219
5220
5221
5222
5223
5224
5225
5226
5227
5228
5229
5230
5231
5232
5233
5234
5235
5236
5237
5238
5239
5240
5241
5242
5243
5244
5245
5246
5247
5248
5249
5250
5251
5252
5253
5254
5255
5256
5257
5258
5259
5260
5261
5262
5263
5264
5265
5266
5267
5268
5269
5270
5271
5272
5273
5274
5275
5276
5277
5278
5279
5280
5281
5282
5283
5284
5285
5286
5287
5288
5289
5290
5291
5292
5293
5294
5295
5296
5297
5298
5299
5300
5301
5302
5303
5304
5305
5306
5307
5308
5309
5310
5311
5312
5313
5314
5315
5316
5317
5318
5319
5320
5321
5322
5323
5324
5325
5326
5327
5328
5329
5330
5331
5332
5333
5334
5335
5336
5337
5338
5339
5340
5341
5342
5343
5344
5345
5346
5347
5348
5349
5350
5351
5352
5353
5354
5355
5356
5357
5358
5359
5360
5361
5362
5363
5364
5365
5366
5367
5368
5369
5370
5371
5372
5373
5374
5375
5376
5377
5378
5379
5380
5381
5382
5383
5384
5385
5386
5387
5388
5389
5390
5391
5392
5393
5394
5395
5396
5397
5398
5399
5400
5401
5402
5403
5404
5405
5406
5407
5408
5409
5410
5411
5412
5413
5414
5415
5416
5417
5418
5419
5420
5421
5422
5423
|
<html>
<head>
<title>SPARK Errors</title>
</head>
<body>
<a name="syntax-semicolon-expected"></a>
<p>
*** Syntax Error : ";" expected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If this is reported at the end of the input file it may well be caused by the misspelling of an identifier in a hide directive. The parser then skips all the following text looking for the misspelled identifier but finds the end of file first where it reports a syntax error.
</i>
</p>
<a name="syntax-no-apragma"></a>
<p>
*** Syntax Error : No APRAGMA can be start with reserved word "IS".
</p>
<p>
<i>
This can occur when a stub for an embedded subprogram is wrongly terminated by a semicolon.
</i>
</p>
<a name="syntax-procedure-spec-annotation-start"></a>
<p>
*** Syntax Error : No complete PROCEDURE_SPECIFICATION can be followed by ANNOTATION_START here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This can occur when the reserved word </i>body<i> has been omitted from the declaration of a package body. This error will occur at the annotation placed between the specification and the reserved word </i>is<i> of the first subprogram.
</i>
</p>
<a name="syntax-procedure-spec-is"></a>
<p>
*** Syntax Error : No complete PROCEDURE_SPECIFICATION can be followed by reserved word "IS" here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This can occur when the reserved word </i>body<i> has been omitted from the declaration of a package body. This error will occur at the reserved word </i>is<i> which introduces the body of the first subprogram.
</i>
</p>
<a name="syntax-inherit-expected"></a>
<p>
*** Syntax Error : reserved word "INHERIT" expected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This occurs where the annotation on a subprogram body is placed after the reserved word </i>is<i> instead of before it.
</i>
</p>
<a name="syntax-simple-expression-rbracket"></a>
<p>
*** Syntax Error : No complete SIMPLE_EXPRESSION can be followed by ")" here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This can occur in an aggregate expression when there is a mixure of named and positional association being used.
</i>
</p>
<a name="syntax-simple-expression-comma"></a>
<p>
*** Syntax Error : No complete SIMPLE_EXPRESSION can be followed by "," here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This can occur in an aggregate expression when there is a mixure of named and positional association being used.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-1"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 1 : The identifier YYY.XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If the identifier is declared in a separate (or parent) package, the package must be included in an inherit clause and the identifier prefixed with the package name. Ensure that there are no errors in the declaration of the identifier.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-2"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 2 : XXX does not denote a formal parameter for YYY.
</p>
<a name="semantic-3"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 3 : Incorrect number of actual parameters for call of subprogram XXX.
</p>
<a name="semantic-4"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 4 : More than one parameter association is given for formal parameter XXX.
</p>
<a name="semantic-5"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 5 : Illegal use of identifier XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Usually associated with the use of an identifier other than a package name as a prefix in a selected component.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-6"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 6 : Identifier XXX is not the name of a variable.
</p>
<a name="semantic-7"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 7 : Identifier XXX is not the name of a procedure.
</p>
<a name="semantic-8"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 8 : There is no field named XXX in this entity.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when the selector in a selected component of a record references a non-existent field.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-9"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 9 : Selected components are not allowed for XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Occurs if the prefix to a selected component representing a procedure in a procedure call statement or a type mark is not a package. Also occurs if a selector is applied in an expression to an object which is not a record variable.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-10"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 10 : Illegal redeclaration of identifier XXX.
</p>
<a name="semantic-11"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 11 : There is no package declaration for XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a package body is encountered for which there is no package specification.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-12"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 12 : Own variable XXX can only be completed by a variable declaration, not a constant.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If the object in question is really a constant, then remove it from the enclosing package's own variable annotation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-13"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 13 : A body for subprogram XXX has already been declared.
</p>
<a name="semantic-14"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 14 : Illegal parent unit name.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if the name in a "separate" clause of a subunit does not correctly identify a compilation unit. Common causes of this error are a syntax error in the parent unit or omitting the parent unit specification and/or parent unit body entries from the index file.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-15"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 15 : The stub for XXX is either undeclared or cannot be located.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Common causes of this error are an error in the declaration of the stub or the omission of the parent unit body from the index file.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-16"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 16 : A body for package XXX has already been declared.
</p>
<a name="semantic-17"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 17 : A body stub for package XXX has already been declared.
</p>
<a name="semantic-18"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 18 : Identifier XXX is not the name of a package.
</p>
<a name="semantic-19"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 19 : Identifier XXX is not the name of a procedure.
</p>
<a name="semantic-20"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 20 : Illegal operator symbol.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a renaming declaration contains a non-existent operator.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-21"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 21 : This entity is not an array.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an attempt is made to index into a name which does not represent an array.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-22"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 22 : The type in this declaration is not consistent with the previous declaration of XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Occurs when the type given in the Ada declaration of an own variable differs from that "announced" in the package's own variable clause.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-23"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 23 : No parameter association is given for formal parameter XXX.
</p>
<a name="semantic-24"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 24 : The identifier XXX (exported by called subprogram) is not visible at this point.
</p>
<p>
<i>
When a procedure is called any global variables exported by that procedure must be visible at the point of call. This error message indicates that the global variable concerned is not visible. It may be that it needs to be added to the global annotation of the procedure containing the call (or some further enclosing subprogram) or it may be that an inherit clause is missing from the package containing the call.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-25"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 25 : The identifier XXX (imported by called subprogram) is not visible at this point.
</p>
<p>
<i>
When a procedure is called any global variables imported by that procedure must be visible at the point of call. This error message indicates that the global variable concerned is not visible. It may be that it needs to be added to the global annotation of the subprogram containing the call (or some further enclosing subprogram) or it may be that an inherit clause is missing from the package containing the call.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-26"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 26 : The deferred constant XXX does not have an associated full definition.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued at the end of a package specification if no full declaration has been supplied for a deferred constant declared in the package specification.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-27"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 27 : The private type XXX does not have an associated full definition.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued at the end of a package specification if no full declaration has been supplied for a private type declared in the package specification.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-28"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 28 : The own variable XXX does not have a definition.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued at the end of a package body if an own variable announced in the package specification has neither been given an Ada declaration nor refined.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-29"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 29 : The subprogram XXX, declared in the package specification, does not have an associated body.
</p>
<a name="semantic-30"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 30 : Attribute XXX is not yet implemented in the Examiner.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The attribute is identified in Annex K of the SPARK 95 report as a valid SPARK 95 attribute but the Examiner does not currently support it. It is possible to work round the omission by putting the use of the attribute inside a suitable function which is hidden from the Examiner.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-31"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 31 : The prefix of this attribute is not an object or type.
</p>
<a name="semantic-32"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 32 : Illegal type conversion.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Likely causes are type conversions involving record types or non-convertible arrays.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-33"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 33 : Illegal aggregate.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if the prefix of an aggregate is not a composite type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-34"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 34 : Illegal procedure call.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a call is made to a user-defined subprogram in a package initialization part.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-35"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 35 : Binary operator is not declared for types XXX and YYY.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Indicates use of an undeclared binary operator; this message means that the type on each side of the operator cannot appear with the operator used. e.g. attempting to add an integer to an enumeration literal.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-36"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 36 : Expression is not static.
</p>
<a name="semantic-37"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 37 : Expression is not constant.
</p>
<a name="semantic-38"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 38 : Expression is not of the expected type.
</p>
<a name="semantic-39"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 39 : Illegal use of unconstrained type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
An unconstrained array type or variable of such a type is illegally used. Use of unconstrained arrays in SPARK is limited to passing them as parameters, indexing into them and taking attributes of them. This message also arises if a string literal is used as an actual parameter where the formal parameter is a string subtype. In this case, the error can be removed by qualifying the string literal with the subtype name.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-40"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 40 : Numeric or Time_Span type required.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This operator is only defined for numeric types and, if the Ravenscar Profile is selected, for type Ada.Real_Time.Time_Span.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-41"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 41 : Array type required.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a subtype declaration taking the form of a constrained subtype of an unconstrained array type is encountered but with a type mark which does not represent an array.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-42"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 42 : Incompatible types.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a name represents an object which is not of the required type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-43"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 43 : Range is not constant.
</p>
<a name="semantic-44"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 44 : Scalar type required.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The bounds of an explicit range must be scalar types.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-45"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 45 : Range is not static.
</p>
<a name="semantic-46"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 46 : Discrete type required.
</p>
<a name="semantic-47"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 47 : The definition of this type contains errors which may make this array definition invalid.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an array type definition is encountered where one or more of the index types used in the definition contained errors in its original declaration. For example, SPARK requires array index bounds to be constant (known at compile time) so an attempt to use an illegal subtype with variable bounds as an array index will generate this message.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-49"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 49 : Attribute XXX takes only one argument.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Only SPARK 95 attributes 'Min and 'Max require two arguments.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-50"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 50 : Initializing expression must be constant.
</p>
<p>
<i>
To assign a non-constant expression to a variable, an assignment statement in the body of the program unit (following the 'begin') must be used.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-51"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 51 : Arrays may not be ordered.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an ordering operator such as "<" is encountered between objects of an array type other than string or a constrained subtype of string.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-52"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 52 : Only Scalar, String and Time types may be ordered.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Ordering operators are only defined for scalar types and type String plus, if the Ravenscar Profile is selected, types Time and Time_Span in package Ada.Real_Time.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-53"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 53 : Illegal others clause.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In SPARK record aggregates may not contain an others clause.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-54"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 54 : Illegal attribute: XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when an attribute not supported by SPARK is used.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-55"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 55 : Attribute XXX takes no argument.
</p>
<a name="semantic-56"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 56 : Argument expected.
</p>
<a name="semantic-57"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 57 : Fixed type definition must have associated range constraint.
</p>
<a name="semantic-58"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 58 : XXX expected, to repeat initial identifier.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Occurs at the end of a package, subprogram, protected type, task type or loop if the terminal identifier does not match the name or label originally given.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-59"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 59 : Composite subtype definition may not have associated range constraint.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A subtype of the form applicable to a subrange of a scalar type has been encountered but the type provided is not a scalar type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-60"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 60 : Illegal choice in record aggregate.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In SPARK record aggregates may not contain multiple choices, each field must be assigned a value individually.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-61"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 61 : Illegal occurrence of body stub - a body stub may only occur in a compilation unit.
</p>
<a name="semantic-62"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 62 : A body for the embedded package XXX is required.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an embedded package declares subprograms or own variables and no body is provided.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-63"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 63 : XXX is not a type mark.
</p>
<a name="semantic-64"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 64 : Parameters of function subprograms must be of mode in.
</p>
<a name="semantic-65"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 65 : Formal parameters of renamed operators may not be renamed.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The names of the parameters used in renaming declarations may not be altered from Left, Right for binary operators and Right for unary operators. These are the names given for the parameters in the ARM and the SPARK Definition requires that parameter names are not changed.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-66"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 66 : Unexpected package initialization - no own variables of package XXX require initialization.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Either the package does not have an initializes annotation or all the own variables requiring initialization were given values at the point of declaration.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-67"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 67 : Illegal machine code insertion. Machine code functions are not permitted in SPARK 83.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This is an Ada 83 rule. Machine code can only be used in procedures.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-68"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 68 : Illegal operator renaming - operators are defined on types not subtypes.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an attempt is made to rename an operator using a subtype of the type for which it was originally implicitly declared.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-69"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 69 : pragma XXX has two parameters.
</p>
<a name="semantic-70"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 70 : pragma Import expected.
</p>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 70 : pragma Interface expected.
</p>
<a name="semantic-71"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 71 : This expression does not represent the expected subprogram or variable name XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if the name supplied in a pragma interface, import or attach_handler does not match the name of the associated subprogram or variable.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-72"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 72 : Unexpected pragma Import.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Pragma import may only occur in a body stub, or immediately after a subprogram declaration in the visible part of a package, or immediately after a variable declaration.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-72"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 72 : Unexpected pragma Interface.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Pragma interface may only occur in a body stub or immediately after a subprogram declaration in the visible part of a package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-73"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 73 : XXX has already been declared or refined.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an Ada declaration is given for an own variable which has been refined, or in a refinement clause if an own variable is refined more than once.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-74"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 74 : XXX does not occur in the package own variable list.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A subject of a refinement definition of a package must be an own variable of that package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-75"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 75 : Illegal use of inherited package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an attempt is made to refine an own variable onto an own variable of a non-embedded package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-76"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 76 : Identifier XXX is already declared and cannot be the name of an embedded package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a refinement clause in a package body attempts to name an embedded package own variable as a refinement constituent and the name given for the embedded package is already in use.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-77"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 77 : Variable XXX should occur in this own variable clause.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Occurs in the own variable clause of a package embedded in another package if an own variable which is a refinement constituent of an own variable of the enclosing package is omitted.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-78"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 78 : Initialization of own variable XXX is ineffective.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an own variable occurs in the initialization clause of an embedded package and the own variable concerned is a refinement constituent of another own variable which is not listed in the initialization specification of its package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-79"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 79 : Variable XXX should occur in this initialization specification.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Occurs in the initialization clause of a package embedded in another package if an own variable which is a refinement constituent of an initialized own variable of the enclosing package is omitted.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-80"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 80 : Unexpected own variable clause - no variable in this clause is a refinement constituent.
</p>
<a name="semantic-81"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 81 : Own variable clause expected - own variables of this package occur as refinement constituents.
</p>
<a name="semantic-82"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 82 : Unexpected initialization specification - no own variables of this package require initialization.
</p>
<p>
<i>
An own variable initialization clause and that of its refinement constituents must be consistent.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-83"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 83 : Initialization specification expected - own variables of this package require initialization.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an own variable does not occur in the initialization clause of an embedded package and the own variable concerned is a refinement constituent of another own variable which is listed in the initialization clause of its package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-84"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 84 : The refinement constituent XXX does not have a declaration.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued at the end of a package if a refinement constituent of a refined own variable has not been given an Ada declaration or further refined.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-85"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 85 : XXX is not a constituent of any abstract own variable appearing in the earlier global definition for this subprogram.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A variable XXX which has occurred in a refined global annotation is neither a variable that occurred in the earlier global definition nor a refinement constituent of any such variable.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-86"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 86 : At least one constituent of XXX was expected in this refined global definition.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If the global annotation of a procedure specification contains an own variable and that own variable is later refined then at least one refinement constituent of the own variable shall appear in the second global annotation supplied for the procedure body.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-87"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 87 : Refined global definition expected for subprogram XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A global definition containing abstract own variables was given in the definition for subprogram XXX, in a package specification. A refined global definition is required in the package body.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-88"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 88 : Variable XXX is not a refinement constituent.
</p>
<a name="semantic-89"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 89 : XXX is not a private type declared in this package.
</p>
<a name="semantic-90"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 90 : This operator may not be applied to ranges.
</p>
<a name="semantic-91"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 91 : Ranges may not be assigned.
</p>
<a name="semantic-92"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 92 : Named association may not be used here.
</p>
<a name="semantic-93"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 93 : Number of index expressions differs from number of dimensions of array XXX.
</p>
<a name="semantic-94"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 94 : Condition is not boolean.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued anywhere a boolean expression is required (e.g. in<b> if</b>, <b> exit </b> and <b>while</b> statements) and the expression provided is not of type boolean.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-95"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 95 : Type mark expected.
</p>
<a name="semantic-96"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 96 : Attribute XXX is not valid with this prefix.
</p>
<a name="semantic-97"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 97 : Attribute BASE may only appear as a prefix.
</p>
<p>
<i>
'BASE may only be used as a prefix to another attribute.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-98"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 98 : This expression is not a range.
</p>
<a name="semantic-99"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 99 : Unconstrained array expected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Occurs if a subtype is declared of an array which is already constrained.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-100"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 100 : Floating point type mark expected.
</p>
<a name="semantic-101"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 101 : Fixed point type mark expected.
</p>
<a name="semantic-102"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 102 : This is not the name of a field of record XXX.
</p>
<a name="semantic-103"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 103 : A value has already been supplied for field XXX.
</p>
<a name="semantic-104"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 104 : No value has been supplied for field XXX.
</p>
<a name="semantic-105"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 105 : More values have been supplied than number of fields in record XXX.
</p>
<a name="semantic-106"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 106 : Range is not of the expected type.
</p>
<a name="semantic-107"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 107 : Expression is not of the expected type. Actual type is XXX. Expected type is YYY.
</p>
<a name="semantic-108"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 108 : Expression is not of the expected type. Expected any Integer type.
</p>
<a name="semantic-109"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 109 : Expression is not of the expected type. Expected any Real type.
</p>
<a name="semantic-110"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 110 : Use type clauses following an embedded package are not currently supported by the Examiner.
</p>
<a name="semantic-111"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 111 : Package renaming is not currently supported by the Examiner.
</p>
<a name="semantic-112"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 112 : A use type clause may not appear here. They are only permitted as part of a context clause or directly following an embedded package specification.
</p>
<a name="semantic-113"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 113 : Private subprogram declarations are not permitted in SPARK 83.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Private subprograms would not be callable in SPARK 83 and are therefore not permitted; they may be declared and called in SPARK 95.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-114"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 114 : Subtype mark or Range may not be used in an expression in this context.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A subtype mark or an explicit Range attribute may not be used in a context where a simple expression is expected.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-115"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 115 : In a package body, an own variable annotation must include one or more refinement constituents.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Annotation should be of the form 'own S is A, B, C;'.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-116"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 116 : View conversion to own type is not permitted in target of an assignment.
</p>
<a name="semantic-117"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 117 : Aggregate must be qualified with subtype mark.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Aggregates are qualified expressions so they must be prefixed with a subtype mark. An exception is made in the case of aggregate assignments to unconstrained arrays as the rules of Ada do not permit unconstrained array aggregates to be qualified.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-118"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 118 : Aggregate assignment to unconstrained multi-dimensional array not permitted.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Unqualified aggregates may only be used in assignments to one-dimensional unconstrained arrays. SPARK does not permit aggregate assignment to multi-dimensional unconstrained arrays.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-119"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 119 : Unary operator is not declared for type XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Indicates use of an undeclared unary operator; this message means that the type on the right hand side of the operator cannot appear with the operator used. e.g. attempting to negate an enumeration literal.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-120"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 120 : Pragma import not allowed here because variable XXX is already initialized. See ALRM B.1(24).
</p>
<a name="semantic-121"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 121 : 'Flow_Message' or 'Warning_Message' expected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The identifier indicating what kind of message to justify must be either 'Flow_Message' or 'Warning_Message' or some unique abbreviation of them such as 'Fl' or even 'F'. Case is ignored.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-122"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 122 : Error or warning number expected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This item should be an integer literal representing the error or warning message that is being marked as expected.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-123"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 123 : This warning number may not appear in an accept annotation.
</p>
<p>
<i>
It does not make sense to allow certain warnings to be justified with the accept annotation. In particular, attempting to justify warnings raised by the justification system itself could lead to some special kind of recursive hell that we would not wish to enter.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-124"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 124 : Incorrect number of names in accept annotation: should be 0.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This class of error does not reference any variables, and therefore requires no names.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-125"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 125 : Incorrect number of names in accept annotation: should be 1.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This class of error references one variable, and therefore requires one name.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-126"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 126 : Incorrect number of names in accept annotation: should be 2.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This class of error references two variables, and therefore requires two names. Two names are need to justify expected information flow messages such as "X is not derived from Y". Note that for messages of this kind the accept annotation should list the names in the order "export, import".
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-127"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 127 : Incorrect number of names in accept annotation: should be 0 or 1.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This class of error references either zero or one variable, and therefore requires either zero or one name. An ineffective assignment error requires the name of variable being assigned to. An ineffective statement error has no name associated with it.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-128"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 128 : Incorrect number of names in accept annotation: should be 1 or 2.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This class of error references either one or two variables, and therefore requires either one or two names. One name is required when the export is a function return value.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-129"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 129 : Assignment to view conversion is not currently implemented.
</p>
<a name="semantic-130"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 130 : A type from the current package should not appear in a use type clause.
</p>
<a name="semantic-131"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 131 : The package name XXX should appear in a with clause preceding the use type clause.
</p>
<a name="semantic-132"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 132 : The unit name or the name of an enclosing package of the unit should not appear in its with clause.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A package should not 'with' itself and a subunit should not 'with' the package (or main program) which declares its stub.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-133"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 133 : Name in with clause is locally redeclared.
</p>
<a name="semantic-134"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 134 : A package name should not appear in its own inherit clause.
</p>
<a name="semantic-135"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 135 : The package XXX is undeclared or not visible, or there is a circularity in the list of inherited packages.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Possible causes of this error are an error in the inherited package specification or omitting an entry for the package specification from the index file or circular inheritance.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-136"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 136 : The own variable XXX is not declared in the own variable clause of the corresponding package declaration.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A refinement clause of a package body defines the constituent parts of own variables given in the own variable clause of the corresponding package declaration.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-137"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 137 : The child package XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Possible causes of this error are an error in the child package specification or omitting the child from the parent's component list in the index file or omitting the child specification entry from the index file.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-138"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 138 : Child package own variable XXX is does not appear in the own variable clause of the child package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A constituent of a refinement clause which is defined in a child package must be an own variable of the child package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-139"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 139 : The variable XXX is not declared in the own variable clause of this package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A package can only initialize variables declared in its own variable clause.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-140"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 140 : The predecessor package XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The parent of a child package must be a library package and must be declared prior to a child package. If using an index file the parent must have an entry in the index file and the child package must be listed as a component of the parent package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-141"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 141 : The private type XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point.
</p>
<a name="semantic-142"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 142 : The subprogram prefix XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The prefix should appear in the inherit clause of the current package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-143"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 143 : The subprogram YYY.XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point.
</p>
<a name="semantic-144"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 144 : The dotted name YYY.XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The name must denote an entire variable or an own variable of a package. If the variable or own variable is declared in a separate (or parent) package, the package must be included in an inherit clause and the identifier prefixed with the package name.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-145"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 145 : The identifier YYY.XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The identifier should be a typemark. If the typemark is declared in a separate (or parent) package, the package must be included in an inherit clause and the identifier prefixed with the package name. Ensure that there are no errors in the declaration of the typemark.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-148"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 148 : The abstract proof type XXX may not be used to define an own variable in another package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Own variables may be "type announced" as being of an abstract proof type only where that type is declared later in the same package. Thus --# own State : T; is legal if --# type T is abstract; appears later in the package; however, --# own State : P.T; is illegal if T is an abstract proof type declared in remote package P.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-149"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 149 : More than one own variable has been announced as being of type XXX which may not therefore be declared as an abstract proof type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Occurs when an own variable clause announces more than one own variable as being of a type XXX and XXX is later declared as being of an abstract proof type. Each abstract own variable must be of a unique type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-150"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 150 : Entire variable expected. The names of constants never appear in mandatory annotations.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a the name of a constant is found in a mandatory annotation such as a global or derives annotation. Constants should not appear in such annotations.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-151"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 151 : The variable XXX does not occur either in the package own variable list or as a refinement constituent.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A variable declared in a package must have been previously announced as either an own variable or as a concrete refinement constituent of an own variable.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-152"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 152 : The number of formal parameters is not consistent with the previous declaration of XXX.
</p>
<a name="semantic-153"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 153 : The declaration of formal parameter XXX is not consistent with the subprogram's previous declaration.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if the name, type or parameter mode of a parameter is different in the subprogram body declaration from that declared originally.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-154"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 154 : The subprogram or task body XXX does not have an annotation.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A subprogram or task body must have a global annotation if it references global variables; a procedure or task body must have a dependency relation to perform information flow analysis.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-155"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 155 : Unexpected annotation - all annotations required for procedure or task body XXX have already occurred.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Do not repeat global or derives annotations in the body (or body stub) of a subprogram, entry or task except for state (own variable) refinement.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-156"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 156 : Entire variable expected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when an identifier which SPARK requires to be an entire variable represents something other than this. Most commonly this message occurs when a component of a structured variable appears in a core annotation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-157"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 157 : The name XXX already appears in the global variable list.
</p>
<a name="semantic-158"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 158 : XXX is a formal parameter of this subprogram.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued in a global annotation if it names a formal parameter of the subprogram.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-159"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 159 : The name XXX has already appeared as an exported variable.
</p>
<a name="semantic-160"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 160 : The name XXX already appears in the list of imported variables.
</p>
<a name="semantic-161"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 161 : Exportation of XXX is incompatible with its parameter mode.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a parameter appears as an export to a procedure when it is of parameter mode in.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-162"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 162 : Importation of XXX is incompatible with its parameter mode.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a parameter appears as an import to a procedure when it is of parameter mode out.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-163"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 163 : Subprogram XXX cannot be called from here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
SPARK contains rules to prevent construction of programs containing recursive subprogram calls; this error message occurs if a procedure or function is called before its body has been declared. Re-ordering of subprogram bodies in the package concerned will be required.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-165"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 165 : This parameter is overlapped by another one, which is exported.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Violation of the anti-aliasing rule.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-166"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 166 : This parameter is overlapped by an exported global variable.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Violation of the anti-aliasing rule.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-167"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 167 : Imported variable XXX is not named in the initialization specification of its package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when an own variable which is imported into the main program procedure (or a task when the Ravenscar profile is enabled) has not been declared as being initialized by its package. At the main program level the only imports that are permitted are initialized own variables of inherited packages. There are two possible cases to consider: (1) the main program should be importing the variable in which case it should be annotated in its package with --# initializes (and, of course, actually initialized in some way) or be an external variable or protected variable which is implicitly initialized; or (2) the own variable concerned is not initialized at elaboration, should not therefore be considered an import to the main program and should be removed from the main program's import list.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-168"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 168 : XXX is a loop parameter, whose updating is not allowed.
</p>
<a name="semantic-169"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 169 : Global variables of function subprograms must be of mode in.
</p>
<p>
<i>
It is an important property of SPARK that functions cannot have side-effects, therefore only the reading of global variable is permitted. It is usually convenient to omit modes from function global annotations but use of mode 'in' is permitted.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-170"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 170 : XXX is a formal parameter of mode in, whose updating is not allowed.
</p>
<a name="semantic-171"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 171 : XXX is a formal parameter of mode out, whose value cannot be read.
</p>
<a name="semantic-172"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 172 : The actual parameter associated with an exported formal parameter must be an entire variable.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an actual parameter which is an array element is associated with an exported formal parameter in a procedure call. Exported parameters must be either entire variables or a record field.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-173"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 173 : This exported parameter is named in the global definition of the procedure.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Violation of the anti-aliasing rule.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-174"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 174 : XXX is not an own variable.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Occurs in initialization specifications if something other than a variable is listed as being initialized.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-175"></a>
<p>
<i>
A justification of an error requires the actual variables named in the error message to be referenced. The keyword "all" can only be used with language profiles for auto-code generators such as SCADE KCG. Such profiles are only available with the SPARK Pro Toolset.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-176"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 176 : XXX does not have a derives annotation so it may not be called from YYY which does have a derives annotation.
</p>
<p>
<i>
When analysing with flow=auto, a procedure or entry without a derives annotation may not be called by a procedure, task or entry with a derives annotation. This is because the body of the caller must be checked against its derives annotation. In order to calculate the correct dependency relation for the body of the caller there must be derives annotations present on all called procedures or entries.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-180"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 180 : Entire composite constant expected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when an identifier which SPARK requires to be an entire composite constant represents something other than this.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-181"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 181 : Invalid policy for constant proof rule generation.
</p>
<a name="semantic-182"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 182 : Rule Policy for YYY.XXX already declared in current scope.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a rule policy has already been declared for this constant within this declarative region. This rule policy will be ineffective.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-190"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 190 : The name XXX already appears in the inherit clause.
</p>
<a name="semantic-191"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 191 : The name XXX already appears in the with clause.
</p>
<a name="semantic-200"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 200 : The parameter XXX is neither imported nor exported.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Each formal parameter of a subprogram shall be imported or exported or both.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-201"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 201 : The global variable XXX is neither imported nor exported.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Every variable in a global definition must also appear in the associated derives annotation where it will be either imported or exported or both.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-250"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 250 : The 'Size value for type XXX has already been set.
</p>
<a name="semantic-251"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 251 : The attribute value for XXX'Size must be of an integer type.
</p>
<a name="semantic-252"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 252 : The attribute value for XXX'Size must be a static simple expression.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The value of 'Size must be static and must be of an integer type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-253"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 253 : The attribute value for XXX'Size must not be negative.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The value of 'Size must be a positive integer or zero.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-254"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 254 : The Size attribute can only be specified for a first subtype.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Setting 'Size for a user-defined non-first subtype is not permitted. See Ada95 LRM 13.3(48).
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-255"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 255 : The Address attribute can only be specified for a variable, a constant, or a program unit.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Ada95 LRM Annex N.31 defines a program unit to be either a package, a task unit, a protected unit, a protected entry, a generic unit, or an explicitly declared subprogram other than an enumeration literal.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-273"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 273 : Own variable XXX may not be refined because it was declared with a type mark which has not subsequently been declared as an abstract proof type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Where a type mark is included in an own variable declaration it indicates that the own variable will either be of a concrete type of that name (which may be either already declared or be declared later in the package) or of an abstract proof type declared in the package specification. In the former case the refinement is illegal because own variables of concrete Ada types may not be refined. In the latter case it is legal; however, no suitable proof type declaration has been found in this case.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-300"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 300 : Renaming declarations are not allowed here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A renaming declaration must be the first declarative item of a package body or main program or it must be placed immediately after the declaration of an embedded package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-301"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 301 : Renaming or use type declarations here can only rename subprograms in package XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A renaming declaration may be placed immediately after the declaration of an embedded package; in this case it may only rename subprograms declared in that package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-302"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 302 : The subprogram specification in this renaming declaration is not consistent with the declaration of subprogram XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued in a subprogram renaming declaration if it contains parameter names, numbers or types which differ from those originally declared.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-303"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 303 : An operator can only be renamed by the same operator.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a renaming declaration has a different operator on each side of the reserved word RENAMES.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-304"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 304 : A renaming declaration for operator XXX is not allowed.
</p>
<a name="semantic-305"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 305 : The specification in this renaming declaration is not consistent with the implicit declaration of operator XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued in an operator renaming declaration if it contains types which differ from those applicable to the operator being renamed.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-306"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 306 : Operator XXX is already visible.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Occurs in an operator renaming declaration if an attempt is made to rename an operator which is already visible. (The message will also appear as a secondary consequence of trying to rename an operator between undeclared types.).
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-307"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 307 : The implicit declaration of this operator does not occur in package XXX.
</p>
<a name="semantic-308"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 308 : Type is limited.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an attempt is made to assign a variable of a type which is limited or which contains a limited type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-309"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 309 : Operator not visible for these types.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This message means that the operator exists between the types on each side of it but that it is not visible. The most likely cause is that the types concerned are defined in another package and that renaming is required to make the operator visible.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-310"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 310 : The % operator may only appear in an assert or check statement in a for loop.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The % operator is used to indicate the value of a variable on entry to a for loop. This is because the variable may be used in the exit expression of the loop and may also be modified in the body of the loop. Since the semantics of Ada require the exit expression to be fixed after evaluation we require a way of reasoning about the original value of a variable prior to any alteration in the loop body. No other situation requires this value so % may not be used anywhere else.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-311"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 311 : Announced own variable types may not be implemented as unconstrained arrays.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Where an own variable is announced as being of some type, SPARK requires that type to be declared; the declaration cannot be in the form of an unconstrained array because SPARK prohibits unconstrained variables.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-312"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 312 : A subprogram can only be renamed to the same name with the package prefix removed.
</p>
<a name="semantic-313"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 313 : Only one main program is permitted.
</p>
<a name="semantic-314"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 314 : Own variable XXX has been refined and may not appear here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an attempt is made to use, in a second annotation, an own variable which has been refined. Second annotations should use the appropriate refinement constituents of the own variable.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-315"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 315 : Unsupported proof context.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Certain proof contexts have been included in the syntax of SPARK but are not yet supported; this error message results if one is found.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-316"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 316 : Selected components are not allowed for XXX since type YYY is private here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If a type is private, then record field selectors may not be used. In pre- and post-conditions, a proof function can be declared to yield the required attribute of a private type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-317"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 317 : Tilde, in a function return annotation, may only be applied to an external variable of mode IN.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The tilde decoration indicates the initial value of a variable or parameter which is both imported and exported. A function may not have an explicit side effect on a program variable and so cannot be regarded as exporting such a variable. For modelling purposes a read of an external (stream) variable is regarded as having a side effect (outside the SPARK boundary). Since it may be necessary to refer to the initial value of the external variable, before this implicit side effect occurs, the use of tilde is allowed only for external variables of mode IN which are globally referenced by function.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-318"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 318 : Tilde or Percent may only be applied to variables.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The tilde decoration indicates the initial value of a variable or parameter which is both imported and exported. Percent indicates the value of a variable on entry to a for loop; this message occurs if either operator is applied to any other object.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-319"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 319 : Tilde may only be applied to a variable which is both imported and exported.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The tilde decoration indicates the initial value of a variable or parameter which is both imported and exported; this message occurs if the variable concerned is either exported only or imported only in which case no distinction between its initial and final value is required.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-320"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 320 : Tilde or Percent may only be applied to an entire variable.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Tilde (and %) may not be applied to an element of an array or field of a record. e.g. to indicate the initial value of the Ith element of array V use V~(I) not V(I)~.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-321"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 321 : Tilde may not appear in pre-conditions.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Since it does not make sense to refer to anything other than the initial value of a variable in a pre-condition there is no need to use tilde to distinguish initial from final values.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-322"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 322 : Only imports may be referenced in pre-conditions or return expressions.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Pre-conditions are concerned with the initial values of information carried into a subprogram. Since only imports can do this only imports can appear in pre-condition expressions.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-323"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 323 : Updates may only be applied to records or arrays.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The extended SPARK update syntax is only used to express changes to components of a structured variable.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-324"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 324 : Only one field name may appear here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
When using the extended SPARK update syntax for a record, you can not update more than one element in each clause of the update. For example, you cannot use [x,y => z], you must instead use [x => z; y => z].
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-325"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 325 : Type XXX has not been declared.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Occurs if a type is "announced" as part of an own variable clause and the end of the package is reached without an Ada declaration for a type of this name being found.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-326"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 326 : Predicate is not boolean.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Occurs anywhere where a proof context is found not to be a boolean expression.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-327"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 327 : XXX is a global variable which may not be updated in a function subprogram.
</p>
<a name="semantic-328"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 328 : The identifier XXX (exported by called subprogram) may not be updated in a function subprogram.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Occurs if a function calls a procedure which exports a global variable; this would create an illegal side-effect of the function.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-329"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 329 : Illegal function call.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a call is made to a user-defined subprogram in a package initialization part.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-330"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 330 : Illegal use of an own variable not of this package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an attempt is made, in a package initialization part, to update an own variable of a non-enclosing package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-331"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 331 : Private types may not be unconstrained arrays.
</p>
<a name="semantic-332"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 332 : This private type was not declared as limited.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued where the type contains a component which is a limited private type, but where the declaration of this type in the visible part of the package does not specify that the type is limited.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-333"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 333 : Initialization of XXX is not announced in the initialization clause of this package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when an own variable is initialized either by assignment or by having a pragma Import attached to it when initialization of the variable is not announced in its package's own variable initialization specification.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-334"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 334 : Identifier XXX is not the name of a function.
</p>
<a name="semantic-335"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 335 : This annotation should be placed with the declaration of function XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a function is declared in a package specification without an annotation but one is then supplied on the function body.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-336"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 336 : Unexpected annotation - all annotations required for function XXX have already occurred.
</p>
<a name="semantic-337"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 337 : Package XXX may not be used as a prefix here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Selected component notation may not be used in places where an item is directly visible.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-338"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 338 : Scalar parameter XXX is of mode in out and must appear as an import.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Parameters passed as mode in out must be listed as imports in the subprogram's dependency relation if they are of scalar types. The rule also applies to a parameter of a private type if its full declaration is scalar.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-339"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 339 : Subprogram XXX was not declared in package YYY.
</p>
<a name="semantic-340"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 340 : Only operators may be renamed in package specifications.
</p>
<p>
<i>
User-declared subprograms may not be renamed in package specifications although the implicitly declared function subprograms associated with operators may be.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-341"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 341 : A range may not appear here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a range is found where a single value is expected, for example, if an array slice is constructed.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-342"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 342 : This proof annotation should be placed with the declaration of subprogram XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Like global and derives annotations, proof annotations should be placed on the first appearance of a subprogram. There may also be a requirement for a second proof annotation on a subprogram body where it references an abstract own variable.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-343"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 343 : Unexpected proof annotation - all annotations required for subprogram XXX have already occurred.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a second proof annotation for a subprogram is found but the subprogram does not reference any abstract own variables. A second annotation is only required where it is necessary to express both an abstract (external) and a refined (internal) view of an operation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-399"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 399 : Range error in annotation expression.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a proof annotation contains an expression that would cause a constraint error if it were in an executable Ada statement. For example: "--# post X = T'Succ(T'Last);" VCs generated from such malformed predicates would always be unprovable.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-400"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 400 : Expression contains division by zero.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a static expression, evaluated using perfect arithmetic, is found to contain a division by zero.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-401"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 401 : Illegal numeric literal.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a numeric literal is illegal because it contains, for example, digits not compatible with its number base.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-402"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 402 : Constraint_Error will be raised here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued whenever a static expression would cause a constraint error. e.g. assigning a value to a constant outside the constant's type range. In SPARK a static expression may not yield a value which violates a range constraint.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-403"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 403 : Argument value is inconsistent with the number of dimensions of array type XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when an array attribute containing an argument is found and the value of the argument is inconsistent with the number of dimensions of the array type to which it is being applied.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-407"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 407 : This choice overlaps a previous one.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Choices in case statements and array aggregates may not overlap.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-408"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 408 : Case statement is incomplete.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A case statement must either explicitly supply choices to cover the whole range of the (sub)type of the controlling expression, or it must supply an others choice.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-409"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 409 : Empty range specified.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In SPARK, no static range is permitted to be null.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-410"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 410 : Choice out of range.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The choices in case statements and array aggregates must be within the constraints of the appropriate (sub)type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-411"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 411 : Others clause required.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued where an others clause is required to satisfy the Ada language rules.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-412"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 412 : Explicit boolean range not permitted.
</p>
<a name="semantic-413"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 413 : Invalid range constraint.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued where a range constraint is outside the range of the (sub)type to which the constraint applies.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-414"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 414 : Array aggregate is incomplete.
</p>
<p>
<i>
An array aggregate must either explicitly supply values for all array elements or provide an others clause.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-415"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 415 : Too many entries in array aggregate.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued where an array aggregate using positional association contains more entries than required by the array index type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-416"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 416 : Type may not have an empty range.
</p>
<a name="semantic-417"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 417 : String subtypes must have a lower index bound of 1.
</p>
<a name="semantic-418"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 418 : Index upper and/or lower bounds do not match those expected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued where assignment, association or type conversion is attempted between two different constrained subtypes of the same unconstrained array type, and where the index bounds do not match.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-419"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 419 : YYY.XXX has been renamed locally, so the prefix YYY must not be used.
</p>
<p>
<i>
When an entity is renamed, the fully qualified name is no longer visible, and so must not be used.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-420"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 420 : Array index(es) not convertible.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when an attempt is made to convert between two arrays whose indexes are neither of the same type nor numeric.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-421"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 421 : Array components are not of the expected type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a type conversion attempts to convert between two array types whose components are of different types.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-422"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 422 : Array component constraints do not match those expected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a type conversion attempts to convert between two array types whose components are of the same type but do not have constraints which can be statically determined to be identical.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-423"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 423 : Array has different number of dimensions from that expected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when attempting to convert between two array types which have different numbers of dimensions.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-424"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 424 : Attributes are not permitted in a String concatenation expression.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Character attributes such as 'Val, 'Pos, 'Succ and 'Pred are not permitted below a concatentation operator in a String expression.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-425"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 425 : String literals may not be converted.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if the argument of a type conversion is a string literal. A common cause is an attempt to type qualify a string and accidentally omitting the tick character.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-500"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 500 : Mode expected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when performing data flow analysis only where a subprogram has no dependency clause and its global variables have not been given modes in the global annotation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-501"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 501 : Dependency relation expected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A dependency relation is required for each procedure if information flow analysis is to be performed.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-502"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 502 : Exportation of XXX is incompatible with its global mode.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a procedure has both a global annotation with modes and a dependency relation, and a global of mode in is listed as an export in the dependency relation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-503"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 503 : Importation of XXX is incompatible with its global mode.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a procedure has both a global annotation with modes and a dependency relation, and a global of mode out is listed as an import in the dependency relation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-504"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 504 : Parameter XXX is of mode in out and must appear as an import.
</p>
<a name="semantic-505"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 505 : Global variable XXX is of mode in out and must appear as an import.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued where a procedure has both a global annotation with modes and a dependency relation, and a global variable of mode in out is not listed as an import in the dependency relation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-506"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 506 : Parameter XXX is of mode in out and must appear as an export.
</p>
<a name="semantic-507"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 507 : Global variable XXX is of mode in out and must appear as an export.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued where a procedure has both a global annotation with modes and a dependency relation, and a global variable of mode in out is not listed as an export in the dependency relation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-508"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 508 : This global variable is a parameter of mode in and can only have the global mode in.
</p>
<a name="semantic-509"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 509 : Unexpected refined dependency relation.
</p>
<p>
<i>
When using refinement in automatic flow analysis mode, if there is a dependency relation on the subprogram specification then there must also be one on the body. Similarly, if there is no dependency relation on the specification then the body is not permitted to have one.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-550"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 550 : use type clauses may only be used in SPARK95: clause ignored.
</p>
<a name="semantic-551"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 551 : All operators for type XXX are already visible.
</p>
<a name="semantic-552"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 552 : The type XXX already appears in the use type clause.
</p>
<a name="semantic-554"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 554 : XXX is a limited private type for which no operators can be made visible.
</p>
<a name="semantic-555"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 555 : XXX is not mentioned in an earlier with clause of this compilation unit.
</p>
<a name="semantic-600"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 600 : pragma Import has a minimum of 2 and a maximum of 4 parameters.
</p>
<a name="semantic-601"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 601 : Convention, Entity, External_Name or Link_Name expected.
</p>
<a name="semantic-602"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 602 : An association for XXX has already been given.
</p>
<a name="semantic-603"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 603 : No association for XXX was given.
</p>
<a name="semantic-604"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 604 : This package may not have a body - consider use of pragma Elaborate_Body.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In Ada 95, a package body is illegal unless it is required for the purpose of providing a subprogram body, or unless this pragma is used. This error is issued where a package body is found for a package whose specification does not require a body.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-605"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 605 : pragma Elaborate_Body has one parameter.
</p>
<a name="semantic-606"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 606 : This expression does not represent the expected package name XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when the parameter to a pragma Elaborate_Body is invalid.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-607"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 607 : This package requires a body and must therefore include either pragma Elaborate_Body or a subprogram declaration.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued where a package specification contains no subprogram declarations, but whose own variables (as specified in the package annotation) are not all declared (and initialized where appropriate) in the package specification. This is because such a package is not allowed a body in Ada 95 unless either the pragma is given or a subprogram declared.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-608"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 608 : Reduced accuracy subtypes of real numbers are considered obsolescent and are not supported by SPARK.
</p>
<a name="semantic-609"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 609 : This entity cannot be assigned to.
</p>
<a name="semantic-610"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 610 : Child packages may not be used in SPARK83.
</p>
<a name="semantic-611"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 611 : Illegal use of deferred constant prior to its full declaration.
</p>
<a name="semantic-613"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 613 : Illegal name for body stub.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a dotted name appears in a body stub as in "package body P.Q is separate". No legal stub could ever have such a name.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-614"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 614 : Child packages may be declared only at library level.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an attempt is made to declare a child package which is embedded in a package or subprogram.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-615"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 615 : Name does not match name of package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if the closing identifier of a package has a different number of identifiers from the name originally given for the package. For example "package P.Q is ... end P.Q.R;".
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-616"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 616 : The private package XXX is not visible at this point.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an attempt is made to with or inherit a private package from the visible part of a public package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-617"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 617 : Public sibling XXX is not visible at this point.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Arises from attempting to inherit a public sibling child package from a private child package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-618"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 618 : The owner of the current package does not inherit the package XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A private descendent (although it may be a public package) can only inherit a remote package if its parent also inherits it; this is a analogous to the behaviour of embedded packages which may also only inherit a remote package if their enclosing package also does so.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-619"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 619 : The package XXX is not owned by the current package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This message indicates an attempt to claim that own variables of a package other than a private child package of the current package are refinement constituents of an abstract own variable of the current package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-620"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 620 : Own variables here must be refinement constituents in package owner XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Own variables of private child packages must appear as refinement constituents of the package which owns the child. If the Examiner has seen the owner package body before processing the child and has not found the required refinement constituent then this message results on processing the child.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-621"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 621 : Own variable XXX expected as a refinement constituent in this package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Own variables of private child packages must appear as refinement constituents of the package which owns the child. If the Examiner has seen a child package which declares an own variable before examining its owner’s body then this message is issued if the owner lacks the required refinement constituent declaration.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-622"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 622 : Own variable XXX did not occur in an initialization specification.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an own variable appears in an initialization clause and is also a refinement constituent of an own variable which is not marked as initialized.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-623"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 623 : Own variable XXX occurred in an initialization specification.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an own variable does not appear in an initialization clause and is also a refinement constituent of an own variable that is marked as initialized.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-624"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 624 : All operators from ancestor package XXX are already visible.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A package must appear in a <b>with</b> clause before types declared in it can be specified in a <b>use type</b> clause.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-626"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 626 : Global/derives/declare on generic subprogram instantiation is not allowed.
</p>
<a name="semantic-628"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 628 : Formal parameter of the instantiation of subprogram XXX is not allowed.
</p>
<a name="semantic-629"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 629 : The generic subprogram XXX has no generic formal parameters.
</p>
<a name="semantic-630"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 630 : XXX is not the name of generic subprogram.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Only generic subprogram can be instantiated.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-631"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 631 : Generic function found where a generic procedure was expected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Subprogram kind of generic and its instantiation must match.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-632"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 632 : Generic procedure found where a generic function was expected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Subprogram kind of generic and its instantiation must match.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-635"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 635 : Incorrect number of generic actual parameters for instantiation of generic unit XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The number of generic formal and actual parameters must match exactly.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-636"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 636 : Type XXX is not compatible with generic formal parameter YYY.
</p>
<p>
<i>
See ALRM 12.5. Each generic formal type parameter must be supplied with an actual type which is of a compatible class. Note that SPARK does not have default values for such associations.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-637"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 637 : User-defined generic units are not permitted in SPARK 83.
</p>
<p>
<i>
There are weaknesses in the generic type model of Ada 83 that prevent the implementation of a safe subset of generics in SPARK 83. These deficiencies are overcome in Ada 95. SPARK 83 users may employ the predefined unit Unchecked_Conversion only.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-638"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 638 : Unexpected global annotation. A generic subprogram may not reference or update global variables.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A standalone generic subprogram may not have a global annotation. Note that a subprogram in a generic package may have a global annotation as long as it only refers to own variables that are local to the package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-639"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 639 : A generic formal object may only have default mode or mode in.
</p>
<p>
<i>
SPARK restricts formal objects to being constants in order to avoid concealed information flows.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-640"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 640 : A generic formal object may only be instantiated with a constant expression.
</p>
<p>
<i>
SPARK restricts formal objects to being constants in order to avoid concealed information flows.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-641"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 641 : There is no generic subprogram declaration named XXX so a generic body of that name cannot be declared here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A generic body must be preceded by a generic declaration of the same name.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-645"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 645 : Actual array element XXX is not compatible with the element type YYY of the generic formal parameter.
</p>
<p>
<i>
See ALRM 12.5. Each generic formal type parameter must be supplied with an actual type which is of a compatible class. Note that SPARK does not have default values for such associations.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-646"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 646 : Actual array index XXX is not compatible with the index type YYY of the generic formal parameter.
</p>
<p>
<i>
See ALRM 12.5. Each generic formal type parameter must be supplied with an actual type which is of a compatible class. Note that SPARK does not have default values for such associations.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-647"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 647 : Actual array XXX has more dimensions than formal array YYY.
</p>
<p>
<i>
See ALRM 12.5. Each generic formal type parameter must be supplied with an actual type which is of a compatible class. Note that SPARK does not have default values for such associations.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-648"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 648 : Actual array XXX has fewer dimensions than formal array YYY.
</p>
<p>
<i>
See ALRM 12.5. Each generic formal type parameter must be supplied with an actual type which is of a compatible class. Note that SPARK does not have default values for such associations.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-649"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 649 : Actual array XXX is constrained but the associated formal YYY is unconstrained.
</p>
<p>
<i>
See ALRM 12.5. Each generic formal type parameter must be supplied with an actual type which is of a compatible class. Note that SPARK does not have default values for such associations.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-650"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 650 : Actual array XXX is unconstrained but the associated formal YYY is constrained.
</p>
<p>
<i>
See ALRM 12.5. Each generic formal type parameter must be supplied with an actual type which is of a compatible class. Note that SPARK does not have default values for such associations.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-651"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 651 : Variables of generic types may not be initialized at declaration.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In non-generic code we statically know the value being assigned to the variable and can check that it is in range. In the case of a generic we cannot do this because we do not know the bounds of the variable's type. The variable may, however, be assigned to in the sequence of statements in the generic body because generation of run-time checks will provide suitable protection from out-of-range values.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-652"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 652 : Subtypes of generic types are not permitted.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In non-generic code we statically know the values being used as the range bounds for a subtype and can check that they are in range. In the case of a generic we cannot do this because we do not know the bounds of the variable's type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-653"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 653 : Constants of generic types are not permitted.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In non-generic code we statically know the value being assigned to the constant and can check that it is in range. In the case of a generic we cannot do this because we do not know the bounds of the constant's type. A variable, assigned to in the sequence of statements in the generic body, may be a suitable substitute for such a constant.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-654"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 654 : XXX is a generic subprogram which must be instantiated before it can be called.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Generic units provide a template for creating callable units and are not directly callable.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-655"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 655 : Invalid prefix, XXX is a generic package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Components of generic packages cannot be accessed directly. First instantiate the package and then access components of the instantiation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-656"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 656 : The only currently supported attribute in this context is 'Always_Valid.
</p>
<a name="semantic-657"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 657 : A 'Always_Valid assertion requires a variable here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The 'Always_Valid assertion can only be applied to variables or to components of record variables.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-658"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 658 : The object in this assertion must be scalar or a non-tagged aggregation of scalar components.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The 'Always_Valid assertion can only be applied to objects which are: (1) of a scalar type, (2) a one dimensional array of scalar components, (3) an entire record variable of a non-tagged type with all components that are either scalar or an array of scalar components, (4) an array variable whose components are records satisfying (3). Additionally a field of a record satisfying these constraints may be marked individually as always valid.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-659"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 659 : A 'Always_Valid assertion must be in the same declarative region as contains the declaration of the variable to which it refers.
</p>
<a name="semantic-660"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 660 : A 'Always_Valid assertion must not be applied to an object already marked as always valid.
</p>
<a name="semantic-662"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 662 : Only Mode in own variables and constituents can be marked using 'Always_Valid.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The 'Always_Valid assertion can only be applied to variables which are own variables with the mode in, or to subcomponents of records which are mode in own variables.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-700"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 700 : Mode 'in out' may not be applied to own variables or their refinement constituents.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Own variables may be given a mode to indicate that they are system level inputs or outputs (i.e. they obtain values from or pass values to the external environment). Since effective SPARK design strictly separates inputs from outputs the mode 'in out' is not permitted.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-701"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 701 : The mode of this refinement constituent is not consistent with its subject: XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If an abstract own variable is given a mode then its refinement constituents must all be of the same mode.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-702"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 702 : Own variable XXX must be given the mode 'in' to match its earlier announcement .
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an own variable of an embedded package is not given the same mode as the earlier refinement constituent that announced it would exist.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-703"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 703 : Own variable XXX must be given the mode 'out' to match its earlier announcement .
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an own variable of an embedded package is not given the same mode as the earlier refinement constituent that announced it would exist.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-704"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 704 : Own variable XXX may not have a mode because one was not present in its earlier announcement .
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if an own variable of an embedded package is given a mode when the earlier refinement constituent that announced it would exist did not have one.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-705"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 705 : Refinement constituent XXX must be given the mode 'in' to match the child package own variable with which it is being associated.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If a refinement constituent is an own variable of a private package then the constituent must have the same mode as the own variable to which it refers.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-706"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 706 : Refinement constituent XXX must be given the mode 'out' to match the child package own variable with which it is being associated.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If a refinement constituent is an own variable of a private package then the constituent must have the same mode as the own variable to which it refers.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-707"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 707 : Refinement constituent XXX may not have a mode because one was not present on the child package own variable with which it is being associated.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If a refinement constituent is an own variable of a private package then the constituent can only be given a mode if the own variable to which it refers has one.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-708"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 708 : Own variable XXX has a mode and may not appear in an initializes clause.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Mode own variables (stream variables) are implicitly initialized by the environment to which they are connected and may not appear in initializes clauses since this would require their explicit initialization.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-709"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 709 : Own variable or constituent XXX has mode 'out' and may not be referenced by a function.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Functions are permitted to reference own variables that are either unmoded or of mode 'in'. Since mode 'out' own variables represent outputs to the environment, reading them in a function does not make sense and is not allowed.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-710"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 710 : The own variable or constituent XXX is of mode 'in' and can only have global mode 'in'.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Global modes, if given, must be consistent with the modes of own variables that appear in the global list.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-711"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 711 : The own variable or constituent XXX is of mode 'out' and can only have global mode 'out'.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Global modes, if given, must be consistent with the modes of own variables that appear in the global list.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-712"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 712 : The own variable or constituent XXX is of either mode 'in' or mode 'out' and may not have global mode 'in out'.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Global modes, if given, must be consistent with the modes of own variables that appear in the global list.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-713"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 713 : The own variable or constituent XXX is of mode 'in' and may not appear in a dependency clause as an export.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Own variables with mode 'in' denote system-level inputs; their exportation is not allowed.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-714"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 714 : The own variable or constituent XXX is of mode 'out' and may not appear in a dependency clause as an import.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Own variables with mode 'out' denote system-level outputs; their importation is not allowed.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-715"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 715 : Function XXX references external (stream) variables and may only appear directly in an assignment or return statement.
</p>
<p>
<i>
To avoid ordering effects, functions which globally access own variables which have modes (indicating that they are connected to the external environment) may only appear directly in assignment or return statements. They may not appear as actual parameters or in any other form of expression.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-716"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 716 : External (stream) variable XXX may only appear directly in an assignment or return statement; or as an actual parameter to an unchecked conversion.
</p>
<p>
<i>
To avoid ordering effects, own variables which have modes (indicating that they are connected to the external environment) may only appear directly in assignment or return statements. They may not appear as actual parameters (other than to instantiations of Unchecked_Conversion) or in any other form of expression.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-717"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 717 : External (stream) variable XXX is of mode 'in' and may not be assigned to.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Own variables with mode 'in' represent inputs to the system from the external environment. As such, assigning to them does not make sense and is not permitted.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-718"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 718 : External (stream) variable XXX is of mode 'out' and may not be referenced.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Own variables with mode 'out' represent outputs to the external environment from the system. As such, referencing them does not make sense and is not permitted.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-719"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 719 : External (stream) variables may not be referenced or updated during package elaboration.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Own variables with modes represent inputs and outputs between the external environment and the system. Referencing or updating them during package elaboration would introduce ordering effects and is not permitted.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-720"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 720 : Variable XXX is an external (stream) variable and may not be initialized at declaration.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Own variables with modes represent inputs and outputs between the external environment and the system. Referencing or updating them during package elaboration would introduce ordering effects and is not permitted.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-721"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 721 : This refined function global annotation may not reference XXX because it is an external (stream) variable whose abstract subject YYY does not have a mode.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Functions may be used to reference external (stream) variables and the Examiner generates the appropriate information flow to show that the value returned by the function is 'volatile'. If the abstract view of the same function shows it referencing an own variable which is not an external stream then the volatility of the function is concealed. The error can be removed either by making the abstract own variable a mode 'in' stream or by using a procedure instead of a function to read the refined stream variable.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-722"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 722 : The mode on abstract global variable YYY must be made 'in out' to make it consistent with the referencing of mode 'in' external (stream) constituent XXX in the refined global annotation.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Where a procedure references an external (stream) variable of mode 'in' the Examiner constructs appropriate information flow to show that the input stream is 'volatile'. If the abstract view shows that the procedure obtains its result by simply reading an own variable which is not an external stream then the volatility is concealed. The error can be removed either by making the global mode of XXX 'in out' or making XXX an external (stream) variable of mode 'in'.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-723"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 723 : Variable XXX must appear in this refined global annotation.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a global variable which is present in the first (abstract) global annotation is omitted from the second (refined) one.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-724"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 724 : Exit label must match the label of the most closely enclosing loop statement.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If an exit statement names a loop label, then the most closely enclosing loop statement must have a matching label.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-725"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 725 : Protected function or variable XXX may only appear directly in an assignment or return statement.
</p>
<p>
<i>
To avoid ordering effects, protected functions may only appear directly in assignment or return statements. They may not appear as actual parameters or in any other form of expression. Ordering effects occur because the global state referenced by the protected function may be updated by another process during expression evaluation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-730"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 730 : A loop with no iteration scheme or exit statements may only appear as the last statement in the outermost scope of the main subprogram (or a task body when using the Ravenscar profile).
</p>
<p>
<i>
If a loop has neither an iteration scheme nor any exit statements then it will run forever. Any statements following it will be unreachable. SPARK only allows one such loop which must be the last statement of the main program.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-750"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 750 : The identifier YYY.XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point. An array type may not be used as its own index type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The type mark used for the index of an array type declaration must not be the same as the name of the array type being declared.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-751"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 751 : The identifier YYY.XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point. A record type may not include fields of its own type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The type mark given for a field in a record type declaration must not be the same as the name of the record type being declared.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-752"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 752 : The identifier YYY.XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point. This identifier must appear in a preceding legal global annotation or formal parameter list.
</p>
<p>
<i>
For an identifier to appear legally as an import in a derives annotation, it must be a formal parameter or must appear legally in a preceding global annotation and must be of mode 'in' or mode 'in out'.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-753"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 753 : The identifier YYY.XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point. This identifier must appear in a preceding legal global annotation or formal parameter list.
</p>
<p>
<i>
For an identifier to appear legally as an export in a derives annotation, it must be a formal parameter or must appear legally in a preceding global annotation and must be of mode 'out' or mode 'in out'.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-754"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 754 : The identifier YYY.XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point. This package must be both inherited and withed to be visible here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
For a package name to be visible in Ada context, it must appear in both the inherit clause and the with clause of the enclosing package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-755"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 755 : The identifier YYY.XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point. A parent of a child package must be inherited to be visible here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A parent of a child package must be inherited (but not withed) to be visible in that child.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-756"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 756 : The identifier YYY.XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point. The grandparent of a child package should not appear in this prefix.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A grandparent of a child package should not be included in prefixes referencing a declaration of the child package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-757"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 757 : The identifer XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point. A record field name cannot be the same as its indicated type.
</p>
<a name="semantic-770"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 770 : If Any_Priority is defined, Priority and Interrupt_Priority must also be defined.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If the type Any_Priority is defined in package System, then the subtypes Priority and Interrupt_Priority must also be defined; if support for tasking is not required, then the definition of Any_Priority may be removed.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-771"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 771 : The parent type of this subtype must be Any_Priority.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Ada 95 requires that both Priority and Interrupt_Priority be immediate subtypes of Any_Priority.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-772"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 772 : The range of Priority must contain at least 30 values; LRM D.1(26).
</p>
<p>
<i>
Ada 95 requires that the range of the subtype Priority include at least 30 values; this requirement is stated in the Ada 95 Language Reference Manual at D.1(26).
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-773"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 773 : Priority'First must equal Any_Priority'First; LRM D.1(10).
</p>
<p>
<i>
Ada 95 requires that task priority types meet the following criteria, the second of which is relevant to this error: <li>subtype Any_Priority is Integer range implementation-defined; <li>subtype Priority is Any_Priority range Any_Priority'First .. implementation-defined; <li>subtype Interrupt_Priority is Any_Priority range Priority'Last+1 .. Any_Priority'Last.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-774"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 774 : Interrupt_Priority'First must equal Priority'Last + 1; LRM D.1(10).
</p>
<p>
<i>
Ada 95 requires that task priority types meet the following criteria, the third of which is relevant to this error: <li>subtype Any_Priority is Integer range implementation-defined; <li>subtype Priority is Any_Priority range Any_Priority'First .. implementation-defined; <li>subtype Interrupt_Priority is Any_Priority range Priority'Last+1 .. Any_Priority'Last.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-775"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 775 : Interrupt_Priority'Last must equal Any_Priority'Last; LRM D.1(10).
</p>
<p>
<i>
Ada 95 requires that task priority types meet the following criteria, the third of which is relevant to this error: <li>subtype Any_Priority is Integer range implementation-defined; <li>subtype Priority is Any_Priority range Any_Priority'First .. implementation-defined; <li>subtype Interrupt_Priority is Any_Priority range Priority'Last+1 .. Any_Priority'Last.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-776"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 776 : In SPARK95 mode, only packages Standard, System, Ada.Real_Time and Ada.Interrupts may be specified in the config file.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In SPARK95 mode, the packages that may be specified in the target configuration file are: Standard, System, Ada.Real_Time and Ada.Interrupts. The latter two are ignored unless the Ravenscar profile is selected.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-777"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 777 : In package System, Priority must be an immediate subtype of Integer.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Ada 95, and hence SPARK95, defines Priority as being an immediate subtype of Integer.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-778"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 778 : This identifier is not valid at this point in the target configuration file.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The specified identifier cannot be used here; it is most probably either not valid in the target configuration file at all, or might be valid in a different package, but not here.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-779"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 779 : Definition of this package in the target configuration file is not allowed in SPARK83 mode.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In SPARK83 mode, only package Standard may be specified in the target configuration file.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-780"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 780 : Type XXX must be private.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This type may only be declared as private in the target configuration file.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-781"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 781 : The lower bound of a signed integer type declaration must be greater than or equal to System.Min_Int.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This error can only be generated in SPARK95 mode when the configuration file specifies a value for System.Min_Int.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-782"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 782 : The upper bound of a signed integer type declaration must be less than or equal to System.Max_Int.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This error can only be generated in SPARK95 mode when the configuration file specifies a value for System.Max_Int.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-783"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 783 : Modulus must be less than or equal to System.Max_Binary_Modulus.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This error can only be generated in SPARK95 mode when the configuration file specifies a value for System.Max_Binary_Modulus.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-784"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 784 : System.Max_Binary_Modulus must be a positive power of 2.
</p>
<a name="semantic-785"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 785 : The number of digits specified exceeds the value defined for System.Max_Digits.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The maximum decimal precision for a floating point type, where a range specification has not been included, is defined by System.Max_Digits.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-786"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 786 : The number of digits specified exceeds the value defined for System.Max_Base_Digits.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The maximum decimal precision for a floating point type, where a range specification has been included, is defined by System.Max_Base_Digits.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-787"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 787 : Digits value must be positive.
</p>
<a name="semantic-788"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 788 : Delta value must be positive.
</p>
<a name="semantic-789"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 789 : The only currently supported type attribute in this context is 'Base.
</p>
<a name="semantic-790"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 790 : A base type assertion requires a type here.
</p>
<a name="semantic-791"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 791 : The base type in this assertion must be a predefined type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Predefined types are those defined either by the language, or in package Standard, using the configuration file mechanism</i>.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-792"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 792 : The types in this assertion must both be either floating point or signed integer.
</p>
<a name="semantic-793"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 793 : This base type must have a defined range in the configuration file.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If a predefined type is to be used in a base type assertion or in a derived type declaration, then it must appear in the configuration file and have a well-defined range.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-794"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 794 : Range of subtype exceeds range of base type.
</p>
<a name="semantic-795"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 795 : A base type assertion must be in the same declarative region as that of the full type definition.
</p>
<a name="semantic-796"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 796 : This type already has a base type: either it already has a base type assertion, or is explicitly derived, or is a predefined type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A base type assertion can only be given exactly once. Explicitly derived scalar types and predefined types never need a base type assertion.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-797"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 797 : The base type in a floating point base type assertion must have a defined accuracy.
</p>
<a name="semantic-798"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 798 : The accuracy of the base type in a base type assertion must be at least that of the type which is the subject of the assertion.
</p>
<a name="semantic-799"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 799 : Only a simple type can be the subject of a base type assertion .
</p>
<a name="semantic-800"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 800 : Modulus must be a positive power of 2.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In SPARK, modular types must have a modulus which is a positive power of 2.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-801"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 801 : Modular types may only be used in SPARK95.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Ada83 (and hence SPARK83) does not include modular types.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-803"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 803 : Unary arithmetic operators are not permitted for modular types.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Unary arithmetic operators are of little value. The "abs" and "+" operators have no effect for modular types, and so are not required. The unary minus operator is a source of potential confusion, and so is not permitted in SPARK.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-804"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 804 : Universal expression may not be implicitly converted to a modular type here. Left hand operand requires qualification to type XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A universal expression cannot be used as the left hand operand of a binary operator if the right hand operand is of a modular type. Qualification of the left hand expression is required in this case.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-805"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 805 : Universal expression may not be implicitly converted to a modular type here. Right hand operand requires qualification to type XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A universal expression cannot be used as the right hand operand of a binary operator if the left hand operand is of a modular type. Qualification of the right hand expression is required in this case.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-806"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 806 : Universal expression may not be implicitly converted to a modular type here. Right hand operand requires qualification.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A universal expression cannot be used as operand of an unary "not" operator if no type can be determined from the context of the expression. Qualification of the operand is required in this case.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-814"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 814 : Default_Bit_Order must be of type Bit_Order.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The only possible type for the constant System.Default_Bit_Order is System.Bit_Order when it appears in the configuration file.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-815"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 815 : The only allowed values of Default_Bit_Order are Low_Order_First and High_Order_First.
</p>
<p>
<i>
System.Bit_Order is implicity declared in package System when a configuration file is given. This is an enumeration type with only two literals Low_Order_First and High_Order_First.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-820"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 820 : Abstract types are not currently permitted in SPARK.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Only non-abstract tagged types are currently supported. It is hoped to lift this restriction in a future Examiner release.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-821"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 821 : This type declaration must be a tagged record because it's private type is tagged.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If a type is declared as "tagged private" then its full declaration must be a tagged record.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-822"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 822 : XXX is not a tagged type; only tagged types may be extended.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In SPARK, "new" can only be used to declare a type extension; other derived types are not permitted.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-823"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 823 : This type may not be extended in the same package in which it is declared.
</p>
<p>
<i>
SPARK only permits types from another library package to be extended. This rule prevents overloading of inherited operations.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-824"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 824 : This package already extends a type from package XXX. Only one type extension per package is permitted.
</p>
<p>
<i>
SPARK only permits one type extension per package. This rule prevents overloading of inherited operations.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-825"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 825 : Type XXX expected in order to complete earlier private extension.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Since SPARK only permits one type extension per package it follows that the declaration "new XXX with private" in a package visible part must be paired with "new XXX with record..." in its private part. The ancestor type XXX must be the same in both declarations.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-826"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 826 : Type extension is not permitted in SPARK 83.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Type extension is an Ada 95 feature not included in Ada or SPARK 83.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-827"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 827 : The actual parameter associated with a tagged formal parameter in an inherited operation must be an object not an expression.
</p>
<p>
<i>
There are several reasons for this SPARK rule. Firstly, Ada requires tagged parameters to be passed by reference and so an object must exist at least implicitly. Secondly, in order to perform flow analysis of inherited subprogram calls, the Examiner needs identify what subset of the information available at the point of call is passed to and from the called subprogram. Since information can only flow through objects it follows that actual parameter must be an object.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-828"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 828 : Tagged types and tagged type extensions may only be declared in library-level package specifications.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This SPARK rule facilitates the main uses of tagged types while greatly simplifying visibility rules.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-829"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 829 : Illegal re-declaration: this subprogram shares the same name as the inheritable root operation XXX but does not override it.
</p>
<p>
<i>
To avoid overloading, SPARK prohibits more than one potentially visible subprogram having the same name.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-830"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 830 : A private type may not be implemented as a tagged type or an extension of a tagged type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This rule means that a private type can only be implemented as a tagged type if the private type itself is tagged.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-831"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 831 : Extended tagged types may only be converted in the direction of their root type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This is an Ada rule: type conversions simply omit unused fields of the extended type. It follows that conversions must be in the direction of the root type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-832"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 832 : Only tagged objects, not expressions, may be converted.
</p>
<p>
<i>
For flow analysis purposes the Examiner needs to know what subset of the information in the unconverted view is available in the converted view. Since information can only flow through objects it follows that only objects can be converted.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-833"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 833 : Invalid record aggregate: type XXX has a private ancestor.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If an extended type has a private ancestor then an extension aggregate must be used rather than a normal aggregate.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-834"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 834 : Null records are only permitted if they are tagged.
</p>
<p>
<i>
An empty record can have no use in a SPARK program others than as a root type from which other types can be derived and extended. For this reason, null records are only allowed if they are tagged.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-835"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 835 : XXX is not an extended tagged record type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
An extension aggregate is only appropriate if the record type it is defining is an extended record. A normal aggregate should be used for other record (and array) types.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-836"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 836 : This expression does not represent a valid ancestor type of the aggregate XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The expression before the reserved word "with" must be of an ancestor type of the overall aggregate type. In SPARK, the ancestor expression may not be a subtype mark.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-837"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 837 : Invalid record aggregate: there is a private ancestor between the type of this expression and the type of the aggregate XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The ancestor type can be an tagged type with a private extension; however, there must be no private extensions between the ancestor type and the type of the aggregate.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-838"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 838 : Incomplete aggregate: null record cannot be used here because fields in XXX require values.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The aggregate form "with null record" can only be used if the type of the aggregate is a null record extension of the ancestor type. If any fields are added between the ancestor type and the aggregate type then values need to be supplied for them so "null record" is inappropriate.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-839"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 839 : This package already contains a root tagged type or tagged type extension. Only one such declaration per package is permitted.
</p>
<p>
<i>
SPARK permits one root tagged type or one tagged type extension per package, but not both. This rule prevents the declaration of illegal operations with more than one controlling parameter.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-840"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 840 : A tagged or extended type may not appear here. SPARK does not permit the declaration of primitive functions with controlling results.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A primitive function controlled by its return result would be almost unusable in SPARK because a data flow error would occur wherever it was used.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-841"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 841 : The return type in the declaration of this function contained an error. It is not possible to check the validity of this return type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when there is an error in the return type on a function's initial declaration. In this situation we cannot be sure what return type is expected in the function's body. It would be misleading to simply report a type mismatch since the types might match perfectly and both be wrong. Instead, the Examiner reports the above error and refuses to analyse the function body until its specification is corrected.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-842"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 842 : Pragma Atomic_Components is not permitted in SPARK when the Ravenscar profile is selected.
</p>
<a name="semantic-843"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 843 : Pragma Volatile_Components is not permitted in SPARK when the Ravenscar profile is selected.
</p>
<a name="semantic-844"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 844 : Missing or contradictory overriding_indicator for operation XXX. This operation successfully overrides its parent operation.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In SPARK2005, an operation which successfully overrides a parent operation must be specified as Overriding.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-845"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 845 : Subprogram XXX does not successfully override a parent operation.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In SPARK2005, an overriding operation must successfully override an operation inherited from the parent.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-850"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 850 : This construct may only be used when the Ravenscar profile is selected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Support for concurrent features of the SPARK language, including protected objects, tasking, etc. are only supported when the Ravenscar profile is selected.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-851"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 851 : The parameter to pragma Atomic must be a simple_name.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The parameter to pragma Atomic must be a simple_name; and may not be passed using a named association.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-852"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 852 : pragma Atomic may only appear in the same immediate scope as the type to which it applies.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This is an Ada rule (pragma Atomic takes a local name see LRM 13.1(1)). Note that this precludes the use of pragma Atomic on a predefined type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-853"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 853 : pragma Atomic may only apply to a scalar base type, or to a non-tagged record type with exactly 1 field that is a predefined scalar type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
pragma Atomic may only be applied to base types that are scalar. (i.e. enumeration types, integer types, real types, modular types) or a non-tagged record type with a single field which is a predefined scalar type, such as Integer, Character or Boolean. As an additional special case, a record type with a single field of type System.Address is also allowed.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-854"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 854 : pragma Atomic takes exactly one parameter.
</p>
<a name="semantic-855"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 855 : The type of own variable XXX is not consistent with its modifier.
</p>
<p>
<i>
An own variable with a task modifier must be of a task type. A task own variable must have the task modifier. An own variable with a protected modifier must be a protected object, suspension object or pragma atomic type. A protected or suspension object own variable must have the protected modifier.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-858"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 858 : A variable that appears in a protects property list may not appear in a refinement clause.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A variable in a protects list is effectively protected and hence cannot be refined.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-859"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 859 : A protected own variable may not appear in a refinement clause.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Protected state cannot be refined or be used as refinement constituents.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-860"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 860 : Own variable XXX appears in a protects list and hence must appear in the initializes clause.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Protected state (including all refinement constituents) must be initialized.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-861"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 861 : Both abstract own variable XXX and refinement constitutent YYY must have an Integrity property.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If an abstract own variable has an Integrity property, then so must all its refinement constituents, and vice-versa.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-862"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 862 : Both abstract own variable XXX and refinement constitutent YYY must have the same Integrity value.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If both an abstract own variable and a refinement constituent have Integrity properties specified, then the value of the Integrity must be the same.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-863"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 863 : Own variable XXX is protected and may not appear in an initializes clause.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Protected own variables must always be initialized, and should not appear in initializes annotations.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-864"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 864 : Unexpected initialization specification - all own variables of this package are either implicitly initialized, or do not require initialization.
</p>
<p>
<i>
An own variable initialization clause and that of its refinement constituents must be consistent.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-865"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 865 : Field XXX is part of the ancestor part of this aggregate and does not require a value here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
An extension aggregate must supply values for all fields that are part of the overall aggregate type but not those which are part of the ancestor part.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-866"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 866 : The expression in a delay_until statement must be of type Ada.Real_Time.Time.
</p>
<p>
<i>
When the Ravenscar Profile is selected, the delay until statement may be used. The argument of this statement must be of type Ada.Real_Time.Time.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-867"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 867 : Subprogram XXX contains a delay statement but does not have a delay property.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Any subprogram that may call delay until must have a delay property in a declare annotation. Your subprogram is directly or indirectly making a call to delay until.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-868"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 868 : Protected object XXX may only be declared immediately within a library package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This error message is issued if a type mark representing a protected type appears anywhere other than in a library level variable declaration or library-level own variable type announcement.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-869"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 869 : Protected type XXX already contains an Entry declaration; only one Entry is permitted.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The Ravenscar profile prohibits a protected type from declaring more than one entry.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-870"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 870 : Protected type XXX does not have any operations, at least one operation must be declared.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A protected type which provides no operations can never be used so SPARK requires the declaration of at least one.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-871"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 871 : A type can only be explicitly derived from a predefined Integer or Floating Point type or from a tagged record type.
</p>
<a name="semantic-872"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 872 : Variable XXX is not protected; only protected items may be globally accessed by protected operations.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In order to avoid the possibility of shared data corruption, SPARK prohibits protected operations from accessing unprotected data items.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-873"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 873 : This subprogram requires a global annotation which references the protected type name XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In order to statically-detect certain bounded errors defined by the Ravenscar profile, SPARK requires every visible operation of protected type to globally reference the abstract state of the type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-874"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 874 : Protected state XXX must be initialized at declaration.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Because there is no guarantee that a concurrent thread that initializes a protected object will be executed before one that reads it, the only way we can be sure that a protected object is properly initialized is to do so at the point of declaration. You have either declared some protected state and not included an initialization or you have tried to initialize some protected state in package body elaboration.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-875"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 875 : Protected type expected; access discriminants may only refer to protected types in SPARK.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Access discriminants have been allowed in SPARK solely to allow devices made up of co-operating Ravenscar-compliant units to be constructed. For this reason only protected types may appear in access discriminants.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-876"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 876 : This protected type or task declaration must include either a pragma Priority or pragma Interrupt_Priority.
</p>
<p>
<i>
To allow the static detection of certain bounded errors defined by the Ravenscar profile, SPARK requires an explicitly-set priority for each protected type, task type or object of those types. The System.Default_Priority may used explicitly provided package System has been defined in the configuration file.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-877"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 877 : Priority values require an argument which is an expression of type integer.
</p>
<a name="semantic-878"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 878 : This protected type declaration contains a pragma Attach_Handler and must therefore also include a pragma Interrupt_Priority.
</p>
<p>
<i>
To allow the static detection of certain bounded errors defined by the Ravenscar profile, SPARK requires an explicitly-set priority for each protected type or object. The System.Default_Priority may used explicitly provided package System has been defined in the configuration file.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-879"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 879 : Unexpected pragma XXX: this pragma may not appear here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
pragma Interrupt_Priority must be the first item in a protected type declaration or task type declaration; pragma Priority must be the first item in a protected type declaration, task type declaration or the main program.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-880"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 880 : Pragma Priority or Interrupt_Priority expected here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a pragma other than Priority or Interrupt_Priority appears as the first item in a protected type or task type declaration.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-881"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 881 : The priority of XXX must be in the range YYY.
</p>
<p>
<i>
See LRM D.1(17).
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-882"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 882 : Integrity property requires an argument which is an expression of type Natural.
</p>
<a name="semantic-883"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 883 : Pragma Interrupt_Handler may not be used; SPARK does not support the dynamic attachment of interrupt handlers [LRM C3.1(9)].
</p>
<p>
<i>
Interrupt_Handler is of no use unless dynamic attachment of interrupt handlers is to be used.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-884"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 884 : Pragma Attach_Handler is only permitted immediately after the corresponding protected procedure declaration in a protected type declaration.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Pragma Attach_Handler may only be used within a protected type declaration. Furthermore, it must immediately follow a protected procedure declaration with the same name as the first argument to the pragma.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-885"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 885 : Pragma Attach_Handler may only be applied to a procedure with no parameters.
</p>
<p>
<i>
See LRM C.3.1(5).
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-887"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 887 : A discriminant may only appear alone, not in an expression.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a task or protected type priority is set using an expression involving a discriminant. The use of such an expression greatly complicates the static evaluation of the priority of task or protected subtypes thus preventing the static elimination of certain Ravenscar bounded errors.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-888"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 888 : Unexpected Delay, XXX already has a Delay property.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A procedure may only have a maximum of one delay annotation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-889"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 889 : The own variable XXX must have the suspendable property.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The type used to declare this object must be a protected type with and entry or a suspension object type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-890"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 890 : The name XXX already appears in the suspends list.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Items may not appear more than once in an a suspends list.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-891"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 891 : Task type or protected type required.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued in a subtype declaration where the constraint is a discriminant constraint. Only task and protected types may take a discriminant constraint as part of a subtype declaration.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-892"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 892 : Array type, task type or protected type required.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued in a subtype declaration where the constraint is a either a discriminant constraint or an index constraint (these two forms cannot always be distinguished syntactically). Only task and protected types may take a discriminant constraint and only array types may take an index constraint as part of a subtype declaration.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-893"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 893 : Number of discriminant constraints differs from number of known discriminants of type XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued in a subtype declaration if too many or two few discriminant constraints are supplied.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-894"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 894 : Only variables of a protected type may be aliased.
</p>
<p>
<i>
SPARK supports the keyword aliased in variable declarations only so that protected and task types can support access discriminants. Since it has no other purpose it may not be used except in a protected object declaration.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-895"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 895 : Attribute Access may only be applied to variables which are declared as aliased, variable XXX is not aliased.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This is a slightly annoying Ada issue. Marking a variable as aliased prevents it being placed in a register which would make pointing at it hazardous; however, SPARK only permits 'Access on protected types which are limited and therefore always passed by reference anyway and immune from register optimization. Requiring aliased on protected objects that will appear in discriminant constraints is therefore unwanted syntactic sugar only.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-896"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 896 : The task type XXX does not have an associated body.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued at the end of a package body if a task type declared in its specification contains neither a body nor a body stub for it.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-897"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 897 : The protected type XXX does not have an associated body.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued at the end of a package body if a protected type declared in its specification contains neither a body nor a body stub for it.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-898"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 898 : XXX is not a protected or task type which requires a body.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a body or body stub for a task or protected type is encountered and there is no matching specification.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-899"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 899 : A body for type XXX has already been declared.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a body or body stub for a task or protected type is encountered and an earlier body has already been encountered.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-901"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 901 : Suspension object XXX may only be declared immediately within a library package specification or body.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Suspension objects must be declared at library level. They cannot be used in protected type state or as local variables in subprograms.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-902"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 902 : Recursive use of typemark XXX in known descriminant.
</p>
<a name="semantic-903"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 903 : Protected or suspension object types cannot be used to declare constants.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Protected and suspension objects are used to ensure integrity of shared objects. If it is necessary to share constant data then these constructs should not be used.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-904"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 904 : Protected or suspension objects cannot be used as subprogram parameters.
</p>
<p>
<i>
SPARK does not currently support this feature.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-905"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 905 : Protected or suspension objects cannot be returned from functions.
</p>
<p>
<i>
SPARK does not currently support this feature.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-906"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 906 : Protected or suspension objects cannot be used in composite types.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Protected and suspension objects cannot be used in record or array structures.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-907"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 907 : Delay until must be called from a task or unprotected procedure body.
</p>
<p>
<i>
You are calling delay until from an invalid construct. Any construct that calls delay until must have a delay property in the declare annotation. This construct must be one of a task or procedure body.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-908"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 908 : Blocking properties are not allowed in protected scope.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Procedures in protected scope must not block and therefore blocking properties are prohibited.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-909"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 909 : Object XXX cannot suspend.
</p>
<p>
<i>
You are either applying the suspendable property to an own variable that cannot suspend or you have declared a variable (whose own variable has the suspendable property) which cannot suspend. Or you have used an item in a suspends list that does not have the suspendable property. An object can only suspend if it is a suspension object or a protected type with an entry.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-910"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 910 : Name XXX must appear in the suspends list property for the enclosing unit.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Protected entry calls and calls to Ada.Synchronous_Task_Control.Suspend_Until_True may block the currently executing task. SPARK requires you announce this fact by placing the actual callee name in the suspends list for the enclosing unit.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-911"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 911 : The argument in pragma Priority for the main program must be an integer literal or a local constant of static integer value.
</p>
<p>
<i>
If the main program priority is not an integer literal then you should declare a constant that has the required value in the declarative part of the main program prior to the position of the pragma.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-912"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 912 : This call contains a delay property that is not propagated to the enclosing unit.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The call being made has a declare annotation that contains a delay property. SPARK requires that this property is propagated up the call chain and hence must appear in a declare annotation for the enclosing unit.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-913"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 913 : This call has a name in its suspends list which is not propagated to the enclosing unit.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The call being made has a declare annotation that contains a suspends list. SPARK requires that the entire list is propagated up the call chain and hence must appear in a declare annotation for the enclosing unit.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-914"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 914 : The name XXX specified in the suspends list can never be called.
</p>
<p>
<i>
You have specified the name of a protected or suspension object in the suspends list that can never be called by this procedure or task.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-915"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 915 : Procedure XXX has a delay property but cannot delay.
</p>
<p>
<i>
You have specified a delay property for this procedure but delay until can never be called from it.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-916"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 916 : Protected object XXX has a circular dependency in subprogram YYY.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The type of the protected object mentions the protected object name in the derives list for the given subprogram.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-917"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 917 : Procedure XXX cannot be called from a protected action.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The procedure being called may block and hence cannot be called from a protected action.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-918"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 918 : The delay property is not allowed for XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The delay property may only be applied to a procedure.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-919"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 919 : The priority property is not allowed for XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The priority property can only be applied to protected own variables which are type announced. If the type has been declared it must be a protected type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-920"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 920 : The suspends property is not allowed for XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The suspends property may only be applied to task type specifications and procedures.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-921"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 921 : The identifier XXX is not recognised as a component of a property list.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The property list can only specify the reserved word delay, suspends or priority.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-922"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 922 : The own variable XXX must have the priority property.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In order to perform the ceiling priority checks the priority property must be given to all own variables of protected type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-923"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 923 : The procedure XXX cannot be called from a function as it has a blocking side effect.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Blocking is seen as a side effect and hence procedures that potentially block cannot be called from functions.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-924"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 924 : The suspendable property is not allowed for XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Objects that suspend must be declared as own protected variables.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-925"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 925 : The own variable or task XXX must have a type announcement.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Own variables of protected type and own tasks must have a type announcement.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-926"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 926 : Illegal declaration of task XXX. Task objects must be declared at library level.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Task objects must be declared in library level package specifications or bodies.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-927"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 927 : The own task annotation for this task is missing the name XXX in its suspends list.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The task type declaration has name XXX in its list and this must appear in the own task annotation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-928"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 928 : Private elements are not allowed for protected type XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Protected type XXX has been used to declare a protected, moded own variable. Protected, moded own variables are refined onto a set of virtual elements with the same mode. As such private elements are not allowed.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-929"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 929 : Unexpected declare annotation. Procedure XXX should have the declare annotation on the specification.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Declare annotations cannot appear on the procedure body if it appears on the procedure specification.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-930"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 930 : Task XXX does not appear in the own task annotation for this package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A task has been declared that is not specified as an own task of the package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-931"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 931 : Task XXX does not have a definition.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A task name appears in the own task annotation for this package but is never declared.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-932"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 932 : The priority for protected object XXX does not match that given in the own variable declaration.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The priority given in the priority property must match that given in the protected type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-933"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 933 : A pragma Priority is required for the main program when Ravenscar Profile is enabled.
</p>
<p>
<i>
When SPARK profile Ravenscar is selected, all tasks, protected objects and the main program must explicitly be assigned a priority.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-934"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 934 : Priority ceiling check failure: the priority of YYY is less than that of XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The active priority of a task is the higher of its base priority and the ceiling priorities of all protected objects that it is executing. The active priority at the point of a call to a protected operation must not exceed the ceiling priority of the callee.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-935"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 935 : The own variable XXX must have the interrupt property.
</p>
<p>
<i>
An own variable has been declared using a protected type with a pragma attach handler. Such objects are used in interrupt processing and must have the interrupt property specified in their own variable declaration.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-936"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 936 : The interrupt property is not allowed for XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The interrupt property can only be applied to protected own variables that are type announced. If the type is declared then it must be a protected type that contains an attach handler.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-937"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 937 : The protects property is not allowed for XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The protects property can only be applied to protected own variables that are type announced. If the type is declared then it must be a protected type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-938"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 938 : The unprotected variable XXX is shared by YYY and ZZZ.
</p>
<p>
<i>
XXX is an unprotected variable that appears in the global list of the threads YYY and ZZZ. Unprotected variables cannot be shared between threads in SPARK. A thread is one of: the main program, a task, an interrupt handler.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-939"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 939 : The suspendable item XXX is referenced by YYY and ZZZ.
</p>
<p>
<i>
XXX is an own variable with the suspends property that appears in the suspends list of the threads YYY and ZZZ. SPARK prohibits this to prevent more than one thread being suspended on the same item at any one time. A thread is one of: the main program, a task, an interrupt handler.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-940"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 940 : XXX is a protected own variable. Protected variables may not be used in proof contexts.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The use of protected variables in pre and postconditions or other proof annotations is not (currently) supported. Protected variables are volatile because they can be changed at any time by another program thread and this may invalidate some common proof techniques. The prohibition of protected variables does not prevent proof of absence of run-time errors nor proof of protected operation bodies. See the manual "SPARK Proof Manual" for more details.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-941"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 941 : The type of own variable XXX must be local to this package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The type used to an announce an own variable with a protects property must be declared in the same package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-942"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 942 : Only one instance of the type XXX is allowed.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Type XXX has a protects property. This means there can be only one object in the package that has this type or any subtype of this type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-943"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 943 : The name XXX cannot appear in a protects list.
</p>
<p>
<i>
All items in a protects list must be unprotected own variables owned by this package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-944"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 944 : The name XXX is already protected by YYY.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The name XXX appears in more than one protects list. The first time it appeared was for own variable YYY. XXX should appear in at most one protects list.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-945"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 945 : The property XXX must be given a static expression for its value.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This property can only accept a static expression.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-946"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 946 : The own variable XXX must only ever be accessed from operations in protected type YYY.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The own variable XXX is protected by the protected type YYY and hence must never be accessed from anywhere else.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-947"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 947 : The own variable XXX appears in a protects list for type YYY but is not used in the body.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The protected type YYY claims to protect XXX via a protects property. However, the variable XXX is not used by any operation in YYY.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-948"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 948 : The type of own variable or task XXX must be a base type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Own tasks and protected own variables of a protected type must be announced using the base type. The subsequent variable declaration may be a subtype of the base type.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-949"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 949 : Unexpected partition annotation: a global annotation may only appear here when the Ravenscar profile is selected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
When the sequential SPARK profile is selected, the global and derives annotation on the main program describes the entire program's behaviour. No additional, partition annotation is required or permitted. Note that an annotation must appear here if the Ravenscar profile is selected.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-950"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 950 : Partition annotation expected: a global and, optionally, a derives annotation must appear after 'main_program' when the Ravenscar profile is selected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
When the Ravenscar profile is selected the global and derives annotation on the main program describes the behaviour of the environment task only, not the entire program. An additional annotation, called the partition annotation, is required to describe the entire program's behaviour; this annotation follows immediately after 'main_program;'.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-951"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 951 : Inherited package XXX contains tasks and/or interrupt handlers and must therefore appear in the preceding WITH clause.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In order to ensure that a Ravenscar program is complete, SPARK requires that all 'active' packages inherited by the environment task also appear in a corresponding with clause. This check ensures that any program entities described in the partition annotation are also linked into the program itself.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-952"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 952 : Subprogram XXX is an interrupt handler and cannot be called.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Interrupt handler operations cannot be called.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-953"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 953 : Interrupt property error for own variable YYY. XXX is not an interrupt handler in type ZZZ.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The handler names in an interrupt property must match one in the protected type of the own variable.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-954"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 954 : Interrupt property error for own variable XXX. Interrupt stream name YYY is illegal.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The stream name must be unprefixed and not already in use within the scope of the package.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-955"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 955 : XXX can only appear in the partition wide flow annotation.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Interrupt stream variables are used only to enhance the partition wide flow annotation and must not be used elsewhere.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-956"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 956 : XXX already appears in as an interrupt handler in the interrupt mappings.
</p>
<p>
<i>
An interrupt handler can be mapped onto exactly one interrupt stream variable. An interrupt stream variable may be mapped onto many interrupt handlers.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-957"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 957 : Consecutive updates of protected variable XXX are disallowed when they do not depend directly on its preceding value.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A protected variable cannot be updated without direct reference to its preceding value more than once within a subprogram or task. Each update of a protected variable may have a wider effect than just the change of value of the protected variable. The overall change is considered to be the accumulation of all updates and reads of the protected variable and to preseve this information flow successive updates must directly depend on the preceding value of the variable.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-958"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 958 : A task may not import the unprotected state XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A task may not import unprotected state unless it is mode in. This is because under the concurrent elaboration policy, the task cannot rely on the state being initialized before it is run.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-959"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 959 : Unprotected state XXX is exported by a task and hence must not appear in an initializes clause.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Own variable XXX is being accessed by a task. The order in which the task is run and the own variable initialized is non-deterministic under a concurrent elaboration policy. In this case SPARK forces the task to perform the initialization and as such the own variable must not appear in an initializes clause.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-960"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 960 : The function Ada.Real_Time.Clock can only be used directly (1) in an assignment or return statement or (2) to initialize a library a level constant.
</p>
<p>
<i>
<li>To avoid ordering effects, functions which globally access own variables which have modes (indicating that they are connected to the external environment) may only appear directly in assignment or return statements. They may not appear as actual parameters or in any other form of expression. <li>SPARK relaxes the illegal use of function calls in elaboration code in the case of the function Ada.Real_Time.Clock. However the function can only be used to directly initialize a constant value.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-961"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 961 : This property value is of an incorrect format.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Please check the user manual for valid property value formats.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-962"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 962 : Error(s) detected by VC Generator. See the .vcg file for more information.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This message is echoed to the screen if an unrecoverable error occurs which makes the generation of VCs for the current subprogram impossible. Another message more precisely identifying the problem will be placed in the .vcg file.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-986"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 986 : A protected function may not call a locally-declared protected procedure.
</p>
<p>
<i>
See LRM 9.5.1 (2). A protected function has read access to the protected elements of the type whereas the called procedure has read-write access. There is no way in which an Ada compiler can determine whether the procedure will illegally update the protected state or not so the call is prohibited by the rules of Ada. (Of course, in SPARK, we know there is no function side effect but the rules of Ada must prevail nonetheless).
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-987"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 987 : Task types and protected types may only be declared in package specifications.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The Examiner performs certain important checks at the whole program level such as detection of illegal sharing of unprotected state and partition-level information flow analysis. These checks require visibility of task types and protected types (especially those containing interrupt handlers). SPARK therefore requires these types to be declare in package specifications. Subtypes and objects of task types, protected types and their subtypes may be declared in package bodies.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-988"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 988 : Illegal re-use of identifier XXX; this identifier is used in a directly visible protected type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
SPARK does not allow the re-use of operation names which are already in use in a directly visible protected type. The restriction is necessary to avoid overload resolution issues in the protected body. For example, type PT in package P declares operation K. Package P also declares an operation K. From inside the body of PT, a call to K could refer to either of the two Ks since both are directly visible.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-989"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 989 : The last statement of a task body must be a plain loop with no exits.
</p>
<p>
<i>
To prevent any possibility of a task terminating (which can lead to a bounded error), SPARK requires each task to end with a non-terminating loop. The environment task (or "main program") does not need to end in a plain loop provided the program closure includes at least one other task. If there are no other tasks, then the environment task must be made non-terminating with a plain loop.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-990"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 990 : Unexpected annotation, a task body may have only global and derives annotations.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a pre, post or declare annotation is attached to a task body.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-991"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 991 : Unexpected task body, XXX is not the name of a task declared in this package specification.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if task body is encountered for which there is no preceding declaration.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-992"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 992 : A body for task type XXX has already been declared.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a duplicate body or body stub is encountered for a task.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-993"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 993 : There is no protected type declaration for XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a body is found for a protected types for which there is no preceding declaration.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-994"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 994 : Invalid guard, XXX is not a Boolean protected element of this protected type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The SPARK Ravenscar rules require a simple Boolean guard which must be one of the protected elements of the type declaring the entry.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-995"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 995 : Unexpected entry body, XXX is not the name of an entry declared in this protected type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Local entries are not permitted so a protected body can declare at most one entry body and that must have declared in the protected type specification.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-996"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 996 : The protected operation XXX, declared in this type, does not have an associated body.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Each exported protected operation must have a matching implementation in the associated protected body.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-997"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 997 : A body for protected type XXX has already been declared.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Each protected type declaration must have exactly one matching protected body or body stub.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-998"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 998 : There is no protected type declaration for XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a protected body or body stub is found and there is no matching declaration for it.
</i>
</p>
<a name="semantic-999"></a>
<p>
*** Semantic Error : 999 : This feature of Generics is not yet implemented.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Generics are currently limited to instantiation of Unchecked_Conversion.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-no-semantic-checks"></a>
<p>
Warning : No semantic checks carried out, text may not be legal SPARK.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when the Examiner is used solely to check the syntax of a SPARK text: this does not check the semantics of a program (e.g. the correctness of the annotations) and therefore does not guarantee that a program is legal SPARK.
</i>
</p>
<a name="note-information-flow"></a>
<p>
Note: Information flow analysis not carried out.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This is issued as a reminder that information flow analysis has not been carried out in this run of the Examiner: information flow errors may be present undetected in the text analysed.
</i>
</p>
<a name="note-automatic-flow"></a>
<p>
Note: Flow analysis mode is automatic.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This is issued as a reminder that the Examiner will perform information flow analysis if it encounters full derives annotations and will perform data flow analysis if only moded global annotations are present. Information flow errors may be present undetected in the text analysed.
</i>
</p>
<a name="note-ada-83"></a>
<p>
Note: Ada 83 language rules selected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when the Examiner is used in SPARK 83 mode.
</i>
</p>
<a name="1"></a>
<a name="2"></a>
<a name="3"></a>
<a name="1"></a>
<a name="2"></a>
<a name="warning-1"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 1 : The identifier XXX is either undeclared or not visible at this point.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This warning will appear against an identifier in a with clause if it is not also present in an inherit clause. Such an identifier cannot be used in any non-hidden part of a SPARK program. The use of with without inherit is permitted to allow reference in hidden parts of the text to imported packages which are not legal SPARK. For example, the body of SPARK_IO is hidden and implements the exported operations of the package by use of package TEXT_IO. For this reason TEXT_IO must appear in the with clause of SPARK_IO. (warning control file keyword:<b> with_clauses</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-2"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 2 : Representation clause - ignored by the Examiner.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The significance of representation clauses cannot be assessed by the Examiner because it depends on the specific memory architecture of the target system. Like pragmas, representation clauses can change the meaning of a SPARK program and the warning highlights the need to ensure their correctness by other means. (warning control file keyword:<b> representation_clauses</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-3"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 3 : Pragma - ignored by the Examiner.
</p>
<p>
<i>
All pragmas encountered by the Examiner generate this warning. While many pragmas (e.g. pragma page) are harmless others can change a program's meaning, for example by causing two variables to share a single memory location. (warning control file keyword:<b> pragma</b> pragma_identifier or <b>pragma all</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-4"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 4 : declare annotation - ignored by the Examiner.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The declare annotation is ignored by the Examiner if the profile is not Ravenscar. (warning control file keyword: <b>declare_annotations</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-5"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 5 : XXX contains interrupt handlers; it is important that an interrupt identifier is not used by more than one handler.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Interrupt identifiers are implementation defined and the Examiner cannot check that values are used only once. Duplication can occur by declaring more than object of a single (sub)type where that type defines handlers. It may also occur if interrupt identifiers are set via discriminants and two or more actual discriminants generate the same value. (warning control file keyword: <b>interrupt_handlers</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-6"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 6 : Machine code insertion. Code insertions are ignored by the Examiner.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Machine code is inherently implementation dependent and cannot be analysed by the Examiner. Users are responsible for ensuring that the behaviour of the inserted machine code matches the annotation of the subprogram containing it.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-7"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 7 : This identifier is an Ada2005 reserved word.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Such identifiers will be rejected by an Ada2005 compiler and by the SPARK Examiner for SPARK2005. It is recommended to rename such identifiers for future upward compatibility. (warning control file keyword: <b>ada2005_reserved_words</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-11"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 11 : Unnecessary others clause - case statement is already complete.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The others clause is non-executable because all case choices have already been covered explicitly. If the range of the case choice is altered later then the others clause may be executed with unexpected results. It is better to omit the others clause in which case any extension of the case range will result in a compilation error.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-12"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 12 : Function XXX is an instantiation of Unchecked_Conversion.
</p>
<p>
<i>
See ALRM 13.9. The use of Unchecked_Conversion can result in implementation-defined values being returned. The function should be used with great care. The principal use of Unchecked_Conversion is SPARK programs is the for the reading of external ports prior to performing a validity check; here the suppression of constraint checking prior to validation is useful. The Examiner does not assume that the value returned by an unchecked conversion is valid and so unprovable run-time check VCs will result if a suitable validity check is not carried out before the value is used. (warning control file keyword: <b>unchecked_conversion</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-13"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 13 : Function XXX is an instantiation of Unchecked_Conversion returning a type for which run-time checks are not generated. Users must take steps to ensure the validity of the returned value.
</p>
<p>
<i>
See ALRM 13.9. The use of Unchecked_Conversion can result in invalid values being returned. The function should be used with great care especially, as in this case, where the type returned does not generate Ada run-time checks nor SPARK run-time verification conditions. For such types, this warning is the ONLY reminder the Examiner generates that the generated value may have an invalid representation. For this reason the warning is NOT suppressed by the warning control file keyword unchecked_conversion. The principal use of Unchecked_Conversion is SPARK programs is the for the reading of external ports prior to performing a validity check; here the suppression of constraint checking prior to validation is useful.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-120"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 120 : Unexpected unmatched 'end accept' annotation ignored.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This end accept annotation does not match any preceding start accept in this unit.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-121"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 121 : No warning message matches this accept annotation.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The accept annotation is used to indicate that a particular flow error or semantic warning message is expected and can be justified. This error indicates that the expected message did not actually occur. Note that when matching any information flow error messages containing two variable names, the export should be placed first and the import second (the order in the error message may differ from this depending on the style of information flow error reporting selected). For example: --# accept Flow, 601, X, Y, "..."; justifies the message: "X may be derived from the imported value(s) of Y" or the alternative form: "Y may be used in the derivation of X".
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-122"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 122 : Maximum number of error or warning justifications reached, subsequent accept annotations will be ignored.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The number of justifications per source file is limited. If you reach this limit it is worth careful consideration of why the code generates so many warnings.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-169"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 169 : Direct update of own variable XXX, which is an own variable of a non-enclosing package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
With the publication of Edition 3.1 of the SPARK Definition the previous restriction prohibiting the direct updating of own variables of non-enclosing packages was removed; however, the preferred use of packages as abstract state machines is compromised by such action which is therefore discouraged. (warning control file keyword:<b> direct_updates</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-200"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 200 : This static expression cannot be evaluated by the Examiner.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if a static expression exceeds the internal limits of the Examiner because its value is, for example, too large to be evaluated using infinite precision arithmetic. No value will be recorded for the expression and this may limit the Examiner's ability to detect certain sorts of errors such as numeric constraints. (warning control file keyword: <b>static_expressions</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-201"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 201 : This expression cannot be evaluated statically because its value may be implementation-defined.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Raised, for example, when evaluating 'Size of a type that does not have an explicit Size representation clause. Attributes of implementation-defined types, such as Integer'Last may also be unknown to be Examiner if they are not specified in the configuration file (warning control file keyword: <b>static_expressions</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-202"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 202 : An arithmetic overflow has occurred. Constraint checks have not been performed.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Raised when comparing two real numbers. The examiner cannot deal with real numbers specified to such a high degree of precision. Consider reducing the precision of these numbers.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-300"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 300 : VCs cannot be built for multi-dimensional array aggregates.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when an aggregate of a multi-dimensional array is found. Suppresses generation of VCs for that subprogram. Can be worked round by using arrays of arrays.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-301"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 301 : Called subprogram exports abstract types for which RTCs are not possible.
</p>
<a name="warning-302"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 302 : This expression may be re-ordered by a compiler. Add parentheses to remove ambiguity.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a potentially re-orderable expression is encountered. For example x := a + b + c; Whether intermediate sub-expression values overflow may depend on the order of evaluation which is compiler-dependent. Therefore, code generating this warning should be parenthesized to remove the ambiguity. e.g. x := (a + b) + c;.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-303"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 303 : Overlapping choices may not be detected.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued where choices in an array aggregate or case statement are outside the range which can be detected because of limits on the size of a table internal to the Examiner.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-304"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 304 : Case statement may be incomplete.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when the Examiner cannot determine the completeness of a case statement because the bounds of the type of the controlling expression exceed the size of the internal table used to perform the checks.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-305"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 305 : Value too big for internal representation.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when the Examiner cannot determine the completeness of an array aggregate or case statement because the number used in a choice exceed the size allowed in the internal table used to perform the checks.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-306"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 306 : Aggregate may be incomplete.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when the Examiner cannot determine the completeness of an array aggregate because its bounds exceed the size of the internal table used to perform the checks.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-307"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 307 : Completeness checking incomplete: index type(s) undefined or not discrete.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued where the array index (sub)type is inappropriate: this is probably because there is an error in its definition, which will have been indicated by a previous error message.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-308"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 308 : Use of equality operator with floating point type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The use of this operator is discouraged in SPARK because of the difficulty in determining exactly what it means to say that two instances of a floating point number are equal.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-309"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 309 : Type conversion to own type, consider using type qualification instead.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued where a type conversion is either converting from a (sub)type to the same (sub)type or is converting between two subtypes of the same type. In the former case the type conversion may be safely removed because no constraint check is required; in the latter case the type conversion may be safely replaced by a type qualification which preserves the constraint check.(warning control file keyword:<b> type_conversions</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-310"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 310 : Use of obsolescent Ada 83 language feature.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a language feature defined by Ada 95 to be obsolescent is used. Use of such features is not recommended because compiler support for them cannot be guaranteed.(warning control file keyword:<b>obsolescent_features</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-311"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 311 : Priority pragma for XXX is unavailable and has not been considered in the ceiling priority check.
</p>
<a name="warning-312"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 312 : Replacement rules cannot be built for multi-dimensional array constant XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a VC or PF references a multi-dimensional array constant. Can be worked round by using arrays of arrays.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-313"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 313 : The constant XXX has semantic errors in its initializing expression or has a hidden completion which prevent generation of a replacement rule.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when replacement rules are requested for a composite constant which had semantic errors in its initializing expression, or is a deferred constant whose completion is hidden from the Examiner. Semantic errors must be eliminated before replacement rules can be generated.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-314"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 314 : The constant XXX has semantic errors in its type which prevent generation of rules.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when an attempt is made to generate type deduction rules for a constant which has semantic errors in its type. These semantic errors must be eliminated before type deduction rules can be generated.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-315"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 315 : The procedure XXX does not have a derives annotation. The analysis of this call assumes that each of its exports is derived from all of its imports.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued in flow=auto mode when a function calls a procedure that does not have a derives annotation. In most cases this assumption will not affect the validity of the analysis, but if the called procedure derives null from an import this can have an impact. Note that functions are considered to have implicit derives annotations so this warning is not issued for calls to functions.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-320"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 320 : The proof function XXX has a non-boolean return and a return annotation. Please make sure that the return is always in-type.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Any proof function with a non-bool return can introduce unsoundness if the result could overflow. For example a return of (x + 1) is not ok if x can take the value of integer'last. (warning control file keyword: <b>proof_function_non_boolean</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-321"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 321 : The proof function XXX has an implicit return annotation. Please be careful not to introduce unsoundness.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Any proof function with an implicit return can easily introduce unsoundness as they do not have a body which we can check to expose any contradictions. For example: return B => False. (warning control file keyword: <b>proof_function_implicit</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-322"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 322 : The return refinement for proof function XXX is assumed to hold as it is axiomatic and thus cannot be checked.
</p>
<p>
<i>
(warning control file keyword: <b>proof_function_refinement</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-323"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 323 : The precondition refinement for proof function XXX is assumed to hold as it is axiomatic and thus cannot be checked.
</p>
<p>
<i>
(warning control file keyword: <b>proof_function_refinement</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-350"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 350 : Unexpected pragma Import. Variable XXX is not identified as an external (stream) variable.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The presence of a pragma Import makes it possible that the variable is connected to some external device. The behaviour of such variables is best captured by making them moded own variables (or "stream" variables). If variables connected to the external environment are treated as if they are normal program variables then misleading analysis results are inevitable. The use of pragma Import on local variables of subprograms is particularly deprecated. The warning may safely be disregarded if the variable is not associated with memory-mapped input/output or if the variable concerned is an own variable and the operations on it are suitably annotated to indicate volatile, stream-like behaviour. Where pragma Import is used, it is essential that the variable is properly initialized at the point from which it is imported. (warning control file keyword:<b>imported_objects</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-351"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 351 : Unexpected address clause. XXX is a constant.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Great care is needed when attaching an address clause to a constant. The use of such a clause is safe if, and only if, the address supplied provides a valid value for the constant which does not vary during the execution life of the program, for example, mapping the constant to PROM data. If the address clause causes the constant to have a value which may alter, or worse, change dynamically under the influence of some device external to the program, then misleading or incorrect analysis is certain to result. If the intention is to create an input port of some kind, then a constant should not be used. Instead a moded own variable (or "stream" variables) should be used. (warning control file keyword:<b> address_clauses</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-360"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 360 : This pragma must have zero or one arguments.
</p>
<a name="warning-361"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 361 : This pragma must have exactly one argument.
</p>
<a name="warning-362"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 362 : This pragma must have exactly two arguments.
</p>
<a name="warning-363"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 363 : This pragma must have at least one argument.
</p>
<a name="warning-364"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 364 : This pragma must have between two and four arguments.
</p>
<a name="warning-365"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 365 : This pragma must have exactly zero arguments.
</p>
<a name="warning-366"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 366 : This pragma must have one or two arguments.
</p>
<a name="warning-380"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 380 : Casing inconsistent with declaration. Expected casing is XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The Examiner checks the case used for an identifier against the declaration of that identifier and warns if they do not match. (warning control file keyword:<b>style_check_casing</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-389"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 389 : Generation of VCs for consistency of generic and instantiated subprogram constraints is not yet supported. It will be supported in a future release of the Examiner.
</p>
<a name="warning-390"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 390 : This generic subprogram has semantic errors in its declaration which prevent instantiations of it.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued to inform the user that a generic subprogram instantiation cannot be completed because of earlier errors in the generic declaration.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-391"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 391 : If the identifier XXX represents a package which contains a task or an interrupt handler then the partition-level analysis performed by the Examiner will be incomplete. Such packages must be inherited as well as withed.
</p>
<a name="warning-392"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 392 : External variable XXX may have an invalid representation and its assignment may cause a run-time exception which is outside the scope of the absence of RTE proof.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Where values are read from external variables (i.e. variables connected to the external environment) there is no guarantee that the bit pattern read will be a valid representation for the type of the external variable. Unexpected behaviour may result if invalid values are used in expressions. If the code is compiled with Ada run-time checks enabled the assignment of an invalid value may (but need not) raise a run-time exception dependent on the compiler. A compiler may provide facilities to apply extended checking which may also raise a run-time exception if an invalid value is used. The SPARK Toolset does not check the validity of the external variable and therefore any possible exception arising from its assignment is outside the scope of proof of absence of RTE. To ensure that a run-time exception cannot occur make the type of the external variable such that any possible bit pattern that may be read from the external source is a valid value. If the desired type is such a type then the always_valid assertion may be applied to the external variable; otherwise use explicit tests to ensure it has a valid value for the desired type before converting to an object of the desired type. In SPARK 95 the 'Valid attribute (see ALRM 13.9.2) may be used to determine the validity of a value if it can be guaranteed that the assignment of an invalid value read from an external variable will not raise a run time exception, either by compiling the code with checks off or by ensuring the compiler does not apply constraint checks when assigning same subtype objects. Note that when the Examiner is used to generate run-time checks, it will not be possible to discharge those involving external variables unless one of the above steps is taken. More information on interfacing can be found in the INFORMED manual and the SPARK Proof Manual. (warning control file keyword:<b> external_assignment</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-393"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 393 : External variable XXX may have an invalid representation and is of a type for which run-time checks are not generated but its assignment may cause a run-time exception. Users must take steps to ensure the validity of the assigned or returned value.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Where values are read from external variables (i.e. variables connected to the external environment) there is no guarantee that the bit pattern read will be a valid representation for the type of the external variable. Unexpected behaviour may result if invalid values are used in expressions. If the code is compiled with Ada run-time checks enabled the assignment of an invalid value may (but need not) raise a run-time exception dependent on the compiler. A compiler may provide facilities to apply extended checking which may also raise a run-time exception if an invalid value is used The SPARK Toolset does not check the validity of the external variable and therefore any possible exception arising from its assignment is outside the scope of proof of absence of RTE. Where, as in this case, the type is one for which Ada run-time checks need not be generated and SPARK run-time verification conditions are not generated, extra care is required. For such types, this warning is the ONLY reminder the Examiner generates that the external value may have an invalid representation. For this reason the warning is NOT suppressed by the warning control file keyword <b> external_assignment</b>. To ensure that a run-time exception cannot occur make the type of the external variable such that any possible bit pattern that may be read from the external source is a valid value. Explicit tests of the value may then be used to determine the value of an object of the desired type. In SPARK 95 the 'Valid attribute (see ALRM 13.9.2) may be used to determine the validity of a value if it can be guaranteed that the assignment of an invalid value read from an external variable will not raise a run time exception, either by compiling the code with checks off or by ensuring the compiler does not apply constraint checks when assigning same subtype objects. Boolean external variables require special care since the Examiner does not generate run-time checks for Boolean variables; use of 'Valid is essential when reading Boolean external variables. More information on interfacing can be found in the INFORMED manual and the SPARK Proof Manual.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-394"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 394 : Variables of type XXX cannot be initialized using the facilities of this package.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A variable of a private type can only be used (without generating a data flow error) if there is some way of giving it an initial value. For a limited private type only a procedure that has an export of that type and no imports of that type is suitable. For a private type either a procedure, function or (deferred) constant is required. The required facility may be placed in, or already available in, a public child package. (warning control file keyword:<b> private_types</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-395"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 395 : Variable XXX is an external (stream) variable but does not have an address clause or a pragma import.
</p>
<p>
<i>
When own variables are given modes they are considered to be inputs from or outputs to the external environment. The Examiner regards them as being volatile (i.e. their values can change in ways not visible from an inspection of the source code). If a variable is declared in that way but it is actually an ordinary variable which is NOT connected to the environment then misleading analysis is inevitable. The Examiner expects to find an address clause or pragma import for variables of this kind to indicate that they are indeed memory-mapped input/output ports. This warning is issued if an address clause or pragma import is not found.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-396"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 396 : Unexpected address clause. Variable XXX is not identified as an external (stream) variable.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The presence of an address clause makes it possible that the variable is connected to some external device. The behaviour of such variables is best captured by making them moded own variables (or "stream" variables). If variables connected to the external environment are treated as if they are normal program variables then misleading analysis results are inevitable. The use of address clauses on local variables of subprograms is particularly deprecated. The warning may safely be disregarded if the variable is not associated with memory-mapped input/output or if the variable concerned is an own variable and the operations on it are suitably annotated to indicate volatile, stream-like behaviour. (warning control file keyword:<b> address_clauses</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-397"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 397 : Variables of type XXX can never be initialized before use.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A variable of a private type can only be used (without generating a data flow error) if there is some way of giving it an initial value. For a limited private type only a procedure that has an export of that type and no imports of that type is suitable. For a private type either a procedure, function or (deferred) constant is required.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-398"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 398 : The own variable XXX can never be initialized before use.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The own variable can only be used (without generating a data flow error) if there is some way of giving it an initial value. If it is initialized during package elaboration (or implicitly by the environment because it represents an input port) it should be placed in an "initializes" annotation. Otherwise there needs to be some way of assigning an initial value during program execution. Either the own variable needs to be declared in the visible part of the package so that a direct assignment can be made to it or, more usually, the package must declare at least one procedure for which the own variable is an export but not an import. Note that if the own variable is an abstract own variable with some constituents initialized during elaboration and some during program execution then it will never be possible correctly to initialize it; such abstract own variables must be divided into separate initialized and uninitialized components.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-399"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 399 : The called subprogram has semantic errors in its interface (parameters and/or annotations) which prevent flow analysis of this call.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued to inform the user that flow analysis has been suppressed because of the error in the called subprogram's interface.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-9"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 9 : The body of XXX has a hidden exception handler - analysis and verification of contracts for this handler have not been performed.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a --# hide XXX annotation is used to hide a user-defined exception handler. (warning control file keyword:<b> handler_parts</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-10"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 10 : XXX is hidden - hidden text is ignored by the Examiner.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a --# hide XXX annotation is used. (warning control file keyword:<b> hidden_parts</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-400"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 400 : Variable XXX is declared but not used.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when a variable declared in a subprogram is neither referenced, nor updated. (warning control file keyword: <b>unused_variables</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-402"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 402 : Default assertion planted to cut loop.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In order to prove properties of code containing loops, the loop must be "cut" with a suitable assertion statement. When generating run-time checks, the Examiner inserts a simple assertion to cut any loops which do not have one supplied by the user. The assertion is placed at the point where this warning appears in the listing file. The default assertion asserts that the subprogram's precondition (if any) is satisfied, that all imports to it are in their subtypes and that any for loop counter is in its subtype. In many cases this provides sufficient information to complete a proof of absence of run-time errors. If more information is required, then the user can supply an assertion and the Examiner will append the above information to it. (warning control file keyword: <b>default_loop_assertions</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-403"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 403 : XXX is declared as a variable but used as a constant.
</p>
<p>
<i>
XXX is a variable which was initialized at declaration but whose value is only ever read not updated; it could therefore have been declared as a constant. (warning control file keyword: <b>constant_variables</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-404"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 404 : Subprogram imports variables of abstract types for which run-time checks cannot be generated.
</p>
<a name="warning-405"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 405 : VCs for statements including real numbers are approximate.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The Examiner generates VCs associated with real numbers using perfect arithmetic rather than the machine approximations used on the target platform. It is possible that rounding errors might cause a Constraint_Error even if these run-time check proofs are completed satisfactorily. (warning control file keyword: <b>real_rtcs</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-406"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 406 : VC Generator unable to create output files. Permission is required to create directories and files in the output directory.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This message is echoed to the screen if the Examiner is unable to create output files for the VCs being generated (for instance, if the user does not have write permission for the output directory).
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-407"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 407 : This package requires a body. Care should be taken to provide one because an Ada compiler will not detect its omission.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued where SPARK own variable and initialization annotations make it clear that a package requires a body but where no Ada requirement for a body exists.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-408"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 408 : VCs could not be generated for this subprogram owing to semantic errors in its specification or body. Unprovable (False) VC generated.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Semantic errors prevent VC Generation, so a single False VC is produced. This will be detected and reported by POGS.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-409"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 409 : VCs could not be generated for this subprogram due to its size and/or complexity exceeding the capacity of the VC Generator. Unprovable (False) VC generated.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A subprogram which has excessive complexity of data structure or number of paths may cause the VC Generator to exceed its capacity. A single False VC is generated in this case to make sure this error is detected in subsequent proof and analysis with POGS.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-410"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 410 : Task or interrupt handler XXX is either unavailable (hidden) or has semantic errors in its specification which prevent partition-wide flow analysis being carried out.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Partition-wide flow analysis is performed by checking all packages withed by the main program for tasks and interrupt handlers and constructing an overall flow relation that captures their cumulative effect. It is for this reason that SPARK requires task and protected types to be declared in package specifications. If a task or protected type which contains an interrupt handler, is hidden from the Examiner (in a hidden package private part) or contains errors in it specification, the partition-wide flow analysis cannot be constructed correctly and is therefore suppressed. Correct the specification of the affected tasks and (temporarily if desired) make them visible to the Examiner.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-411"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 411 : Task type XXX is unavailable and has not been considered in the shared variable check.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The Examiner checks that there is no potential sharing of unprotected data between tasks. If a task type is hidden from the Examiner in a hidden package private part, then it is not possible to check whether that task may share unprotected data.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-412"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 412 : Task type XXX is unavailable and has not been considered in the max-one-in-a-queue check.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The Examiner checks that no more than one task can suspend on a single object. If a task is hidden from the Examiner in a hidden package private part, then it is not possible to check whether that task may suspend on the same object as another task.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-413"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 413 : Task or main program XXX has errors in its annotations. The shared variable and max-one-in-a-queue checks may be incomplete.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The Examiner checks that no more than one task can suspend on a single object and that there is no potential sharing of unprotected data between tasks. These checks depend on the accuracy of the annotations on the task types withed by the main program. If these annotations contain errors, then any reported violations of the shared variable and max-one-in-a-queue checks will be correct; however, the check may be incomplete. The errors in the task annotations should be corrected.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-414"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 414 : Long output file name has been truncated.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Raised if an output file name is longer than the limit imposed by the operating system and has been truncated. Section 4.7 of the Examiner User Manual describes how the output file names are constructed. If this message is seen there is a possibility that the output from two or more subprograms will be written to the same file name, if they have a sufficiently large number of characters in common.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-415"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 415 : The analysis of generic packages is not yet supported. It will be supported in a future release of the Examiner.
</p>
<a name="warning-420"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 420 : Instance of SEPR 2124 found. An extra VC will be generated here and must be discharged to ensure absence of run-time errors. Please seek advice for assistance with this issue.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In release 7.5 of the Examiner, a flaw in the VC generation was fixed such that subcomponents of records and elements of arrays when used as "out" or "in out" parameters will now generate an additional VC to verify absence of run-time errors. This warning flags an instance of this occurrence. Please read the release note and/or seek advice for assistance with this issue.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-425"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 425 : The -vcg switch should be used with the selected language profile.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A code generator language profile such as KCG is in use and so conditional flow errors may be present in the subprogram. Therefore the -vcg switch must be used to generate VCs and the VCs related to definedness discharged using the proof tools.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-426"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 426 : The with_clause contains a reference to a public child of the package. The Examiner will not detect mutual recursion between subprograms of the two packages.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A code generator language profile such as KCG allows a package body to with its own public child which is not normally permitted in SPARK. The removal of this restriction means that the Examiner will not detect mutual recursion between subprograms declared in the visible parts of the package and its child. The code generator is expected to guarantee the absence of recursion.
</i>
</p>
<a name="warning-430"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 430 : SLI generation abandoned owing to syntax or semantic errors or multiple units in a single source file.
</p>
<a name="warning-431"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 431 : Preconditions on the main program are assumed to be true and not checked by the VC generation system.
</p>
<a name="warning-444"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 444 : Assumptions cannot be checked and must be justified with an accept annotation.
</p>
<a name="warning-495"></a>
<p>
--- Warning : 495 : The VC file XXX has a pathname longer than 255 characters which can produce unexpected problems on Windows with respect to the SPARK tools (undischarged VCs) and other tools.
</p>
<p>
<i>
There is little that can be done to work around this as this is a fundamental limitation of Windows. You could try one of the following: Perform analysis higher up in the directory tree (i.e. in C:\a instead of C:\project_name\spark\analysis). You could try remapping a directory to a new drive to do the same (google for subst). You could try renaming or restructuring your program to flatten the structure a bit. And finally you can perform analysis on a UNIX system such as Mac OSX or GNU/Linux as they do not suffer from this problem.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-501"></a>
<p>
??? Flow Error : 501 : Expression contains reference(s) to variable XXX, which may have an undefined value.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The expression may be that in an assignment or return statement, an actual parameter, or a condition occurring in an if or case statement, an iteration scheme or exit statement. The Examiner has identified at least one syntactic path to this point where the variable has NOT been given a value. Conditional data flow errors are extremely serious and must be carefully investigated. NOTE: the presence of random and possibly invalid values introduced by data flow errors invalidates proof of exception freedom for the subprogram body which contains them. All reports of data flow errors must be eliminated or shown to be associated with semantically infeasible paths before attempting exception freedom proofs. See the manual "SPARK Proof Manual " for full details.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-504"></a>
<p>
??? Flow Error : 504 : Statement contains reference(s) to variable XXX, which may have an undefined value.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The statement here is a procedure call, and the variable XXX may appear in an actual parameter, whose value is imported when the procedure is executed. If the variable XXX does not occur in the actual parameter list, it is an imported global variable of the procedure (named in its global definition). The Examiner has identified at least one syntactic path to this point where the variable has NOT been given a value. Conditional data flow errors are extremely serious and must be carefully investigated. NOTE: the presence of random and possibly invalid values introduced by data flow errors invalidates proof of exception freedom for the subprogram body which contains them. All reports of data flow errors must be eliminated or shown to be associated with semantically infeasible paths before attempting exception freedom proofs. See the manual "SPARK Proof Manual " for full details.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-601"></a>
<p>
??? Flow Error : 601 : YYY may be derived from the imported value(s) of XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Here the item on the left of "may be derived from ..." is an exported variable and the item(s) on the right are imports of a procedure subprogram. The message reports a possible dependency, found in the code, which does not appear in the specified dependency relation (derives annotation). The discrepancy could be caused by an error in the subprogram code which implements an unintended dependency. It could also be in an error in the subprogram derives annotation which omits a necessary and intended dependency. Finally, the Examiner may be reporting a false coupling between two items resulting from a non-executable code path or the sharing of disjoint parts of structured or abstract data (e.g one variable writing to one element of an array and another variable reading back a different element). Unexpected dependencies should be investigated carefully and only accepted without modification of either code or annotation if it is certain they are of "false coupling" kind.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-601"></a>
<p>
??? Flow Error : 601 : The imported value of XXX may be used in the derivation of YYY.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Here first item is an import and the second is an export of a procedure subprogram. The message reports a possible dependency, found in the code, which does not appear in the specified dependency relation. This version of the message has been retained for backward compatibility.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-602"></a>
<p>
??? Flow Error : 602 : The undefined initial value of XXX may be used in the derivation of YYY.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Here XXX is a non-imported variable, and YYY is an export, of a procedure subprogram.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-605"></a>
<p>
??? Flow Error : 605 : Information flow from XXX to YYY violates information flow policy.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This message indicates a violation of security or safety policy, such as information flow from a Secret input to an Unclassified output.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-606"></a>
<p>
??? Flow Error : 606 : The imported value of XXX may be used in the derivation of YYY. Furthermore, this information flow violates information flow policy.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Here XXX is an import and YYY is an export of a procedure subprogram. The message reports a possible dependency, found in the code, which does not appear in the specified dependency relation. If this dependency did appear in the dependency relation, then it would also constitute an integrity violation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-20"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 20 : Expression contains reference(s) to variable XXX which has an undefined value.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The expression may be that in an assignment or return statement, an actual parameter, or a condition occurring in an if or case statement, an iteration scheme or exit statement. NOTE: the presence of random and possibly invalid values introduced by data flow errors invalidates proof of exception freedom for the subprogram body which contains them. All unconditional data flow errors must be eliminated before attempting exception freedom proofs. See the manual "SPARK Proof Manual" for full details.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-23"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 23 : Statement contains reference(s) to variable XXX which has an undefined value.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The statement here is a procedure call or an assignment to an array element, and the variable XXX may appear in an actual parameter, whose value is imported when the procedure is executed. If the variable XXX does not occur in the actual parameter list, it is an imported global variable of the procedure (named in its global definition). NOTE: the presence of random and possibly invalid values introduced by data flow errors invalidates proof of exception freedom for the subprogram body which contains them. All unconditional data flow errors must be eliminated before attempting exception freedom proofs. See the manual "SPARK Proof Manual" for full details.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-22"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 22 : Value of expression is invariant.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The expression is either a case expression or a condition (Boolean-valued expression) associated with an if-statement, not contained in a loop statement. The message indicates that the expression takes the same value whenever it is evaluated, in all program executions. Note that if the expression depends on values obtained by a call to another other subprogram then a possible source for its invariance might be an incorrect annotation on the called subprogram.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-30"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 30 : The variable XXX is imported but neither referenced nor exported.
</p>
<a name="flow-31"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 31 : The variable XXX is exported but not (internally) defined.
</p>
<a name="flow-32"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 32 : The variable XXX is neither imported nor defined.
</p>
<a name="flow-33"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 33 : The variable XXX is neither referenced nor exported.
</p>
<a name="flow-34"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 34 : The imported, non-exported variable XXX may be redefined.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The updating of imported-only variables is forbidden under all circumstances.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-35"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 35 : Importation of the initial value of variable XXX is ineffective.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The meaning of this message is explained in Section 4.2 of Appendix A.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-36"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 36 : The referencing of variable XXX by a task or interrupt handler has been omitted from the partition annotation.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This message is only issued when processing the partition annotation. The partition annotation must describe all the actions of the tasks and interrupt handlers making up the program. Therefore, if a variable is imported somewhere in the program by a task or interrupt handler, then it must also be an import at the partition level. As well as the omission of explicit imports, this message is also generated if the implicit imports of tasks and interrupt handlers are omitted. For tasks this means any variable the task suspends on and for interrupt handlers it means the name of the protected object containing the handler or, if given, the name of the interrupt stream associated with the handler.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-37"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 37 : The updating of variable XXX by a task or interrupt handler has been omitted from the partition annotation.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This message is only issued when processing the partition annotation. The partition annotation must describe all the actions of the tasks and interrupt handlers making up the program. Therefore, if a variable is exported somewhere in the program by a task or interrupt handler, then it must also be an export at the partition level.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-38"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 38 : The protected element XXX must be initialized at its point of declaration.
</p>
<p>
<i>
To avoid potential race conditions during program startup, all elements of a protected type must be initialized with a constant value at the point of declaration.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-50"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 50 : YYY is not derived from the imported value(s) of XXX.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The item before "is not derived ..." is an export or function return value and the item(s) after are imports of the subprogram. The message indicates that a dependency, stated in the dependency relation (derives annotation) or implied by the function signature is not present in the code. The absence of a stated dependency is always an error in either code or annotation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-50"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 50 : The imported value of XXX is not used in the derivation of YYY.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The variable XXX, which appears in the dependency relation of a procedure subprogram, as an import from which the export YYY is derived, is not used in the code for that purpose. YYY may be a function return value. This version of the message has been retained for backward compatibility.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-53"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 53 : The package initialization of XXX is ineffective.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Here XXX is an own variable of a package, initialized in the package initialization. The message states that XXX is updated elsewhere, before being read.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-54"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 54 : The initialization at declaration of XXX is ineffective.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if the value assigned to a variable at declaration cannot affect the final value of any exported variable of the subprogram in which it occurs because, for example, it is overwritten before it is used.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-57"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 57 : Information flow from XXX to YYY violates the selected information flow policy.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued if safety or security policy checking is enabled and the specified dependency relation contains a relationship in which the flow of information from state or input to state or output violates the selected policy.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-1"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 1 : The previously stated updating of XXX has been omitted.
</p>
<p>
<i>
XXX occurred as an export in the earlier dependency relation but neither XXX nor any refinement constituent of it occurs in the refined dependency relation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-2"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 2 : The updating of XXX has not been previously stated.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A refinement constituent of XXX occurs as an export in the refined dependency relation but XXX does not occur as an export in the earlier dependency relation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-3"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 3 : The previously stated dependency of the exported value of XXX on the imported value of YYY has been omitted.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The dependency of the exported value of XXX on the imported value of YYY occurs in the earlier dependency relation but in the refined dependency relation, no constituents of XXX depend on any constituents of YYY.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-4"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 4 : The dependency of the exported value of XXX on the imported value of YYY has not been previously stated.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A refined dependency relation states a dependency of XXX or a constituent of XXX on YYY or a constituent of YYY, but in the earlier relation, no dependency of XXX on YYY is stated.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-5"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 5 : The (possibly implicit) dependency of the exported value of XXX on its imported value has not been previously stated.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Either a dependency of a constituent of XXX on at least one constituent of XXX occurs in the refined dependency relation, or not all the constituents of XXX occur as exports in the refined dependency relation. However, the dependency of XXX on itself does not occur in the earlier dependency relation.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-40"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 40 : Exit condition is stable, of index 0.
</p>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 40 : Exit condition is stable, of index 1.
</p>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 40 : Exit condition is stable, of index greater than 1.
</p>
<p>
<i>
In these cases the (loop) exit condition occurs in an iteration scheme, an exit statement, or an if-statement whose (unique) sequence of statements ends with an unconditional exit statement - see the SPARK Definition. The concept of loop stability is explained in Section 4.4 of Appendix A. A loop exit condition which is stable of index 0 takes the same value at every iteration around the loop, and with a stability index of 1, it always takes the same value after the first iteration. Stability with indices greater than 0 does not necessarily indicate a program error, but the conditions for loop termination require careful consideration.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-41"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 41 : Expression is stable, of index 0.
</p>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 41 : Expression is stable, of index 1.
</p>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 41 : Expression is stable, of index greater than 1.
</p>
<p>
<i>
The expression, occurring within a loop, is either a case expression or a condition (Boolean-valued expression) associated with an if-statement, whose value determines the path taken through the body of the loop, but does not (directly) cause loop termination. Information flow analysis shows that the expression does not vary as the loop is executed, so the same branch of the case or if statement will be taken on every loop iteration. An Index of 0 means that the expression is immediately stable, 1 means it becomes stable after the first pass through the loop and so on. The stability index is given with reference to the loop most closely-containing the expression. Stable conditionals are not necessarily an error but do require careful evaluation; they can often be removed by lifting them outside the loop.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-10"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 10 : Ineffective statement.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Execution of this statement cannot affect the final value of any exported variable of the subprogram in which it occurs. The cause may be a data-flow anomaly (i.e. the statement could be an assignment to a variable, which is always updated again before it is read. However, statements may be ineffective for other reasons - see Section 4.1 of Appendix A.
</i>
</p>
<a name="flow-10"></a>
<p>
!!! Flow Error : 10 : Assignment to XXX is ineffective.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This message always relates to a procedure call or an assignment to a record. The variable XXX may be an actual parameter corresponding to a formal one that is exported; otherwise XXX is an exported global variable of the procedure. The message indicates that the updating of XXX, as a result of the procedure call, has no effect on any final values of exported variables of the calling subprogram. Where the ineffective assignment is expected (e.g. calling a supplied procedure that returns more parameters than are needed for the immediate purpose), it can be a useful convention to choose a distinctive name, such as "Unused" for the actual parameter concerned. The message "Assignment to Unused is ineffective" is then self-documenting.
</i>
</p>
<a name="illegal-1"></a>
<p>
*** Illegal Structure : 1 : An exit statement may not occur here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Exit statements must be of the form "exit when c;" where the closest enclosing statement is a loop or "if c then S; exit;" where the if statement has no else part and its closest enclosing statement is a loop. See the SPARK Definition for details.
</i>
</p>
<a name="illegal-2"></a>
<p>
*** Illegal Structure : 2 : A return statement may not occur here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
A return statement may only occur as the last statement of a function.
</i>
</p>
<a name="illegal-3"></a>
<p>
*** Illegal Structure : 3 : The last statement of this function is not a return statement.
</p>
<p>
<i>
SPARK requires that the last statement of a function be a return statement.
</i>
</p>
<a name="illegal-4"></a>
<p>
*** Illegal Structure : 4 : Return statements may not occur in procedure subprograms.
</p>
<a name="note-1"></a>
<p>
--- note : 1 : This dependency relation was not used for this analysis and has not been checked for accuracy.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued when information flow analysis is not performed and when modes were specified in the global annotation. It is a reminder that the dependencies specified in this annotation (including whether each variable is an import or an export) have not been checked against the code, and may therefore be incorrect. (warning control file keyword:<b> notes</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="note-2"></a>
<p>
--- note : 2 : This dependency relation has been used only to identify imports and exports, dependencies have been ignored.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued as a reminder when information flow analysis is not performed in SPARK 83. The dependencies specified in this annotation have not been checked against the code, and may therefore be incorrect. (warning control file keyword: <b>notes</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="note-3"></a>
<p>
--- note : 3 : The deferred constant Null_Address has been implicitly defined here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued as a reminder that the declaration of the type Address within the target configuration file implicitly defines a deferred constant of type Null_Address. (warning control file keyword:<b> notes</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="note-4"></a>
<p>
--- note : 4 : The constant Default_Priority, of type Priority, has been implicitly defined here.
</p>
<p>
<i>
Issued as a reminder that the declaration of the subtype Priority within the target configuration file implicitly defines a constant Default_Priority, of type Priority, with the value (Priority'First + Priority'Last) / 2. (warning control file keyword:<b> notes</b>).
</i>
</p>
<a name="program-has-a-cyclic-path-without-an-assertion"></a>
<p>
!!! Program has a cyclic path without an assertion.
</p>
<p>
<i>
SPARK generates VCs for paths between cutpoints in the code; these must be chosen by the developer in such a way that every loop traverses at least one cutpoint. If the SPARK Examiner detects a loop which is not broken by a cutpoint, it cannot generate verification conditions for the subprogram in which the loop is located, and instead, issues this warning. This can only be corrected by formulating a suitable loop-invariant assertion for the loop and including it as an assertion in the SPARK text at the appropriate point.
</i>
</p>
<a name="unexpected-node-kind-in-main-tree"></a>
<p>
!!! Unexpected node kind in main tree.
</p>
<p>
<i>
This message indicates corruption of the syntax tree being processed by the VC Generator. It should not be seen in normal operation.
</i>
</p>
</body>
</html>
|
