1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225
|
% a package derived from nelson beebe's texnames.sty; the name
%
\ProvidesPackage{stupid_names}[2004/02/26 v0.00001]
%
% This has a chance of working in different styles and sizes, although
% it's not perfect. If \sc actually selects a caps-and-small caps font,
% we want to use lowercase letters (to get the small caps). But if \sc
% selects a smaller point size, we want to use uppercase letters.
% \uppercasesc is called on every letter we typeset in \sc, so both
% forms can be accommodated.
\ifx\sc\undefined
\def\sc{%
% If there is no \scriptfont for the current family, use a fixed
% font. What more can we do?
\expandafter\ifx\the\scriptfont\fam\nullfont
\font\temp = cmr7 \temp
\else
\the\scriptfont\fam
\fi
\def\uppercasesc{\char\uccode`}%
}%
\fi
\ifx\uppercasesc\undefined
\let\uppercasesc = \relax
\fi
%
% In the following, we first give the ``official'' definition,
% then follow it with spelling variants. Alternate definitions
% are discarded in favor of the official one. Each family is
% separated by a line like the following one.
%
%=======================================================================
%
% Only change from plain.tex is the \spacefactor assignment (suggested
% by Phil Taylor), so that \TeX at the end of a sentence isn't treated
% as an abbreviation.
%
\def\TeX{T\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{E}\kern-.125emX\spacefactor1000 }%
%
%=======================================================================
% From the AMS tex/ams/amslatex/fontsel/nfssinst.tex file:
% hacked by RF 1994/03/31
\ifx\mathcal\undefined
\def\mathcal#1{{\cal #1}}
\fi
\ifx\AmS\undefined
\def\AmS{$\mathcal{A}$\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox
{$\mathcal{M}$}\kern-.125em$\mathcal{S}$}
\fi
\ifx\AMS\undefined \let\AMS=\AmS \fi
\ifx\AmSLaTeX\undefined
\def\AmSLaTeX{\AmS-\LaTeX}
\fi
\ifx\AMSLaTeX\undefined \let\AMSLaTeX=\AmSLaTeX \fi
%=======================================================================
%
% Mike Spivak's amstex/amstex.tex 1.1d [26-Aug-1988] has
% \def\AmSTeX{{\textfontii A}\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox
% {\textfontii M}\kern-.125em{\textfontii S}-\TeX}
% and 2.1 [05-Apr-1991] has an equivalent definition.
% AmSTeX's \textfontii is exactly the same as \cal, which
% all TeX variants understand.
%
\ifx\AmSTeX\undefined
\def\AmSTeX{\AmS-\TeX}%
\fi
%
% Leslie Lamport's latex/tmanual.tex [10-Jul-1984] (an early
% draft of the book) defines it in uppercase with the standard
% definition.
\ifx\AMSTEX\undefined \let\AMSTEX=\AmSTeX \fi
%
% Barbara Beeton's latex/deproc.sty [24-Apr-1986] and inputs/tugbot.sty
% [11-Jan-1988] uses this spelling, but the definition
% \leavevmode\hbox{$\mathcal{A}\kern-.2em\lower.376ex \hbox{$\mathcal{
% M}$}\kern-.2em\mathcal{S}$-\TeX}
\ifx\AMSTeX\undefined \let\AMSTeX=\AmSTeX \fi
%
%=======================================================================
%
% The definitions of \BibTeX and \SLiTeX in Leslie Lamport's
% latex/local.tex lower the E by 0.7ex, while \TeX in plain.tex lowers
% it by 0.5ex. Oren Patashnik's bibtex/btxdoc.tex and bibtex/btxhak.tex
% [08-Feb-1988] and bibtex/bibtex.web 0.99c [xx-Feb-1988] use this same
% name and definition, but Oren said using \TeX here is ok. (Curiously,
% LaTeX itself does not define macros for any TeXware except LaTeX and
% TeX!)
\ifx\BibTeX\undefined
\ifx\textsc\undefined
\def\BibTeX{B{\sc \uppercasesc i\kern-.025em \uppercasesc b}\kern-.08em
\TeX}%
\else
\def\BibTeX{\textsc{Bib}\kern-.08em
\TeX}%
\fi
\fi
%
% Leslie Lamport uses this spelling in latex.tex, but not as a
% macro. We include it for consistency with AMSTeX.
\ifx\BIBTeX\undefined \let\BIBTeX=\BibTeX \fi
%
% Leslie Lamport's latex/slides.tex [05-Jun-1984],
% latex/tmanual.tex [10-Jul-1984] (an early draft of the book),
% and latex/lerrata.tex [23-Jul-1985] have this spelling, but the
% definition BIB\kern-.1em\TeX.
\ifx\BIBTEX\undefined \let\BIBTEX=\BibTeX \fi
%
%=======================================================================
%
% From tugboat.com 1.08 [24-Oct-1990].
\ifx\LAMSTeX\undefined
\def\LAMSTeX{L\raise.42ex\hbox{\kern-.3em\the\scriptfont2 A}%
\kern-.2em\lower.376ex\hbox{\the\textfont2 M}%
\kern-.125em {\the\textfont2 S}-\TeX}%
\fi
%
\ifx\LamSTeX\undefined \let\LamSTeX=\LAMSTeX \fi
%
% This variant seems likely to appear:
\ifx\LAmSTeX\undefined \let\LAmSTeX=\LAMSTeX \fi
%
%=======================================================================
%
% The definition from latex.tex (LATEX VERSION 2.09 <14 January 1991>)
% and bibtex.web 0.99c [xx-Feb-1988] lowers the E slightly more than
% \TeX, but consistency seems more desirable. See comments at \BibTeX.
% Different definitions are given by latex/deproc.sty [24-Apr-1986],
% amstex/man.sty [15-Dec-1986] inputs/tugbot.sty [11-Jan-1988], and
% latex/tugboat.com 1.08 [24-Oct-1990].
%
% note: this definition doesn't have a variant based on \textsc, since
% anything that's LaTeX2e-compatible ought to have it anyway...
%
\ifx\LaTeX\undefined
\def\LaTeX{L\kern-.36em\raise.3ex\hbox{\sc \uppercasesc a}\kern-.15em\TeX}%
\fi
%
% latex/slides.tex [05-Jun-1984] and latex/lerrata.tex [23-Jul-1985]
% have this spelling, but different definitions
\ifx\LATEX\undefined \let\LATEX=\LaTeX \fi
%
% LaTeX 2e `standard' logo (euuccchhhh!)
\ifx\LaTeXe\undefined
\def\LaTeXe{\LaTeX\kern.15em 2${}_{\textstyle\varepsilon}$}
\fi
%
% and a corresponding thing for LaTeX _explicitly_ 2.09
%
\ifx\LaTeXo\undefined
\def\LaTeXo{\LaTeX\kern.15em 2.09}
\fi
%
%=======================================================================
%
% Don Knuth's mf.web 2.7 [xx-Sep-1990] and Barbara Beeton's
% latex/deproc.sty [24-Apr-1986] use an equivalent of this definition.
% The font is variously named \logo, \manfnt, and \mf. plain.tex
% preloads \manfnt. manfnt has the letters A, E, F, M, N, O, T in
% various sizes plus extra symbols for Don Knuth's books Computers and
% Typesetting, and Concrete Mathematics, while logo10 has only those
% letters in one size. AmSTeX uses \logo in amsppt.sty and imappt.sty,
% so we should avoid it, and tugboat.com uses \mf for {\smc Metafont}.
% We therefore use \manfnt here, defining it if necessary. QUESTION:
% should we use manfnt, or logo10?
\ifx\MF\undefined
\ifx\manfnt\undefined
\font\manfnt=logo10
\fi
\ifx\manfntsl\undefined
\font\manfntsl=logosl10
\fi
\def\MF{{\ifdim\fontdimen1\font>0pt \let\manfnt = \manfntsl \fi
{\manfnt META}\-{\manfnt FONT}}\spacefactor1000 }%
\fi
%
% I cannot find any `official' uses of this alternate, but it
% seems likely that people will use it.
\ifx\METAFONT\undefined \let\METAFONT=\MF \fi
%
%=======================================================================
%
% Leslie Lamport's latex/slides.tex [05-Jun-1984]. His
% latex/lerrata.tex [23-Jul-1985] and latex/tmanual.tex
% [10-Jul-1984] (an early draft of the book) define it as
% SLI\TeX! The LaTeX User's Guide and Reference Manual (1986)
% appears to use small caps, and possibly kerning, for Sli.
% I need to ask Leslie to suggest a preferred definition.
\ifx\SLITEX\undefined
\ifx\textsc\undefined
\def\SLITEX{S\kern-.065em L\kern-.18em\raise.32ex\hbox{\textsc{i}}%
\kern-.03em\TeX}%
\else
\def\SLITEX{S\kern-.065em L\kern-.18em\raise.32ex\hbox{i}%
\kern-.03em\TeX}%
\fi
\fi
%
% latex/local.tex (sample Local Guide) [27-Oct-1988] uses
% this name, but defines it as
% {\rm S\kern-.06em{\sc l\kern-.035emi}\kern-.06em T\kern
% -.1667em\lower.7ex\hbox{E}\kern-.125emX}
% with an extra-low E, and kerned Sli in small caps. Is this
% what the LaTeX User's Guide and Reference Manual (1986) used?
\ifx\SLiTeX\undefined \let\SLiTeX=\SLITEX \fi
%
% latex/slitex.tex [08-Jun-1988] uses SliTeX in typeouts,
% but not as a macro -- what a way to confuse the user.
\ifx\SliTeX\undefined \let\SliTeX=\SLITEX \fi
%
% I cannot find a use of this one, but it seems a likely
% candidate anyway, and is consistent with AMSTeX and BIBTeX.
\ifx\SLITeX\undefined \let\SLITeX=\SLITEX \fi
%
%=======================================================================
%
% from pictex.tex:
\ifx\PiC\undefined \def\PiC{P\kern-.12em\lower.5ex\hbox{I}\kern-.075emC} \fi
\ifx\PiCTeX\undefined \def\PiCTeX{\PiC\kern-.11em\TeX} \fi
%
% from fantasy-land:
\ifx\VorTeX\undefined \def\VorTeX{V\kern-2.7pt\lower.5ex\hbox{O\kern-1.4pt R}%
\kern-2.6ptT\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{E}\kern-.125emX} \fi
%
\endinput
%=========================[End of texnames.sty]=========================
|