File: redundant-member-init.rst

package info (click to toggle)
swiftlang 6.0.3-2
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid, trixie
  • size: 2,519,992 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 9,107,863; ansic: 2,040,022; asm: 1,135,751; python: 296,500; objc: 82,456; f90: 60,502; lisp: 34,951; pascal: 19,946; sh: 18,133; perl: 7,482; ml: 4,937; javascript: 4,117; makefile: 3,840; awk: 3,535; xml: 914; fortran: 619; cs: 573; ruby: 573
file content (45 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,230 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (8)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
.. title:: clang-tidy - readability-redundant-member-init

readability-redundant-member-init
=================================

Finds member initializations that are unnecessary because the same default
constructor would be called if they were not present.

Example
-------

.. code-block:: c++

  // Explicitly initializing the member s is unnecessary.
  class Foo {
  public:
    Foo() : s() {}

  private:
    std::string s;
  };

Options
-------

.. option:: IgnoreBaseInCopyConstructors

    Default is `false`.

    When `true`, the check will ignore unnecessary base class initializations
    within copy constructors, since some compilers issue warnings/errors when
    base classes are not explicitly initialized in copy constructors. For example,
    ``gcc`` with ``-Wextra`` or ``-Werror=extra`` issues warning or error
    ``base class 'Bar' should be explicitly initialized in the copy constructor``
    if ``Bar()`` were removed in the following example:

.. code-block:: c++

  // Explicitly initializing member s and base class Bar is unnecessary.
  struct Foo : public Bar {
    // Remove s() below. If IgnoreBaseInCopyConstructors!=0, keep Bar().
    Foo(const Foo& foo) : Bar(), s() {}
    std::string s;
  };