1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520
|
# 2008 September 1
#
# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
#
# May you do good and not evil.
# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
#
#***********************************************************************
#
# $Id: in4.test,v 1.4 2009/06/05 17:09:12 drh Exp $
set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl
set testprefix in4
do_test in4-1.1 {
execsql {
CREATE TABLE t1(a, b);
CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a);
}
} {}
do_test in4-1.2 {
execsql {
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a IN ('aaa', 'bbb', 'ccc');
}
} {}
do_test in4-1.3 {
execsql {
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('aaa', 1);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('ddd', 2);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('ccc', 3);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('eee', 4);
SELECT b FROM t1 WHERE a IN ('aaa', 'bbb', 'ccc');
}
} {1 3}
do_test in4-1.4 {
execsql {
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE rowid IN (1, 3);
}
} {aaa ccc}
do_test in4-1.5 {
execsql {
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE rowid IN ();
}
} {}
do_test in4-1.6 {
execsql {
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a IN ('ddd');
}
} {ddd}
do_test in4-2.1 {
execsql {
CREATE TABLE t2(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b TEXT);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(-1, '-one');
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(0, 'zero');
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(1, 'one');
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2, 'two');
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(3, 'three');
}
} {}
do_test in4-2.2 {
execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN (0, 2) }
} {zero two}
do_test in4-2.3 {
execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN (2, 0) }
} {zero two}
do_test in4-2.4 {
execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN (2, -1) }
} {-one two}
do_test in4-2.5 {
execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN (NULL, 3) }
} {three}
do_test in4-2.6 {
execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN (1.0, 2.1) }
} {one}
do_test in4-2.7 {
execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN ('1', '2') }
} {one two}
do_test in4-2.8 {
execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN ('', '0.0.0', '2') }
} {two}
# The following block of tests test expressions of the form:
#
# <expr> IN ()
#
# i.e. IN expressions with a literal empty set.
#
# This has led to crashes on more than one occasion. Test case in4-3.2
# was added in reponse to a bug reported on the mailing list on 11/7/2008.
# See also tickets #3602 and #185.
#
do_test in4-3.1 {
execsql {
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1;
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t2;
CREATE TABLE t1(x, id);
CREATE TABLE t2(x, id);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(NULL, NULL);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(0, NULL);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 3);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2, 4);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3, 5);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(4, 6);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(0, NULL);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(4, 1);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(NULL, 1);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(NULL, NULL);
}
} {}
do_test in4-3.2 {
execsql {
SELECT x FROM t1 WHERE id IN () AND x IN (SELECT x FROM t2 WHERE id=1)
}
} {}
do_test in4-3.3 {
execsql {
CREATE TABLE t3(x, y, z);
CREATE INDEX t3i1 ON t3(x, y);
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1, 1, 1);
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(10, 10, 10);
}
execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN () }
} {}
do_test in4-3.4 {
execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x = 10 AND y IN () }
} {}
do_test in4-3.5 {
execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN () AND y = 10 }
} {}
do_test in4-3.6 {
execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN () OR x = 10 }
} {10 10 10}
do_test in4-3.7 {
execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE y IN () }
} {}
do_test in4-3.8 {
execsql { SELECT x IN() AS a FROM t3 WHERE a }
} {}
do_test in4-3.9 {
execsql { SELECT x IN() AS a FROM t3 WHERE NOT a }
} {0 0}
do_test in4-3.10 {
execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE oid IN () }
} {}
do_test in4-3.11 {
execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (1, 2) OR y IN ()}
} {1 1 1}
do_test in4-3.12 {
execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (1, 2) AND y IN ()}
} {}
# Tests for "... IN (?)" and "... NOT IN (?)". In other words, tests
# for when the RHS of IN is a single expression. This should work the
# same as the == and <> operators.
#
do_execsql_test in4-3.21 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x=10 AND y IN (10);
} {10 10 10}
do_execsql_test in4-3.22 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10) AND y=10;
} {10 10 10}
do_execsql_test in4-3.23 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10) AND y IN (10);
} {10 10 10}
do_execsql_test in4-3.24 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x=1 AND y NOT IN (10);
} {1 1 1}
do_execsql_test in4-3.25 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10) AND y=1;
} {1 1 1}
do_execsql_test in4-3.26 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10) AND y NOT IN (10);
} {1 1 1}
# The query planner recognizes that "x IN (?)" only generates a
# single match and can use this information to optimize-out ORDER BY
# clauses.
#
do_execsql_test in4-3.31 {
DROP INDEX t3i1;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX t3xy ON t3(x,y);
SELECT *, '|' FROM t3 A, t3 B
WHERE A.x=10 AND A.y IN (10)
AND B.x=1 AND B.y IN (1);
} {10 10 10 1 1 1 |}
do_execsql_test in4-3.32 {
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
SELECT *, '|' FROM t3 A, t3 B
WHERE A.x=10 AND A.y IN (10)
AND B.x=1 AND B.y IN (1);
} {~/B-TREE/} ;# No separate sorting pass
do_execsql_test in4-3.33 {
SELECT *, '|' FROM t3 A, t3 B
WHERE A.x IN (10) AND A.y=10
AND B.x IN (1) AND B.y=1;
} {10 10 10 1 1 1 |}
do_execsql_test in4-3.34 {
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
SELECT *, '|' FROM t3 A, t3 B
WHERE A.x IN (10) AND A.y=10
AND B.x IN (1) AND B.y=1;
} {~/B-TREE/} ;# No separate sorting pass
# An expression of the form "x IN (?,?)" creates an ephemeral table to
# hold the list of values on the RHS. But "x IN (?)" does not create
# an ephemeral table.
#
do_execsql_test in4-3.41 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10,11);
} {10 10 10}
do_execsql_test in4-3.42 {
EXPLAIN
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10,11);
} {/OpenEphemeral/}
do_execsql_test in4-3.43 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10);
} {10 10 10}
# This test would verify that the "X IN (Y)" -> "X==Y" optimization
# was working. But we have now taken that optimization out.
#do_execsql_test in4-3.44 {
# EXPLAIN
# SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10);
#} {~/OpenEphemeral/}
do_execsql_test in4-3.45 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10,11,99999);
} {1 1 1}
do_execsql_test in4-3.46 {
EXPLAIN
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10,11,99999);
} {/OpenEphemeral/}
do_execsql_test in4-3.47 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10);
} {1 1 1}
do_execsql_test in4-3.48 {
EXPLAIN
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10);
} {~/OpenEphemeral/}
# Make sure that when "x IN (?)" is converted into "x==?" that collating
# sequence and affinity computations do not get messed up.
#
do_execsql_test in4-4.1 {
CREATE TABLE t4a(a TEXT, b TEXT COLLATE nocase, c);
INSERT INTO t4a VALUES('ABC','abc',1);
INSERT INTO t4a VALUES('def','xyz',2);
INSERT INTO t4a VALUES('ghi','ghi',3);
SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE a=b ORDER BY c;
} {3}
do_execsql_test in4-4.2 {
SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE b=a ORDER BY c;
} {1 3}
do_execsql_test in4-4.3 {
SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE (a||'')=b ORDER BY c;
} {1 3}
do_execsql_test in4-4.4 {
SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE (a||'')=(b||'') ORDER BY c;
} {3}
do_execsql_test in4-4.5 {
SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE a IN (b) ORDER BY c;
} {3}
do_execsql_test in4-4.6 {
SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE (a||'') IN (b) ORDER BY c;
} {3}
do_execsql_test in4-4.11 {
CREATE TABLE t4b(a TEXT, b NUMERIC, c);
INSERT INTO t4b VALUES('1.0',1,4);
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE a=b;
} {4}
do_execsql_test in4-4.12 {
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE b=a;
} {4}
do_execsql_test in4-4.13 {
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE +a=b;
} {4}
do_execsql_test in4-4.14 {
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE a=+b;
} {}
do_execsql_test in4-4.15 {
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE +b=a;
} {}
do_execsql_test in4-4.16 {
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE b=+a;
} {4}
do_execsql_test in4-4.17 {
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE a IN (b);
} {}
do_execsql_test in4-4.18 {
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE b IN (a);
} {4}
do_execsql_test in4-4.19 {
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE +b IN (a);
} {}
do_execsql_test in4-5.1 {
CREATE TABLE t5(c INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, d TEXT COLLATE nocase);
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(17, 'fuzz');
SELECT 1 FROM t5 WHERE 'fuzz' IN (d); -- match
SELECT 2 FROM t5 WHERE 'FUZZ' IN (d); -- no match
SELECT 3 FROM t5 WHERE d IN ('fuzz'); -- match
SELECT 4 FROM t5 WHERE d IN ('FUZZ'); -- match
} {1 3 4}
# An expression of the form "x IN (y)" can be used as "x=y" by the
# query planner when computing transitive constraints or to run the
# query using an index on y.
#
do_execsql_test in4-6.1 {
CREATE TABLE t6a(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b);
INSERT INTO t6a VALUES(1,2),(3,4),(5,6);
CREATE TABLE t6b(c INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, d);
INSERT INTO t6b VALUES(4,44),(5,55),(6,66);
SELECT * FROM t6a, t6b WHERE a=3 AND b IN (c);
} {3 4 4 44}
do_execsql_test in4-6.1-eqp {
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
SELECT * FROM t6a, t6b WHERE a=3 AND b IN (c);
} {~/SCAN t6a/}
do_execsql_test in4-6.2 {
SELECT * FROM t6a, t6b WHERE a=3 AND c IN (b);
} {3 4 4 44}
do_execsql_test in4-6.2-eqp {
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
SELECT * FROM t6a, t6b WHERE a=3 AND c IN (b);
} {~/SCAN/}
reset_db
do_execsql_test 7.0 {
CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c);
CREATE TABLE t2(d, e);
CREATE INDEX t1bc ON t1(c, b);
INSERT INTO t2(e) VALUES(1);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(NULL, NULL, NULL);
}
do_execsql_test 7.1 {
SELECT * FROM t2 LEFT JOIN t1 ON c = d AND b IN (10,10,10);
} {{} 1 {} {} {}}
ifcapable rtree {
reset_db
do_execsql_test 7.2 {
CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE t1 USING rtree(a, b, c);
CREATE TABLE t2(d INTEGER, e INT);
INSERT INTO t2(e) VALUES(1);
}
do_execsql_test 7.3 {
SELECT * FROM t2 LEFT JOIN t1 ON c IN (d) AND b IN (10,10,10);
} {{} 1 {} {} {}}
}
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
reset_db
do_execsql_test 8.0 {
CREATE TABLE t1(x INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, y);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX t1y ON t1(y);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(111, 'AAA'),(222, 'BBB'),(333, 'CCC');
CREATE TABLE t2(z);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES('BBB'),('AAA');
ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1', 't1y','100 1');
}
db close
sqlite3 db test.db
do_execsql_test 8.1 {
SELECT t1.x FROM t2 CROSS JOIN t1 WHERE t2.z = t1.y;
} {222 111}
do_execsql_test 8.2 {
SELECT t1.x FROM t2 CROSS JOIN t1 WHERE t2.z = t1.y AND +t1.x IN (111, 222);
} {222 111}
do_execsql_test 8.3 {
SELECT t1.x FROM t2 CROSS JOIN t1 WHERE t2.z = t1.y AND t1.x IN (111, 222);
} {222 111}
# 2021-06-02 forum post https://sqlite.org/forum/forumpost/b4fcb8a598
# OP_SeekScan changes from check-in 4a43430fd23f8835 on 2020-09-30 causes
# performance regression.
#
reset_db
do_execsql_test 9.0 {
CREATE TABLE node(node_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY);
CREATE TABLE edge(node_from INT, node_to INT);
CREATE TABLE sub_nodes(node_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY);
CREATE INDEX edge_from_to ON edge(node_from,node_to);
CREATE INDEX edge_to_from ON edge(node_to,node_from);
ANALYZE;
DELETE FROM sqlite_stat1;
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES
('sub_nodes',NULL,'1000000'),
('edge','edge_to_from','20000000 2 2'),
('edge','edge_from_to','20000000 2 2'),
('node',NULL,'10000000');
ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
} {}
do_eqp_test 9.1 {
SELECT count(*) FROM edge
WHERE node_from IN sub_nodes AND node_to IN sub_nodes;
} {
QUERY PLAN
|--SEARCH edge USING COVERING INDEX edge_to_from (node_to=?)
|--USING ROWID SEARCH ON TABLE sub_nodes FOR IN-OPERATOR
`--USING ROWID SEARCH ON TABLE sub_nodes FOR IN-OPERATOR
}
# ^^^^^ the key to the above is that the index should only use a single
# term (node_to=?), not two terms (node_to=? AND node_from=).
# dbsqlfuzz case
#
reset_db
do_execsql_test 10.0 {
CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c,d,PRIMARY KEY(a,b,c)) WITHOUT ROWID;
INSERT INTO t1(a,b,c,d) VALUES
(0,-2,2,3),
(0,2,3,4),
(0,5,8,10),
(1,7,11,13);
ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1','10 3 2 1');
ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
PRAGMA reverse_unordered_selects(1);
SELECT d FROM t1 WHERE 0=a AND b IN (-17,-4,-3,1,5,25,7798);
} {10}
# 2021-06-13 dbsqlfuzz e41762333a4d6e90a49e628f488d0873b2dba4c5
# The opcode that preceeds OP_SeekScan is usually OP_IdxGT, but can
# sometimes be OP_IdxGE
#
reset_db
do_execsql_test 11.0 {
CREATE TABLE t1(a TEXT, b INT, c INT, d INT);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('abc',123,4,5);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('xyz',1,'abcdefxyz',99);
CREATE INDEX t1abc ON t1(b,b,c);
ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1abc','10000 5 00 2003 10');
ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
} {}
do_execsql_test 11.1 {
SELECT * FROM t1
WHERE b IN (345, (SELECT 1 FROM t1
WHERE b IN (coalesce(1,random()))
AND c GLOB 'abc*xyz'))
AND c BETWEEN 'abc' AND 'xyz';
} {xyz 1 abcdefxyz 99}
do_execsql_test 11.2 {
EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1
WHERE b IN (345, (SELECT 1 FROM t1
WHERE b IN (coalesce(1,random()))
AND c GLOB 'abc*xyz'))
AND c BETWEEN 'abc' AND 'xyz';
} {/ SeekScan /}
# 2021-06-25 ticket 6dcbfd11cf666e21
# Another problem with OP_SeekScan
#
reset_db
do_execsql_test 12.0 {
CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c);
CREATE INDEX t1abc ON t1(a,b,c);
CREATE INDEX t1bca on t1(b,c,a);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(56,1119,1115);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(57,1147,1137);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(100,1050,1023);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(101,1050,1023);
ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1abc','358677 2 2 1');
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1bca','358677 4 2 1');
ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
SELECT * FROM t1 NOT INDEXED
WHERE (b = 1137 AND c IN (97, 98))
OR (b = 1119 AND c IN (1115, 1023));
} {56 1119 1115}
do_execsql_test 12.1 {
SELECT * FROM t1
WHERE (b = 1137 AND c IN (97, 98))
OR (b = 1119 AND c IN (1115, 1023));
} {56 1119 1115}
# 2021-11-02 ticket 5981a8c041a3c2f3
# Another OP_SeekScan problem.
#
reset_db
do_execsql_test 13.0 {
CREATE TABLE t1(id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, a INT, b INT, c INT);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(10,1,2,5);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(20,1,3,5);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(30,1,2,4);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(40,1,3,4);
ANALYZE sqlite_master;
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1x','84000 3 2 1');
CREATE INDEX t1x ON t1(a,b,c);
PRAGMA writable_schema=RESET;
SELECT * FROM t1
WHERE a=1
AND b IN (2,3)
AND c BETWEEN 4 AND 5
ORDER BY +id;
} {10 1 2 5 20 1 3 5 30 1 2 4 40 1 3 4}
finish_test
|