1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283
|
.. _unitofwork_contextual:
Contextual/Thread-local Sessions
================================
Recall from the section :ref:`session_faq_whentocreate`, the concept of
"session scopes" was introduced, with an emphasis on web applications
and the practice of linking the scope of a :class:`.Session` with that
of a web request. Most modern web frameworks include integration tools
so that the scope of the :class:`.Session` can be managed automatically,
and these tools should be used as they are available.
SQLAlchemy includes its own helper object, which helps with the establishment
of user-defined :class:`.Session` scopes. It is also used by third-party
integration systems to help construct their integration schemes.
The object is the :class:`.scoped_session` object, and it represents a
**registry** of :class:`.Session` objects. If you're not familiar with the
registry pattern, a good introduction can be found in `Patterns of Enterprise
Architecture <https://martinfowler.com/eaaCatalog/registry.html>`_.
.. warning::
The :class:`.scoped_session` registry by default uses a Python
``threading.local()``
in order to track :class:`_orm.Session` instances. **This is not
necessarily compatible with all application servers**, particularly those
which make use of greenlets or other alternative forms of concurrency
control, which may lead to race conditions (e.g. randomly occurring
failures) when used in moderate to high concurrency scenarios.
Please read :ref:`unitofwork_contextual_threadlocal` and
:ref:`session_lifespan` below to more fully understand the implications
of using ``threading.local()`` to track :class:`_orm.Session` objects
and consider more explicit means of scoping when using application servers
which are not based on traditional threads.
.. note::
The :class:`.scoped_session` object is a very popular and useful object
used by many SQLAlchemy applications. However, it is important to note
that it presents **only one approach** to the issue of :class:`.Session`
management. If you're new to SQLAlchemy, and especially if the
term "thread-local variable" seems strange to you, we recommend that
if possible you familiarize first with an off-the-shelf integration
system such as `Flask-SQLAlchemy <https://pypi.org/project/Flask-SQLAlchemy/>`_
or `zope.sqlalchemy <https://pypi.org/project/zope.sqlalchemy>`_.
A :class:`.scoped_session` is constructed by calling it, passing it a
**factory** which can create new :class:`.Session` objects. A factory
is just something that produces a new object when called, and in the
case of :class:`.Session`, the most common factory is the :class:`.sessionmaker`,
introduced earlier in this section. Below we illustrate this usage::
>>> from sqlalchemy.orm import scoped_session
>>> from sqlalchemy.orm import sessionmaker
>>> session_factory = sessionmaker(bind=some_engine)
>>> Session = scoped_session(session_factory)
The :class:`.scoped_session` object we've created will now call upon the
:class:`.sessionmaker` when we "call" the registry::
>>> some_session = Session()
Above, ``some_session`` is an instance of :class:`.Session`, which we
can now use to talk to the database. This same :class:`.Session` is also
present within the :class:`.scoped_session` registry we've created. If
we call upon the registry a second time, we get back the **same** :class:`.Session`::
>>> some_other_session = Session()
>>> some_session is some_other_session
True
This pattern allows disparate sections of the application to call upon a global
:class:`.scoped_session`, so that all those areas may share the same session
without the need to pass it explicitly. The :class:`.Session` we've established
in our registry will remain, until we explicitly tell our registry to dispose of it,
by calling :meth:`.scoped_session.remove`::
>>> Session.remove()
The :meth:`.scoped_session.remove` method first calls :meth:`.Session.close` on
the current :class:`.Session`, which has the effect of releasing any connection/transactional
resources owned by the :class:`.Session` first, then discarding the :class:`.Session`
itself. "Releasing" here means that connections are returned to their connection pool and any transactional state is rolled back, ultimately using the ``rollback()`` method of the underlying DBAPI connection.
At this point, the :class:`.scoped_session` object is "empty", and will create
a **new** :class:`.Session` when called again. As illustrated below, this
is not the same :class:`.Session` we had before::
>>> new_session = Session()
>>> new_session is some_session
False
The above series of steps illustrates the idea of the "registry" pattern in a
nutshell. With that basic idea in hand, we can discuss some of the details
of how this pattern proceeds.
Implicit Method Access
----------------------
The job of the :class:`.scoped_session` is simple; hold onto a :class:`.Session`
for all who ask for it. As a means of producing more transparent access to this
:class:`.Session`, the :class:`.scoped_session` also includes **proxy behavior**,
meaning that the registry itself can be treated just like a :class:`.Session`
directly; when methods are called on this object, they are **proxied** to the
underlying :class:`.Session` being maintained by the registry::
Session = scoped_session(some_factory)
# equivalent to:
#
# session = Session()
# print(session.scalars(select(MyClass)).all())
#
print(Session.scalars(select(MyClass)).all())
The above code accomplishes the same task as that of acquiring the current
:class:`.Session` by calling upon the registry, then using that :class:`.Session`.
.. _unitofwork_contextual_threadlocal:
Thread-Local Scope
------------------
Users who are familiar with multithreaded programming will note that representing
anything as a global variable is usually a bad idea, as it implies that the
global object will be accessed by many threads concurrently. The :class:`.Session`
object is entirely designed to be used in a **non-concurrent** fashion, which
in terms of multithreading means "only in one thread at a time". So our
above example of :class:`.scoped_session` usage, where the same :class:`.Session`
object is maintained across multiple calls, suggests that some process needs
to be in place such that multiple calls across many threads don't actually get
a handle to the same session. We call this notion **thread local storage**,
which means, a special object is used that will maintain a distinct object
per each application thread. Python provides this via the
`threading.local() <https://docs.python.org/library/threading.html#threading.local>`_
construct. The :class:`.scoped_session` object by default uses this object
as storage, so that a single :class:`.Session` is maintained for all who call
upon the :class:`.scoped_session` registry, but only within the scope of a single
thread. Callers who call upon the registry in a different thread get a
:class:`.Session` instance that is local to that other thread.
Using this technique, the :class:`.scoped_session` provides a quick and relatively
simple (if one is familiar with thread-local storage) way of providing
a single, global object in an application that is safe to be called upon
from multiple threads.
The :meth:`.scoped_session.remove` method, as always, removes the current
:class:`.Session` associated with the thread, if any. However, one advantage of the
``threading.local()`` object is that if the application thread itself ends, the
"storage" for that thread is also garbage collected. So it is in fact "safe" to
use thread local scope with an application that spawns and tears down threads,
without the need to call :meth:`.scoped_session.remove`. However, the scope
of transactions themselves, i.e. ending them via :meth:`.Session.commit` or
:meth:`.Session.rollback`, will usually still be something that must be explicitly
arranged for at the appropriate time, unless the application actually ties the
lifespan of a thread to the lifespan of a transaction.
.. _session_lifespan:
Using Thread-Local Scope with Web Applications
----------------------------------------------
As discussed in the section :ref:`session_faq_whentocreate`, a web application
is architected around the concept of a **web request**, and integrating
such an application with the :class:`.Session` usually implies that the :class:`.Session`
will be associated with that request. As it turns out, most Python web frameworks,
with notable exceptions such as the asynchronous frameworks Twisted and
Tornado, use threads in a simple way, such that a particular web request is received,
processed, and completed within the scope of a single *worker thread*. When
the request ends, the worker thread is released to a pool of workers where it
is available to handle another request.
This simple correspondence of web request and thread means that to associate a
:class:`.Session` with a thread implies it is also associated with the web request
running within that thread, and vice versa, provided that the :class:`.Session` is
created only after the web request begins and torn down just before the web request ends.
So it is a common practice to use :class:`.scoped_session` as a quick way
to integrate the :class:`.Session` with a web application. The sequence
diagram below illustrates this flow:
.. sourcecode:: text
Web Server Web Framework SQLAlchemy ORM Code
-------------- -------------- ------------------------------
startup -> Web framework # Session registry is established
initializes Session = scoped_session(sessionmaker())
incoming
web request -> web request -> # The registry is *optionally*
starts # called upon explicitly to create
# a Session local to the thread and/or request
Session()
# the Session registry can otherwise
# be used at any time, creating the
# request-local Session() if not present,
# or returning the existing one
Session.execute(select(MyClass)) # ...
Session.add(some_object) # ...
# if data was modified, commit the
# transaction
Session.commit()
web request ends -> # the registry is instructed to
# remove the Session
Session.remove()
sends output <-
outgoing web <-
response
Using the above flow, the process of integrating the :class:`.Session` with the
web application has exactly two requirements:
1. Create a single :class:`.scoped_session` registry when the web application
first starts, ensuring that this object is accessible by the rest of the
application.
2. Ensure that :meth:`.scoped_session.remove` is called when the web request ends,
usually by integrating with the web framework's event system to establish
an "on request end" event.
As noted earlier, the above pattern is **just one potential way** to integrate a :class:`.Session`
with a web framework, one which in particular makes the significant assumption
that the **web framework associates web requests with application threads**. It is
however **strongly recommended that the integration tools provided with the web framework
itself be used, if available**, instead of :class:`.scoped_session`.
In particular, while using a thread local can be convenient, it is preferable that the :class:`.Session` be
associated **directly with the request**, rather than with
the current thread. The next section on custom scopes details a more advanced configuration
which can combine the usage of :class:`.scoped_session` with direct request based scope, or
any kind of scope.
Using Custom Created Scopes
---------------------------
The :class:`.scoped_session` object's default behavior of "thread local" scope is only
one of many options on how to "scope" a :class:`.Session`. A custom scope can be defined
based on any existing system of getting at "the current thing we are working with".
Suppose a web framework defines a library function ``get_current_request()``. An application
built using this framework can call this function at any time, and the result will be
some kind of ``Request`` object that represents the current request being processed.
If the ``Request`` object is hashable, then this function can be easily integrated with
:class:`.scoped_session` to associate the :class:`.Session` with the request. Below we illustrate
this in conjunction with a hypothetical event marker provided by the web framework
``on_request_end``, which allows code to be invoked whenever a request ends::
from my_web_framework import get_current_request, on_request_end
from sqlalchemy.orm import scoped_session, sessionmaker
Session = scoped_session(sessionmaker(bind=some_engine), scopefunc=get_current_request)
@on_request_end
def remove_session(req):
Session.remove()
Above, we instantiate :class:`.scoped_session` in the usual way, except that we pass
our request-returning function as the "scopefunc". This instructs :class:`.scoped_session`
to use this function to generate a dictionary key whenever the registry is called upon
to return the current :class:`.Session`. In this case it is particularly important
that we ensure a reliable "remove" system is implemented, as this dictionary is not
otherwise self-managed.
Contextual Session API
----------------------
.. autoclass:: sqlalchemy.orm.scoped_session
:members:
:inherited-members:
.. autoclass:: sqlalchemy.util.ScopedRegistry
:members:
.. autoclass:: sqlalchemy.util.ThreadLocalRegistry
.. autoclass:: sqlalchemy.orm.QueryPropertyDescriptor
|