1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669
|
"""
Test lldb breakpoint command add/list/delete.
"""
import lldb
from lldbsuite.test.decorators import *
from lldbsuite.test.lldbtest import *
from lldbsuite.test import lldbutil
import json
import os
import side_effect
class BreakpointCommandTestCase(TestBase):
NO_DEBUG_INFO_TESTCASE = True
@expectedFailureAll(oslist=["windows"], bugnumber="llvm.org/pr24528")
def test_breakpoint_command_sequence(self):
"""Test a sequence of breakpoint command add, list, and delete."""
self.build()
self.breakpoint_command_sequence()
@skipIf(oslist=["windows"], bugnumber="llvm.org/pr44431")
def test_script_parameters(self):
"""Test a sequence of breakpoint command add, list, and delete."""
self.build()
self.breakpoint_command_script_parameters()
def test_commands_on_creation(self):
self.build()
self.breakpoint_commands_on_creation()
@skipIf(oslist=["windows"])
@no_debug_info_test
def test_breakpoints_with_relative_path_line_tables(self):
"""
Test that we can set breakpoints using a full or partial path when
line tables in the debug information has relative paths where the
relative path is either fully contained in the specified path, or if
the specified path also a relative path that is shorter than the
path in the debug info.
The "relative.yaml" contains a line table that is:
Line table for a/b/c/main.cpp in `a.out
0x0000000100003f94: a/b/c/main.cpp:1
0x0000000100003fb0: a/b/c/main.cpp:2:3
0x0000000100003fb8: a/b/c/main.cpp:2:3
So the line table contains relative paths. We should be able to set
breakpoints with any source path that matches this path which
includes paths that are longer than "a/b/c/main.cpp", but also any
relative path that is shorter than this while all specified relative
path components still match.
"""
src_dir = self.getSourceDir()
yaml_path = os.path.join(src_dir, "relative.yaml")
yaml_base, ext = os.path.splitext(yaml_path)
obj_path = self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")
self.yaml2obj(yaml_path, obj_path)
# Create a target with the object file we just created from YAML
target = self.dbg.CreateTarget(obj_path)
# We now have debug information with line table paths that start are
# "./a/b/c/main.cpp".
# Make sure that all of the following paths create a breakpoint
# successfully. We have paths that are longer than our path, and also
# that are shorter where all relative directories still match.
valid_paths = [
"/x/a/b/c/main.cpp",
"/x/y/a/b/c/main.cpp",
"./x/y/a/b/c/main.cpp",
"x/y/a/b/c/main.cpp",
"./y/a/b/c/main.cpp",
"y/a/b/c/main.cpp",
"./a/b/c/main.cpp",
"a/b/c/main.cpp",
"./b/c/main.cpp",
"b/c/main.cpp",
"./c/main.cpp",
"c/main.cpp",
"./main.cpp",
"main.cpp",
]
for path in valid_paths:
bkpt = target.BreakpointCreateByLocation(path, 2)
self.assertTrue(
bkpt.GetNumLocations() > 0,
'Couldn\'t resolve breakpoint using full path "%s" in executate "%s" with '
"debug info that has relative path with matching suffix"
% (path, self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")),
)
invalid_paths = [
"/x/b/c/main.cpp",
"/x/c/main.cpp",
"/x/main.cpp",
"./x/y/a/d/c/main.cpp",
]
# Reset source map.
self.runCmd("settings clear target.source-map")
for path in invalid_paths:
bkpt = target.BreakpointCreateByLocation(path, 2)
self.assertEqual(
bkpt.GetNumLocations(),
0,
'Incorrectly resolved a breakpoint using full path "%s" with '
"debug info that has relative path with matching suffix" % (path),
)
@no_debug_info_test
def test_breakpoints_with_bad_aranges(self):
"""
Test that we can set breakpoints in a file that has an invalid
.debug_aranges. Older versions of LLDB would find a line entry
in the line table and then would use the start address of the line
entry to do an address lookup on the entry from the line table. If
this address to symbol context lookup would fail, due to a bad
.debug_aranges, it would cause the breakpoint to not get resolved.
Verify that even in these conditions we are able to resolve a
breakpoint.
The "bad_aranges.yaml" contains a line table that is:
Line table for /tmp/ab/main.cpp in `a.out
0x0000000100003f94: /tmp/ab/main.cpp:1
0x0000000100003fb0: /tmp/ab/main.cpp:2:3
0x0000000100003fb8: /tmp/ab/main.cpp:2:3
The .debug_aranges has one range for this compile unit that is
invalid: [0x0000000200003f94-0x0000000200003fb8). This will cause
the resolving of the addresses to fail.
"""
src_dir = self.getSourceDir()
yaml_path = os.path.join(src_dir, "bad_aranges.yaml")
yaml_base, ext = os.path.splitext(yaml_path)
obj_path = self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")
self.yaml2obj(yaml_path, obj_path)
# Create a target with the object file we just created from YAML
target = self.dbg.CreateTarget(obj_path)
src_path = "/tmp/ab/main.cpp"
bkpt = target.BreakpointCreateByLocation(src_path, 2)
self.assertTrue(
bkpt.GetNumLocations() > 0,
'Couldn\'t resolve breakpoint using "%s" in executate "%s" with '
"debug info that has a bad .debug_aranges section"
% (src_path, self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")),
)
def setUp(self):
# Call super's setUp().
TestBase.setUp(self)
# Find the line number to break inside main().
self.line = line_number("main.c", "// Set break point at this line.")
# disable "There is a running process, kill it and restart?" prompt
self.runCmd("settings set auto-confirm true")
self.addTearDownHook(lambda: self.runCmd("settings clear auto-confirm"))
def test_delete_all_breakpoints(self):
"""Test that deleting all breakpoints works."""
self.build()
exe = self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")
self.runCmd("file " + exe, CURRENT_EXECUTABLE_SET)
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_symbol(self, "main")
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self, "main.c", self.line, num_expected_locations=1, loc_exact=True
)
self.runCmd("run", RUN_SUCCEEDED)
self.runCmd("breakpoint delete")
self.runCmd("process continue")
self.expect(
"process status",
PROCESS_STOPPED,
patterns=["Process .* exited with status = 0"],
)
def breakpoint_command_sequence(self):
"""Test a sequence of breakpoint command add, list, and delete."""
exe = self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")
self.runCmd("file " + exe, CURRENT_EXECUTABLE_SET)
# Add three breakpoints on the same line. The first time we don't specify the file,
# since the default file is the one containing main:
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self, None, self.line, num_expected_locations=1, loc_exact=True
)
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self, "main.c", self.line, num_expected_locations=1, loc_exact=True
)
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self, "main.c", self.line, num_expected_locations=1, loc_exact=True
)
# Breakpoint 4 - set at the same location as breakpoint 1 to test
# setting breakpoint commands on two breakpoints at a time
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self, None, self.line, num_expected_locations=1, loc_exact=True
)
# Make sure relative path source breakpoints work as expected. We test
# with partial paths with and without "./" prefixes.
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self, "./main.c", self.line, num_expected_locations=1, loc_exact=True
)
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self,
"breakpoint_command/main.c",
self.line,
num_expected_locations=1,
loc_exact=True,
)
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self,
"./breakpoint_command/main.c",
self.line,
num_expected_locations=1,
loc_exact=True,
)
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self,
"breakpoint/breakpoint_command/main.c",
self.line,
num_expected_locations=1,
loc_exact=True,
)
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self,
"./breakpoint/breakpoint_command/main.c",
self.line,
num_expected_locations=1,
loc_exact=True,
)
# Test relative breakpoints with incorrect paths and make sure we get
# no breakpoint locations
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self, "invalid/main.c", self.line, num_expected_locations=0, loc_exact=True
)
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self,
"./invalid/main.c",
self.line,
num_expected_locations=0,
loc_exact=True,
)
# Now add callbacks for the breakpoints just created.
self.runCmd(
"breakpoint command add -s command -o 'frame variable --show-types --scope' 1 4"
)
self.runCmd(
"breakpoint command add -s python -o 'import side_effect; side_effect.one_liner = \"one liner was here\"' 2"
)
import side_effect
self.runCmd("command script import --allow-reload ./bktptcmd.py")
self.runCmd("breakpoint command add --python-function bktptcmd.function 3")
# Check that the breakpoint commands are correctly set.
# The breakpoint list now only contains breakpoint 1.
self.expect(
"breakpoint list",
"Breakpoints 1 & 2 created",
substrs=[
"2: file = 'main.c', line = %d, exact_match = 0, locations = 1"
% self.line
],
patterns=[
"1: file = '.*main.c', line = %d, exact_match = 0, locations = 1"
% self.line
],
)
self.expect(
"breakpoint list -f",
"Breakpoints 1 & 2 created",
substrs=[
"2: file = 'main.c', line = %d, exact_match = 0, locations = 1"
% self.line
],
patterns=[
"1: file = '.*main.c', line = %d, exact_match = 0, locations = 1"
% self.line,
"1.1: .+at main.c:%d:?[0-9]*, .+unresolved, hit count = 0" % self.line,
"2.1: .+at main.c:%d:?[0-9]*, .+unresolved, hit count = 0" % self.line,
],
)
self.expect(
"breakpoint command list 1",
"Breakpoint 1 command ok",
substrs=["Breakpoint commands:", "frame variable --show-types --scope"],
)
self.expect(
"breakpoint command list 2",
"Breakpoint 2 command ok",
substrs=[
"Breakpoint commands (Python):",
"import side_effect",
"side_effect.one_liner",
],
)
self.expect(
"breakpoint command list 3",
"Breakpoint 3 command ok",
substrs=[
"Breakpoint commands (Python):",
"bktptcmd.function(frame, bp_loc, internal_dict)",
],
)
self.expect(
"breakpoint command list 4",
"Breakpoint 4 command ok",
substrs=["Breakpoint commands:", "frame variable --show-types --scope"],
)
self.runCmd("breakpoint delete 4")
# Next lets try some other breakpoint kinds. First break with a regular expression
# and then specify only one file. The first time we should get two locations,
# the second time only one:
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_regexp(
self, r"._MyFunction", num_expected_locations=2
)
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_regexp(
self, r"._MyFunction", extra_options="-f a.c", num_expected_locations=1
)
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_regexp(
self,
r"._MyFunction",
extra_options="-f a.c -f b.c",
num_expected_locations=2,
)
# Now try a source regex breakpoint:
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_source_regexp(
self,
r"is about to return [12]0",
extra_options="-f a.c -f b.c",
num_expected_locations=2,
)
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_source_regexp(
self,
r"is about to return [12]0",
extra_options="-f a.c",
num_expected_locations=1,
)
# Reset our canary variables and run the program.
side_effect.one_liner = None
side_effect.bktptcmd = None
self.runCmd("run", RUN_SUCCEEDED)
# Check the value of canary variables.
self.assertEqual("one liner was here", side_effect.one_liner)
self.assertEqual("function was here", side_effect.bktptcmd)
# Finish the program.
self.runCmd("process continue")
# Remove the breakpoint command associated with breakpoint 1.
self.runCmd("breakpoint command delete 1")
# Remove breakpoint 2.
self.runCmd("breakpoint delete 2")
self.expect(
"breakpoint command list 1",
startstr="Breakpoint 1 does not have an associated command.",
)
self.expect(
"breakpoint command list 2",
error=True,
startstr="error: '2' is not a currently valid breakpoint ID.",
)
# The breakpoint list now only contains breakpoint 1.
self.expect(
"breakpoint list -f",
"Breakpoint 1 exists",
patterns=[
"1: file = '.*main.c', line = %d, exact_match = 0, locations = 1, resolved = 1"
% self.line,
"hit count = 1",
],
)
# Not breakpoint 2.
self.expect(
"breakpoint list -f",
"No more breakpoint 2",
matching=False,
substrs=[
"2: file = 'main.c', line = %d, exact_match = 0, locations = 1, resolved = 1"
% self.line
],
)
# Run the program again, with breakpoint 1 remaining.
self.runCmd("run", RUN_SUCCEEDED)
# We should be stopped again due to breakpoint 1.
# The stop reason of the thread should be breakpoint.
self.expect(
"thread list",
STOPPED_DUE_TO_BREAKPOINT,
substrs=["stopped", "stop reason = breakpoint"],
)
# The breakpoint should have a hit count of 1, since we reset counts
# for each run.
lldbutil.check_breakpoint(self, bpno=1, expected_hit_count=1)
def breakpoint_command_script_parameters(self):
"""Test that the frame and breakpoint location are being properly passed to the script breakpoint command function."""
exe = self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")
self.runCmd("file " + exe, CURRENT_EXECUTABLE_SET)
# Add a breakpoint.
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self, "main.c", self.line, num_expected_locations=1, loc_exact=True
)
# Now add callbacks for the breakpoints just created.
self.runCmd(
"breakpoint command add -s python -o 'import side_effect; side_effect.frame = str(frame); side_effect.bp_loc = str(bp_loc)' 1"
)
# Reset canary variables and run.
side_effect.frame = None
side_effect.bp_loc = None
self.runCmd("run", RUN_SUCCEEDED)
self.expect(side_effect.frame, exe=False, startstr="frame #0:")
self.expect(
side_effect.bp_loc,
exe=False,
patterns=["1.* where = .*main .* resolved,( hardware,)? hit count = 1"],
)
def breakpoint_commands_on_creation(self):
"""Test that setting breakpoint commands when creating the breakpoint works"""
target = self.createTestTarget()
# Add a breakpoint.
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self,
"main.c",
self.line,
num_expected_locations=1,
loc_exact=True,
extra_options='-C bt -C "thread list" -C continue',
)
bkpt = target.FindBreakpointByID(1)
self.assertTrue(bkpt.IsValid(), "Couldn't find breakpoint 1")
com_list = lldb.SBStringList()
bkpt.GetCommandLineCommands(com_list)
self.assertEqual(com_list.GetSize(), 3, "Got the wrong number of commands")
self.assertEqual(com_list.GetStringAtIndex(0), "bt", "First bt")
self.assertEqual(
com_list.GetStringAtIndex(1), "thread list", "Next thread list"
)
self.assertEqual(com_list.GetStringAtIndex(2), "continue", "Last continue")
def test_add_commands_by_breakpoint_name(self):
"""Make sure that when you specify a breakpoint name to "break command add"
it gets added to all the breakpoints marked with that name."""
self.build()
target = self.createTestTarget()
bp_ids = []
bp_names = ["main", "not_here", "main"]
for bp_name in bp_names:
bp = target.BreakpointCreateByName(bp_name)
bp.AddName("MyBKPTS")
bp_ids.append(bp.GetID())
# First do it with a script one-liner:
self.runCmd("breakpoint command add -s py -o 'print(\"some command\")' MyBKPTS")
for id in bp_ids:
self.expect(
"breakpoint command list {0}".format(id), patterns=["some command"]
)
# Now do the same thing with a python function:
import side_effect
self.runCmd("command script import --allow-reload ./bktptcmd.py")
self.runCmd(
"breakpoint command add --python-function bktptcmd.function MyBKPTS"
)
for id in bp_ids:
self.expect(
"breakpoint command list {0}".format(id), patterns=["bktptcmd.function"]
)
def test_breakpoint_delete_disabled(self):
"""Test 'break delete --disabled' works"""
self.build()
target = self.createTestTarget()
bp_1 = target.BreakpointCreateByName("main")
bp_2 = target.BreakpointCreateByName("not_here")
bp_3 = target.BreakpointCreateByName("main")
bp_3.AddName("DeleteMeNot")
bp_1.SetEnabled(False)
bp_3.SetEnabled(False)
bp_id_1 = bp_1.GetID()
bp_id_2 = bp_2.GetID()
bp_id_3 = bp_3.GetID()
self.runCmd("breakpoint delete --disabled DeleteMeNot")
bp_1 = target.FindBreakpointByID(bp_id_1)
self.assertFalse(bp_1.IsValid(), "Didn't delete disabled breakpoint 1")
bp_2 = target.FindBreakpointByID(bp_id_2)
self.assertTrue(bp_2.IsValid(), "Deleted enabled breakpoint 2")
bp_3 = target.FindBreakpointByID(bp_id_3)
self.assertTrue(
bp_3.IsValid(), "DeleteMeNot didn't protect disabled breakpoint 3"
)
# Reset the first breakpoint, disable it, and do this again with no protected name:
bp_1 = target.BreakpointCreateByName("main")
bp_1.SetEnabled(False)
bp_id_1 = bp_1.GetID()
self.runCmd("breakpoint delete --disabled")
bp_1 = target.FindBreakpointByID(bp_id_1)
self.assertFalse(bp_1.IsValid(), "Didn't delete disabled breakpoint 1")
bp_2 = target.FindBreakpointByID(bp_id_2)
self.assertTrue(bp_2.IsValid(), "Deleted enabled breakpoint 2")
bp_3 = target.FindBreakpointByID(bp_id_3)
self.assertFalse(bp_3.IsValid(), "Didn't delete disabled breakpoint 3")
def get_source_map_json(self):
stream = lldb.SBStream()
self.dbg.GetSetting("target.source-map").GetAsJSON(stream)
return json.loads(stream.GetData())
def verify_source_map_entry_pair(self, entry, original, replacement):
self.assertEqual(
entry[0], original, "source map entry 'original' does not match"
)
self.assertEqual(
entry[1], replacement, "source map entry 'replacement' does not match"
)
def verify_source_map_deduce_statistics(self, target, expected_count):
stream = lldb.SBStream()
res = target.GetStatistics().GetAsJSON(stream)
self.assertTrue(res.Success())
debug_stats = json.loads(stream.GetData())
self.assertEqual(
"targets" in debug_stats,
True,
'Make sure the "targets" key in in target.GetStatistics()',
)
target_stats = debug_stats["targets"][0]
self.assertNotEqual(target_stats, None)
self.assertEqual(target_stats["sourceMapDeduceCount"], expected_count)
@skipIf(oslist=["windows"])
@no_debug_info_test
def test_breakpoints_auto_source_map_relative(self):
"""
Test that with target.auto-source-map-relative settings.
The "relative.yaml" contains a line table that is:
Line table for a/b/c/main.cpp in `a.out
0x0000000100003f94: a/b/c/main.cpp:1
0x0000000100003fb0: a/b/c/main.cpp:2:3
0x0000000100003fb8: a/b/c/main.cpp:2:3
"""
src_dir = self.getSourceDir()
yaml_path = os.path.join(src_dir, "relative.yaml")
yaml_base, ext = os.path.splitext(yaml_path)
obj_path = self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")
self.yaml2obj(yaml_path, obj_path)
# Create a target with the object file we just created from YAML
target = self.dbg.CreateTarget(obj_path)
# We now have debug information with line table paths that start are
# "./a/b/c/main.cpp".
source_map_json = self.get_source_map_json()
self.assertEqual(
len(source_map_json), 0, "source map should be empty initially"
)
self.verify_source_map_deduce_statistics(target, 0)
# Verify auto deduced source map when file path in debug info
# is a suffix of request breakpoint file path
path = "/x/y/a/b/c/main.cpp"
bp = target.BreakpointCreateByLocation(path, 2)
self.assertTrue(
bp.GetNumLocations() > 0,
'Couldn\'t resolve breakpoint using full path "%s" in executate "%s" with '
"debug info that has relative path with matching suffix"
% (path, self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")),
)
source_map_json = self.get_source_map_json()
self.assertEqual(len(source_map_json), 1, "source map should not be empty")
self.verify_source_map_entry_pair(source_map_json[0], ".", "/x/y")
self.verify_source_map_deduce_statistics(target, 1)
# Reset source map.
self.runCmd("settings clear target.source-map")
# Verify source map will not auto deduced when file path of request breakpoint
# equals the file path in debug info.
path = "a/b/c/main.cpp"
bp = target.BreakpointCreateByLocation(path, 2)
self.assertTrue(
bp.GetNumLocations() > 0,
'Couldn\'t resolve breakpoint using full path "%s" in executate "%s" with '
"debug info that has relative path with matching suffix"
% (path, self.getBuildArtifact("a.out")),
)
source_map_json = self.get_source_map_json()
self.assertEqual(len(source_map_json), 0, "source map should not be deduced")
def test_breakpoint_statistics_hitcount(self):
"""Test breakpoints statistics have hitCount field."""
self.build()
target = self.createTestTarget()
lldbutil.run_break_set_by_file_and_line(
self, "main.c", self.line, num_expected_locations=1, loc_exact=True
)
stream = lldb.SBStream()
res = target.GetStatistics().GetAsJSON(stream)
self.assertTrue(res.Success())
debug_stats = json.loads(stream.GetData())
self.assertEqual(
"targets" in debug_stats,
True,
'Make sure the "targets" key in in target.GetStatistics()',
)
target_stats = debug_stats["targets"][0]
self.assertNotEqual(target_stats, None)
breakpoints_stats = target_stats["breakpoints"]
self.assertNotEqual(breakpoints_stats, None)
for breakpoint_stats in breakpoints_stats:
self.assertIn("hitCount", breakpoint_stats)
|