File: reasync_ranking.swift

package info (click to toggle)
swiftlang 6.1.3-1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid
  • size: 2,791,532 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 9,901,743; ansic: 2,201,431; asm: 1,091,827; python: 308,252; objc: 82,166; f90: 80,126; lisp: 38,358; pascal: 25,559; sh: 20,429; ml: 5,058; perl: 4,745; makefile: 4,484; awk: 3,535; javascript: 3,018; xml: 918; fortran: 664; cs: 573; ruby: 396
file content (32 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,170 bytes parent folder | download
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
// RUN: %target-typecheck-verify-swift -enable-experimental-concurrency -target %target-swift-5.1-abi-triple

// REQUIRES: concurrency

// We don't want 'reasync' overloads to have a higher score in the
// case of a sync vs reasync mismatch the way 'async' overloads do,
// since this would change solver performance characteristics when
// using the reasync '&&', '||' and '??' operators.

func asyncOverload(_: () async -> (), _: Int) async {}
func asyncOverload(_: () -> (), _: String) {}

func referencesAsyncOverload() {
  _ = asyncOverload // we prefer the sync overload
}

func referencesAsyncOverloadAsync() async {
  _ = asyncOverload // we prefer the async overload
}

func reasyncOverload(_: () async -> (), _: Int) reasync {} // expected-note {{found this candidate}}
func reasyncOverload(_: () -> (), _: String) {} // expected-note {{found this candidate}}

func referencesReasyncOverload() {
  _ = reasyncOverload // expected-error {{ambiguous use of 'reasyncOverload'}}
}

func referencesReasyncOverloadAsync() async {
  // we prefer the async overload because the sync overload scores higher
  // due to a sync-vs-async mismatch.
  _ = reasyncOverload
}