1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This source file is part of the SwiftCertificates open source project
//
// Copyright (c) 2023 Apple Inc. and the SwiftCertificates project authors
// Licensed under Apache License v2.0
//
// See LICENSE.txt for license information
// See CONTRIBUTORS.txt for the list of SwiftCertificates project authors
//
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
import Foundation
import SwiftASN1
/// A sub-policy of the ``RFC5280Policy`` that polices the nameConstraints extension.
@usableFromInline
struct NameConstraintsPolicy: VerifierPolicy {
@usableFromInline
let verifyingCriticalExtensions: [ASN1ObjectIdentifier] = [
.X509ExtensionID.nameConstraints
]
@inlinable
init() {}
@inlinable
func chainMeetsPolicyRequirements(chain: UnverifiedCertificateChain) -> PolicyEvaluationResult {
// The rules for name constraints come from https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5280#section-4.2.1.10.
//
// Some notes:
//
// - RFC 5280 says we MUST validate directoryName constraints, and SHOULD validate rfc822Name,
// URI, dNSName, and iPAddress constraints.
// - If there's a constraint we don't support and can't validate, we MUST reject the cert.
//
// Our algorithm is recursive: starting from the root and moving towards the leaf, for each CA
// cert we apply the name constraints to all of the other certificates in the chain. The one exception
// is for self-signed certs where, much like with basic constraints, we briefly pretend that the
// self-signed cert issued itself and enforce its own name constraints on it.
if chain.count == 1 {
return Self._validateNameConstraints(chain[...], issuer: chain.first!)
}
var issuedCerts = chain[...]
while let issuer = issuedCerts.popLast(), issuedCerts.count > 0 {
if case .failsToMeetPolicy(let reason) = Self._validateNameConstraints(issuedCerts, issuer: issuer) {
return .failsToMeetPolicy(reason: reason)
}
}
return .meetsPolicy
}
@inlinable
static func _validateNameConstraints(
_ issuedCerts: UnverifiedCertificateChain.SubSequence,
issuer: Certificate
) -> PolicyEvaluationResult {
let maybeConstraints: NameConstraints?
do {
maybeConstraints = try issuer.extensions.nameConstraints
} catch {
// We couldn't decode these! Fail validation.
return .failsToMeetPolicy(reason: "RFC5280Policy: Unable to decode name constraints from \(issuer)")
}
guard let constraints = maybeConstraints else {
// No name constraints to enforce, we're done.
return .meetsPolicy
}
for cert in issuedCerts {
let names: Certificate.NameSequence
do {
names = try cert.names
} catch {
return .failsToMeetPolicy(reason: "RFC5280Policy: Unable to decode SAN field of \(cert): \(error)")
}
for name in names {
if case .failsToMeetPolicy(let reason) = Self._validatePermittedSubtrees(
constraints.permittedSubtrees,
name
) {
return .failsToMeetPolicy(reason: reason)
}
if case .failsToMeetPolicy(let reason) = Self._validateExcludedSubtrees(
constraints.excludedSubtrees,
name
) {
return .failsToMeetPolicy(reason: reason)
}
}
}
return .meetsPolicy
}
@inlinable
static func _validateExcludedSubtrees(
_ excludedSubtrees: [GeneralName],
_ name: GeneralName
) -> PolicyEvaluationResult {
// For excluded trees, if _any_ match then the name is forbidden.
for excludedSubtree in excludedSubtrees {
switch (excludedSubtree, name) {
case (.directoryName(let constraint), .directoryName(let presentedName)):
if directoryNameMatchesConstraint(directoryName: presentedName, constraint: constraint) {
return .failsToMeetPolicy(
reason:
"RFC5280Policy: directoryName \(presentedName) is excluded by \(excludedSubtree) in name constraints"
)
}
case (.dnsName(let constraint), .dnsName(let presentedName)):
if dnsNameMatchesConstraint(dnsName: presentedName.utf8, constraint: constraint.utf8) {
return .failsToMeetPolicy(
reason:
"RFC5280Policy: dnsName \(presentedName) is excluded by \(excludedSubtree) in name constraints"
)
}
case (.ipAddress(let constraint), .ipAddress(let presentedName)):
if ipAddressMatchesConstraint(ipAddress: presentedName, constraint: constraint) {
return .failsToMeetPolicy(
reason:
"RFC5280Policy: ipAddress \(presentedName) is excluded by \(excludedSubtree) in name constraints"
)
}
case (.uniformResourceIdentifier(let constraint), .uniformResourceIdentifier(let presentedName)):
if uriNameMatchesConstraint(uriName: presentedName, constraint: constraint) {
return .failsToMeetPolicy(
reason:
"RFC5280Policy: URI \(presentedName) is excluded by \(excludedSubtree) in name constraints"
)
}
case (.directoryName, _), (.dnsName, _), (.ipAddress, _), (.uniformResourceIdentifier, _):
// We support these, but the current name isn't of that type.
continue
default:
// We don't support constraints on these!
//
// Of the set that's currently unsupported, we should probably support rfc822Name (a.k.a. email address).
// For now we're omitting it, but at some point someone is going to run into this limitation and we'll want to come
// back and fix it.
return .failsToMeetPolicy(
reason:
"RFC5280Policy: Unable to validate excluded subtree for name \(excludedSubtree), unsupported constraint"
)
}
}
// No policy rejected this.
return .meetsPolicy
}
@inlinable
static func _validatePermittedSubtrees(
_ permittedSubtrees: [GeneralName],
_ name: GeneralName
) -> PolicyEvaluationResult {
var evaluatedAtLeastOneConstraint = false
for permittedSubtree in permittedSubtrees {
switch (permittedSubtree, name) {
case (.directoryName(let constraint), .directoryName(let presentedName)):
evaluatedAtLeastOneConstraint = true
if directoryNameMatchesConstraint(directoryName: presentedName, constraint: constraint) {
// This is a match, we're good.
return .meetsPolicy
}
case (.dnsName(let constraint), .dnsName(let presentedName)):
evaluatedAtLeastOneConstraint = true
if dnsNameMatchesConstraint(dnsName: presentedName.utf8, constraint: constraint.utf8) {
// This is a match, we're good.
return .meetsPolicy
}
case (.ipAddress(let constraint), .ipAddress(let presentedName)):
evaluatedAtLeastOneConstraint = true
if ipAddressMatchesConstraint(ipAddress: presentedName, constraint: constraint) {
// This is a match, we're good.
return .meetsPolicy
}
case (.uniformResourceIdentifier(let constraint), .uniformResourceIdentifier(let presentedName)):
evaluatedAtLeastOneConstraint = true
if uriNameMatchesConstraint(uriName: presentedName, constraint: constraint) {
// This is a match, we're good.
return .meetsPolicy
}
case (.directoryName, _), (.dnsName, _), (.ipAddress, _), (.uniformResourceIdentifier, _):
// We support these, but the current name isn't of that type. This means we didn't evaluate
// this constraint.
continue
default:
// We don't support constraints on these!
//
// Of the set that's currently unsupported, we should probably support rfc822Name (a.k.a. email address).
// For now we're omitting it, but at some point someone is going to run into this limitation and we'll want to come
// back and fix it.
return .failsToMeetPolicy(
reason:
"RFC5280Policy: Unable to validate permitted subtree for name \(permittedSubtree), unsupported constraint"
)
}
}
// Uh-oh, nothing matched! This is only a problem if we have at least one constraint for the given type.
guard evaluatedAtLeastOneConstraint else {
return .meetsPolicy
}
return .failsToMeetPolicy(
reason: "RFC5280Policy: Unable to validate permitted subtree for \(permittedSubtrees), no matches!"
)
}
}
extension Certificate {
@inlinable
var names: NameSequence {
get throws {
return try NameSequence(self)
}
}
@usableFromInline
struct NameSequence: Sequence {
@usableFromInline
var subject: DistinguishedName
@usableFromInline
var alternativeNames: SubjectAlternativeNames
@inlinable
init(_ certificate: Certificate) throws {
self.subject = certificate.subject
self.alternativeNames = try certificate.extensions.subjectAlternativeNames ?? .init()
}
@inlinable
func makeIterator() -> Iterator {
return Iterator(self.subject, self.alternativeNames)
}
@usableFromInline
struct Iterator: IteratorProtocol {
@usableFromInline
var subject: DistinguishedName?
@usableFromInline
var alternativeNames: SubjectAlternativeNames.SubSequence
@inlinable
init(_ subject: DistinguishedName, _ alternativeNames: SubjectAlternativeNames) {
self.subject = subject
self.alternativeNames = alternativeNames[...]
}
@inlinable
mutating func next() -> GeneralName? {
guard let subject = self.subject else {
return self.alternativeNames.popFirst()
}
self.subject = nil
return .directoryName(subject)
}
}
}
}
|