File: README.md

package info (click to toggle)
swiftlang 6.0.3-2
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid, trixie
  • size: 2,519,992 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 9,107,863; ansic: 2,040,022; asm: 1,135,751; python: 296,500; objc: 82,456; f90: 60,502; lisp: 34,951; pascal: 19,946; sh: 18,133; perl: 7,482; ml: 4,937; javascript: 4,117; makefile: 3,840; awk: 3,535; xml: 914; fortran: 619; cs: 573; ruby: 573
file content (86 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 3,603 bytes parent folder | download
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86

# SIL Bug Reducer

This directory contains a script called bug_reducer. It is a reimplementation of
llvm's bugpoint using a python script + high level IR utilities. This will
enable bugpoint to easily be ported to newer IRs.

An example invocation would be:

    ./swift/utils/bug-reducer/bug_reducer.py \
        opt \
        --sdk=$(xcrun --sdk macosx --toolchain default --show-sdk-path) \
        --module-name=${MODULE_NAME} \
        --work-dir=${PWD}/bug_reducer \
        --module-cache=${PWD}/bug_reducer/module-cache \
        ${SWIFT_BUILD_DIR} \
        ${SIB_FILE}

This is still very alpha and needs a lot of work including tests, so please do
not expect it to work at all until tests are available. Once testing is
available, please only use this if you are willing to tolerate bugs (and
hopefully help fix them/add tests).

# Tasks

1. A lot of this code was inspired by llvm's bisect tool. This includes a bit of
   the code style, we should clean this up and pythonify these parts of the
   tool.
2. Reduction at a function level is complete, we should look into block/instruction
   reduction techniques to reduce SIL further.
3. Then we need to implement miscompile detection support. This implies
   implementing support for codegening code from this tool using swiftc. This
   implies splitting modules into optimized and unoptimized parts. Luckily,
   sil-func-extractor can perform this task modulo one task*.

* Specifically, we need to be able to create internal shims that call shared
  functions so that if a shared function is partitioned on the opposite side of
  any of its call sites, we can avoid having to create a shared function
  declaration in the other partition. We avoid this since creating shared
  function declarations is illegal in SIL.

# High Level Example

Imagine that I have a test case foo.swift that causes the optimizer to assert in
the normal performance pipeline. I decide I want to use the bug_reducer to
reduce the passes and or size of the test case. First I emit a SIB file with the
performance optimizations disabled:

    ${SWIFTC_CMDLINE} -emit-sib -Xllvm -disable-sil-optzns -O -o ${OUTPUT}.sib

Then I invoke the bug reducer as follows:

    ./swift/utils/bug-reducer/bug_reducer.py \
        opt \
        --sdk=$(xcrun --sdk macosx --toolchain default --show-sdk-path) \
        --module-name=${MODULE_NAME} \
        --work-dir=${PWD}/bug_reducer \
        --module-cache=${PWD}/bug_reducer/module-cache \
        --reduce-sil \
        ${SWIFT_BUILD_DIR} \
        ${OUTPUT_SIB}

Then the bug_reducer will first attempt to reduce the passes. Then, it will
attempt to reduce the test case by splitting the module and only optimizing part
of it. The output will look something like:

    *** Successfully Reduced file!
    *** Final File: ${FINAL_SIB_FILE}
    *** Final Functions: ${FINAL_SET_OF_FUNCTIONS}
    *** Repro command line: ${FULL_FINAL_REPRO_CMDLINE}
    *** Final Passes: ${FINAL_PASSES}

Some notes:

1. The final sib file produced _may be different_ than the sib file that you
inputted. This is because the bug_reducer may have:

    a. Created an intermediate optimized sib file with some of the passes applied
    (this ensures that a module with only one pass can be provided)

    b. (In a future version) Split the module into optimized and unoptimized parts
       to reduce the code even further.

2. Repro command line will be the actual final full command line used to
   reproduce the crasher. You should be able to copy/paste the command line
   directly into LLDB to reproduce. No further work is required.