File: cpp11_std_unique_ptr_runme.tcl

package info (click to toggle)
swig 4.1.0-0.2
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bookworm
  • size: 47,992 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 50,555; ansic: 27,840; java: 15,366; python: 11,221; cs: 8,852; ruby: 6,307; yacc: 6,290; makefile: 5,702; sh: 5,492; perl: 3,818; php: 3,046; ml: 2,094; lisp: 1,756; javascript: 1,751; tcl: 1,499; xml: 115
file content (163 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 4,465 bytes parent folder | download
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163

if [ catch { load ./cpp11_std_unique_ptr[info sharedlibextension] cpp11_std_unique_ptr} err_msg ] {
	puts stderr "Could not load shared object:\n$err_msg"
}


proc checkCount {expected_count} {
  set actual_count [Klass_getTotal_count]
  if {$actual_count != $expected_count} {
    error "Counts incorrect, expected: $expected_count actual: $actual_count"
  }
}

################################# Tcl pointer recycling bug start
#
# ### Possibly related to premature object deletion problem mentioned in newobject1_runme.tcl. ###
#
# While this won't be repeatable on all machines, the following caused the underlying C++
# pointer value for k1 to be reused for k4.
#
# If the C/C++ memory allocator uses the same pointer value again, then a command name that
# contains a pointer encoding, such as, _b09b1148bd550000_p_Klass (not a variable name) will be
# re-used in SWIG_Tcl_NewInstanceObj. The command should have disappeared from the Tcl side when
# the object was deleted, but there is some sort of bug preventing this from happening in this
# scenario as follows:
#
# Below creates a struct via the call to Tcl_CreateObjCommand in
# SWIG_Tcl_NewInstanceObj (creates a command name with a pointer encoding such as
# _50fb3608ce550000_p_Klass) which also makes a second call to Tcl_CreateObjCommand in
# SWIG_Tcl_ObjectConstructor (creates a command name with the name k1).
Klass k1 "one"
# Line below calls Tcl_DeleteCommandFromToken but is only called for the command created in the
# second call (k1) and not the first call to Tcl_CreateObjCommand.
k1 -delete
set k2 [makeKlassUniquePtr "two"]
set k3 [makeKlassUniquePtr "three"]
$k2 -delete
# If the memory allocator uses the same pointer value, then SWIG_Tcl_NewInstanceObj will find
# the undeleted command _50fb3608ce550000_p_Klass and re-use it. This command should surely
# have been deleted !??
set k4 [makeKlassUniquePtr "four"]
$k3 -delete
$k4 -delete
checkCount 0
################################# Tcl pointer recycling bug end

# Test raw pointer handling involving virtual inheritance
KlassInheritance kini "KlassInheritanceInput"
checkCount 1
set s [useKlassRawPtr kini]
kini -delete
checkCount 0


# unique_ptr as input
Klass kin "KlassInput"
checkCount 1
set s [takeKlassUniquePtr kin]
checkCount 0
if {[kin cget -thisown]} {
  error "thisown should be false"
}
if {$s != "KlassInput"} {
  error "Incorrect string: $s"
}
if {![is_nullptr kin]} {
  error "is_nullptr failed"
}
kin -delete # Should not fail, even though already deleted
checkCount 0

Klass kin "KlassInput"
checkCount 1
set s [takeKlassUniquePtr kin]
checkCount 0
if {[kin cget -thisown]} {
  error "thisown should be false"
}
if {$s != "KlassInput"} {
  error "Incorrect string: $s"
}
if {![is_nullptr kin]} {
  error "is_nullptr failed"
}
set exception_thrown 0
if [ catch { set s [takeKlassUniquePtr kin] } e ] {
  if {[string first "cannot release ownership as memory is not owned" $e] == -1} {
    error "incorrect exception message: $e"
  }
  set exception_thrown 1
}
if {!$exception_thrown} {
  error "double usage of takeKlassUniquePtr should have been an error"
}
kin -delete # Should not fail, even though already deleted
checkCount 0

Klass kin "KlassInput"
set exception_thrown 0
set notowned [get_not_owned_ptr kin]
if [ catch {
  takeKlassUniquePtr notowned
} ] {
  set exception_thrown 1
}
if {!$exception_thrown} {
  error "Should have thrown 'Cannot release ownership as memory is not owned' error"
}
checkCount 1
kin -delete
checkCount 0

KlassInheritance kini "KlassInheritanceInput"
checkCount 1
set s [takeKlassUniquePtr kini]
checkCount 0
if {[kini cget -thisown]} {
  error "thisown should be false"
}
if {$s != "KlassInheritanceInput"} {
  error "Incorrect string: $s"
}
if {![is_nullptr kini]} {
  error "is_nullptr failed"
}
kini -delete # Should not fail, even though already deleted
checkCount 0

takeKlassUniquePtr "NULL"
takeKlassUniquePtr [make_null]
checkCount 0

# overloaded parameters
if {[overloadTest] != 0} {
  error "overloadTest failed"
}
if {[overloadTest "NULL"] != 1} {
  error "overloadTest failed"
}
if {[overloadTest [Klass k "over"]] != 1} {
  error "overloadTest failed"
}
checkCount 0


# unique_ptr as output
set k1 [makeKlassUniquePtr "first"]
set k2 [makeKlassUniquePtr "second"]
checkCount 2

$k1 -delete
checkCount 1

if {[$k2 getLabel] != "second"} {
  error "wrong object label"
}

$k2 -delete
checkCount 0

if {[makeNullUniquePtr] != "NULL"} {
  error "null failure"
}