1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
|
<HTML>
<TITLE>Portable Interceptors</TITLE>
<BODY>
<CENTER><H1>Portable Interceptors</H1></CENTER>
<BODY text = "#000000"
link="#000fff"
vlink="#ff0f0f"
bgcolor="#ffffff">
<h3><a name="toc">Table of Contents</a></h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="#context">Context</a>
<li><a href="#implement">TAO's Implementation</a>
<li><a href="#api">APIs</a>
<li><a href="#status">Current Status</a>
<li><a href="#future">Future Works</a>
<li><a href="#ref">References</a>
</ul>
<h2><a name="context">Context</a></h2>
<p>Interceptors allow you to interpose other CORBA services to the ORB
and extend the ORB's functionalities. They are most commonly used in,
but not limited to, Security Service, Transaction Service.</p>
<p>Although both CORBA 2.2 and 2.3 define an interceptor interface,
the definitions are pretty much useless because it does not define how
the interceptor should interact with an ORB. Therefore, OMG is
currently trying to define a "<a
href="http://www.omg.org/techprocess/meetings/schedule/Portable_Interceptors_RFP.html">Portable
Interceptor</a>" which will remedy the problems and allow application
users to use interceptos from different venders with their ORBs. </p>
<h2><a name="implement">TAO's Implementation of "Portable
Interceptors"</a></h2>
<p>Because the "<a href="#ref">Portable Interceptor Spec</a>" is still
in the initial submission stage, and there are several proposed
standards which define very different interfaces and capabilities, our
goal is to provide an minimum subset of functionalities proposed in
the initial submissions. This approach should allow TAO users to
explore various use cases of interceptors while avoid adding something
that will eventually be removed from the standard.</p>
<p>As we will eventually modify TAO's interceptor interface in the
future when it become available, you will have to revise your
implementation also when that occurs. </p>
<h2><a name="api">Interceptor APIs</a></h2>
<pre>
// -*- IDL -*- $Id: interceptors.html,v 1.2 1999/09/03 23:03:45 schmidt Exp $
// This file contains the interface definitions for "Portable"
// Interceptor support.
// **********************************************************
// Notice that the Portable Interceptor specification
// is still under discussion in OMG and both the IDL
// and the implementation details in TAO will eventually
// change to conform with the PI spec in the future.
// **********************************************************
// Author (currently): Nanbor Wang <nanbor@cs.wustl.edu>
#include <corba.pidl>
#include <IOP.pidl>
#pragma prefix "TAO"
// The prefix should be changed to "omg.org" once the spec. gets
// finallized.
module PortableInterceptor
{
interface Cookie
{
// Cookie's are used to pass information among interceptors
// within a invocation or an upcall.
string myname ();
};
typedef sequence<Cookie> Cookies;
// Collections of Cookie's become Cookies'es.
interface Interceptor
{
// Base interface for Interceptors.
readonly attribute string name;
};
interface ServerRequestInterceptor : Interceptor
{
// Server side request interceptor definition.
void preinvoke (in unsigned long request_id,
in boolean response_expected,
in CORBA::Object objref,
in string operation_name,
inout IOP::ServiceContextList sc,
inout NVList arguments,
inout Cookies ck);
// Interception pointer before invoking the servant method.
// Currently, we don't pass NVList into the interceptor because
// I haven't figured out how to best optimize this stuff.
// In the future, NVList will contain all in and inout arguments
// of the operation.
void postinvoke (in unsigned long request_id,
in boolean response_expected,
in CORBA::Object objref,
in string operation_name,
inout IOP::ServiceContextList sc,
inout NVList arguments,
inout Cookies ck);
// Interception pointer after invoking the servant method.
// Currently, we don't pass NVList into the interceptor because
// I haven't figured out how to best optimize this stuff.
// In the future, NVList will contain all out, inout arguments
// and the return value of the operation.
void exception_occurred (in unsigned long request_id,
in boolean response_expected,
in CORBA::Object objref,
in string operation_name,
inout Cookies ck);
// Exception interception point.
};
interface ClientRequestInterceptor : Interceptor
{
// Client side interceptor.
void preinvoke (in unsigned long request_id,
in boolean response_expected,
in CORBA::Object objref,
in string operation_name,
inout IOP::ServiceContextList sc,
inout NVList arguments,
inout Cookies ck);
// Before remote invocation.
// Currently, we don't pass NVList into the interceptor because
// I haven't figured out how to best optimize this stuff.
// In the future, NVList will contain all in and inout arguments
// of the operation.
void postinvoke (in unsigned long request_id,
in boolean response_expected,
in CORBA::Object objref,
in string operation_name,
inout IOP::ServiceContextList sc,
inout NVList arguments,
inout Cookies ck);
// After returned from remote invocation.
// Currently, we don't pass NVList into the interceptor because
// I haven't figured out how to best optimize this stuff.
// In the future, NVList will contain all out, inout arguments
// and the return value of the operation.
void exception_occurred (in unsigned long request_id,
in boolean response_expected,
in CORBA::Object objref,
in string operation_name,
inout Cookies ck);
// Exception occurred.
};
};
#pragma prefix ""
</pre>
<h2><a name="status">Current Status</a></h2>
<ul>
<li><p>Currently, TAO only support request-level
interceptor. </p></li>
<li>Users are allowed to register one interceptor with ORB Core thru
<tt>CORBA::ORB::_register_server_interceptor</tt> and
<tt>CORBA::ORB::_register_client_interceptor</tt>. Both methods
returns the previous registered interceptor if one
exist. </p></li>
<li><p>The NVList argument that passes the argument list of
the operation is current empty, i.e., currently, you can not
access/modify the arguments of a method invocation.</p></li>
</ul>
<h2><a name="future">Future Works</a></h2>
<ol>
<li><p>Obviously, added support for accessing the invocation
arguments.</p></li>
<li><p>Implement a better interceptor management interface in
ORB. </p></li>
<li><p>Review ways to support interceptors with <a
href="releasenotes/index.html#ami">AMI</a>.</p></li>
</ol>
<H3><a name="ref">References:</a></H3>
<UL>
<LI><a href="ftp://ftp.omg.org/pub/docs/orbos/99-04-10.pdf">
<CODE>[EXP]</CODE> 99-04-10</a> by Expersoft Corp., GMD Fokus,
OIS, OOC (ORBacus)
<LI><a href="ftp://ftp.omg.org/pub/docs/orbos/99-04-04.pdf">
<CODE>[IBM]</CODE> 99-04-04</a> by IBM
<LI><a href="ftp://ftp.omg.org/pub/docs/orbos/99-04-05.pdf">
<CODE>[INP]</CODE> 99-04-05</a> by Inprise (Visibroker) and BEA
<LI><a href="ftp://ftp.omg.org/pub/docs/orbos/99-04-08.pdf">
<CODE>[HPI]</CODE> 99-04-08</a> by HP and IONA (Orbix)
<LI><a href="ftp://ftp.omg.org/pub/docs/orbos/99-04-07.pdf">
<CODE>[SUN]</CODE> 99-04-07</a> by Eternal System, Expersoft and
Sun
</UL>
</BODY>
|
