1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 1647 1648 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 2071 2072 2073 2074 2075 2076 2077 2078 2079 2080 2081 2082 2083 2084 2085 2086 2087 2088 2089 2090 2091 2092 2093 2094 2095 2096 2097 2098 2099 2100 2101 2102 2103 2104 2105 2106 2107 2108 2109 2110 2111 2112 2113 2114 2115 2116 2117 2118 2119 2120 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 2127 2128 2129
|
% \iffalse
%<*internal>
\begingroup
\input docstrip.tex
\keepsilent
\preamble
______________________________________________________
The curve2e package for LaTeX and XeLaTeX
Copyright (C) 2005-2012 Claudio Beccari
All rights reserved
License information appended
\endpreamble
\postamble
Copyright 2005-2012 Claudio Beccari
Distributable under the LaTeX Project Public License,
version 1.3c or higher (your choice). The latest version of
this license is at: http://www.latex-project.org/lppl.txt
This work is "author-maintained"
This work consists of this file curve2e.dtx, a README file
and the derived files curve2e.sty and curve2e.pdf.
\endpostamble
\askforoverwritefalse
\generate{\file{curve2e.sty}{\from{curve2e.dtx}{package}}}
\def\tmpa{plain}
\ifx\tmpa\fmtname\endgroup\expandafter\bye\fi
\endgroup
%</internal>
%
%%
%% File `curve2e.dtx'.
%% Copyright (C) 2005--2011 Claudio Beccari all rights reserved.
%%
% What follows is the usual trick that is not typeset in the documentation
% dvi file that is produced by LaTeX. It is used to define the date, the version
% and the short description that characterizes both this file and the package;
% the point is that |\ProvidesFile| is being read only by the driver, while
% |\ProvidePackage| goes to the stripped package file; it must be done before
% starting the documentation otherwise |\GetFileInfo| can't get the necessary
% information.
% \fi
%
% \iffalse
%<*package>
%<package>\NeedsTeXFormat{LaTeX2e}
%</package>
%<*driver>
\ProvidesFile{curve2e.dtx}%
%</driver>
%<+package>\ProvidesPackage{curve2e}%
%<*package>
[2012/12/11 v.1.41 Extension package for pict2e]
%</package>
%<*driver>
\documentclass{ltxdoc}
\hfuzz 10pt
\usepackage{multicol}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{curve2e}
\GetFileInfo{curve2e.dtx}
\title{The extension package \textsf{curve2e}\thanks{Version number
\fileversion; last revised \filedate.}}
\author{Claudio Beccari}
\date{}
\begin{document}
\maketitle
\begin{multicols}{2}
\tableofcontents
\end{multicols}
\DocInput{curve2e.dtx}
\end{document}
%</driver>
% \fi
%
% \CheckSum{2264}
% \begin{abstract}
% This file documents the |curve2e| extension package to the recent
% implementation of the |pict2e| bundle that has been described by Lamport
% himself in the second edition of his \LaTeX\ handbook.
%
% Please take notice that in April 2011 a new updated version of the package
% |pict2e| has been released that incorporates some of the commands defined in
% this package; apparently there are no conflicts, but only the advanced features
% of |curve2e| remain available for extending the above package. Moreover
% the |xetex.def| driver was introduced so that certian commands previously
% defined in this extension not only become unnnecessary, but also would produce
% errors when the program is used under XeLaTeX. Therefore these commands were
% either eliminated or corrected.
%
% This extension redefines a couple of commands and introduces some more drawing
% facilities that allow to draw circular arcs and arbitrary curves with the
% minimum of user intervention. This beta version is open to the contribution of
% other users as well as it may be incorporated in other people's packages.
% Please cite the original author and the chain of contributors.
% \end{abstract}
%
% \section{Package \texttt{pict2e} and this extension \texttt{curve2e}}
% Package \texttt{pict2e} was announced in issue 15 of \texttt{latexnews}
% around December 2003; it was declared that the new package would replace the
% dummy one that has been accompanying every release of \LaTeXe\ since its
% beginnings in 1994. The dummy package was just issuing an info message that
% simply announced the temporary unavailability of the real package.
%
% Eventually Gäßlein and Niepraschk implemented what Lamport himself had already
% documented in the second edition of his \LaTeX\ handbook, that is a \LaTeX\
% package that contained the macros capable of removing all the limitations
% contained in the standard commands of the original \texttt{picture}
% environment; specifically:
% \begin{enumerate}
% \item the line and vector slopes were limited to the ratios of relatively
% prime one-digit integers of magnitude not exceeding 6 for lines and 4 for
% vectors;
% \item filled and unfilled full circles were limited by the necessarily
% limited number of specific glyphs contained in the special \LaTeX\
% \texttt{picture} fonts;
% \item quarter circles were also limited in their radii for the same reason;
% \item ovals (rectangles with rounded corners) could not be too small because
% of the unavailability of small radius quarter circles, nor could be too
% large, in the sense that after a certain radius the rounded corners remained
% the same and would not increase proportionally to the oval size.
% \item vector arrows had only one possible shape and matched the limited
% number of vector slopes;
% \item for circles and inclined lines and vectors just two possible thicknesses
% were available.
% \end{enumerate}
%
% The package \texttt{pict2e} removes most if not all the above limitations:
% \begin{enumerate}
% \item line and vector slopes are virtually unlimited; the only remaining
% limitation is that the direction coefficients must be three-digit integer
% numbers; they need not be relatively prime; with the 2009 upgrade even this
% limitation was removed and now slope coefficients can be any fractional number
% whose magnitude does not exceed 16\,384, the maximum dimension in points that
% \TeX\ can handle;
% \item filled and unfilled circles can be of any size;
% \item ovals can be designed with any specified corner curvature and there is
% virtually no limitation to such curvatures; of course corner radii should not
% exceed half the lower value between the base and the height of the oval;
% \item there are two shapes for the arrow tips; the triangular one traditional
% with \LaTeX\ vectors, or the arrow tip with PostScript style.
% \item the |\linethickness| command changes the thickness of all lines, straight,
% curved, vertical, horizontal, arrow tipped, et cetera.
% \end{enumerate}
%
% This specific extension adds the following features
% \begin{enumerate}
% \item commands for setting the line terminations are introduced; the user can
% chose between square or rounded caps; the default is set to rounded caps (now
% available also with |pict2e|); the 2011 upgrade of |pict2e| made these commands
% superfluous and redefined the internal special commands for the drivers, so that
% I deicided to completely eliminate these definitions and relay on those produced
% by |pict2e|;
% \item the |\line| macro is redefined so as to allow integer and fractional
% direction coefficients, but maintaining the same syntax as in the original
% \texttt{picture} environment (now available also with |pict2e|);
% ^^A
% \item a new macro |\Line| was defined so as to avoid the need to specify the
% horizontal projection of inclined lines (now available also with |pict2e|);
% this conflicts with |pict2e| 2009 version; therefore its name is changed to
% |\LIne| and supposedly it will not be used very often, if ever used;
% ^^A
% \item a new macro |\LINE| was defined in order to join two points specified with
% their coordinates; this is now the normal behavior of the |\Line| macro of
% |pict2e| so that |\LINE| is now renamed |\segment|; of course there is no need
% to use the |\put| command with this line specification;
% ^^A
% \item a new macro |\DLine| is defined in order to draw dashed lines joining any
% two given points; the dash length and gap (equal to one another) must be
% specified;
% ^^A
% \item similar macros are redefined for vectors; |\vector| redefines the
% original macro but with the vector slope limitations removed; |\Vector| gets
% specified with its two horizontal and vertical components; |\VECTOR|
% joins two specified points (without using the |\put| command) with the arrow
% pointing to the second point;
% \item a new macro |\polyline| for drawing polygonal lines is defined that
% accepts from two vertices up to an arbitrary (reasonably limited) number of
% them (available now also in |pict2e|);
% \item a new macro |\Arc| is defined in order to draw an arc with arbitrary
% radius and arbitrary angle amplitude; this amplitude is specified in
% sexagesimal degrees, not in radians; the same functionality is now achieved with
% the |\arc| macro of |pict2e|, which provides also the star version |\arc*| that
% fills up the interior of the generated circular arc. It must be noticed that
% the syntax is slighltly different, so that it's reasonable that both commands,
% in spite of producing identical arcs, might be more comfortable with this or that
% syntax.
% \item two new macros are defined in order to draw circular arcs with one
% arrow at one or both ends;
% \item a new macro |\Curve| is defined so as to draw arbitrary curved lines
% by means of third order Bézier splines; the |\Curve| macro requires only the
% curve nodes and the direction of the tangents at each node.
% \end{enumerate}
%
% In order to make the necessary calculations many macros have been defined so
% as to use complex number arithmetics to manipulate point coordinates, directions,
% rotations and the like. The trigonometric functions have also been defined in
% a way that the author believes to be more efficient than that implied by the
% \texttt{trig} package; in any case the macro names are sufficiently
% different to accommodate both definitions in the same \LaTeX\ run.
%
% Many aspects of this extension could be fine tuned for better performance;
% many new commands could be defined in order to further extend this extension.
% If the new service macros are accepted by other \TeX\ and \LaTeX\ programmers,
% this beta version could become the start for a real extension of the
% \texttt{pict2e} package or even become a part of it.
%
% For this reason I suppose that every enhancement should be submitted to
% Gäßlein and Niepraschk who are the prime maintainers of \texttt{pict2e};
% they only can decide whether or not to incorporate new macros in their package.
%
% \section{Summary of modifications and new commands}
% This package \texttt{curve2e} extends the power of \texttt{pict2e} with the
% following modifications and the following new commands.
% \begin{enumerate}
% \item This package |curve2e| calls directly the \LaTeX\ packages |color| and
% |pict2e| to whom it passes any possible option that the latter can receive;
% actually the only options that make sense are those concerning the arrow tips,
% either \LaTeX\ or PostScript styled, because it is assumed that if you use this
% package you are not interested in using the original \LaTeX\ commands. See the
% |pict2e| documentation in order to use the correct options |pict2e| can receive.
% \item The commands |\linethickness|, |\thicklines|, |\thinlines| together with
% |\defaultlinethickness| always redefine the internal |\@wholewidth| and
% |\@halfwidth|
% so that the former always refer to a full width and the latter to a half of it in this
% way: if you issue the command |\defaultlinewidth{2pt}| all thin lines will be
% drawn with a thickeness of 1\,pt while if a drawing command directly refers to the
% internal value |\@wholewidth|, its line will be drawn with a thickness of 2\,pt.
% If one issues the declaration |\thinlines| all lines will be drawn with a 1\,pt
% width, but if a command refers to the internal value |\@halfwidth| the line will
% be drawn with a thickness of 0.5\,pt. The command |\linethickness| redefines the
% above internals but does not change the default width value; all these width
% specifications apply to all lines, straight ones, curved ones, circles, ovals,
% vectors, dashed, et cetera. It's better to recall that |thinlines| and
% |thicklines| are declarations that do not take arguments; on the opposite the
% other two commands follow the standard syntax:
% \begin{flushleft}
% |\linethickness|\marg{dimension value}\\
% |\defaultlinewidth|\marg{dimension value}
% \end{flushleft}
% where \meta{dimension value} means a length specification complete of its units
% or a dimensional expression.
% \item Straight lines and vectors are redefined in such a way that fractional slope
% coefficients may be specified; the zero length line does not produce errors and is
% ignored; the zero length vectors draw only the arrow tips.
% \item New line and vector macros are defined that avoid the necessity of
% specifying the horizontal component |\put(3,4){\LIne(25,15)}| specifies a segment
% that starts at point $(3,4)$ and goes to point $(3+25,4+15)$; the command
% |\segment(3,4)(28,19)| achieves the same result without the need of the using
% command |\put|.
% The same applies to the vector commands |\Vector| and |\VECTOR|. Experience has
% shown that the commands intended to joint two specified coordinates are
% particularly useful.
% \item The |\polyline| command has been introduced: it accepts an unlimited list of
% point coordinates enclosed within round parentheses; the command draws a sequence
% of connected segments that joins in sequence the specified points; the syntax is:
% \begin{flushleft}
% \cs{polyline[}\marg{optional join style}\texttt{](}\meta{$P_1$}\texttt{)(}%
% \meta{$P_2$}\texttt{)...(}\meta{$P_n$}\texttt{)}
% \end{flushleft}
% See figure~\ref{fig:polyline} where a pentagon is designed..
%
% \begin{figure}[!ht]
% \begin{minipage}{.48\linewidth}
% \begin{verbatim}
% \unitlength=.5mm
% \begin{picture}(40,32)(-20,0)
% \polyline(0,0)(19.0211,13,8197)(11.7557,36.1803)%
% (-11.7557,36.1803)(-19.0211,13,8197)(0,0)
% \end{picture}
% \end{verbatim}
% \end{minipage}
% \hfill
% \begin{minipage}{.48\linewidth}\raggedleft
% \unitlength=.5mm
% \begin{picture}(40,32)(-20,0)
% \polyline(0,0)(19.0211,13,8197)(11.7557,36.1803)%
% (-11.7557,36.1803)(-19.0211,13,8197)(0,0)
% \end{picture}\hspace*{2em}
% \end{minipage}
% \caption{Polygonal line obtained by means of the \texttt{\string\polyline}
% command} \label{fig:polyline}
% \end{figure}
%
% Although you can draw polygons with |\polyline|, as it was done in
% figure~\ref{fig:polyline}, do not confuse this command with the command |\polygon|
% defined in |pict2e| 2009; the latter automatically joins the last specified
% coordinate to the first one, therefore closing the path. |pict2e| defines also the
% starred command that fills up the inside of the generated polygon.
% \item The new command
% \begin{flushleft}
% |\Dline(|\textit{first point}|)(|\textit{second point}|)(|\textit{dash length}|)|
% \end{flushleft}
% draws a dashed line containing as many dashes as possible, long as specified, and
% separated by a gap exactly the same size; actually, in order to make an even
% gap-dash sequence, the desired dash length is used to do some computations in
% order to find a suitable length, close to the one specified, such that the
% distance of the end points is evenly divided in equally sized dashes and gaps.
% The end points may be anywhere in
% the drawing area, without any constraint on the slope of the joining segment. The
% desired dash length is specified as a fractional multiple of |\unitlength|; see
% figure~\ref{fig:dashline}.
% \begin{figure}[!ht]
% \begin{minipage}{.48\textwidth}
% \begin{verbatim}
% \unitlength.5mm
% \begin{picture}(40,40)
% \put(0,0){\GraphGrid(40,40)}
% \Dline(0,0)(40,10){4}
% \put(0,0){\circle*{2}}
% \Dline(40,10)(0,25){4}
% \put(40,10){\circle*{2}}
% \Dline(0,25)(20,40){4}
% \put(0,25){\circle*{2}}
% \put(20,40){\circle*{2}}
% \end{picture}
% \end{verbatim}
% \end{minipage}
% \hfill
% \begin{minipage}{.48\textwidth}\centering
% \unitlength.5mm
% \begin{picture}(40,40)
% \put(0,0){\GraphGrid(40,40)}
% \Dline(0,0)(40,10){4}
% \put(0,0){\circle*{2}}
% \Dline(40,10)(0,25){4}
% \put(40,10){\circle*{2}}
% \Dline(0,25)(20,40){4}
% \put(0,25){\circle*{2}}
% \put(20,40){\circle*{2}}
% \end{picture}
% \end{minipage}
% \caption{Dashed lines and graph grid}\label{fig:dashline}
% \end{figure}
% \item |\GraphGrid| is a command that draws a red grid over the drawing area with
% lines separated |10\unitlength|s; it is described only with a comma separated
% couple of numbers, representing the base and the height of the grid, see
% figure~\ref{fig;dashline}; it's better to specify multiples of ten and the grid
% can be placed anywhere in the drawing plane by means of |\put|, whose coordinates
% are multiples of 10; nevertheless the grid line distance is rounded to the
% nearest multiple of 10, while the point coordinates specified to |\put| are not
% rounded at all; therefore some care should be used to place the working grid in
% the drawing plane. This grid is intended as an aid in drawing; even if you sketch
% your drawing on millimeter paper, the drawing grid turns out to be very useful;
% one must only delete or comment out the command when the drawing is finished.
% \item New trigonometric function macros have been implemented; possibly they are
% not better than the corresponding macros of the |trig| package, but they are
% supposed to be more accurate at least they were intended to be so. The other
% difference is that angles are specified in sexagesimal degrees ($360^\circ$ to one
% revolution), so that reduction to the fundamental quadrant is supposed to be more
% accurate; the tangent of odd multiples of $90^\circ$ are approximated with a
% ``\TeX\ infinity'', that is the signed value 16383.99999. This will possibly
% produce computational errors in the subsequent calculations, but at least it does
% not stop the tangent computation. In order to avoid overflows or underflows in the
% computation of small angles (reduced to the first quadrant), the sine and the
% tangent of angles smaller than $1^\circ$ are approximated by the first term of the
% McLaurin series, while for the cosine the approximation is given by the first two
% terms of the McLaurin series. In both cases theoretical errors are smaller
% than what \TeX\ arithmetics can handle.
%
% These trigonometric functions are used within the complex number macros; but if
% the user wants to use them the syntax is the following:
%\begin{flushleft}
% \texttt{\char92SinOf}\meta{angle}\texttt{to}\meta{control sequence}
%\\
% \texttt{\char92CosOf}\meta{angle}\texttt{to}\meta{control sequence}
%\\
% \texttt{\char92TanOf}\meta{angle}\texttt{to}\meta{control sequence}
%\end{flushleft}
% The \meta{control sequence} may then be used as a multiplying factor of a length.
% \item Arcs can be drawn as simple circular arcs, or with one or two arrows at
% their ends (curved vectors); the syntax is:
%\begin{flushleft}
% \texttt{\char92Arc(}\meta{center}\texttt{)(}\meta{starting point}\texttt{)}\marg{angle}\\
% \texttt{\char92VectorArc(}\meta{center}\texttt{)(}\meta{starting point}\texttt{)}\marg{angle}\\
% \texttt{\char92VectorARC(}\meta{center}\texttt{)(}\meta{starting point}\texttt{)}\marg{angle}\\
%\end{flushleft}
% If the angle is specified numerically it must be enclosed in braces, while if it
% is specified with a control sequence the braces (curly brackets) are not
% necessary. The above macro |\Arc| draws a simple circular arc without arrows;
% |\VectorArc| draws an arc with an arrow tip at the ending point; |\VectorARC|
% draws an arc with arrow tips at both ends; see figure~\ref{fig:arcs}.
% \begin{figure}
% \begin{minipage}{.48\textwidth}
% \begin{verbatim}
% \unitlength=0.5mm
% \begin{picture}(60,40)
% \put(0,0){\GraphGrid(60,40)}
% \Arc(0,20)(30,0){60}
% \VECTOR(0,20)(30,0)\VECTOR(0,20)(32.5,36)
% \VectorArc(0,20)(15,10){60}
% \put(20,20){\makebox(0,0)[l]{$60^\circ$}}
% \VectorARC(60,20)(60,0){-180}
% \end{picture}
% \end{verbatim}
% \end{minipage}
% \hfill
% \begin{minipage}{.48\textwidth}\centering
% \unitlength=0.5mm
% \begin{picture}(60,40)
% \put(0,0){\GraphGrid(60,40)}
% \Arc(0,20)(30,0){60}
% \VECTOR(0,20)(30,0)\VECTOR(0,20)(32.5,36)
% \VectorArc(0,20)(15,10){60}
% \put(20,20){\makebox(0,0)[l]{$60^\circ$}}
% \VectorARC(60,20)(60,0){-180}
% \end{picture}
% \end{minipage}
% \caption{Arcs and curved vectors}\label{fig:arcs}
% \end{figure}
% \item A multitude of commands have been defined in order to manage complex
% numbers; actually complex numbers are represented as a comma separated pair of
% fractional numbers. They are used to point to specific points in the drawing
% plane, but also as operators so as to scale and rotate other objects. In the
% following \meta{vector} means a comma separated pair of fractional numbers,
% possibly stored in macros; \meta{argument} means a brace delimiteded numeric
% value, possibly a macro; \textit{macro} is a valid macro name, a backslash
% followed by letters, or anything else that can receive a definition.
%
% {\footnotesize\begin{itemize}
% \item |\MakeVectorFrom|\meta{two arguments}|to|\meta{vector}
% \item |\CopyVect|\meta{first vector}|to|\meta{second vector}
% \item |\ModOfVect|\meta{vector}|to|\meta{macro}
% \item |\DirOfvect|\meta{vector}|to|\meta{macro}
% \item |\DmodAndDirOfVect|\meta{vector}|to|\meta{first macro}|and|\meta{second macro}
% \item |\DistanceAndDirOfVect|\meta{first vector}|minus|\meta{second vector}|to|\meta{first macro}|and|\meta{second macro}
% \item |\XpartOfVect|\meta{vector}|to|\meta{macro}
% \item |\YpartOfVect|\meta{vector}|to|\meta{macro}
% \item |\DirFromAngle|\meta{angle}|to|\meta{macro}
% \item |\ScaleVect|\meta{vector}|by|\meta{scaling factor}|to|\meta{macro}
% \item |\ConjVect|\meta{vector}|to|\meta{conjugate vector}
% \item |\SubVect|\meta{first vector}|from|\meta{second vector}|to|\meta{vector}
% \item |\AddVect|\meta{first vector}|and|\meta{second vector}|to|\meta{vector}
% \item |\MultVect|\meta{first vector}|by|\meta{second vector}|to|\meta{vector}
% \item |\MultVect|\meta{first vector}|by*|\meta{second vector}|to|\meta{vector}
% \item |\DivVect|\meta{first vector}|by|\meta{second vector}|to|\meta{vector}
% \end{itemize}}
%
% \item General curves can be drawn with the |pict2e| macro |\curve| but it requires
% the specification of the Bézier third order spline control points; sometimes it's
% better to be very specific with the control points and there is no other means to
% do a decent graph; sometimes the curves to be drawn are not so tricky and a
% general set of macros can be defined so as to compute the control points, while
% letting the user specify only the nodes through which the curve must pass, and the
% tangent direction of the curve in such nodes. This macro is |\Curve| and must be
% followed by an ``unlimited" sequence of node-direction coordinates as a quadruple
% defined as
%\[
% \texttt{(}\meta{node coordinates}\texttt{)<}\meta{direction vector}\texttt{>}
%\]
% Possibly if a sudden change of direction has to be performed (cusp) another item
% can be inserted after one of those quadruples in the form
%\[
% \texttt{...(...)<...>[}\meta{new direction vector}\texttt{](...)<...>...}
%\]
% The |\Curve| macro does not (still) have facilities for cycling the path, that is
% to close the path from the last specified node-direction to the first specified
% node-direction.
% The tangent direction need not be specified with a unit vector, although only its
% direction is relevant; the scaling of the specified direction vector to a unit
% vector is performed by the macro itself. Therefore one cannot specify the fine
% tuning of the curve convexity as it can be done with other programs, as for
% example with METAFONT or the |pgf/tikz| package and environment.
% See figure~\ref{fig:curve} for an example.
% \end{enumerate}
% \begin{figure}
% \begin{minipage}{.48\textwidth}
% \begin{verbatim}
% \unitlength=8mm
% \begin{picture}(5,5)
% \put(0,0){\framebox(5,5){}}\thicklines\roundcap
% \Curve(2.5,0)<1,1>(5,3.5)<0,1>%
% (2.5,3.5)<-.5,-1.2>[-.5,1.2]%
% (0,3.5)<0,-1>(2.5,0)<1,-1>
% \end{picture}
% \end{verbatim}
% \end{minipage}
% \hfill
% \begin{minipage}{.48\textwidth}\raggedleft
% \unitlength=8mm
% \begin{picture}(5,5)
% \put(0,0){\framebox(5,5){}}\thicklines\roundcap
% \Curve(2.5,0)<1,1>(5,3.5)<0,1>(2.5,3.5)<-0.5,-1.2>[-0.5,1.2](0,3.5)<0,-1>(2.5,0)<1,-1>
% \end{picture}
% \end{minipage}
% \caption{A heart shaped curve with cusps drawn with \texttt{\string\Curve}}
% \label{fig:curve}
% \end{figure}
%
% In spite of the relative simplicity of the macros contained in this package, the
% described macros, as well as the original macros included in the |pict2e| package,
% allow to produce fine drawings that were inconceivable of with the original \LaTeX\
% picture environment. Leslie Lamport himself announced an extension to his
% environment when \LaTeXe\ was first issued in 1994; in the |latexnews| news letter
% of December 2003; the first implementation appeared; the first version of this
% package was issued in 2006. It was time to have a better drawing environment; this
% package is a simple attempt to follow the initial path while extending the drawing
% facilities; but Till Tantau's |pgf| package has gone much farther.
%
% \section{Notice}
% There are other packages in the \textsc{ctan} archives that deal with tracing
% curves of various kinds. |PSTricks| and |tikz/pgf| are the most powerful ones. But
% there are also the package |curves| that is intended to draw almost anything by
% using little dots or other symbols partially superimposed to one another. It used
% only quadratic Bézier curves and the curve tracing is eased by specifying only the
% curve nodes, without specifying the control nodes; with a suitable option to the
% package call it is possible to reduce the memory usage by using short straight
% segments drawn with the PostScript facilities offered by the |dvips| driver.
%
% Another package |ebezier| performs about the same as |curve2e| but draws its
% Bézier curves by using little dots partially superimposed to one another. The
% documentation is quite interesting but since it explains very clearly what exactly
% are the Bézier splines, it appears that |ebezier| should be used only for dvi
% output without recourse to PostScript machinery.
%
% \section{Acknowledgements}
% I wish to express my deepest thanks to Michel Goosens who spotted some errors
% and very kindly submitted them to me so that I was able to correct them.
%
% Josef Tkadlec and the author collaborated extensively in order to make a better
% real long division so as to get the fractional part and to avoid as much as
% possible any numeric overflow; many Josef's ideas are incorporated in the macro
% that is implemented in this package, although the macro used by Josef is slightly
% different from this one. Both versions aim at a better accuracy and at widening
% the operand ranges. Some of the work we did together was incorporated in |pict2e| 2009.
%
% Daniele Degiorgi spotted a fault in the kernel definition of |\linethickness|
% that heavily influenced also |curve2e|; see below.
%
% Thanks also to Jin-Hwan Cho and Juho Lee who suggested a small but crucial modification
% in order to have \texttt{curve2e} work smoothly also with XeTeX (XeLaTeX).
% Actually if version 0.2x or later, dated 2009/08/05 or later, of |pict2e| is being used,
% such modification is not necessary, but it's true that it becomes imperative if older
% versions are used.
%
% \StopEventually{%
% \begin{thebibliography}{9}
% \bibitem{pict2e} Gäßlein H., Niepraschk R., and Tkadlec J.
% \emph{The \texttt{pict2e}
% package}, 2009, PDF document attached to the ``new'' \texttt{pict2e} bundle; the
% bundle may be downloaded from any CTAN archive or one of their mirrors.
% \end{thebibliography}
% }
%
% \section{Source code}
% \subsection{Some preliminary extensions to the \texttt{pict2e} package}
% The necessary preliminary code has already been introduced. Here we require
% the \texttt{color} package and the \texttt{pict2e} one; for the latter one we
% make sure that a sufficiently recent version is used.
% \begin{macrocode}
\RequirePackage{color}
\RequirePackageWithOptions{pict2e}[2011/04/01]
% \end{macrocode}
%
% The next macros are just for debugging. With the \texttt{trace} package it
% would probably be better to define other macros, but this is not for the
% developers, not the users.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\TRON{\tracingcommands\tw@ \tracingmacros\tw@}%
\def\TROF{\tracingcommands\z@ \tracingmacros\z@}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% Next we define some new dimension registers that will be used by the
% subsequent macros; should they be already defined, there will not be any
% redefinition; nevertheless the macros should be sufficiently protected so as
% to avoid overwriting register values loaded by other macro packages.
% \begin{macrocode}
\ifx\undefined\@tdA \newdimen\@tdA \fi
\ifx\undefined\@tdB \newdimen\@tdB \fi
\ifx\undefined\@tdC \newdimen\@tdC \fi
\ifx\undefined\@tdD \newdimen\@tdD \fi
\ifx\undefined\@tdE \newdimen\@tdE \fi
\ifx\undefined\@tdF \newdimen\@tdF \fi
\ifx\undefined\defaultlinewidth \newdimen\defaultlinewidth \fi
% \end{macrocode}
%
% It is better to define a macro for setting a different value for the line and
% curve thicknesses; the `|\defaultlinewidth| should contain the
% equivalent of |\@wholewidth|, that is the thickness of thick lines; thin lines
% are half as thick; so when the default line thickness is specified to, say,
% 1pt, thick lines will be 1pt thick and thin lines will be 0.5pt thick. The
% default whole width of thick lines is 0,8pt, but this is specified in the
% kernel of \LaTeX\ and\slash or in \texttt{pict2e}. On the opposite it is
% necessary to redefine |\linethickness| because the \LaTeX\ kernel global
% definition does not hide the space after the closed brace when you enter something
% such as |\linethickness{1mm}| followed by a space or a new line.\footnote{Thanks
% to Daniele Degiorgi (\texttt{degiorgi@inf.ethz.ch}).}
% \begin{macrocode}
\gdef\linethickness#1{\@wholewidth#1\@halfwidth.5\@wholewidth\ignorespaces}%
\newcommand\defaultlinethickness[1]{\defaultlinewidth=#1\relax
\def\thicklines{\linethickness{\defaultlinewidth}}%
\def\thinlines{\linethickness{.5\defaultlinewidth}}%
\thinlines\ignorespaces}
% \end{macrocode}
% The |\ignorespaces| at the end of this and the subsequent macros is for
% avoiding spurious spaces to get into the picture that is being drawn, because
% these spaces introduce picture deformities often difficult to spot and
% eliminate.
%
% \subsubsection{Improved line and vector macros}
% The new macro |\LIne| allows to draw an arbitrary inclination line as if it
% was a polygonal with just two vertices. This line should be set by means of a
% |\put| command so that its starting point is always at a relative 0,0
% coordinate point. The two arguments define the horizontal and the
% vertical component respectively.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\LIne(#1,#2){\pIIe@moveto\z@\z@
\pIIe@lineto{#1\unitlength}{#2\unitlength}\pIIe@strokeGraph}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% A similar macro |\segment| operates between two explicit points with absolute
% coordinates, instead of relative to the position specified by a |\put|
% command; it resorts to the |\polyline| macro that is to be defined in a while.
% The |\@killglue|command might be unnecessary, but it does not harm; it eliminates
% any explicit or implicit spacing that might precede this command.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\segment(#1)(#2){\@killglue\polyline(#1)(#2)}%
% \end{macrocode}
% By passing its ending points coordinates to the |\polyline| macro, both macro
% arguments are a pair of coordinates, not their components; in other words, if
% $P_1=(x_1, y_2)$ and $P_2=(x_2, y_2)$, then the first argument is the couple
% $x_1, y_1$ and likewise the second argument is $x_2, y_2$. Please remember that
% the decimal separator is the decimal \emph{point}, while the \emph{comma} acts
% as coordinate separator. This recommendation is particularly important for
% non-English speaking users, since the ISO regulations allow the decimal point
% only for English speaking countries, while in all other countries the comma
% must be used as the decimal separator.
%
% The |\line| macro is redefined by making use of a new division routine that
% receives in input two dimensions and yields on output their fractional ratio.
% The beginning of the macro definition is the same as that of \texttt{pict2e}:
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\line(#1)#2{\begingroup
\@linelen #2\unitlength
\ifdim\@linelen<\z@\@badlinearg\else
% \end{macrocode}
% but as soon as it is verified that the line length is not negative, things
% change remarkably; in facts the machinery for complex numbers is invoked.
% This makes the code muche simpler, not necessarily more efficient; nevertheless
% |\DirOfVect| takes the only macro argument (that actually contains a comma
% separated pair of fractional numbers) and copies it to |\Dir@line| (an
% arbitrarily named control sequence) after re-normalizing to unit magnitude;
% this is passed to |GetCoord| that separates the two components into the
% control sequences |\d@mX| and|\d@mY|; these in turn are the values that are
% actually operated upon by the subsequent commands.
% \begin{macrocode}
\expandafter\DirOfVect#1to\Dir@line
\GetCoord(\Dir@line)\d@mX\d@mY
% \end{macrocode}
% The normalized vector direction is actually formed with the directing cosines
% of the line direction; since the line length is actually the horizontal
% component for non vertical lines, it is necessary to compute the actual line
% length for non vertical lines by dividing the given length by the
% magnitude of horizontal cosine |\d@mX|, and the line length is accordingly
% scaled:
% \begin{macrocode}
\ifdim\d@mX\p@=\z@\else
\DividE\ifdim\d@mX\p@<\z@-\fi\p@ by\d@mX\p@ to\sc@lelen
\@linelen=\sc@lelen\@linelen
\fi
% \end{macrocode}
% Of course, it the line is vertical this division must not take place.
% Finally the \texttt{moveto}, \texttt{lineto} and \texttt{stroke} language
% keywords are invoked by means of the internal \texttt{pict2e} commands in
% order to draw the line. Notice that even vertical lines are drawn with the
% ``PostScript'' commands instead of resorting to the dvi low level language
% that was used both in \texttt{pict2e} and in the original \texttt{picture}
% commands; it had a meaning in the old times, but it certainly does not have
% any when lines are drawn by the driver that drives the output to a visible
% document form, not by \TeX\ the program.
% \begin{macrocode}
\pIIe@moveto\z@\z@
\pIIe@lineto{\d@mX\@linelen}{\d@mY\@linelen}%
\pIIe@strokeGraph
\fi
\endgroup\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
% The new definition of the command |\line|, besides tha ease with which is
% readable, does not do different things from the definition of |pict2e| 2009, but
% it did preform in a better way whith the 2004 version that was limited to integer
% direction coefficients up to 999 in magnitude.
%
% Another usefull line-type macro creates a dashed line between two given points
% with a dash length that must be specified; actually the specified dash length is a
% desired dash length; the actual length is computed by integer division between
% the distance of the given points and the desired dash length; this integer is
% tested in order to see if it's odd; if it's not, it is increased by one. Then the
% actual dash length is obtained by dividing the above distance by this odd number.
% Another vector is created from $P_1-P_0$ by dividing it by the magic odd number;
% then it is multiplied by two in order to have the increment from one dash to the
% next, and finally the number of patterns is obtained by integer dividing the magic
% odd number by 2 and increasing it by 1. A simple |\multiput| completes the job,
% but in order to use the various vectors and numbers within a group and to throw
% the result outside the group while restoring all the intermediate counters and
% registers, a service macro is created with an expanded definition and then this
% service macro is executed.
% \begin{macrocode}
\ifx\Dline\undefined
\def\Dline(#1,#2)(#3,#4)#5{%
\begingroup
\countdef\NumA254\countdef\NumB252\relax
\MakeVectorFrom{#1}{#2}to\V@ttA
\MakeVectorFrom{#3}{#4}to\V@ttB
\SubVect\V@ttA from\V@ttB to\V@ttC
\ModOfVect\V@ttC to\DlineMod
\DividE\DlineMod\p@ by#5\p@ to\NumD
\NumA\expandafter\Integer\NumD.??
\ifodd\NumA\else\advance\NumA\@ne\fi
\NumB=\NumA \divide\NumB\tw@
\DividE\DlineMod\p@ by\NumA\p@ to\D@shMod
\DividE\p@ by\NumA\p@ to \@tempa
\MultVect\V@ttC by\@tempa,0 to\V@ttB
\MultVect\V@ttB by 2,0 to\V@ttC
\advance\NumB\@ne
\edef\@mpt{\noexpand\endgroup
\noexpand\multiput(\V@ttA)(\V@ttC){\number\NumB}{\noexpand\LIne(\V@ttB)}}%
\@mpt\ignorespaces}%
\fi
% \end{macrocode}
%
% The new macro |\GetCoord| splits a vector (or complex number) specification
% into its components:
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\GetCoord(#1)#2#3{%
\expandafter\SplitNod@\expandafter(#1)#2#3\ignorespaces}
% \end{macrocode}
% But the macro that does the real work is |\SplitNod@|:
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\SplitNod@(#1,#2)#3#4{\edef#3{#1}\edef#4{#2}}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% The redefinitions and the new definitions for vectors are a little more
% complicated than with segments, because each vector is drawn as a filled
% contour; the original \texttt{pict2e} 2004 macro checks if the slopes are
% corresponding to the limitations specified by Lamport (integer three digit
% signed numbers) and sets up a transformation in order to make it possible to
% draw each vector as an horizontal left-to-right arrow and then to rotate it by
% its angle about its tail point; with |pict2e| 2009, possibly this redefinition
% of |\vector| is not necessary, but we do it as well and for the same reasons
% we had for redefining |\line|; actually there are two macros for tracing the
% contours that are eventually filled by the principal macro; each contour
% macro draws the vector with a \LaTeX\ or a PostScript arrow whose parameters
% are specified by default or may be taken from the parameters taken from the
%\texttt{PSTricks} package if this one is loaded before \texttt{pict2e}; in any
% case we did not change the contour drawing macros because if they are
% modified the same modification is passed on to the arrows drawn with the
% \texttt{curve2e} package redefinitions.
%
% Because of these features the redefinitions and the new macros are different
% from those used for straight lines.
%
% We start with the redefinition of |\vector| and we use the machinery for
% vectors (as complex numbers) we used for |\line|.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\vector(#1)#2{%
\begingroup
\GetCoord(#1)\d@mX\d@mY
\@linelen#2\unitlength
% \end{macrocode}
% As in \texttt{pict2e} we avoid tracing vectors if the slope parameters are
% both zero.
% \begin{macrocode}
\ifdim\d@mX\p@=\z@\ifdim\d@mY\p@=\z@\@badlinearg\fi\fi
% \end{macrocode}
% But we check only for the positive nature of the $l_x$ component; if it is
% negative, we simply change sign instead of blocking the typesetting process.
% This is useful also for macros |\Vector| and |\VECTOR| to be defined in a
% while.
% \begin{macrocode}
\ifdim\@linelen<\z@ \@linelen=-\@linelen\fi
% \end{macrocode}
% We now make a vector with the slope coefficients even if one or the other is
% zero and we determine its direction; the real and imaginary parts of the
% direction vector are also the values we need for the subsequent rotation.
% \begin{macrocode}
\MakeVectorFrom\d@mX\d@mY to\@Vect
\DirOfVect\@Vect to\Dir@Vect
% \end{macrocode}
% In order to be compatible with the original \texttt{pict2e} we need to
% transform the components of the vector direction in lengths with the specific
% names |\@xdim| and |\@ydim|
% \begin{macrocode}
\YpartOfVect\Dir@Vect to\@ynum \@ydim=\@ynum\p@
\XpartOfVect\Dir@Vect to\@xnum \@xdim=\@xnum\p@
% \end{macrocode}
% If the vector is really sloping we need to scale the $l_x$ component in order
% to get the vector total length; we have to divide by the cosine of the vector
% inclination which is the real part of the vector direction. I use my division
% macro; since it yields a ``factor'' I directly use it to scale the length of
% the vector. I finally memorize the true vector length in the internal
% dimension |@tdB|
% \begin{macrocode}
\ifdim\d@mX\p@=\z@
\else\ifdim\d@mY\p@=\z@
\else
\DividE\ifdim\@xnum\p@<\z@-\fi\p@ by\@xnum\p@ to\sc@lelen
\@linelen=\sc@lelen\@linelen
\fi
\fi
\@tdB=\@linelen
% \end{macrocode}
% The remaining code is definitely similar to that of \texttt{pict2e}; the
% real difference consists in the fact that the arrow is designed by itself
% without the stem; but it is placed at the vector end; therefore the first
% statement is just the transformation matrix used by the output driver to
% rotate the arrow tip and to displace it the right amount. But in order
% to draw only the arrow tip I have to set the |\@linelen| length to zero.
% \begin{macrocode}
\pIIe@concat\@xdim\@ydim{-\@ydim}\@xdim{\@xnum\@linelen}{\@ynum\@linelen}%
\@linelen\z@
\pIIe@vector
\pIIe@fillGraph
% \end{macrocode}
% Now we can restore the stem length that must be shortened by the dimension of
% the arrow; examining the documentation of \texttt{pict2e} we discover that
% we have to shorten it by an approximate amount of $AL$ (with the notations of
% \texttt{pict2e}, figs~10 and~11); the arrow tip parameters are stored in
% certain variables with which we can determine the amount of the stem
% shortening; if the stem was too short and the new length is negative, we
% refrain from designing such stem.
% \begin{macrocode}
\@linelen=\@tdB
\@tdA=\pIIe@FAW\@wholewidth
\@tdA=\pIIe@FAL\@tdA
\advance\@linelen-\@tdA
\ifdim\@linelen>\z@
\pIIe@moveto\z@\z@
\pIIe@lineto{\@xnum\@linelen}{\@ynum\@linelen}%
\pIIe@strokeGraph\fi
\endgroup}
% \end{macrocode}
%
% Now we define the macro that does not require the specification of the length
% or the $l_x$ length component; the way the new |\vector| macro works does not
% actually require this specification, because \TeX\ can compute the vector
% length, provided the two direction components are exactly the horizontal and
% vertical vector components. If the horizontal component is zero, the actual length
% must be specified as the vertical component.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\Vector(#1,#2){%
\ifdim#1\p@=\z@\vector(#1,#2){#2}
\else
\vector(#1,#2){#1}\fi}
% \end{macrocode}
%
% On the opposite the next macro specifies a vector by means of the coordinates
% of its end points; the first point is where the vector starts, and the second
% point is the arrow tip side. We need the difference of these two coordinates, because % it represents the actual vector.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\VECTOR(#1)(#2){\begingroup
\SubVect#1from#2to\@tempa
\expandafter\put\expandafter(#1){\expandafter\Vector\expandafter(\@tempa)}%
\endgroup\ignorespaces}
% \end{macrocode}
%
% The \texttt{pict2e} documentation says that if the vector length is zero the
% macro designs only the arrow tip; this may work with macro |\vector|,
% certainly not with |\Vector| and |\VECTOR|. This might be useful for adding
% an arrow tip to a circular arc. See examples in figure~\ref{fig:vectors}.
%
% \begin{figure}
% \begin{minipage}{.48\textwidth}
% \begin{verbatim}
% \unitlength=.5mm
% \begin{picture}(60,20)
% \put(0,0){\GraphGrid(60,20)}
% \put(0,0){\vector(1.5,2.3){10}}
% \put(20,0){\Vector(10,15.33333)}
% \VECTOR(40,0)(50,15.33333)
% \end{picture}
% \end{verbatim}
% \end{minipage}
% \hfill
% \begin{minipage}{.48\textwidth}\centering
% \unitlength=.5mm
% \begin{picture}(60,20)
% \put(0,0){\GraphGrid(60,20)}
% \put(0,0){\vector(1.5,2.3){10}}
% \put(20,0){\Vector(10,15.33333)}
% \VECTOR(40,0)(50,15.33333)
% \end{picture}
% \end{minipage}
% \caption{Three (displaced) identical vectors obtained with the three vector
% macros.}\label{fig:vectors}
% \end{figure}
%
% \subsubsection{Polygonal lines}
% We now define the polygonal line macro; its syntax is very simple
% \begin{flushleft}
% \cs{polygonal}\texttt{(}$P_0$\texttt{)(}$P_1$\texttt{)(}$P_2$)%
% \texttt{\dots(}$P_n$\texttt{)}
% \end{flushleft}
% In order to write a recursive macro we need aliases for the parentheses;
% actually we need only the left parenthesis, but some editors complain about
% unmatched delimiters, so we define an alias also for the right parenthesis.
% \begin{macrocode}
\let\lp@r( \let\rp@r)
% \end{macrocode}
% The first call to |\polyline| examines the first point coordinates and moves
% the drawing position to this point; afterwards it looks for the second point
% coordinates; they start with a left parenthesis; if this is found the
% coordinates should be there, but if the left parenthesis is missing (possibly
% preceded by spaces that are ignored by the |\@ifnextchar| macro) then a
% warning message is output together with the line number where the missing
% parenthesis causes the warning: beware, this line number might point to
% several lines further on along the source file! In any case it's necessary to
% insert a |\@killglue| command, because |\polyline| refers to absolute coordinates
% not necessarily is put in position through a |\put| command that provides to
% eliminate any spurious spaces preceding this command.
%
% Remember: |\polyline| has been incorporated into |pict2e| 2009, but we redefine it so as to allow an optional argument to allow the line join specification.
%
% In order to allow a specification for the joints of the various segements of
% a polygonal line it is necessary to allow for an optional parameter; the default
% join is the bevel join.
% \begin{macrocode}
\providecommand*\polyline[1][\beveljoin]{\p@lylin@[#1]}
\def\p@lylin@[#1](#2){\@killglue#1\GetCoord(#2)\d@mX\d@mY
\pIIe@moveto{\d@mX\unitlength}{\d@mY\unitlength}%
\@ifnextchar\lp@r{\p@lyline}{%
\PackageWarning{curve2e}%
{Polygonal lines require at least two vertices!\MessageBreak
Control your polygonal line specification\MessageBreak}%
\ignorespaces}}
% \end{macrocode}
% But if there is a second or further point coordinate the recursive macro
% |\p@lyline| is called; it works on the next point and checks for a further
% point; if such a point exists it calls itself, otherwise it terminates the
% polygonal line by stroking it.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\p@lyline(#1){\GetCoord(#1)\d@mX\d@mY
\pIIe@lineto{\d@mX\unitlength}{\d@mY\unitlength}%
\@ifnextchar\lp@r{\p@lyline}{\pIIe@strokeGraph\ignorespaces}}
% \end{macrocode}
%
% \subsubsection{The red service grid}
% The next command is very useful for debugging while editing one's drawings;
% it draws a red grid with square meshes that are ten drawing units apart;
% there is no graduation along the grid, since it is supposed to be a debugging
% aid and the user should know what he/she is doing; nevertheless it is
% advisable to displace the grid by means of a |\put| command so that its grid
% lines coincide with the graph coordinates multiples of 10. Missing to do so
% the readings become cumbersome. The |\RoundUp| macro provides to increase the
% grid dimensions to integer multiples of ten.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\GraphGrid(#1,#2){\begingroup\textcolor{red}{\linethickness{.1\p@}%
\RoundUp#1modulo10to\@GridWd \RoundUp#2modulo10to\@GridHt
\@tempcnta=\@GridWd \divide\@tempcnta10\relax \advance\@tempcnta\@ne
\multiput(0,0)(10,0){\@tempcnta}{\line(0,1){\@GridHt}}%
\@tempcnta=\@GridHt \divide\@tempcnta10\advance\@tempcnta\@ne
\multiput(0,0)(0,10){\@tempcnta}{\line(1,0){\@GridWd}}\thinlines}%
\endgroup\ignorespaces}
% \end{macrocode}
% Rounding up is useful because also the grid margins fall on coordinates
% multiples of 10. It resorts to the |\Integer| macro that will be described in
% a while.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\RoundUp#1modulo#2to#3{\expandafter\@tempcnta\Integer#1.??%
\count254\@tempcnta\divide\count254by#2\relax
\multiply\count254by#2\relax
\count252\@tempcnta\advance\count252-\count254
\ifnum\count252>0\advance\count252-#2\relax
\advance\@tempcnta-\count252\fi\edef#3{\number\@tempcnta}\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
% The |\Integer| macro takes a possibly fractional number whose decimal
% separator, if present, \textit{must} be the decimal point and uses the point
% as an argument delimiter If one has the doubt that the number being passed
% to |\Integer| might be an integer, he/she should call the macro with a
% further point;
% if the argument is truly integer this point works as the delimiter of the
% integer part; if the argument being passed is fractional this extra point
% gets discarded as well as the fractional part of the number.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\Integer#1.#2??{#1}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% \subsection{The new division macro}
% Now comes one of the most important macros in the whole package: the division
% macro; it takes two lengths as input values and computes their fractional
% ratio into a control sequence.
% It must take care of the signs, so that it examines the operand signs and
% determines the result sign separately conserving this computed sign in the
% macro |\segno|; this done, we are sure that both operands are or are
% made positive; should the
% numerator be zero it directly issues the zero quotient; should the
% denominator be zero it outputs ``infinity'' (|\maxdimen| in points), that is
% the maximum allowable length measured in points that \TeX\ can deal with.
% Since the result is assigned a value, the calling statement must pass as the
% third argument either a control sequence or an active character. Of course the
% first operand is the dividend, the second the divisor and the third the
% quotient.
%
% Since |curve2e| is supposed to be an extension of |pic2e| and this macro package
% already contains a division maro, we do not define any other division macro;
% nevetheless, since the macro in |pic2e| may not be so efficient as it might be
% if the |e-tex| extensions of the interpreter program were available, here we
% check and eventually provide a more efficient macro. The latter exploits the
% scaling mechanism embedded in |pdftex| since 2007, if the extended mode is
% enabled, that is used to scale a dimension by a fraction: $L\times N/D$, where
% $L$ is a dimension, and $N$ and $D$ are the numerator an denominator of the
% scaling factor; these might be integers, but it's better they represent the
% numbers of scaled points another two dimensions correspond to, in the philosophy
% that floating point numbers are represented by the measures of lengths in points.
%
% Therefore first we test if the macro is already defined:
% \begin{macrocode}
\ifx\DividE\undefined
% \end{macrocode}
%then we test if the extended mode exists and/or is enabled:
% \begin{macrocode}
\ifx\dimexpr\undefined\else
% \end{macrocode}
% Notice that |\dimexpr| is the specific extended mode control sequence we are going
% to use in order to perform our task; if the interpeter program is too old and/or
% it is a recent version, but it was compiled without activating the extended mode,
% the macro |\dimexpr| is undefined.
%
% The macro, creates a group where the names of two counters and a
% dimensional register are defined; the numbers of these integer and dimension
% registers are expressly above the value 255, because one of the extensions is
% the possibility of using a virtually unlimited number of registers; moreover
% even if these registers were used within other macros, their use within a group
% does not damage the other macros; we just have to use a dirty trick to throw
% the result beyond the end-group command.
%
% The efficiency of this macro is contained in the extended command |\dimexpr|; both
% the |\@DimA| and |\Num| registers are program words of 32\,bits; the result is
% stored into an internal register of 64\,bits; the final division by a factor
% stored into a register of 32 bits, so that in terms of scaled points a division by
% 1\,pt = $1\times 2^{16}$, scales down the result by 16 bits, and if the total
% length of the result is smaller than $2^{30}$, the result can be correctly
% assigned to a dimension register. In any other case the extended features imply
% suitable error messages end the termination of the program. During the division a
% scaling down by 16 bits, the result is not simply truncated, but it is rounded to
% the nearest integer (in scaled points)
%
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\DividE#1by#2to#3{%
\begingroup
\countdef\Num2254\relax \countdef\Den2252\relax
\dimendef\@DimA 2254
\Num=\p@ \@DimA=#2\relax \Den=\@DimA
\ifnum\Den=\z@
\edef\x{\noexpand\endgroup\noexpand\def\noexpand#3{\strip@pt\maxdimen}}%
\else
\@DimA=#1\relax
\@DimA=\dimexpr\@DimA*\Num/\Den\relax
\edef\x{\noexpand\endgroup\noexpand\def\noexpand#3{\strip@pt\@DimA}}%
\fi
\x}
% \end{macrocode}
% \begin{macrocode}
\fi\fi
% \end{macrocode}
%
% The next two macros are one of the myriad variants of the dirty trick used by
% Knuth for separating a measure from its units that \textit{must} be points,
% ``\texttt{pt}''. One has to call |\Numero| with a control sequence and a
% dimension; the dimension value in points is assigned to the control sequence.
% \begin{macrocode}
\ifx\undefined\@Numero%
{\let\cc\catcode \cc`p=12\cc`t=12\gdef\@Numero#1pt{#1}}%
\fi
\ifx\undefined\Numero
\def\Numero#1#2{\dimen254#2\relax
\edef#1{\expandafter\@Numero\the\dimen254}\ignorespaces}%
\fi
% \end{macrocode}
% For both macros the |\ifx|\dots|\fi| constructs avoid messing up the
% definitions I have in several packages.
%
% \subsection{Trigonometric functions}
% We now start with trigonometric functions. We define the macros |\SinOf|,
% |\CosOf| and |\TanOf| (we might define also |\CotOf|, but the cotangent does
% not appear so essential) by means of the parametric formulas that require the
% knowledge of the tangent of the half angle. We want to specify the angles
% in sexagesimal degrees, not in radians, so we can make accurate reductions to
% the main quadrants. We use the formulas
% \begin{eqnarray*}
% \sin\theta &=& \frac{2}{\cot x + \tan x}\\
% \cos\theta &=& \frac{\cot x - \tan x}{\cot x + \tan x}\\
% \tan\theta &=& \frac{2}{\cot x - \tan x}\\
% \noalign{\hbox{where}}
% x &=& \theta/114.591559
% \end{eqnarray*}
% is the half angle in degrees converted to radians.
%
% We use this slightly modified set of parametric formulas because the cotangent
% of $x$ is a by product of the computation of the tangent of $x$; in this way
% we avoid computing the squares of numbers that might lead to overflows. For
% the same reason we avoid computing the value of the trigonometric functions
% in proximity of the value zero (and the other values that might involve high
% tangent or cotangent values) and in that case we prefer to approximate the
% small angle function value with its first or second order truncation of the
% McLaurin series; in facts for angles whose magnitude is smaller than $1^\circ$
% the magnitude of the independent variable $y=2x$ (the angle in degrees
% converted to radians) is so small (less than 0.017) that the sine and tangent
% can be freely approximated with $y$ itself (the error being smaller than
% approximately $10^{-6}$), while the cosine can be freely approximated with
% the formula $1-0.5y^2$ (the error being smaller than about $4\cdot10^{-9}$).
%
% We keep using grouping so that internal variables are local to these groups
% and do not mess up other things.
%
% The first macro is the service routine that computes the tangent and the
% cotangent of the half angle in radians; since we have to use always the
% reciprocal of this value, we call it |\X@| but in spite of the similarity it
% is the reciprocal of $x$. Notice that parameter \texttt{\#1} must be a length.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\g@tTanCotanFrom#1to#2and#3{%
\DividE 114.591559\p@ by#1to\X@ \@tdB=\X@\p@
% \end{macrocode}
% Computations are done with the help of counter |\I|, of the length |\@tdB|,
% and the auxiliary control sequences |\Tan| and |\Cot| whose meaning is
% transparent. The iterative process controlled by |\@whilenum| implements the
% (truncated) continued fraction expansion of the tangent function
% \[
% \tan x = \frac{1}{\displaystyle \frac{1\mathstrut}{\displaystyle x}
% -\frac{1}{\displaystyle \frac{3\mathstrut}{\displaystyle x}
% -\frac{1}{\displaystyle \frac{5\mathstrut}{\displaystyle x}
% -\frac{1}{\displaystyle \frac{7\mathstrut}{\displaystyle x}
% -\frac{1}{\displaystyle \frac{9\mathstrut}{\displaystyle x}
% -\frac{1}{\displaystyle \frac{11\mathstrut}{\displaystyle x}
% -\cdots}}}}}}
% \]
% \begin{macrocode}
\countdef\I=254\def\Tan{0}\I=11\relax
\@whilenum\I>\z@\do{%
\@tdC=\Tan\p@ \@tdD=\I\@tdB
\advance\@tdD-\@tdC \DividE\p@ by\@tdD to\Tan
\advance\I-2\relax}%
\def#2{\Tan}\DividE\p@ by\Tan\p@ to\Cot \def#3{\Cot}%
\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% Now that we have the macro for computing the tangent and cotangent of the
% half angle, we can compute the real trigonometric functions we are interested
% in. The sine value is computed after reducing the sine argument to the
% interval $0^\circ< \theta<180^\circ$; actually special values such as
% $0^\circ$, $90^\circ$, $180^\circ$, et cetera, are taken care separately, so
% that CPU time is saved for these special cases. The sine sign is taken care
% separately according to the quadrant of the sine argument.
%
% Since all computations are done within a group, a trick is necessary in order to
% extract the sine value from the group; this is done by defining within the group
% a macro (in this case |\endSinOf|) with the expanded definition of the result,
% but in charge of of closing the group, so that when the group is closed the
% auxiliary function is not defined any more, although its expansion keeps getting
% executed so that the expanded result is thrown beyond the group end.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\SinOf#1to#2{\begingroup%
\@tdA=#1\p@%
\ifdim\@tdA>\z@%
\@whiledim\@tdA>180\p@\do{\advance\@tdA -360\p@}%
\else%
\@whiledim\@tdA<-180\p@\do{\advance\@tdA 360\p@}%
\fi \ifdim\@tdA=\z@
\def\@tempA{0}%
\else
\ifdim\@tdA>\z@
\def\Segno{+}%
\else
\def\Segno{-}%
\@tdA=-\@tdA
\fi
\ifdim\@tdA>90\p@
\@tdA=-\@tdA \advance\@tdA 180\p@
\fi
\ifdim\@tdA=90\p@
\def\@tempA{\Segno1}%
\else
\ifdim\@tdA=180\p@
\def\@tempA{0}%
\else
\ifdim\@tdA<\p@
\@tdA=\Segno0.0174533\@tdA
\DividE\@tdA by\p@ to \@tempA%
\else
\g@tTanCotanFrom\@tdA to\T and\Tp
\@tdA=\T\p@ \advance\@tdA \Tp\p@
\DividE \Segno2\p@ by\@tdA to \@tempA%
\fi
\fi
\fi
\fi
\edef\endSinOf{\noexpand\endgroup
\noexpand\def\noexpand#2{\@tempA}\noexpand\ignorespaces}%
\endSinOf}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% For the computation of the cosine we behave in a similar way using also the identical
% trick for throwing the result beyond the group end.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\CosOf#1to#2{\begingroup%
\@tdA=#1\p@%
\ifdim\@tdA>\z@%
\@whiledim\@tdA>360\p@\do{\advance\@tdA -360\p@}%
\else%
\@whiledim\@tdA<\z@\do{\advance\@tdA 360\p@}%
\fi
%
\ifdim\@tdA>180\p@
\@tdA=-\@tdA \advance\@tdA 360\p@
\fi
%
\ifdim\@tdA<90\p@
\def\Segno{+}%
\else
\def\Segno{-}%
\@tdA=-\@tdA \advance\@tdA 180\p@
\fi
\ifdim\@tdA=\z@
\def\@tempA{\Segno1}%
\else
\ifdim\@tdA<\p@
\@tdA=0.0174533\@tdA \Numero\@tempA\@tdA
\@tdA=\@tempA\@tdA \@tdA=-.5\@tdA
\advance\@tdA \p@
\DividE\@tdA by\p@ to\@tempA%
\else
\ifdim\@tdA=90\p@
\def\@tempA{0}%
\else
\g@tTanCotanFrom\@tdA to\T and\Tp
\@tdA=\Tp\p@ \advance\@tdA-\T\p@
\@tdB=\Tp\p@ \advance\@tdB\T\p@
\DividE\Segno\@tdA by\@tdB to\@tempA%
\fi
\fi
\fi
\edef\endCosOf{\noexpand\endgroup
\noexpand\def\noexpand#2{\@tempA}\noexpand\ignorespaces}%
\endCosOf}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% For the tangent computation we behave in a similar way, except that we
% consider the fundamental interval as $0^\circ<\theta<90^\circ$; for the odd
% multiples of $90^\circ$ we assign the result a \TeX\ infinity value, that is
% the maximum a dimension can be.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\TanOf#1to#2{\begingroup%
\@tdA=#1\p@%
\ifdim\@tdA>90\p@%
\@whiledim\@tdA>90\p@\do{\advance\@tdA -180\p@}%
\else%
\@whiledim\@tdA<-90\p@\do{\advance\@tdA 180\p@}%
\fi%
\ifdim\@tdA=\z@%
\def\@tempA{0}%
\else
\ifdim\@tdA>\z@
\def\Segno{+}%
\else
\def\Segno{-}%
\@tdA=-\@tdA
\fi
\ifdim\@tdA=90\p@
\def\@tempA{\Segno16383.99999}%
\else
\ifdim\@tdA<\p@
\@tdA=\Segno0.0174533\@tdA
\DividE\@tdA by\p@ to\@tempA%
\else
\g@tTanCotanFrom\@tdA to\T and\Tp
\@tdA\Tp\p@ \advance\@tdA -\T\p@
\DividE\Segno2\p@ by\@tdA to\@tempA%
\fi
\fi
\fi
\edef\endTanOf{\noexpand\endgroup
\noexpand\def\noexpand#2{\@tempA}\noexpand\ignorespaces}%
\endTanOf}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% \subsection{Arcs and curves preliminary information}
% We would like to define now a macro for drawing circular arcs of any radius
% and any angular aperture; the macro should require the arc center, the
% arc starting point and the angular aperture. The arc has its reference point in
% its center, therefore it does not need to be put in place by the command |\put|;
% nevertheless if |\put| is used, it may displace the arc into another position.
% The command should have the following syntax:
% \begin{flushleft}\ttfamily
% \cs{Arc}(\meta{{\rmfamily center}})(\meta{{\rmfamily starting
% point}}){\marg{{\rmfamily angle}}}
% \end{flushleft}
% which is totally equivalent to:
% \begin{flushleft}\ttfamily
% \string\put(\meta{\rmfamily center})\string{\string\Arc(0,0)(\meta{\rmfamily starting
% point})\marg{\rmfamily angle}\string}
% \end{flushleft}
% If the \meta{angle} is positive the arc runs counterclockwise from the
% starting point; clockwise if it's negative.
%
% It's necessary to determine the end point and the control points of the
% Bézier spline(s) that make up the circular arc.
%
% The end point is obtained from the rotation of the starting point around the
% center; but the \texttt{pict2e} command |\pIIe@rotate| is such that the
% pivoting point appears to be non relocatable.
% It is therefore necessary to resort to low level \TeX\ commands and the
% defined trigonometric functions and a set of macros that operate on complex
% numbers used as vector scale-rotate operators.
%
% \subsection{Complex number macros}
% We need therefore macros for summing, subtracting, multiplying, dividing
% complex numbers, for determining they directions (unit vectors); a unit vector
% is the complex number divided by its magnitude so that the result is the
% Cartesian form of the Euler's formula
% \[
% \mathrm{e}^{\mathrm{j}\phi} = \cos\phi+\mathrm{j}\sin\phi
% \]
%
% The magnitude of a vector is determined by taking a clever square root of a
% function of the real and the imaginary parts; see further on.
%
% It's better to represent each complex number with one control sequence; this
% implies frequent assembling and disassembling the pair of real numbers that
% make up a complex number. These real components are assembled into the
% defining control sequence as a couple of coordinates, i.e.\ two comma
% separated integer or fractional signed decimal numbers.
%
% For assembling two real numbers into a complex number we use the following
% elementary macro:
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\MakeVectorFrom#1#2to#3{\edef#3{#1,#2}\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
% Another elementary macro copies a complex number into another one:
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\CopyVect#1to#2{\edef#2{#1}\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
% The magnitude is determined with the macro |\ModOfVect| with delimited
% arguments; as usual it is assumed that the results are retrieved by means of
% control sequences, not used directly.
%
% The magnitude $M$ is determined by taking the moduli of the real and
% imaginary parts, changing their signs if necessary; the larger component is
% then taken as the reference one so that, if $a$ is larger than $b$, the
% square root of the sum of their squares is computed as such:
% \[
% M = \sqrt{a^2+b^2} = \vert a\vert\sqrt{1+(b/a)^2}
% \]
% In this way the radicand never exceeds 2 and it is quite easy to get its
% square root by means of the Newton iterative process; due to the quadratic
% convergence, five iterations are more than sufficient. When one of the
% components is zero, the Newton iterative process is skipped. The overall
% macro is the following:
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\ModOfVect#1to#2{\GetCoord(#1)\t@X\t@Y
\@tempdima=\t@X\p@ \ifdim\@tempdima<\z@ \@tempdima=-\@tempdima\fi
\@tempdimb=\t@Y\p@ \ifdim\@tempdimb<\z@ \@tempdimb=-\@tempdimb\fi
\ifdim\@tempdima>\@tempdimb
\DividE\@tempdimb by\@tempdima to\@T
\@tempdimc=\@tempdima
\else
\DividE\@tempdima by\@tempdimb to\@T
\@tempdimc=\@tempdimb
\fi
\ifdim\@T\p@=\z@
\else
\@tempdima=\@T\p@ \@tempdima=\@T\@tempdima
\advance\@tempdima\p@%
\@tempdimb=\p@%
\@tempcnta=5\relax
\@whilenum\@tempcnta>\z@\do{\DividE\@tempdima by\@tempdimb to\@T
\advance\@tempdimb \@T\p@ \@tempdimb=.5\@tempdimb
\advance\@tempcnta\m@ne}%
\@tempdimc=\@T\@tempdimc
\fi
\Numero#2\@tempdimc
\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
% As a byproduct of the computation the control sequence |\@tempdimc| contains
% the vector or complex number magnitude multiplied by the length of one point.
%
% Since the macro for determining the magnitude of a vector is available, we
% can now normalize the vector to its magnitude, therefore getting the Cartesian
% form of the direction vector. If by any chance the direction of the null
% vector is requested, the output is again the null vector, without
% normalization.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\DirOfVect#1to#2{\GetCoord(#1)\t@X\t@Y
\ModOfVect#1to\@tempa
\ifdim\@tempdimc=\z@\else
\DividE\t@X\p@ by\@tempdimc to\t@X
\DividE\t@Y\p@ by\@tempdimc to\t@Y
\fi
\MakeVectorFrom\t@X\t@Y to#2\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% A cumulative macro uses the above ones for determining with one call both the
% magnitude and the direction of a complex number. The first argument is the
% input complex number, the second its magnitude, and the third is again a
% complex number normalized to unit magnitude (unless the input was the null
% complex number); remember always that output quantities must be specified
% with control sequences to be used at a later time.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\ModAndDirOfVect#1to#2and#3{%
\GetCoord(#1)\t@X\t@Y
\ModOfVect#1to#2%
\ifdim\@tempdimc=\z@\else
\DividE\t@X\p@ by\@tempdimc to\t@X
\DividE\t@Y\p@ by\@tempdimc to\t@Y
\fi
\MakeVectorFrom\t@X\t@Y to#3\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
% The next macro computes the magnitude and the direction of the difference of
% two complex numbers; the first input argument is the minuend, the second is
% the subtrahend; the output quantities are the third argument containing the
% magnitude of the difference and the fourth is the direction of the difference.
% The service macro |\SubVect| executes the difference of two complex numbers
% and is described further on.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\DistanceAndDirOfVect#1minus#2to#3and#4{%
\SubVect#2from#1to\@tempa
\ModAndDirOfVect\@tempa to#3and#4\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
% We now have two macros intended to fetch just the real or, respectively, the
% imaginary part of the input complex number.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\XpartOfVect#1to#2{%
\GetCoord(#1)#2\@tempa\ignorespaces}%
%
\def\YpartOfVect#1to#2{%
\GetCoord(#1)\@tempa#2\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
% With the next macro we create a direction vector (second argument) from a
% given angle (first argument).
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\DirFromAngle#1to#2{%
\CosOf#1to\t@X
\SinOf#1to\t@Y
\MakeVectorFrom\t@X\t@Y to#2\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% Sometimes it is necessary to scale a vector by an arbitrary real factor; this
% implies scaling both the real and imaginary part of the input given vector.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\ScaleVect#1by#2to#3{\GetCoord(#1)\t@X\t@Y
\@tempdima=\t@X\p@ \@tempdima=#2\@tempdima\Numero\t@X\@tempdima
\@tempdima=\t@Y\p@ \@tempdima=#2\@tempdima\Numero\t@Y\@tempdima
\MakeVectorFrom\t@X\t@Y to#3\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
% Again, sometimes it is necessary to reverse the direction of rotation; this
% implies changing the sign of the imaginary part of a given complex number;
% this operation produces the complex conjugate of the given number.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\ConjVect#1to#2{\GetCoord(#1)\t@X\t@Y
\@tempdima=-\t@Y\p@\Numero\t@Y\@tempdima
\MakeVectorFrom\t@X\t@Y to#2\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% With all the low level elementary operations we can now proceed to the
% definitions of the binary operations on complex numbers. We start with the
% addition:
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\AddVect#1and#2to#3{\GetCoord(#1)\tu@X\tu@Y
\GetCoord(#2)\td@X\td@Y
\@tempdima\tu@X\p@\advance\@tempdima\td@X\p@ \Numero\t@X\@tempdima
\@tempdima\tu@Y\p@\advance\@tempdima\td@Y\p@ \Numero\t@Y\@tempdima
\MakeVectorFrom\t@X\t@Y to#3\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
% Then the subtraction:
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\SubVect#1from#2to#3{\GetCoord(#1)\tu@X\tu@Y
\GetCoord(#2)\td@X\td@Y
\@tempdima\td@X\p@\advance\@tempdima-\tu@X\p@ \Numero\t@X\@tempdima
\@tempdima\td@Y\p@\advance\@tempdima-\tu@Y\p@ \Numero\t@Y\@tempdima
\MakeVectorFrom\t@X\t@Y to#3\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% For the multiplication we need to split the operation according to the fact
% that we want to multiply by the second operand or by the complex conjugate of
% the second operand; it would be nice if we could use the usual
% postfixed asterisk notation for the complex conjugate, but I could not find
% a simple means for doing so; therefore I use the prefixed notation, that is
% I put the asterisk before the second operand. The first part of the
% multiplication macro just takes care of the multiplicand and then checks for
% the asterisk; if there is no asterisk it calls a second service macro that
% performs a regular complex multiplication, otherwise it calls a third
% service macro that executes the conjugate multiplication.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\MultVect#1by{\@ifstar{\@ConjMultVect#1by}{\@MultVect#1by}}%
%
\def\@MultVect#1by#2to#3{\GetCoord(#1)\tu@X\tu@Y
\GetCoord(#2)\td@X\td@Y
\@tempdima\tu@X\p@ \@tempdimb\tu@Y\p@
\@tempdimc=\td@X\@tempdima\advance\@tempdimc-\td@Y\@tempdimb
\Numero\t@X\@tempdimc
\@tempdimc=\td@Y\@tempdima\advance\@tempdimc\td@X\@tempdimb
\Numero\t@Y\@tempdimc
\MakeVectorFrom\t@X\t@Y to#3\ignorespaces}%
%
\def\@ConjMultVect#1by#2to#3{\GetCoord(#1)\tu@X\tu@Y
\GetCoord(#2)\td@X\td@Y \@tempdima\tu@X\p@ \@tempdimb\tu@Y\p@
\@tempdimc=\td@X\@tempdima\advance\@tempdimc+\td@Y\@tempdimb
\Numero\t@X\@tempdimc
\@tempdimc=\td@X\@tempdimb\advance\@tempdimc-\td@Y\@tempdima
\Numero\t@Y\@tempdimc
\MakeVectorFrom\t@X\t@Y to#3\ignorespaces}
% \end{macrocode}
%
% The division of two complex numbers implies scaling down the dividend by the
% magnitude of the divisor and by rotating the dividend scaled vector by the
% opposite direction of the divisor; therefore:
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\DivVect#1by#2to#3{\ModAndDirOfVect#2to\@Mod and\@Dir
\DividE\p@ by\@Mod\p@ to\@Mod \ConjVect\@Dir to\@Dir
\ScaleVect#1by\@Mod to\@tempa
\MultVect\@tempa by\@Dir to#3\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% \subsection{Arcs and curved vectors}
% We are now in the position of really doing graphic work.
% \subsubsection{Arcs}
% We start with tracing
% a circular arc of arbitrary center, arbitrary starting point and arbitrary
% aperture; the first macro checks the aperture; if this is not zero it
% actually proceeds with the necessary computations, otherwise it does
% nothing.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\Arc(#1)(#2)#3{\begingroup
\@tdA=#3\p@
\ifdim\@tdA=\z@\else
\@Arc(#1)(#2)%
\fi
\endgroup\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
% The aperture is already memorized in |\@tdA|; the |\@Arc| macro receives
% the center coordinates in the first argument and the coordinates of the
% starting point in the second argument.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\@Arc(#1)(#2){%
\ifdim\@tdA>\z@
\let\Segno+%
\else
\@tdA=-\@tdA \let\Segno-%
\fi
% \end{macrocode}
% The rotation angle sign is memorized in |\Segno| and |\@tdA| now contains the
% absolute value of the arc aperture.
% If the rotation angle is larger than $360^\circ$ a message is issued that
% informs the user that the angle will be reduced modulo $360^\circ$; this
% operation is performed by successive subtractions rather than with modular
% arithmetics on the assumption that in general one subtraction suffices.
% \begin{macrocode}
\Numero\@gradi\@tdA
\ifdim\@tdA>360\p@
\PackageWarning{curve2e}{The arc aperture is \@gradi\space degrees
and gets reduced\MessageBreak%
to the range 0--360 taking the sign into consideration}%
\@whiledim\@tdA>360\p@\do{\advance\@tdA-360\p@}%
\fi
% \end{macrocode}
% Now the radius is determined and the drawing point is moved to the stating
% point.
% \begin{macrocode}
\SubVect#2from#1to\@V \ModOfVect\@V to\@Raggio \CopyVect#2to\@pPun
\CopyVect#1to\@Cent \GetCoord(\@pPun)\@pPunX\@pPunY
% \end{macrocode}
% From now on it's better to define a new macro that will be used also in the
% subsequent macros that trace arcs; here we already have the starting point
% coordinates and the angle to draw the arc, therefore we just call the new
% macro, stroke the line and exit.
% \begin{macrocode}
\@@Arc
\pIIe@strokeGraph\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
% And the new macro |\@@Arc| starts with moving the drawing point to the first
% point and does everything needed for tracing the requested arc, except
% stroking it; I leave the \texttt{stroke} command to the completion of the
% calling macro and nobody forbids to use the |\@@Arc| macro for other purposes.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\@@Arc{%
\pIIe@moveto{\@pPunX\unitlength}{\@pPunY\unitlength}%
% \end{macrocode}
% If the aperture is larger than $180^\circ$ it traces a semicircle in the
% right direction and correspondingly reduces the overall aperture.
% \begin{macrocode}
\ifdim\@tdA>180\p@
\advance\@tdA-180\p@
\Numero\@gradi\@tdA
\SubVect\@pPun from\@Cent to\@V
\AddVect\@V and\@Cent to\@sPun
\MultVect\@V by0,-1.3333333to\@V \if\Segno-\ScaleVect\@V by-1to\@V\fi
\AddVect\@pPun and\@V to\@pcPun
\AddVect\@sPun and\@V to\@scPun
\GetCoord(\@pcPun)\@pcPunX\@pcPunY
\GetCoord(\@scPun)\@scPunX\@scPunY
\GetCoord(\@sPun)\@sPunX\@sPunY
\pIIe@curveto{\@pcPunX\unitlength}{\@pcPunY\unitlength}%
{\@scPunX\unitlength}{\@scPunY\unitlength}%
{\@sPunX\unitlength}{\@sPunY\unitlength}%
\CopyVect\@sPun to\@pPun
\fi
% \end{macrocode}
% If the remaining aperture is not zero it continues tracing the rest of the arc.
% Here we need the extrema of the arc and the coordinates of the control points
% of the Bézier cubic spline that traces the arc. The control points lay on the
% perpendicular to the vectors that join the arc center to the starting
% and end points respectively. Their distance $K$ from the adjacent nodes is
% determined with the formula
% \[
% K= \frac{4}{3}\,\frac{1-\cos\theta}{\sin\theta}R
% \]
% where $\theta$ is half the arc aperture and $R$ is its radius.
% \begin{macrocode}
\ifdim\@tdA>\z@
\DirFromAngle\@gradi to\@Dir \if\Segno-\ConjVect\@Dir to\@Dir \fi
\SubVect\@Cent from\@pPun to\@V
\MultVect\@V by\@Dir to\@V
\AddVect\@Cent and\@V to\@sPun
\@tdA=.5\@tdA \Numero\@gradi\@tdA
\DirFromAngle\@gradi to\@Phimezzi
\GetCoord(\@Phimezzi)\@cosphimezzi\@sinphimezzi
\@tdB=1.3333333\p@ \@tdB=\@Raggio\@tdB
\@tdC=\p@ \advance\@tdC -\@cosphimezzi\p@ \Numero\@tempa\@tdC
\@tdB=\@tempa\@tdB
\DividE\@tdB by\@sinphimezzi\p@ to\@cZ
\ScaleVect\@Phimezzi by\@cZ to\@Phimezzi
\ConjVect\@Phimezzi to\@mPhimezzi
\if\Segno-%
\let\@tempa\@Phimezzi
\let\@Phimezzi\@mPhimezzi
\let\@mPhimezzi\@tempa
\fi
\SubVect\@sPun from\@pPun to\@V
\DirOfVect\@V to\@V
\MultVect\@Phimezzi by\@V to\@Phimezzi
\AddVect\@sPun and\@Phimezzi to\@scPun
\ScaleVect\@V by-1to\@V
\MultVect\@mPhimezzi by\@V to\@mPhimezzi
\AddVect\@pPun and\@mPhimezzi to\@pcPun
\GetCoord(\@pcPun)\@pcPunX\@pcPunY
\GetCoord(\@scPun)\@scPunX\@scPunY
\GetCoord(\@sPun)\@sPunX\@sPunY
\pIIe@curveto{\@pcPunX\unitlength}{\@pcPunY\unitlength}%
{\@scPunX\unitlength}{\@scPunY\unitlength}%
{\@sPunX\unitlength}{\@sPunY\unitlength}%
\fi}
% \end{macrocode}
%
% \subsubsection{Arc vectors}
% We exploit much of the above definitions for the |\Arc| macro for drawing
% circular arcs with an arrow at one or both ends; the first macro
% |\VerctorArc| draws an arrow at the ending point of the arc; the second macro
% |\VectorARC| draws arrows at both ends; the arrows have the same shape as
% those for vectors; actually they are drawn by putting a vector of zero
% length at the proper arc end(s), therefore they are styled as traditional \LaTeX\
% or PostScript arrows according to the option of the \texttt{pict2e} package.
%
% But the specific drawing done here shortens the arc so as not to overlap on
% the arrow(s); the only arrow (or both ones) are also lightly tilted in order to
% avoid the impression of a corner where the arc enters the arrow tip.
%
% All these operations require a lot of ``playing'' with vector directions,
% but even if the operations are numerous, they do not do anything else but:
% (a) determining the end point and its direction; (b) determining the arrow
% length as an angular quantity, i.e. the arc amplitude that must be subtracted
% from the total arc to be drawn; (c) the direction of the arrow should be
% corresponding to the tangent to the arc at the point where the arrow tip is
% attached;(d) tilting the arrow tip by half its angular amplitude; (e)
% determining the resulting position and direction of the arrow tip so as to
% draw a zero length vector; (f) possibly repeating the same procedure for the
% other end of the arc; (g) shortening the total arc angular amplitude by the
% amount of the arrow tip(s) already set, and (h) then drawing the final circular
% arc that joins the starting point to the final arrow or one arrow to the other
% one.
%
% The calling macros are very similar to the |\Arc| macro initial one:
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\VectorArc(#1)(#2)#3{\begingroup
\@tdA=#3\p@ \ifdim\@tdA=\z@\else
\@VArc(#1)(#2)%
\fi
\endgroup\ignorespaces}%
%
\def\VectorARC(#1)(#2)#3{\begingroup
\@tdA=#3\p@
\ifdim\@tdA=\z@\else
\@VARC(#1)(#2)%
\fi
\endgroup\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% The single arrowed arc is defined with the following long macro where all the
% described operations are performed more or less in the described succession;
% probably the macro requires a little cleaning, but since it works fine I did
% not try to optimize it for time or number of tokens. The final part of the
% macro is almost identical to that of the plain arc; the beginning also is
% quite similar. The central part is dedicated to the positioning of the arrow
% tip and to the necessary calculations for determining the tip tilt and the
% reduction of the total arc length; pay attention that the arrow length, stored in
% |\@tdE| is a real length, while the radius stored in |\@Raggio| is just a multiple
% of the |\unitlength|, so that the division (that yields a good angular
% approximation to the arrow length as seen from the center of the arc) must be done
% with real lengths. The already defined |\@@Arc| macro actually draws the curved
% vector stem without stroking it.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\@VArc(#1)(#2){%
\ifdim\@tdA>\z@
\let\Segno+%
\else
\@tdA=-\@tdA \let\Segno-%
\fi \Numero\@gradi\@tdA
\ifdim\@tdA>360\p@
\PackageWarning{curve2e}{The arc aperture is \@gradi\space degrees
and gets reduced\MessageBreak%
to the range 0--360 taking the sign into consideration}%
\@whiledim\@tdA>360\p@\do{\advance\@tdA-360\p@}%
\fi
\SubVect#1from#2to\@V \ModOfVect\@V to\@Raggio \CopyVect#2to\@pPun
\@tdE=\pIIe@FAW\@wholewidth \@tdE=\pIIe@FAL\@tdE
\DividE\@tdE by \@Raggio\unitlength to\DeltaGradi
\@tdD=\DeltaGradi\p@
\@tdD=57.29578\@tdD \Numero\DeltaGradi\@tdD
\@tdD=\ifx\Segno--\fi\@gradi\p@ \Numero\@tempa\@tdD
\DirFromAngle\@tempa to\@Dir
\MultVect\@V by\@Dir to\@sPun
\edef\@tempA{\ifx\Segno-\m@ne\else\@ne\fi}%
\MultVect\@sPun by 0,\@tempA to\@vPun
\DirOfVect\@vPun to\@Dir
\AddVect\@sPun and #1 to \@sPun
\GetCoord(\@sPun)\@tdX\@tdY
\@tdD\ifx\Segno--\fi\DeltaGradi\p@
\@tdD=.5\@tdD \Numero\DeltaGradi\@tdD
\DirFromAngle\DeltaGradi to\@Dird
\MultVect\@Dir by*\@Dird to\@Dir
\GetCoord(\@Dir)\@xnum\@ynum
\put(\@tdX,\@tdY){\vector(\@xnum,\@ynum){0}}%
\@tdE =\ifx\Segno--\fi\DeltaGradi\p@
\advance\@tdA -\@tdE \Numero\@gradi\@tdA
\CopyVect#1to\@Cent \GetCoord(\@pPun)\@pPunX\@pPunY
\@@Arc
\pIIe@strokeGraph\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% The macro for the arc terminated with arrow tips at both ends is again very
% similar, except it is necessary to repeat the arrow tip positioning also at
% the starting point. The |\@@Arc| macro draws the curved stem.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\@VARC(#1)(#2){%
\ifdim\@tdA>\z@
\let\Segno+%
\else
\@tdA=-\@tdA \let\Segno-%
\fi \Numero\@gradi\@tdA
\ifdim\@tdA>360\p@
\PackageWarning{curve2e}{The arc aperture is \@gradi\space degrees
and gets reduced\MessageBreak%
to the range 0--360 taking the sign into consideration}%
\@whiledim\@tdA>360\p@\do{\advance\@tdA-360\p@}%
\fi
\SubVect#1from#2to\@V \ModOfVect\@V to\@Raggio \CopyVect#2to\@pPun
\@tdE=\pIIe@FAW\@wholewidth \@tdE=0.8\@tdE
\DividE\@tdE by \@Raggio\unitlength to\DeltaGradi
\@tdD=\DeltaGradi\p@ \@tdD=57.29578\@tdD \Numero\DeltaGradi\@tdD
\@tdD=\ifx\Segno--\fi\@gradi\p@ \Numero\@tempa\@tdD
\DirFromAngle\@tempa to\@Dir
\MultVect\@V by\@Dir to\@sPun% corrects the end point
\edef\@tempA{\ifx\Segno-\m@ne\else\@ne\fi}%
\MultVect\@sPun by 0,\@tempA to\@vPun
\DirOfVect\@vPun to\@Dir
\AddVect\@sPun and #1 to \@sPun
\GetCoord(\@sPun)\@tdX\@tdY
\@tdD\ifx\Segno--\fi\DeltaGradi\p@
\@tdD=.5\@tdD \Numero\@tempB\@tdD
\DirFromAngle\@tempB to\@Dird
\MultVect\@Dir by*\@Dird to\@Dir
\GetCoord(\@Dir)\@xnum\@ynum
\put(\@tdX,\@tdY){\vector(\@xnum,\@ynum){0}}% arrow tip at the end point
\@tdE =\DeltaGradi\p@
\advance\@tdA -2\@tdE \Numero\@gradi\@tdA
\CopyVect#1to\@Cent \GetCoord(\@pPun)\@pPunX\@pPunY
\SubVect\@Cent from\@pPun to \@V
\edef\@tempa{\ifx\Segno-\else-\fi\@ne}%
\MultVect\@V by0,\@tempa to\@vPun
\@tdE\ifx\Segno--\fi\DeltaGradi\p@
\Numero\@tempB{0.5\@tdE}%
\DirFromAngle\@tempB to\@Dird
\MultVect\@vPun by\@Dird to\@vPun% corrects the starting point
\DirOfVect\@vPun to\@Dir\GetCoord(\@Dir)\@xnum\@ynum
\put(\@pPunX,\@pPunY){\vector(\@xnum,\@ynum){0}}% arrow tip at the starting point
\edef\@tempa{\ifx\Segno--\fi\DeltaGradi}%
\DirFromAngle\@tempa to \@Dir
\SubVect\@Cent from\@pPun to\@V
\MultVect\@V by\@Dir to\@V
\AddVect\@Cent and\@V to\@pPun
\GetCoord(\@pPun)\@pPunX\@pPunY
\@@Arc
\pIIe@strokeGraph\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% It must be understood that the curved vectors, the above circular arcs
% terminated with an arrow tip at one or both ends, have a nice appearance only
% if the arc radius is not too small, or, said in a different way, if the arrow
% tip angular width does not exceed a maximum of a dozen degrees (and this is
% probably already too much); the tip does not get curved as the arc is,
% therefore there is not a smooth transition from the curved stem and the
% straight arrow tip if this one is large in comparison to the arc radius.
%
% \subsection{General curves}
% Now we define a macro for tracing a general, not necessarily circular arc.
% This macro resorts to a general triplet of macros with which it is possible
% to draw almost anything. It traces a single Bézier spline from a first point
% where the tangent direction is specified to a second point where again it is
% specified the tangent direction. Actually this is a special (possibly useless)
% case where the general |\curve| macro could do the same or a better job. In
% any case\dots
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\CurveBetween#1and#2WithDirs#3and#4{%
\StartCurveAt#1WithDir{#3}\relax
\CurveTo#2WithDir{#4}\CurveFinish}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% Actually the above macro is a special case of concatenation of the triplet
% formed by macros |\StartCurve|, |\CurveTo| and|\CurveFinish|; the second of
% which can be repeated an arbitrary number of times.
%
% The first macro initializes the drawing and the third one strokes it; the
% real work is done by the second macro. The first macro initializes the
% drawing but also memorizes the starting direction; the second macro traces
% the current Bézier arc reaching the destination point with the specified
% direction, but memorizes this direction as the one with which to start the
% next arc. The overall curve is then always smooth because the various
% Bézier arcs join with continuous tangents. If a cusp is desired it is
% necessary to change the memorized direction at the end of the arc before the
% cusp and before the start of the next arc; this is better than stroking the
% curve before the cusp and then starting another curve, because the curve
% joining point at the cusp is not stroked with the same command, therefore we get
% two superimposed curve terminations. We therefore need another small macro
% |\ChangeDir| to perform this task.
%
% It is necessary to recall that the directions point to the control points,
% but they do not define the control points themselves; they are just
% directions, or, even better, they are simply vectors with the desired
% direction; the macros themselves provide to the normalization and
% memorization.
%
% The next desirable point would be to design a macro that accepts optional node
% directions and computes the missing ones according to a suitable strategy. I
% can think of many such strategies, but none seems to be generally applicable,
% in the sense that one strategy might give good results, say, with sinusoids
% and another one, say, with cardioids, but neither one is suitable for both
% cases.
%
% For the moment we refrain from automatic direction computation, but we design
% the general macro as if directions were optional.
%
% Here we begin with the first initializing macro that receives in the first
% argument the starting point and in the second argument the direction of the
% tangent (not necessarily normalized to a unit vector)
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\StartCurveAt#1WithDir#2{%
\begingroup
\GetCoord(#1)\@tempa\@tempb
\CopyVect\@tempa,\@tempb to\@Pzero
\pIIe@moveto{\@tempa\unitlength}{\@tempb\unitlength}%
\GetCoord(#2)\@tempa\@tempb
\CopyVect\@tempa,\@tempb to\@Dzero
\DirOfVect\@Dzero to\@Dzero}
% \end{macrocode}
% And this re-initializes the direction after a cusp
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\ChangeDir<#1>{%
\GetCoord(#1)\@tempa\@tempb
\CopyVect\@tempa,\@tempb to\@Dzero
\DirOfVect\@Dzero to\@Dzero
\ignorespaces}
% \end{macrocode}
%
% The next macro is the finishing one; it strokes the whole curve and closes the
% group that was opened with |\StartCurve|.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\CurveFinish{\pIIe@strokeGraph\endgroup\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% The ``real'' curve macro comes next; it is supposed to determine the control
% points for joining the previous point (initial node) with the specified
% direction to the next point with another specified direction (final node).
% Since the control points are along the specified directions, it is necessary
% to determine the distances from the adjacent curve nodes. This must work
% correctly even if nodes and directions imply an inflection point somewhere
% along the arc.
%
% The strategy I devised consists in determining each control point as if it
% were the control point of a circular arc, precisely an arc of an
% osculating circle, a circle tangent to the curve at that node. The ambiguity
% of the stated problem may be solved by establishing that the chord of the
% osculating circle has the same direction as the chord of the arc being drawn,
% and that the curve chord is divided into two parts each of which should be
% interpreted as half the chord of the osculating circle; this curve chord
% division is made proportionally to the projection of the tangent directions
% on the chord itself. Excluding degenerate cases that may be dealt with
% directly, imagine the triangle built with the chord and the two tangents;
% this triangle is straightforward if there is no inflection point; otherwise it
% is necessary to change one of the two directions by reflecting it about the
% chord. This is much simpler to view if a general rotation of the whole
% construction is made so as to bring the curve chord on the $x$ axis, because
% the reflection about the chord amounts to taking the complex conjugate of one
% of the directions. In facts with a concave curve the ``left'' direction
% vector arrow and the ``right'' direction vector tail lay in the same half
% plane, while with an inflected curve, they lay in opposite half plains, so
% that taking the complex conjugate of one of directions re-establishes the
% correct situation for the triangle we are looking for.
%
% This done the perpendicular from the triangle vertex to the cord divides the
% chord in two parts (the foot of this perpendicular may lay outside the chord,
% but this is no problem since we are looking for positive solutions, so that
% if we get negative numbers we just negate them); these two parts are taken as
% the half chords of the osculating circles, therefore there is no problem
% determining the distances $K_{\mathrm{left}}$ and $K_{\mathrm{right}}$ from
% the left and right
% nodes by using the same formula we used with circular arcs. Well\dots\ the
% same formula means that we have to determine the radius from the half chord
% and its inclination with the node tangent; all things we can do with the
% complex number algebra and macros we already have at our disposal. If we look
% carefully at this computation done for the circular arc we discover that in
% practice we used the half chord length instead of the radius; so the coding
% is actually the same, may be just with different variable names.
%
% We therefore start with getting the points and directions and calculating the
% chord and its direction
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\CurveTo#1WithDir#2{%
\def\@Puno{#1}\def\@Duno{#2}\DirOfVect\@Duno to\@Duno
\DistanceAndDirOfVect\@Puno minus\@Pzero to\@Chord and\@DirChord
% \end{macrocode}
% Then we rotate everything about the starting point so as to bring the chord on
% the real axis
% \begin{macrocode}
\MultVect\@Dzero by*\@DirChord to \@Dpzero
\MultVect\@Duno by*\@DirChord to \@Dpuno
\GetCoord(\@Dpzero)\@Xpzero\@Ypzero
\GetCoord(\@Dpuno)\@Xpuno\@Ypuno
% \end{macrocode}
% The chord needs not be actually rotated because it suffices its length
% along the real axis; the chord length is memorized in |\@Chord|.
%
% We now examine the various degenerate cases, when either tangent is
% perpendicular to the chord, or when it is parallel pointing inward or outward,
% with or without inflection.
%
% We start with the $90^\circ$ case for the ``left'' direction
% separating the cases when the other direction is or is not $90^\circ$~\dots
% \begin{macrocode}
\ifdim\@Xpzero\p@=\z@
\ifdim\@Xpuno\p@=\z@
\@tdA=0.666666\p@
\Numero\@Mcpzero{\@Chord\@tdA}%
\edef\@Mcpuno{\@Mcpzero}%
\else
\@tdA=0.666666\p@
\Numero\@Mcpzero{\@Chord\@tdA}%
\SetCPmodule\@Mcpuno from\@ne\@Chord\@Dpuno%
\fi
% \end{macrocode}
% \dots\ from when the ``left'' direction is not perpendicular to the chord; it
% might be parallel and we must distinguish the cases for the other direction~\dots
% \begin{macrocode}
\else
\ifdim\@Xpuno\p@=\z@
\@tdA=0.666666\p@
\Numero\@Mcpuno{\@Chord\@tdA}%
\SetCPmodule\@Mcpzero from\@ne\@Chord\@Dpzero%
\else
\ifdim\@Ypzero\p@=\z@
\@tdA=0.333333\p@
\Numero\@Mcpzero{\@Chord\@tdA}%
\edef\@Mcpuno{\@Mcpzero}%
% \end{macrocode}
% \dots\ from when the left direction is oblique and the other direction is
% either parallel to the chord~\dots
% \begin{macrocode}
\else
\ifdim\@Ypuno\p@=\z@
\@tdA=0.333333\p@
\Numero\@Mcpuno{\@Chord\@tdA}%
\SetCPmodule\@Mcpzero from\@ne\@Chord\@Dpzero
% \end{macrocode}
% \dots\ and, finally, from when both directions are oblique with respect to
% the chord; we must see if there is an inflection point; if both direction
% point to the same half plane we have to take the complex conjugate of one
% direction so as to define the triangle we were speaking about above.
% \begin{macrocode}
\else
\@tdA=\@Ypzero\p@ \@tdA=\@Ypuno\@tdA
\ifdim\@tdA>\z@
\ConjVect\@Dpuno to\@Dwpuno
\else
\edef\@Dwpuno{\@Dpuno}%
\fi
% \end{macrocode}
% The control sequence |\@Dwpuno| contains the right direction for forming the
% triangle; we can make the weighed subdivision of the chord according to the
% horizontal components of the directions; we eventually turn negative values
% to positive ones since we are interested in the magnitudes of the control
% vectors.
% \begin{macrocode}
\GetCoord(\@Dwpuno)\@Xwpuno\@Ywpuno
\@tdA=\@Xpzero\p@ \@tdA=\@Ywpuno\@tdA
\@tdB=\@Xwpuno\p@ \@tdB=\@Ypzero\@tdB
\DividE\@tdB by\@tdA to\@Fact
\@tdC=\p@ \advance\@tdC-\@Fact\p@
\ifdim\@tdC<\z@ \@tdC=-\@tdC\fi
\DividE\p@ by \@Fact\p@ to\@Fact
\@tdD=\p@ \advance\@tdD-\@Fact\p@
\ifdim\@tdD<\z@ \@tdD=-\@tdD\fi
% \end{macrocode}
% Before dividing by the denominator we have to check the directions, although
% oblique to the chord are not parallel to one another; in this case there is
% no question of a weighed subdivision of the chord
% \begin{macrocode}
\ifdim\@tdD<0.0001\p@
\def\@factzero{1}%
\def\@factuno{1}%
\else
\DividE\p@ by\@tdC to\@factzero
\DividE\p@ by\@tdD to\@factuno
\fi
% \end{macrocode}
% We now have the subdivision factors and we call another macro for determining
% the required magnitudes
% \begin{macrocode}
\SetCPmodule\@Mcpzero from\@factzero\@Chord\@Dpzero
\SetCPmodule\@Mcpuno from\@factuno\@Chord\@Dwpuno
\fi
\fi
\fi
\fi
% \end{macrocode}
% Now we have all data we need and we determine the positions of the control
% points; we do not work any more on the rotated diagram of the horizontal
% chord, but we operate on the original points and directions; all we had to
% compute, after all, were the distances of the control points along the
% specified directions; remember that the ``left'' control point is along the
% positive ``left'' direction, while the ``right'' control point precedes the
% curve node along the ``right'' direction, so that a vector subtraction must
% be done.
% \begin{macrocode}
\ScaleVect\@Dzero by\@Mcpzero to\@CPzero
\AddVect\@Pzero and\@CPzero to\@CPzero
\ScaleVect\@Duno by\@Mcpuno to\@CPuno
\SubVect\@CPuno from\@Puno to\@CPuno
% \end{macrocode}
% Now we have the four points and we can instruct the internal \texttt{pict2e}
% macros to do the path tracing.
% \begin{macrocode}
\GetCoord(\@Puno)\@XPuno\@YPuno
\GetCoord(\@CPzero)\@XCPzero\@YCPzero
\GetCoord(\@CPuno)\@XCPuno\@YCPuno
\pIIe@curveto{\@XCPzero\unitlength}{\@YCPzero\unitlength}%
{\@XCPuno\unitlength}{\@YCPuno\unitlength}%
{\@XPuno\unitlength}{\@YPuno\unitlength}%
% \end{macrocode}
% It does not have to stroke the curve because other Bézier splines might still
% be added to the path. On the opposite it memorizes the final point as the
% initial point of the next spline
% \begin{macrocode}
\CopyVect\@Puno to\@Pzero
\CopyVect\@Duno to\@Dzero
\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% The next macro is used to determine the control vectors lengths when we have
% the chord fraction, the chord length and the direction along which to compute
% the vector; all the input data (arguments from \#2 to \#4) may be passed as
% control sequences so the calling statement needs not use any curly braces.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\SetCPmodule#1from#2#3#4{%
\GetCoord(#4)\t@X\t@Y
\@tdA=#3\p@
\@tdA=#2\@tdA
\@tdA=1.333333\@tdA
\@tdB=\p@ \advance\@tdB +\t@X\p@
\DividE\@tdA by\@tdB to#1\relax
\ignorespaces}%
% \end{macrocode}
%
% We finally define the overall |\Curve| macro that recursively examines an
% arbitrary list of nodes and directions; node coordinates are grouped within
% regular parentheses while direction components are grouped within angle
% brackets. The first call of the macro initializes the drawing process and
% checks for the next node and direction; if a second node is missing, it issues
% a warning message and does not draw anything. It does not check for a change in
% direction, because it would be meaningless at the beginning of a curve.
% The second macro defines the path to the next point and checks for another node;
% if the next list item is a square bracket delimited argument, it interprets it as
% a change of direction, while if it is another parenthesis delimited argument it
% interprets it as a new node-direction specification; if the node and direction
% list is terminated, it issues the stroking command and exits the recursive
% process. The |@ChangeDir| macro is just an interface for executing the regular
% |\ChangeDir| macro, but also for recursing again by recalling |\@Curve|.
% \begin{macrocode}
\def\Curve(#1)<#2>{%
\StartCurveAt#1WithDir{#2}%
\@ifnextchar\lp@r\@Curve{%
\PackageWarning{curve2e}{%
Curve specifications must contain at least two nodes!\Messagebreak
Please, control your Curve specifications\MessageBreak}}}
\def\@Curve(#1)<#2>{%
\CurveTo#1WithDir{#2}%
\@ifnextchar\lp@r\@Curve{%
\@ifnextchar[\@ChangeDir\CurveFinish}}
\def\@ChangeDir[#1]{\ChangeDir<#1>\@Curve}
% \end{macrocode}
%
% As a concluding remark, please notice the the |\Curve| macro is certainly the
% most comfortable to use, but it is sort of frozen in its possibilities. The
% user may certainly use the |\StartCurve|, |\CurveTo|, |\ChangeDir|, and
% |\CurveFinish| for a more versatile set of drawing macros; evidently nobody
% forbids to exploit the full power of the |\cbezier| original macro for cubic
% splines.
%
% I believe that the set of new macros can really help the user to draw his/her
% diagrams with more agility; it will be the accumulated experience to decide if
% this is true.
% \Finale
% \endinput
|