//===--- HomotopyReduction.cpp - Higher-dimensional term rewriting --------===//
//
// This source file is part of the Swift.org open source project
//
// Copyright (c) 2021 Apple Inc. and the Swift project authors
// Licensed under Apache License v2.0 with Runtime Library Exception
//
// See https://swift.org/LICENSE.txt for license information
// See https://swift.org/CONTRIBUTORS.txt for the list of Swift project authors
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file implements the algorithm for computing a minimal set of rules from
// a confluent rewrite system. A minimal set of rules is:
//
// 1) Large enough that computing the confluent completion produces the original
//    rewrite system;
//
// 2) Small enough that no further rules can be deleted without changing the
//    resulting confluent rewrite system.
//
// The main entry point here is RewriteSystem::minimizeRewriteSystem().
//
// Redundant rules are detected by analyzing the set of rewrite loops computed
// by the completion procedure. See RewriteLoop.cpp for a discussion of rewrite
// loops.
//
// If a rewrite rule appears exactly once in a loop and without context, the
// loop witnesses a redundancy; the rewrite rule is equivalent to traveling
// around the loop "in the other direction". This rewrite rule and the
// corresponding rewrite loop can be deleted.
//
// Any occurrence of the rule in the remaining loops is replaced with the
// alternate definition obtained by splitting the loop that witnessed the
// redundancy.
//
// Iterating this process eventually produces a minimal set of rewrite rules.
//
// For a description of the general algorithm, see "A Homotopical Completion
// Procedure with Applications to Coherence of Monoids",
// https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00818253.
//
// Note that in the world of Swift, rewrite rules for introducing associated
// type symbols are marked 'permanent'; they are always re-added when a new
// rewrite system is built from a minimal generic signature, so instead of
// deleting them it is better to leave them in place in case it allows other
// rules to be deleted instead.
//
// Also, for a conformance rule (V.[P] => V) to be redundant, a stronger
// condition is needed than appearing once in a loop and without context;
// the rule must not be a _minimal conformance_. The algorithm for computing
// minimal conformances is implemented in MinimalConformances.cpp.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//

#include "swift/AST/Type.h"
#include "swift/Basic/Assertions.h"
#include "swift/Basic/Range.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include <algorithm>
#include "PropertyMap.h"
#include "RewriteContext.h"
#include "RewriteSystem.h"

using namespace swift;
using namespace rewriting;

/// If a rewrite loop contains an explicit rule in empty context, propagate the
/// explicit bit to all other rules appearing in empty context within the same
/// loop.
///
/// When computing minimal conformances we prefer to eliminate non-explicit
/// rules, as a heuristic to ensure that minimized conformance requirements
/// remain in the same protocol as originally written, in cases where they can
/// be moved between protocols.
///
/// However, conformance rules can also be written in a non-canonical way.
///
/// Most conformance requirements are non-canonical, since the original
/// requirements use unresolved types. For example, a requirement 'Self.X.Y : Q'
/// inside a protocol P will lower to a rewrite rule
///
///    [P].X.Y.[Q] => [P].X.Y
///
/// Completion will then add a new rule that looks something like this, using
/// associated type symbols:
///
///    [P:X].[P2:Y].[Q] => [P:X].[P2:Y]
///
/// Furthermore, if [P:X].[P2:Y] simplies to some other term, such as [P:Z],
/// there will be yet another rule added by completion:
///
///    [P:Z].[Q] => [P:Z]
///
/// The new rules are related to the original rule via rewrite loops where
/// both rules appear in empty context. This algorithm will propagate the
/// explicit bit from the original rule to the canonical rule.
void RewriteSystem::propagateExplicitBits() {
  for (const auto &loop : Loops) {
    auto rulesInEmptyContext =
      loop.findRulesAppearingOnceInEmptyContext(*this);

    bool sawExplicitRule = false;

    for (unsigned ruleID : rulesInEmptyContext) {
      const auto &rule = getRule(ruleID);
      if (rule.isExplicit())
        sawExplicitRule = true;
    }
    if (sawExplicitRule) {
      for (unsigned ruleID : rulesInEmptyContext) {
        auto &rule = getRule(ruleID);
        if (!rule.isPermanent() && !rule.isExplicit())
          rule.markExplicit();
      }
    }
  }
}

/// Find concrete type or superclass rules where the right hand side occurs as a
/// proper prefix of one of its substitutions.
///
/// eg, (T.[concrete: G<T.[P:A]>] => T).
void RewriteSystem::computeRecursiveRules() {
  for (unsigned ruleID = FirstLocalRule, e = Rules.size();
       ruleID < e; ++ruleID) {
    auto &rule = getRule(ruleID);

    if (rule.isPermanent() ||
        rule.isRedundant())
      continue;

    auto optSymbol = rule.isPropertyRule();
    if (!optSymbol)
      continue;

    auto kind = optSymbol->getKind();
    if (kind != Symbol::Kind::ConcreteType &&
        kind != Symbol::Kind::Superclass) {
      continue;
    }

    auto rhs = rule.getRHS();
    for (auto term : optSymbol->getSubstitutions()) {
      if (term.size() > rhs.size() &&
          std::equal(rhs.begin(), rhs.end(), term.begin())) {
        RecursiveRules.push_back(ruleID);
        rule.markRecursive();
        break;
      }
    }
  }
}

/// Find a rule to delete by looking through all loops for rewrite rules appearing
/// once in empty context. Returns a pair consisting of a loop ID and a rule ID,
/// otherwise returns None.
///
/// Minimization performs three passes over the rewrite system.
///
/// 1) First, rules that are not conformance rules are deleted, with
///    \p redundantConformances equal to nullptr.
///
/// 2) Second, minimal conformances are computed.
///
/// 3) Finally, redundant conformance rules are deleted, with
/// \p redundantConformances equal to the set of conformance rules that are
///    not minimal conformances.
std::optional<std::pair<unsigned, unsigned>>
RewriteSystem::findRuleToDelete(EliminationPredicate isRedundantRuleFn) {
  SmallVector<std::pair<unsigned, unsigned>, 2> redundancyCandidates;
  for (unsigned loopID : indices(Loops)) {
    auto &loop = Loops[loopID];
    if (loop.isDeleted())
      continue;

    // Delete loops that don't contain any rewrite rules in empty context,
    // since such loops do not yield any elimination candidates.
    if (!loop.isUseful(*this)) {
      if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::HomotopyReduction)) {
        llvm::dbgs() << "** Deleting useless loop #" << loopID << ": ";
        loop.dump(llvm::dbgs(), *this);
        llvm::dbgs() << "\n";
      }

      loop.markDeleted();
      continue;
    }

    for (unsigned ruleID : loop.findRulesAppearingOnceInEmptyContext(*this)) {
      redundancyCandidates.emplace_back(loopID, ruleID);
    }
  }

  std::optional<std::pair<unsigned, unsigned>> found;

  if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::HomotopyReduction)) {
    llvm::dbgs() << "\n";
  }

  for (const auto &pair : redundancyCandidates) {
    unsigned loopID = pair.first;
    unsigned ruleID = pair.second;

    const auto &loop = Loops[loopID];
    const auto &rule = getRule(ruleID);

    // We should not find a rule that has already been marked redundant
    // here; it should have already been replaced with a rewrite path
    // in all homotopy generators.
    ASSERT(!rule.isRedundant());

    // Associated type introduction rules are 'permanent'. They're
    // not worth eliminating since they are re-added every time; it
    // is better to find other candidates to eliminate in the same
    // loop instead.
    if (rule.isPermanent())
      continue;

    // Homotopy reduction runs multiple passes with different filters to
    // prioritize the deletion of certain rules ahead of others. Apply
    // the filter now.
    if (!isRedundantRuleFn(loopID, ruleID)) {
      if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::HomotopyReductionDetail)) {
        llvm::dbgs() << "** Skipping rule " << rule << " from loop #"
                     << loopID << "\n";
      }

      continue;
    }

    if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::HomotopyReductionDetail)) {
      llvm::dbgs() << "** Candidate rule " << rule << " from loop #"
                   << loopID << "\n";
    }

    if (!found) {
      found = pair;
      continue;
    }

    // 'rule' is the candidate rule; 'otherRule' is the best rule to eliminate
    // we've found so far.
    const auto &otherRule = getRule(found->second);

    const auto &otherLoop = Loops[found->first];

    {
      // If one of the rules was a concrete unification projection, prefer to
      // eliminate the *other* rule.
      //
      // For example, if 'X.T == G<U, V>' is implied by the conformance on X,
      // and the following three rules are defined in the current protocol:
      //
      //    a) X.T == G<Int, W>
      //    b) X.U == Int
      //    c) X.V == W
      //
      // Then we can either eliminate a) alone, or b) and c). Since b) and c)
      // are projections, they are "simpler", and we would rather keep both and
      // eliminate a).
      unsigned projectionCount = loop.getProjectionCount(*this);
      unsigned otherProjectionCount = otherLoop.getProjectionCount(*this);

      if (projectionCount != otherProjectionCount) {
        if (projectionCount < otherProjectionCount)
          found = pair;

        continue;
      }
    }

    {
      // If one of the rules is a concrete type requirement, prefer to
      // eliminate the *other* rule.
      bool ruleIsConcrete = rule.getLHS().back().hasSubstitutions();
      bool otherRuleIsConcrete = otherRule.getLHS().back().hasSubstitutions();

      if (ruleIsConcrete != otherRuleIsConcrete) {
        if (otherRuleIsConcrete)
          found = pair;

        continue;
      }
    }

    {
      // If both are concrete type requirements, prefer to eliminate the
      // one with the more deeply nested type.
      unsigned ruleNesting = rule.getNesting();
      unsigned otherRuleNesting = otherRule.getNesting();

      if (ruleNesting != otherRuleNesting) {
        if (ruleNesting > otherRuleNesting)
          found = pair;

        continue;
      }
    }

    {
      // Otherwise, perform a shortlex comparison on (LHS, RHS).
      std::optional<int> comparison = rule.compare(otherRule, Context);

      if (!comparison.has_value()) {
        // Two rules (T.[C] => T) and (T.[C'] => T) are incomparable if
        // C and C' are superclass, concrete type or concrete conformance
        // symbols.
        continue;
      }

      if (*comparison == 0) {
        // Given two rewrite loops that both eliminate the same rule, prefer
        // the one that was not recorded by substitution simplification;
        // substitution simplification rules contain the projections in
        // context, which then prevents the projections from being eliminated.
        //
        // An example is if you have two rules implied by conformances on X,
        //
        //     a) X.T == G<Y>
        //     b) X.T == G<Z>
        //
        // then the induced rule Y == Z is a projection.
        //
        // The rule X.T == G<Z> can be eliminated with a loop that begins at
        // X.T.[concrete: G<Y>] followed by a decomposition and rewrite of
        // Y into Z, finally followed by an inverse decomposition back to
        // X.T.[concrete: G<Z>].
        //
        // However, if we can eliminate G<Y> via some other loop, we prefer
        // to do that, since that might *also* allow us to eliminate Y == Z.
        unsigned decomposeCount = loop.getDecomposeCount(*this);
        unsigned otherDecomposeCount = otherLoop.getDecomposeCount(*this);

        if (decomposeCount != otherDecomposeCount) {
          if (decomposeCount < otherDecomposeCount)
            found = pair;

          continue;
        }
      }

      if (*comparison > 0) {
        // Otherwise, if the new rule is less canonical than the best one so
        // far, it becomes the new candidate for elimination.
        found = pair;
        continue;
      }
    }
  }

  return found;
}

/// Delete a rewrite rule that is known to be redundant, replacing all
/// occurrences of the rule in all loops with the replacement path.
void RewriteSystem::deleteRule(unsigned ruleID,
                               const RewritePath &replacementPath) {
  // Replace all occurrences of the rule with the replacement path in
  // all remaining rewrite loops.
  for (unsigned loopID : indices(Loops)) {
    auto &loop = Loops[loopID];
    if (loop.isDeleted())
      continue;

    bool changed = loop.Path.replaceRuleWithPath(ruleID, replacementPath);
    if (!changed)
      continue;

    if (Context.getASTContext().LangOpts.EnableRequirementMachineLoopNormalization) {
      loop.computeNormalForm(*this);
    }

    // The loop's path has changed, so we must invalidate the cached
    // result of findRulesAppearingOnceInEmptyContext().
    loop.markDirty();

    if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::HomotopyReductionDetail)) {
      llvm::dbgs() << "** Updated loop #" << loopID << ": ";
      loop.dump(llvm::dbgs(), *this);
      llvm::dbgs() << "\n";
    }
  }

  // Record the redundant rule along with its replacement path.
  RedundantRules.emplace_back(ruleID, replacementPath);
}

void RewriteSystem::performHomotopyReduction(
    EliminationPredicate isRedundantRuleFn) {
  while (true) {
    auto optPair = findRuleToDelete(isRedundantRuleFn);

    // If no redundant rules remain which can be eliminated by this pass, stop.
    if (!optPair)
      break;

    unsigned loopID = optPair->first;
    unsigned ruleID = optPair->second;

    auto &loop = Loops[loopID];
    auto replacementPath = loop.Path.splitCycleAtRule(ruleID);

    loop.markDeleted();

    auto &rule = getRule(ruleID);

    if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::HomotopyReduction)) {
      llvm::dbgs() << "** Deleting rule " << rule << " from loop #"
                   << loopID << "\n";
      llvm::dbgs() << "* Replacement path: ";
      MutableTerm mutTerm(getRule(ruleID).getLHS());
      replacementPath.dump(llvm::dbgs(), mutTerm, *this);
      llvm::dbgs() << "\n";
    }

    rule.markRedundant();

    deleteRule(ruleID, replacementPath);
  }
}

/// Use the loops to delete redundant rewrite rules via a series of Tietze
/// transformations, updating and simplifying existing loops as each rule
/// is deleted.
///
/// Redundant rules are mutated to set their isRedundant() bit.
void RewriteSystem::minimizeRewriteSystem(const PropertyMap &map) {
  if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::HomotopyReduction)) {
    llvm::dbgs() << "-----------------------------\n";
    llvm::dbgs() << "- Minimizing rewrite system -\n";
    llvm::dbgs() << "-----------------------------\n";
  }

  ASSERT(Complete);
  ASSERT(!Minimized);
  ASSERT(!Frozen);
  Minimized = 1;

  propagateExplicitBits();

  if (Context.getASTContext().LangOpts.EnableRequirementMachineLoopNormalization) {
    for (auto &loop : Loops) {
      loop.computeNormalForm(*this);
    }
  }

  // First pass:
  // - Eliminate all LHS-simplified non-conformance rules.
  // - Eliminate all RHS-simplified and substitution-simplified rules.
  //
  // An example of a conformance rule that is LHS-simplified but not
  // RHS-simplified is (T.[P] => T) where T is irreducible, but there
  // is a rule (V.[P] => V) for some V with T == U.V.
  //
  // Such conformance rules can still be minimal, as part of a hack to
  // maintain compatibility with the GenericSignatureBuilder's minimization
  // algorithm.
  if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::HomotopyReduction)) {
    llvm::dbgs() << "------------------------------\n";
    llvm::dbgs() << "First pass: simplified rules -\n";
    llvm::dbgs() << "------------------------------\n";
  }

  performHomotopyReduction([&](unsigned loopID, unsigned ruleID) -> bool {
    const auto &rule = getRule(ruleID);

    if (rule.isLHSSimplified() &&
        !rule.isAnyConformanceRule())
      return true;

    if (rule.isRHSSimplified() ||
        rule.isSubstitutionSimplified())
      return true;

    return false;
  });

  // Second pass:
  // - Eliminate all rules with unresolved symbols which were *not*
  //   simplified.
  //
  // Two examples of such rules:
  //
  //  - (T.X => T.[P:X]) obtained from resolving the overlap between
  //    (T.[P] => T) and ([P].X => [P:X]).
  //
  // - (T.X.[concrete: C] => T.X) obtained from resolving the overlap
  //   between (T.[P] => T) and a protocol typealias rule
  //   ([P].X.[concrete: C] => [P].X).
  if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::HomotopyReduction)) {
    llvm::dbgs() << "-------------------------------\n";
    llvm::dbgs() << "Second pass: unresolved rules -\n";
    llvm::dbgs() << "-------------------------------\n";
  }

  performHomotopyReduction([&](unsigned loopID, unsigned ruleID) -> bool {
    const auto &rule = getRule(ruleID);

    if (rule.containsNameSymbols())
      return true;

    return false;
  });

  // Now compute a set of minimal conformances.
  //
  // FIXME: For now this just produces a set of redundant conformances, but
  // it should actually output the canonical minimal conformance equation
  // for each non-minimal conformance. We can then use information to
  // compute conformance access paths, instead of the current "brute force"
  // algorithm used for that purpose.
  llvm::DenseSet<unsigned> redundantConformances;
  computeMinimalConformances(map, redundantConformances);

  // Third pass: Eliminate all non-minimal conformance rules.
  if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::HomotopyReduction)) {
    llvm::dbgs() << "-------------------------------------------\n";
    llvm::dbgs() << "Third pass: non-minimal conformance rules -\n";
    llvm::dbgs() << "-------------------------------------------\n";
  }

  performHomotopyReduction([&](unsigned loopID, unsigned ruleID) -> bool {
    const auto &rule = getRule(ruleID);

    if (rule.isAnyConformanceRule() &&
        redundantConformances.count(ruleID))
      return true;

    return false;
  });

  // Fourth pass: Eliminate all remaining redundant non-conformance rules.
  if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::HomotopyReduction)) {
    llvm::dbgs() << "----------------------------------------\n";
    llvm::dbgs() << "Fourth pass: all other redundant rules -\n";
    llvm::dbgs() << "----------------------------------------\n";
  }

  performHomotopyReduction([&](unsigned loopID, unsigned ruleID) -> bool {
    const auto &loop = Loops[loopID];
    const auto &rule = getRule(ruleID);

    if (rule.isProtocolTypeAliasRule())
      return true;

    if (!loop.hasConcreteTypeAliasRule(*this) &&
        !rule.isAnyConformanceRule())
      return true;

    return false;
  });

  computeRecursiveRules();

  // Check invariants after homotopy reduction.
  verifyRewriteLoops();
  verifyRedundantConformances(redundantConformances);
  verifyMinimizedRules(redundantConformances);

  if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::RedundantRules)) {
    llvm::dbgs() << "\nRedundant rules:\n";
    for (const auto &pair : RedundantRules) {
      const auto &rule = getRule(pair.first);
      llvm::dbgs() << "- ("
                   << rule.getLHS() << " => "
                   << rule.getRHS() << ") ::== ";

      MutableTerm lhs(rule.getLHS());
      pair.second.dump(llvm::dbgs(), lhs, *this);

      llvm::dbgs() << "\n";

      if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::RedundantRulesDetail)) {
        llvm::dbgs() << "\n";
        pair.second.dumpLong(llvm::dbgs(), lhs, *this);

        llvm::dbgs() << "\n\n";
      }
    }
  }
}

/// Returns flags indicating if the rewrite system has unresolved or
/// conflicting rules in our minimization domain. If these flags are
/// set, we do not install this rewrite system in the rewrite context
/// after minimization. Instead, we will rebuild a new rewrite system
/// from the minimized requirements.
GenericSignatureErrors RewriteSystem::getErrors() const {
  ASSERT(Complete);
  ASSERT(Minimized);

  GenericSignatureErrors result;

  if (!ConflictingRules.empty())
    result |= GenericSignatureErrorFlags::HasInvalidRequirements;

  for (const auto &rule : getLocalRules()) {
    if (rule.isPermanent())
      continue;

    // The conditional requirement inference feature imports new protocol
    // components after the basic rewrite system is already built, so that's
    // why we end up with imported rules that appear to be in the local rules
    // slice. Those rules are well-formed, but their isRedundant() bit isn't
    // set, so we must ignore them here.
    if (!isInMinimizationDomain(rule.getLHS().getRootProtocol()))
      continue;

    if (!rule.isRedundant() &&
        !rule.isProtocolTypeAliasRule() &&
        rule.containsNameSymbols())
      result |= GenericSignatureErrorFlags::HasInvalidRequirements;

    if (rule.isRecursive())
      result |= GenericSignatureErrorFlags::HasInvalidRequirements;

    if (!rule.isRedundant()) {
      if (auto property = rule.isPropertyRule()) {
        if (property->getKind() == Symbol::Kind::ConcreteConformance)
          result |= GenericSignatureErrorFlags::HasConcreteConformances;

        if (property->hasSubstitutions()) {
          for (auto t : property->getSubstitutions()) {
            if (t.containsNameSymbols())
              result |= GenericSignatureErrorFlags::HasInvalidRequirements;
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }

  return result;
}

/// Collect all non-permanent, non-redundant rules whose domain is equal to
/// one of the protocols in the connected component represented by this
/// rewrite system.
///
/// These rules form the requirement signatures of these protocols.
llvm::DenseMap<const ProtocolDecl *, RewriteSystem::MinimizedProtocolRules>
RewriteSystem::getMinimizedProtocolRules() const {
  ASSERT(Minimized);
  ASSERT(!Protos.empty());

  llvm::DenseMap<const ProtocolDecl *, MinimizedProtocolRules> rules;
  for (unsigned ruleID = FirstLocalRule, e = Rules.size();
       ruleID < e; ++ruleID) {
    const auto &rule = getRule(ruleID);

    if (rule.isPermanent() ||
        rule.isRedundant() ||
        rule.isConflicting())
      continue;

    const auto *proto = rule.getLHS().getRootProtocol();
    if (!isInMinimizationDomain(proto))
      continue;

    if (rule.isProtocolTypeAliasRule())
      rules[proto].TypeAliases.push_back(ruleID);
    else if (!rule.containsNameSymbols())
      rules[proto].Requirements.push_back(ruleID);
  }

  return rules;
}

/// Collect all non-permanent, non-redundant rules whose left hand side
/// begins with a generic parameter symbol.
///
/// These rules form the top-level generic signature for this rewrite system.
std::vector<unsigned>
RewriteSystem::getMinimizedGenericSignatureRules() const {
  ASSERT(Minimized);
  ASSERT(Protos.empty());

  std::vector<unsigned> rules;
  for (unsigned ruleID = FirstLocalRule, e = Rules.size();
       ruleID < e; ++ruleID) {
    const auto &rule = getRule(ruleID);

    if (rule.isPermanent() ||
        rule.isRedundant() ||
        rule.isConflicting() ||
        rule.containsNameSymbols()) {
      continue;
    }

    if (rule.getLHS()[0].getKind() != Symbol::Kind::PackElement &&
        rule.getLHS()[0].getKind() != Symbol::Kind::GenericParam)
      continue;

    rules.push_back(ruleID);
  }

  return rules;
}

/// Verify that each loop begins and ends at its basepoint.
void RewriteSystem::verifyRewriteLoops() const {
  for (const auto &loop : Loops) {
    loop.verify(*this);
  }
}

/// Assert if homotopy reduction failed to eliminate a redundant conformance,
/// since this suggests a misunderstanding on my part.
void RewriteSystem::verifyRedundantConformances(
    const llvm::DenseSet<unsigned> &redundantConformances) const {
  for (unsigned ruleID : redundantConformances) {
    const auto &rule = getRule(ruleID);
    ASSERT(!rule.isPermanent() &&
           "Permanent rule cannot be redundant");
    ASSERT(!rule.isIdentityConformanceRule() &&
           "Identity conformance cannot be redundant");
    ASSERT(rule.isAnyConformanceRule() &&
           "Redundant conformance is not a conformance rule?");

    if (!rule.isRedundant()) {
      llvm::errs() << "Homotopy reduction did not eliminate redundant "
                   << "conformance?\n";
      llvm::errs() << "(#" << ruleID << ") " << rule << "\n\n";
      dump(llvm::errs());
      abort();
    }
  }
}

// Assert if homotopy reduction failed to eliminate a rewrite rule it was
// supposed to delete.
void RewriteSystem::verifyMinimizedRules(
    const llvm::DenseSet<unsigned> &redundantConformances) const {
  unsigned redundantRuleCount = 0;

  for (unsigned ruleID = FirstLocalRule, e = Rules.size();
       ruleID < e; ++ruleID) {
    const auto &rule = getRule(ruleID);

    // Ignore the rewrite rule if it is not part of our minimization domain.
    if (!isInMinimizationDomain(rule.getLHS().getRootProtocol())) {
      if (rule.isRedundant()) {
        llvm::errs() << "Redundant rule outside minimization domain: "
                     << rule << "\n\n";
        dump(llvm::errs());
        abort();
      }

      continue;
    }

    // Note that sometimes permanent rules can be simplified, but they can never
    // be redundant.
    if (rule.isPermanent()) {
      if (rule.isRedundant()) {
        llvm::errs() << "Permanent rule is redundant: " << rule << "\n\n";
        dump(llvm::errs());
        abort();
      }

      continue;
    }

    if (rule.isRedundant())
      ++redundantRuleCount;

    // LHS-simplified rules should be redundant, unless they're protocol
    // conformance rules, which unfortunately might not be redundant, because
    // we try to keep them in the original protocol definition for
    // compatibility with the GenericSignatureBuilder's minimization algorithm.
    if (rule.isLHSSimplified() &&
        !rule.isRedundant() &&
        !rule.isProtocolConformanceRule()) {
      llvm::errs() << "Simplified rule is not redundant: " << rule << "\n\n";
      dump(llvm::errs());
      abort();
    }

    // RHS-simplified and substitution-simplified rules should be redundant.
    if ((rule.isRHSSimplified() ||
         rule.isSubstitutionSimplified()) &&
        !rule.isRedundant()) {
      llvm::errs() << "Simplified rule is not redundant: " << rule << "\n\n";
      dump(llvm::errs());
      abort();
    }

    if (rule.isRedundant() &&
        rule.isAnyConformanceRule() &&
        !rule.isRHSSimplified() &&
        !rule.isSubstitutionSimplified() &&
        !rule.containsNameSymbols() &&
        !redundantConformances.count(ruleID)) {
      llvm::errs() << "Minimal conformance is redundant: " << rule << "\n\n";
      dump(llvm::errs());
      abort();
    }
  }

  if (RedundantRules.size() != redundantRuleCount) {
    llvm::errs() << "Expected " << RedundantRules.size() << " redundant rules "
                 << "but counted " << redundantRuleCount << "\n";
    dump(llvm::errs());
    abort();
  }

  // Replacement paths for redundant rules can only reference other redundant
  // rules if those redundant rules were made redundant later, ie if they
  // appear later in the array.
  llvm::DenseSet<unsigned> laterRedundantRules;
  for (const auto &pair : llvm::reverse(RedundantRules)) {
    const auto &rule = getRule(pair.first);
    if (!rule.isRedundant()) {
      llvm::errs() << "Recorded replacement path for non-redundant rule "
                   << rule << "\n";
      dump(llvm::errs());
      abort();
    }

    for (const auto &step : pair.second) {
      if (step.Kind == RewriteStep::Rule) {
        unsigned otherRuleID = step.getRuleID();
        const auto &otherRule = getRule(otherRuleID);
        if (otherRule.isRedundant() &&
            !laterRedundantRules.count(otherRuleID)) {
          llvm::errs() << "Redundant requirement path contains a redundant "
                          "rule " << otherRule << "\n";
          dump(llvm::errs());
          abort();
        }
      }
    }

    laterRedundantRules.insert(pair.first);
  }

}