File: FAQ-fuzzy-gs.html

package info (click to toggle)
tetex-base 3.0.dfsg.3-5
  • links: PTS
  • area: main
  • in suites: etch-m68k
  • size: 239,540 kB
  • ctags: 10,610
  • sloc: xml: 103,461; perl: 9,398; ruby: 2,850; python: 1,551; php: 1,067; sh: 981; lisp: 494; makefile: 371; awk: 88
file content (26 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 1,384 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (3)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
<head>
<title>UK TeX FAQ -- question label fuzzy-gs</title>
</head><body>
<h3>Fuzzy fonts because <i>Ghostscript</i> too old</h3>
<!-- crippled blurry -->
<p>So you've done everything the FAQ has told you that you need,
correct fonts properly installed and appearing in the <i>dvips</i>
output, but <em>still</em> you get fuzzy character output after
distilling with <i>ghostscript</i>.
<p>The problem could arise from too old a version of
<i>ghostscript</i>, which you may be using directly, or via a
script such as <i>ps2pdf</i> (distributed with
<i>ghostscript</i> itself), <i>dvipdf</i>, or similar.
Though <i>ghostscript</i> was capable of distillation from
version 5.50, that version could only produce bitmap Type 3 output of
any font other than the fundamental 35 fonts (<i>Times</i>,
<i>Helvetica</i>, etc.).  Later versions added 'complete'
distillation, but it wasn't until version 6.50 that one could rely on
it for everyday work.
<p>So, if your PDF  output still looks fuzzy in <i>Acrobat</i>
<i>Reader</i>, upgrade <i>ghostscript</i>.  The new version
should be at least version 6.50, of course, but it's usually good
policy to go to the most recent version (version 8.12 at the time of
writing - 2003).
<p><p>This question on the Web: <a href="http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=fuzzy-gs">http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=fuzzy-gs</a>
</body>