1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
|
// RUN: mlir-opt %s \
// RUN: --pass-pipeline="builtin.module(test-transform-dialect-interpreter{ \
// RUN: bind-first-extra-to-ops=linalg.matmul \
// RUN: bind-second-extra-to-ops=linalg.elemwise_binary \
// RUN: enable-expensive-checks},canonicalize,cse,symbol-dce)" \
// RUN: --split-input-file --verify-diagnostics
// ****************************** IMPORTANT NOTE ******************************
//
// If you are changing this file, you may also need to change
// mlir/docs/Tutorials/Transform accordingly.
//
// ****************************************************************************
// Original function to optimize.
func.func @fc_relu(%lhs: tensor<512x512xf32>, %rhs: tensor<512x512xf32>,
%bias: tensor<512x512xf32>, %output: tensor<512x512xf32>)
-> tensor<512x512xf32> {
// Matrix-matrix multiplication.
// expected-note @below {{nested payload op}}
%matmul = linalg.matmul ins(%lhs, %rhs: tensor<512x512xf32>, tensor<512x512xf32>)
outs(%output: tensor<512x512xf32>) -> tensor<512x512xf32>
// Elementwise addition.
// expected-note @below {{ancestor payload op}}
%biased = linalg.elemwise_binary { fun = #linalg.binary_fn<add> }
ins(%matmul, %bias : tensor<512x512xf32>, tensor<512x512xf32>)
outs(%output : tensor<512x512xf32>) -> tensor<512x512xf32>
// Elementwise max with 0 (ReLU).
%c0f = arith.constant 0.0 : f32
%relued = linalg.elemwise_binary { fun = #linalg.binary_fn<max_signed> }
ins(%biased, %c0f : tensor<512x512xf32>, f32)
outs(%output : tensor<512x512xf32>) -> tensor<512x512xf32>
func.return %relued : tensor<512x512xf32>
}
// Declaration of the "microkernel" function that we will be targeting.
func.func private @microkernel(
%lhs: tensor<4x512xf32>,
%rhs: tensor<512x4xf32>,
%bias: tensor<4x4xf32>,
%init: tensor<4x4xf32>,
%output: tensor<4x4xf32>) -> tensor<4x4xf32>
transform.sequence failures(propagate) {
^bb0(%arg0: !transform.any_op,
%arg1: !transform.op<"linalg.matmul">,
%arg2: !transform.op<"linalg.elemwise_binary">):
// Since the %arg2 handle is associated with both elementwise operations,
// we need to split it into two handles so we can target only the second
// elementwise operation.
%add, %max = transform.split_handle %arg2 : (!transform.op<"linalg.elemwise_binary">)
-> (!transform.any_op, !transform.any_op)
// The actual tiling transformation takes tile sizes as attributes. It produces a
// handle to the loop generated during tiling.
%loop, %tiled = transform.structured.tile_to_forall_op %max tile_sizes [8, 32]
: (!transform.any_op) -> (!transform.any_op, !transform.any_op)
// We can now fuse the other operations into the loop. Here, we fuse
// operations one-by-one. This requires the operation that is being fused
// to define the value used within the loop, so the order of such fusions
// is important. We could also use "transform.merge_handles" to obtain
// a single handle to all operations and give it to `fuse_into_containing_op`
// that would take care of the ordering in this case.
%add_fused, %loop2 = transform.structured.fuse_into_containing_op %add into %loop
: (!transform.any_op, !transform.any_op) -> (!transform.any_op, !transform.any_op)
%matmul_fused, %loop3 = transform.structured.fuse_into_containing_op %arg1 into %loop2
: (!transform.op<"linalg.matmul">, !transform.any_op) -> (!transform.any_op, !transform.any_op)
// Tile again to get the desired size. Note that this time this tiles the
// "add" operation and fuses matmul into the loop, but doesn't affect the
// "max" operation. This illustrates the precise targeting with the transform
// dialect. Otherwise, it is difficult to differentiate "add" and "max", both
// of which having the same kind.
%loop_second, %tiled_second = transform.structured.tile_to_forall_op %add_fused tile_sizes [4, 4]
: (!transform.any_op) -> (!transform.any_op, !transform.any_op)
%matmul_fused_2, %loop_second_2 =
transform.structured.fuse_into_containing_op %matmul_fused into %loop_second
: (!transform.any_op, !transform.any_op) -> (!transform.any_op, !transform.any_op)
// Since outlining is currently only implemented for region-holding operations
// such as loops, use tiling to size 1 to materialize the outer loop that is
// going to be outlined.
%loop_third, %_0 = transform.structured.tile_to_forall_op %tiled_second tile_sizes [1]
: (!transform.any_op) -> (!transform.any_op, !transform.any_op)
// expected-note @below {{handle to invalidated ops}}
%f, %outline_target = transform.structured.fuse_into_containing_op %matmul_fused_2 into %loop_third
: (!transform.any_op, !transform.any_op) -> (!transform.any_op, !transform.any_op)
// expected-note @below {{invalidated by this transform op that consumes its operand #0 and invalidates all handles to payload IR entities associated with this operand and entities nested in them}}
%func, %call = transform.loop.outline %outline_target {func_name = "outlined"}
: (!transform.any_op) -> (!transform.any_op, !transform.op<"func.call">)
// expected-error @below {{uses a handle invalidated by a previously executed transform op}}
transform.test_print_remark_at_operand %f, "fused" : !transform.any_op
transform.yield
}
|
