1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
|
%module cpp11_noexcept
%ignore NoExceptAbstract::operator std::string;
%ignore NoExceptAbstract::operator int;
%ignore NoExceptClass(NoExceptClass&&);
%rename(Assignment) NoExceptClass::operator=;
%{
extern "C" void global_noexcept(int, bool) noexcept {}
%}
%inline %{
#include <string>
extern "C" void global_noexcept(int, bool) noexcept;
extern "C" void global_noexcept2(int, bool) noexcept {}
struct NoExceptClass {
static const bool VeryTrue = true;
NoExceptClass() noexcept {}
NoExceptClass(const NoExceptClass&) noexcept {}
NoExceptClass(NoExceptClass&&) noexcept {}
NoExceptClass& operator=(const NoExceptClass&) noexcept { return *this; }
virtual ~NoExceptClass() noexcept {}
void noex0() noexcept {}
void noex1() noexcept(sizeof(int) == 4) {}
void noex2() noexcept(true) {}
void noex3() noexcept(false) {}
void noex4() noexcept(VeryTrue) {}
template<typename T> void template_noexcept(T) noexcept {}
void noo1() const noexcept {}
static void noo2() noexcept {}
virtual void noo3() const noexcept {}
// Workaround clang 10.0.1 -std=c++17 linker error (oddly for Java and not Python):
// Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: "___cxa_deleted_virtual", referenced from: vtable for NoExceptClass
#if !(defined(__clang__) && __cplusplus >= 201703L)
virtual void noo4() const noexcept = delete;
virtual void noo5() const throw() = delete;
#endif
};
struct NoExceptAbstract {
virtual void noo4() const noexcept = 0;
virtual ~NoExceptAbstract() noexcept = 0;
// Regression test for https://github.com/swig/swig/issues/2474
virtual explicit operator std::string() const noexcept = 0;
explicit virtual operator int() const noexcept = 0;
};
struct NoExceptDefaultDelete {
template<typename T> NoExceptDefaultDelete(T) noexcept = delete;
NoExceptDefaultDelete() noexcept = default;
NoExceptDefaultDelete(const NoExceptDefaultDelete&) noexcept = delete;
NoExceptDefaultDelete(NoExceptDefaultDelete&&) = delete;
NoExceptDefaultDelete& operator=(const NoExceptDefaultDelete&) = delete;
~NoExceptDefaultDelete() noexcept = default;
};
%}
// Regression tests for #2087 (noexcept on a function pointer parameter type).
//
// FIXME: We've only fixed `noexcept` on parameter types which are function
// pointers to parse - the generated code has `noexcept` in the wrong place
// and won't compile so for now we only check SWIG can parse this.
%ignore f2087a;
%ignore f2087b;
void f2087a(int (*g)() noexcept) { (void)g; }
void f2087b(int const (*g)() noexcept) { (void)g; }
|
