File: FAQ-misschar.html

package info (click to toggle)
tetex-base 3.0.dfsg.3-5
  • links: PTS
  • area: main
  • in suites: etch-m68k
  • size: 239,540 kB
  • ctags: 10,610
  • sloc: xml: 103,461; perl: 9,398; ruby: 2,850; python: 1,551; php: 1,067; sh: 981; lisp: 494; makefile: 371; awk: 88
file content (43 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 2,053 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (3)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
<head>
<title>UK TeX FAQ -- question label misschar</title>
</head><body>
<h3>Where have my characters gone?</h3>
<p>You've typed some apparently reasonable text and processed it, but the
result contains no sign of some of the characters you typed.  A likely
reason is that the font you selected just doesn't have a
representation for the character in question.
<p>For example, if I type "that will be &pound;44.00" into an ordinary
(La)TeX document, or if I select the font <code>rsfs10</code> (which contains
uppercase letters only) and type pretty much anything, the &pound;
sign, or any lowercase letters or digits will not appear in the
output.  There's no actual error message, either: you have to read the
log file, where you'll find cryptic little messages like
<blockquote>
<pre>
Missing character: There is no ^^a3 in font cmr10!
Missing character: There is no 3 in font rsfs10!
</pre> 

</blockquote>
(the former demonstrating my TeX's unwillingness to deal in characters
which have the eighth bit set, while the <code>rsfs10</code> example shows that
TeX will log the actual character in error, if it thinks it's
possible).
<p>Somewhat more understandable are the diagnostics you may get from
<i>dvips</i> when using the OT1 and T1 versions of
fonts that were supplied in Adobe standard encoding:
<blockquote>
<pre>
dvips: Warning: missing glyph `Delta'
</pre>
</blockquote>
The process that generates the metrics for using the fonts generates
an instruction to <i>dvips</i> to produce these diagnostics, so
that their non-appearance in the printed output is less surprising
than it might be.  Quite a few glyphs provided in Knuth's text
encodings and in the Cork encoding are not available in the Adobe
fonts.  In these cases, there <em>is</em> a typeset sign of the
character: <i>dvips</i> produces a black rectangle of whatever
size the concocted font file has specified.
<p><p>This question on the Web: <a href="http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=misschar">http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=misschar</a>
</body>