File: ReplaceForEachWithForLoop.swift

package info (click to toggle)
swiftlang 6.1.3-4
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: forky, sid
  • size: 2,791,644 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 9,901,738; ansic: 2,201,433; asm: 1,091,827; python: 308,252; objc: 82,166; f90: 80,126; lisp: 38,358; pascal: 25,559; sh: 20,429; ml: 5,058; perl: 4,745; makefile: 4,484; awk: 3,535; javascript: 3,018; xml: 918; fortran: 664; cs: 573; ruby: 396
file content (52 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,843 bytes parent folder | download
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This source file is part of the Swift.org open source project
//
// Copyright (c) 2014 - 2023 Apple Inc. and the Swift project authors
// Licensed under Apache License v2.0 with Runtime Library Exception
//
// See https://swift.org/LICENSE.txt for license information
// See https://swift.org/CONTRIBUTORS.txt for the list of Swift project authors
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//

import SwiftSyntax

/// Replace `forEach` with `for-in` loop unless its argument is a function reference.
///
/// Lint:  invalid use of `forEach` yield will yield a lint error.
@_spi(Rules)
public final class ReplaceForEachWithForLoop: SyntaxLintRule {
  public override func visit(_ node: FunctionCallExprSyntax) -> SyntaxVisitorContinueKind {
    // We are only interested in calls with a single trailing closure
    // argument.
    if !node.arguments.isEmpty || node.trailingClosure == nil || !node.additionalTrailingClosures.isEmpty {
      return .visitChildren
    }

    guard let member = node.calledExpression.as(MemberAccessExprSyntax.self) else {
      return .visitChildren
    }

    let memberName = member.declName.baseName
    guard memberName.text == "forEach" else {
      return .visitChildren
    }

    // If there is another chained member after `.forEach`,
    // let's skip the diagnostic because resulting code might
    // be less understandable.
    if node.parent?.is(MemberAccessExprSyntax.self) == true {
      return .visitChildren
    }

    diagnose(.replaceForEachWithLoop(), on: memberName)
    return .visitChildren
  }
}

extension Finding.Message {
  fileprivate static func replaceForEachWithLoop() -> Finding.Message {
    "replace use of '.forEach { ... }' with for-in loop"
  }
}