1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456
|
#!/usr/bin/env python
# DO NOT EDIT
# Autogenerated from the notebook statespace_forecasting.ipynb.
# Edit the notebook and then sync the output with this file.
#
# flake8: noqa
# DO NOT EDIT
# # Forecasting in statsmodels
#
# This notebook describes forecasting using time series models in
# statsmodels.
#
# **Note**: this notebook applies only to the state space model classes,
# which are:
#
# - `sm.tsa.SARIMAX`
# - `sm.tsa.UnobservedComponents`
# - `sm.tsa.VARMAX`
# - `sm.tsa.DynamicFactor`
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import statsmodels.api as sm
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
macrodata = sm.datasets.macrodata.load_pandas().data
macrodata.index = pd.period_range('1959Q1', '2009Q3', freq='Q')
# ## Basic example
#
# A simple example is to use an AR(1) model to forecast inflation. Before
# forecasting, let's take a look at the series:
endog = macrodata['infl']
endog.plot(figsize=(15, 5))
# ### Constructing and estimating the model
# The next step is to formulate the econometric model that we want to use
# for forecasting. In this case, we will use an AR(1) model via the
# `SARIMAX` class in statsmodels.
#
# After constructing the model, we need to estimate its parameters. This
# is done using the `fit` method. The `summary` method produces several
# convenient tables showing the results.
# Construct the model
mod = sm.tsa.SARIMAX(endog, order=(1, 0, 0), trend='c')
# Estimate the parameters
res = mod.fit()
print(res.summary())
# ### Forecasting
# Out-of-sample forecasts are produced using the `forecast` or
# `get_forecast` methods from the results object.
#
# The `forecast` method gives only point forecasts.
# The default is to get a one-step-ahead forecast:
print(res.forecast())
# The `get_forecast` method is more general, and also allows constructing
# confidence intervals.
# Here we construct a more complete results object.
fcast_res1 = res.get_forecast()
# Most results are collected in the `summary_frame` attribute.
# Here we specify that we want a confidence level of 90%
print(fcast_res1.summary_frame(alpha=0.10))
# The default confidence level is 95%, but this can be controlled by
# setting the `alpha` parameter, where the confidence level is defined as
# $(1 - \alpha) \times 100\%$. In the example above, we specified a
# confidence level of 90%, using `alpha=0.10`.
# ### Specifying the number of forecasts
#
# Both of the functions `forecast` and `get_forecast` accept a single
# argument indicating how many forecasting steps are desired. One option for
# this argument is always to provide an integer describing the number of
# steps ahead you want.
print(res.forecast(steps=2))
fcast_res2 = res.get_forecast(steps=2)
# Note: since we did not specify the alpha parameter, the
# confidence level is at the default, 95%
print(fcast_res2.summary_frame())
# However, **if your data included a Pandas index with a defined
# frequency** (see the section at the end on Indexes for more information),
# then you can alternatively specify the date through which you want
# forecasts to be produced:
print(res.forecast('2010Q2'))
fcast_res3 = res.get_forecast('2010Q2')
print(fcast_res3.summary_frame())
# ### Plotting the data, forecasts, and confidence intervals
#
# Often it is useful to plot the data, the forecasts, and the confidence
# intervals. There are many ways to do this, but here's one example
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(15, 5))
# Plot the data (here we are subsetting it to get a better look at the
# forecasts)
endog.loc['1999':].plot(ax=ax)
# Construct the forecasts
fcast = res.get_forecast('2011Q4').summary_frame()
fcast['mean'].plot(ax=ax, style='k--')
ax.fill_between(fcast.index,
fcast['mean_ci_lower'],
fcast['mean_ci_upper'],
color='k',
alpha=0.1)
# ### Note on what to expect from forecasts
#
# The forecast above may not look very impressive, as it is almost a
# straight line. This is because this is a very simple, univariate
# forecasting model. Nonetheless, keep in mind that these simple forecasting
# models can be extremely competitive.
# ## Prediction vs Forecasting
#
# The results objects also contain two methods that all for both in-sample
# fitted values and out-of-sample forecasting. They are `predict` and
# `get_prediction`. The `predict` method only returns point predictions
# (similar to `forecast`), while the `get_prediction` method also returns
# additional results (similar to `get_forecast`).
#
# In general, if your interest is out-of-sample forecasting, it is easier
# to stick to the `forecast` and `get_forecast` methods.
# ## Cross validation
#
# **Note**: some of the functions used in this section were first
# introduced in statsmodels v0.11.0.
#
# A common use case is to cross-validate forecasting methods by performing
# h-step-ahead forecasts recursively using the following process:
#
# 1. Fit model parameters on a training sample
# 2. Produce h-step-ahead forecasts from the end of that sample
# 3. Compare forecasts against test dataset to compute error rate
# 4. Expand the sample to include the next observation, and repeat
#
# Economists sometimes call this a pseudo-out-of-sample forecast
# evaluation exercise, or time-series cross-validation.
# ### Example
# We will conduct a very simple exercise of this sort using the inflation
# dataset above. The full dataset contains 203 observations, and for
# expositional purposes we'll use the first 80% as our training sample and
# only consider one-step-ahead forecasts.
# A single iteration of the above procedure looks like the following:
# Step 1: fit model parameters w/ training sample
training_obs = int(len(endog) * 0.8)
training_endog = endog[:training_obs]
training_mod = sm.tsa.SARIMAX(training_endog, order=(1, 0, 0), trend='c')
training_res = training_mod.fit()
# Print the estimated parameters
print(training_res.params)
# Step 2: produce one-step-ahead forecasts
fcast = training_res.forecast()
# Step 3: compute root mean square forecasting error
true = endog.reindex(fcast.index)
error = true - fcast
# Print out the results
print(
pd.concat(
[true.rename('true'),
fcast.rename('forecast'),
error.rename('error')],
axis=1))
# To add on another observation, we can use the `append` or `extend`
# results methods. Either method can produce the same forecasts, but they
# differ in the other results that are available:
#
# - `append` is the more complete method. It always stores results for all
# training observations, and it optionally allows refitting the model
# parameters given the new observations (note that the default is *not* to
# refit the parameters).
# - `extend` is a faster method that may be useful if the training sample
# is very large. It *only* stores results for the new observations, and it
# does not allow refitting the model parameters (i.e. you have to use the
# parameters estimated on the previous sample).
#
# If your training sample is relatively small (less than a few thousand
# observations, for example) or if you want to compute the best possible
# forecasts, then you should use the `append` method. However, if that
# method is infeasible (for example, because you have a very large training
# sample) or if you are okay with slightly suboptimal forecasts (because the
# parameter estimates will be slightly stale), then you can consider the
# `extend` method.
# A second iteration, using the `append` method and refitting the
# parameters, would go as follows (note again that the default for `append`
# does not refit the parameters, but we have overridden that with the
# `refit=True` argument):
# Step 1: append a new observation to the sample and refit the parameters
append_res = training_res.append(endog[training_obs:training_obs + 1],
refit=True)
# Print the re-estimated parameters
print(append_res.params)
# Notice that these estimated parameters are slightly different than those
# we originally estimated. With the new results object, `append_res`, we can
# compute forecasts starting from one observation further than the previous
# call:
# Step 2: produce one-step-ahead forecasts
fcast = append_res.forecast()
# Step 3: compute root mean square forecasting error
true = endog.reindex(fcast.index)
error = true - fcast
# Print out the results
print(
pd.concat(
[true.rename('true'),
fcast.rename('forecast'),
error.rename('error')],
axis=1))
# Putting it altogether, we can perform the recursive forecast evaluation
# exercise as follows:
# Setup forecasts
nforecasts = 3
forecasts = {}
# Get the number of initial training observations
nobs = len(endog)
n_init_training = int(nobs * 0.8)
# Create model for initial training sample, fit parameters
init_training_endog = endog.iloc[:n_init_training]
mod = sm.tsa.SARIMAX(training_endog, order=(1, 0, 0), trend='c')
res = mod.fit()
# Save initial forecast
forecasts[training_endog.index[-1]] = res.forecast(steps=nforecasts)
# Step through the rest of the sample
for t in range(n_init_training, nobs):
# Update the results by appending the next observation
updated_endog = endog.iloc[t:t + 1]
res = res.append(updated_endog, refit=False)
# Save the new set of forecasts
forecasts[updated_endog.index[0]] = res.forecast(steps=nforecasts)
# Combine all forecasts into a dataframe
forecasts = pd.concat(forecasts, axis=1)
print(forecasts.iloc[:5, :5])
# We now have a set of three forecasts made at each point in time from
# 1999Q2 through 2009Q3. We can construct the forecast errors by subtracting
# each forecast from the actual value of `endog` at that point.
# Construct the forecast errors
forecast_errors = forecasts.apply(lambda column: endog - column).reindex(
forecasts.index)
print(forecast_errors.iloc[:5, :5])
# To evaluate our forecasts, we often want to look at a summary value like
# the root mean square error. Here we can compute that for each horizon by
# first flattening the forecast errors so that they are indexed by horizon
# and then computing the root mean square error fore each horizon.
# Reindex the forecasts by horizon rather than by date
def flatten(column):
return column.dropna().reset_index(drop=True)
flattened = forecast_errors.apply(flatten)
flattened.index = (flattened.index + 1).rename('horizon')
print(flattened.iloc[:3, :5])
# Compute the root mean square error
rmse = (flattened**2).mean(axis=1)**0.5
print(rmse)
# #### Using `extend`
#
# We can check that we get similar forecasts if we instead use the
# `extend` method, but that they are not exactly the same as when we use
# `append` with the `refit=True` argument. This is because `extend` does not
# re-estimate the parameters given the new observation.
# Setup forecasts
nforecasts = 3
forecasts = {}
# Get the number of initial training observations
nobs = len(endog)
n_init_training = int(nobs * 0.8)
# Create model for initial training sample, fit parameters
init_training_endog = endog.iloc[:n_init_training]
mod = sm.tsa.SARIMAX(training_endog, order=(1, 0, 0), trend='c')
res = mod.fit()
# Save initial forecast
forecasts[training_endog.index[-1]] = res.forecast(steps=nforecasts)
# Step through the rest of the sample
for t in range(n_init_training, nobs):
# Update the results by appending the next observation
updated_endog = endog.iloc[t:t + 1]
res = res.extend(updated_endog)
# Save the new set of forecasts
forecasts[updated_endog.index[0]] = res.forecast(steps=nforecasts)
# Combine all forecasts into a dataframe
forecasts = pd.concat(forecasts, axis=1)
print(forecasts.iloc[:5, :5])
# Construct the forecast errors
forecast_errors = forecasts.apply(lambda column: endog - column).reindex(
forecasts.index)
print(forecast_errors.iloc[:5, :5])
# Reindex the forecasts by horizon rather than by date
def flatten(column):
return column.dropna().reset_index(drop=True)
flattened = forecast_errors.apply(flatten)
flattened.index = (flattened.index + 1).rename('horizon')
print(flattened.iloc[:3, :5])
# Compute the root mean square error
rmse = (flattened**2).mean(axis=1)**0.5
print(rmse)
# By not re-estimating the parameters, our forecasts are slightly worse
# (the root mean square error is higher at each horizon). However, the
# process is faster, even with only 200 datapoints. Using the `%%timeit`
# cell magic on the cells above, we found a runtime of 570ms using `extend`
# versus 1.7s using `append` with `refit=True`. (Note that using `extend` is
# also faster than using `append` with `refit=False`).
# ## Indexes
#
# Throughout this notebook, we have been making use of Pandas date indexes
# with an associated frequency. As you can see, this index marks our data as
# at a quarterly frequency, between 1959Q1 and 2009Q3.
print(endog.index)
# In most cases, if your data has an associated data/time index with a
# defined frequency (like quarterly, monthly, etc.), then it is best to make
# sure your data is a Pandas series with the appropriate index. Here are
# three examples of this:
# Annual frequency, using a PeriodIndex
index = pd.period_range(start='2000', periods=4, freq='A')
endog1 = pd.Series([1, 2, 3, 4], index=index)
print(endog1.index)
# Quarterly frequency, using a DatetimeIndex
index = pd.date_range(start='2000', periods=4, freq='QS')
endog2 = pd.Series([1, 2, 3, 4], index=index)
print(endog2.index)
# Monthly frequency, using a DatetimeIndex
index = pd.date_range(start='2000', periods=4, freq='ME')
endog3 = pd.Series([1, 2, 3, 4], index=index)
print(endog3.index)
# In fact, if your data has an associated date/time index, it is best to
# use that even if does not have a defined frequency. An example of that
# kind of index is as follows - notice that it has `freq=None`:
index = pd.DatetimeIndex([
'2000-01-01 10:08am', '2000-01-01 11:32am', '2000-01-01 5:32pm',
'2000-01-02 6:15am'
])
endog4 = pd.Series([0.2, 0.5, -0.1, 0.1], index=index)
print(endog4.index)
# You can still pass this data to statsmodels' model classes, but you will
# get the following warning, that no frequency data was found:
mod = sm.tsa.SARIMAX(endog4)
res = mod.fit()
# What this means is that you cannot specify forecasting steps by dates,
# and the output of the `forecast` and `get_forecast` methods will not have
# associated dates. The reason is that without a given frequency, there is
# no way to determine what date each forecast should be assigned to. In the
# example above, there is no pattern to the date/time stamps of the index,
# so there is no way to determine what the next date/time should be (should
# it be in the morning of 2000-01-02? the afternoon? or maybe not until
# 2000-01-03?).
#
# For example, if we forecast one-step-ahead:
res.forecast(1)
# The index associated with the new forecast is `4`, because if the given
# data had an integer index, that would be the next value. A warning is
# given letting the user know that the index is not a date/time index.
#
# If we try to specify the steps of the forecast using a date, we will get
# the following exception:
#
# KeyError: 'The `end` argument could not be matched to a location
# related to the index of the data.'
#
# Here we'll catch the exception to prevent printing too much of
# the exception trace output in this notebook
try:
res.forecast('2000-01-03')
except KeyError as e:
print(e)
# Ultimately there is nothing wrong with using data that does not have an
# associated date/time frequency, or even using data that has no index at
# all, like a Numpy array. However, if you can use a Pandas series with an
# associated frequency, you'll have more options for specifying your
# forecasts and get back results with a more useful index.
|