File: portabilitystrategies.html

package info (click to toggle)
swi-prolog 7.2.3%2Bdfsg-6
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: stretch
  • size: 84,180 kB
  • ctags: 45,684
  • sloc: ansic: 330,358; perl: 268,104; sh: 6,795; java: 4,904; makefile: 4,561; cpp: 4,153; ruby: 1,594; yacc: 843; xml: 82; sed: 12; sql: 6
file content (367 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 10,492 bytes parent folder | download
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">

<html>
<head>
<title>SWI-Prolog 7.3.6 Reference Manual: Section C.1</title><link rel="home" href="index.html">
<link rel="contents" href="Contents.html">
<link rel="index" href="DocIndex.html">
<link rel="summary" href="summary.html">
<link rel="previous" href="dialect.html">
<link rel="next" href="glossary.html">

<style type="text/css">

/* Style sheet for SWI-Prolog latex2html
*/

dd.defbody
{ margin-bottom: 1em;
}

dt.pubdef, dt.multidef
{ color: #fff;
padding: 2px 10px 0px 10px;
margin-bottom: 5px;
font-size: 18px;
vertical-align: middle;
overflow: hidden;
}

dt.pubdef { background-color: #0c3d6e; }
dt.multidef { background-color: #ef9439; }

.bib dd
{ margin-bottom: 1em;
}

.bib dt
{ float: left;
margin-right: 1.3ex;
}

pre.code
{ margin-left: 1.5em;
margin-right: 1.5em;
border: 1px dotted;
padding-top: 5px;
padding-left: 5px;
padding-bottom: 5px;
background-color: #f8f8f8;
}

div.navigate
{ text-align: center;
background-color: #f0f0f0;
border: 1px dotted;
padding: 5px;
}

div.title
{ text-align: center;
padding-bottom: 1em;
font-size: 200%;
font-weight: bold;
}

div.author
{ text-align: center;
font-style: italic;
}

div.abstract
{ margin-top: 2em;
background-color: #f0f0f0;
border: 1px dotted;
padding: 5px;
margin-left: 10%; margin-right:10%;
}

div.abstract-title
{ text-align: center;
padding: 5px;
font-size: 120%;
font-weight: bold;
}

div.toc-h1
{ font-size: 200%;
font-weight: bold;
}

div.toc-h2
{ font-size: 120%;
font-weight: bold;
margin-left: 2em;
}

div.toc-h3
{ font-size: 100%;
font-weight: bold;
margin-left: 4em;
}

div.toc-h4
{ font-size: 100%;
margin-left: 6em;
}

span.sec-nr
{
}

span.sec-title
{
}

span.pred-ext
{ font-weight: bold;
}

span.pred-tag
{ float: right;
padding-top: 0.2em;
font-size: 80%;
font-style: italic;
color: #fff;
}

div.caption
{ width: 80%;
margin: auto;
text-align:center;
}

/* Footnotes */
.fn {
color: red;
font-size: 70%;
}

.fn-text, .fnp {
position: absolute;
top: auto;
left: 10%;
border: 1px solid #000;
box-shadow: 5px 5px 5px #888;
display: none;
background: #fff;
color: #000;
margin-top: 25px;
padding: 8px 12px;
font-size: larger;
}

sup:hover span.fn-text
{ display: block;
}

/* Lists */

dl.latex
{ margin-top: 1ex;
margin-bottom: 0.5ex;
}

dl.latex dl.latex dd.defbody
{ margin-bottom: 0.5ex;
}

/* PlDoc Tags */

dl.tags
{ font-size: 90%;
margin-left: 5ex;
margin-top: 1ex;
margin-bottom: 0.5ex;
}

dl.tags dt
{ margin-left: 0pt;
font-weight: bold;
}

dl.tags dd
{ margin-left: 3ex;
}

td.param
{ font-style: italic;
font-weight: bold;
}

/* Index */

dt.index-sep
{ font-weight: bold;
font-size: +1;
margin-top: 1ex;
}

/* Tables */

table.center
{ margin: auto;
}

table.latex
{ border-collapse:collapse;
}

table.latex tr
{ vertical-align: text-top;
}

table.latex td,th
{ padding: 2px 1em;
}

table.latex tr.hline td,th
{ border-top: 1px solid black;
}

table.frame-box
{ border: 2px solid black;
}

</style>
</head>
<body style="background:white">
<div class="navigate"><a class="nav" href="index.html"><img src="home.gif" alt="Home"></a>
<a class="nav" href="Contents.html"><img src="index.gif" alt="Contents"></a>
<a class="nav" href="DocIndex.html"><img src="yellow_pages.gif" alt="Index"></a>
<a class="nav" href="summary.html"><img src="info.gif" alt="Summary"></a>
<a class="nav" href="dialect.html"><img src="prev.gif" alt="Previous"></a>
<a class="nav" href="glossary.html"><img src="next.gif" alt="Next"></a>
</div>
<h2 id="sec:portabilitystrategies"><a id="sec:C.1"><span class="sec-nr">C.1</span> <span class="sec-title">Some 
considerations for writing portable code</span></a></h2>

<a id="sec:portabilitystrategies"></a>

<p>The traditional way to write portable code is to define custom 
predicates for all potentially non-portable code and define these 
separately for all Prolog dialects one wishes to support. Here are some 
considerations.

<p>
<ul class="latex">
<li>Probably the best reason for this is that it allows to define 
minimal semantics required by the application for the portability 
predicates. Such functionality can often be mapped efficiently to the 
target dialect. Contrary, if code was written for dialect <var>X</var>, 
the defined semantics are those of dialect <var>X</var>. Emulating all 
extreme cases and full error handling compatibility may be tedious and 
result in a much slower implementation that needed. Take for example
<a id="idx:callcleanup2:2063"></a><a class="pred" href="metacall.html#call_cleanup/2">call_cleanup/2</a>. 
The SICStus definition is fundamentally different from the SWI 
definition, but 99% of the applications just want to make calls like 
below to guarantee <var>StreamIn</var> is closed, even if <span class="pred-ext">process/1</span> 
misbehaves.

<pre class="code">
        call_cleanup(process(StreamIn), close(In))
</pre>

<p>
<li>As a drawback, the code becomes full of <i>my_call_cleanup</i>, etc. and 
every potential portability conflict needs to be abstracted. It is hard 
for people who have to maintain such code later to grasp the exact 
semantics of the <i>my_*</i> predicates and applications that combine 
multiple libraries using this compatibility approach are likely to 
encounter conflicts between the portability layers. A good start is not 
to use <i>my_*</i>, but a prefix derived from the library or application 
name or names that explain the intended semantics more precisely.

<p>
<li>Another problem is that most code is initially not written with 
portability in mind. Instead, ports are requested by users or arise from 
the desire to switch Prolog dialect. Typically, we want to achieve 
compatibility with the new Prolog dialect with minimal changes, often 
keeping compatibility with the original dialect(s). This problem is well 
known from the C/Unix world and we advise anyone to study the philosophy 
of
<a class="url" href="http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/">GNU autoconf</a>, 
from which we will illustrate some highlights below.
</ul>

<p>The GNU autoconf suite, known to most people as <b>configure</b>, was 
an answer to the frustrating life of Unix/C programmers when Unix 
dialects were about as abundant and poorly standardised as Prolog 
dialects today. Writing a portable C program can only be achieved using 
cpp, the C preprocessor. The C preprocessor performs two tasks: macro 
expansion and conditional compilation. Prolog realises macro expansion 
through <a id="idx:termexpansion2:2064"></a><a class="pred" href="consulting.html#term_expansion/2">term_expansion/2</a> 
and <a id="idx:goalexpansion2:2065"></a><a class="pred" href="consulting.html#goal_expansion/2">goal_expansion/2</a>. 
Conditional compilation is achieved using <code>:- if(Condition)</code> 
as explained in
<a class="sec" href="consulting.html">section 4.3.1.2</a>. The situation 
appears similar.

<p>The important lesson learned from GNU autoconf is that the <em>last</em> 
resort for conditional compilation to achieve portability is to switch 
on the platform or dialect. Instead, GNU autoconf allows you to write 
tests for specific properties of the platform. Most of these are whether 
or not some function or file is available. Then there are some standard 
tests for difficult-to-write-portable situations and finally there is a 
framework that allows you to write arbitrary C programs and check 
whether they can be compiled and/or whether they show the intended 
behaviour. Using a separate <b>configure</b> program is needed in C, as 
you cannot perform C compilation step or run C programs from the C 
preprocessor. In most Prolog environments we do not need this 
distinction as the compiler is integrated into the runtime environment 
and Prolog has excellent reflexion capabilities.

<p>We must learn from the distinction to test for features instead of 
platform (dialect), as this makes the platform-specific code robust for 
future changes of the dialect. Suppose we need <a id="idx:compare3:2066"></a><a class="pred" href="compare.html#compare/3">compare/3</a> 
as defined in this manual. The <a id="idx:compare3:2067"></a><a class="pred" href="compare.html#compare/3">compare/3</a> 
predicate is not part of the ISO standard, but many systems support it 
and it is not unlikely it will become ISO standard or the intended 
dialect will start supporting it. GNU autoconf strongly advises to test 
for the availability:

<pre class="code">
:- if(\+current_predicate(_, compare(_,_,_))).
compare(&lt;, Term1, Term2) :-
        Term1 @&lt; Term2, !.
compare(&gt;, Term1, Term2) :-
        Term1 @&gt; Term2, !.
compare(=, Term1, Term2) :-
        Term1 == Term2.
:- endif.
</pre>

<p>This code is <b>much</b> more robust against changes to the intended 
dialect and, possibly at least as important, will provide compatibility 
with dialects you didn't even consider porting to right now.

<p>In a more challenging case, the target Prolog has <a id="idx:compare3:2068"></a><a class="pred" href="compare.html#compare/3">compare/3</a>, 
but the semantics are different. What to do? One option is to write a
<a id="idx:mycompare3:2069"></a><span class="pred-ext">my_compare/3</span> 
and change all occurrences in the code. Alternatively you can rename 
calls using <a id="idx:goalexpansion2:2070"></a><a class="pred" href="consulting.html#goal_expansion/2">goal_expansion/2</a> 
like below. This construct will not only deal with Prolog dialects 
lacking <a id="idx:compare3:2071"></a><a class="pred" href="compare.html#compare/3">compare/3</a> 
as well as those that only implement it for numeric comparison or have 
changed the argument order. Of course, writing rock-solid code would 
require a complete test-suite, but this example will probably cover all 
Prolog dialects that allow for conditional compilation, have core ISO 
facilities and provide <a id="idx:goalexpansion2:2072"></a><a class="pred" href="consulting.html#goal_expansion/2">goal_expansion/2</a>, 
the things we claim a Prolog dialect should have to start writing 
portable code for it.

<pre class="code">
:- if(\+catch(compare(&lt;,a,b), _, fail)).
compare_standard_order(&lt;, Term1, Term2) :-
        Term1 @&lt; Term2, !.
compare_standard_order(&gt;, Term1, Term2) :-
        Term1 @&gt; Term2, !.
compare_standard_order(=, Term1, Term2) :-
        Term1 == Term2.

goal_expansion(compare(Order, Term1, Term2),
               compare_standard_order(Order, Term1, Term2)).
:- endif.
</pre>

<p></body></html>