File: white-space-vs-joiners-002.html

package info (click to toggle)
thunderbird 1%3A115.12.0-1~deb11u1
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bullseye
  • size: 3,463,904 kB
  • sloc: cpp: 6,971,272; javascript: 5,208,988; ansic: 3,507,245; python: 1,137,377; asm: 432,531; xml: 205,149; java: 175,761; sh: 116,483; makefile: 22,157; perl: 13,971; objc: 12,561; yacc: 4,583; pascal: 2,840; lex: 1,720; ruby: 1,075; exp: 762; sql: 666; awk: 580; php: 436; lisp: 430; sed: 70; csh: 10
file content (29 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 980 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (18) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
 
<!DOCTYPE html>
<meta charset=utf-8>

<title>CSS Text Test: join controls do not disrupt white-space processing</title>
<link rel="author" title="Jonathan Kew" href="mailto:jkew@mozilla.com">
<link rel="help" href="https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-3/#white-space-rules">
<!-- NB: The spec doesn't explicitly discuss join controls in this context,
     but it is self-evident that they should not have any effect on the white-space processing.
     Their only effect should be on the shaping (if any) of the adjacent characters. -->
<link rel="match" href="reference/white-space-vs-joiners-002-ref.html">
<meta name="assert" content="The presence of join controls (ZWJ/ZWNJ) at word edges should not affect white-space processing">

<style>
p {
  width: min-content;
  border: 2px solid green;
  font: 24px monospace;
}
</style>

<body>
  <p>
    &#x200d;This&#x200d;
    &#x200d;is&#x200d;
    &#x200d;a&#x200d;
    &#x200d;simple&#x200d;
    &#x200d;test&#x200d;
  </p>
</body>