1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
|
/* This interface tests whether SWIG supports the new "constexpr" keyword
introduced by C++11.
*/
%module cpp11_constexpr
%{
#if defined(__clang__)
#pragma clang diagnostic push
// Suppress: 'constexpr' non-static member function will not be implicitly 'const' in C++14; add 'const' to avoid a change in behavior
// For MMM() and NNN()
#pragma clang diagnostic ignored "-Wconstexpr-not-const"
#endif
%}
%inline %{
#ifdef SWIG
#define SWIGTESTCONST const
#else
#define SWIGTESTCONST
#endif
constexpr int AAA = 10;
constexpr const int BBB = 20;
constexpr int CCC() { return 30; }
constexpr SWIGTESTCONST int DDD() { return 40; }
constexpr int XXX() { return 10; }
constexpr int YYY = XXX() + 100;
struct ConstExpressions {
static constexpr const int JJJ = 100;
static constexpr int KKK = 200;
static const int LLL = 300;
constexpr int MMM() { return 400; }
constexpr SWIGTESTCONST int NNN() { return 500; }
// Regression tests for support added in SWIG 3.0.4:
static constexpr const int JJJ1 = 101;
constexpr static int KKK1 = 201;
// Regression tests for https://github.com/swig/swig/issues/284 :
explicit constexpr ConstExpressions(int) { }
constexpr explicit ConstExpressions(double) { }
};
%}
%{
int Array10[AAA];
int Array20[BBB];
int Array30[CCC()];
int Array40[DDD()];
int Array100[ConstExpressions::JJJ];
int Array200[ConstExpressions::KKK];
int Array300[ConstExpressions::LLL];
//int Array400[ConstExpressions::MMM()];
//int Array500[ConstExpressions::NNN()];
%}
|
