File: conc_path_bm.erl

package info (click to toggle)
yaws 2.0.8%2Bdfsg-3
  • links: PTS, VCS
  • area: main
  • in suites: bullseye
  • size: 8,084 kB
  • sloc: erlang: 42,190; sh: 2,543; javascript: 1,459; ansic: 890; makefile: 878; lisp: 79; python: 34; xml: 12; php: 1
file content (171 lines) | stat: -rw-r--r-- 4,208 bytes parent folder | download | duplicates (6)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
%%
%% See '8.5 Benchmarking' under 'Efficiency Guide' in the OTP documentation.
%%
%
% This particular benchmark was assembled to learn about Erlang benchmarking on a simple case and to
% satisfy my curiosity as to why the yaws_server:conc_path/1 function was used instead of one of the
% 'lists' functions such as lists:append, and why conc_path isn't tail-recursive.
%
% Note that I'm not suggesting that conc_path is necessarily worth of particular attention regarding performance!
% (though it  may be.. )
% Applying this sort of benchmark to such small parts of Yaws at this stage (v 1.68) could quite reasonably be classed
% as 'premature optimization' I think ;)
% Proper profiling would need to be done to determine what code paths are actually performance sensitive and worthy
% of attention.
%


-module(conc_path_bm).
-author('julian@precisium.com.au').

-include("bench.hrl").

-include("../../include/yaws_api.hrl").
-include("../../src/yaws_debug.hrl").
-include("../../include/yaws.hrl").


-export([benchmarks/0]).
-export([conc_path_orig/1,conc_path_tweaked/1, conc_path_tail/1, conc_path_lappend/1, conc_path_lflatten/1, conc_path_lconcat/1]).

benchmarks() ->
 {20000, [conc_path_orig, conc_path_tweaked, conc_path_tail, conc_path_lappend, conc_path_lflatten, conc_path_lconcat]}.



%--------------------------------------
% original conc_path from yaws_server.erl
%--------------------------------------
conc_path_orig(Iter) ->
        do_conc_path_orig(Iter, getData()).

do_conc_path_orig(0, _Path) -> ok;
do_conc_path_orig(Iter, Path) ->

        ?rep20(conc_path(Path)),

        do_conc_path_orig(Iter-1, Path).


%--------------------------------------
% slightly tweaked conc_path from yaws_server.erl
%--------------------------------------
conc_path_tweaked(Iter) ->
        do_conc_path_tweaked(Iter, getData()).

do_conc_path_tweaked(0, _Path) -> ok;
do_conc_path_tweaked(Iter, Path) ->

        ?rep20(conc_path2(Path)),

        do_conc_path_tweaked(Iter-1, Path).

%--------------------------------------
% tail recursive version of conc_path
%--------------------------------------
conc_path_tail(Iter) ->
        do_conc_path_tail(Iter, getData()).

do_conc_path_tail(0, _Path) -> ok;
do_conc_path_tail(Iter, Path) ->

        ?rep20(conc_path_tailrecursive(Path)),

        do_conc_path_tail(Iter-1, Path).


%--------------------------------------
% lists:flatten
%--------------------------------------
conc_path_lflatten(Iter) ->
        do_conc_path_lflatten(Iter, getData()).

do_conc_path_lflatten(0, _Path) -> ok;
do_conc_path_lflatten(Iter, Path) ->

        ?rep20(lists:flatten(Path)),

        do_conc_path_lflatten(Iter-1, Path).


%--------------------------------------
% lists:concat
%--------------------------------------
conc_path_lconcat(Iter) ->
        do_conc_path_lconcat(Iter, getData()).

do_conc_path_lconcat(0, _Path) -> ok;
do_conc_path_lconcat(Iter, Path) ->

        ?rep20(lists:concat(Path)),

        do_conc_path_lconcat(Iter-1, Path).

%--------------------------------------
% lists:append
%--------------------------------------
conc_path_lappend(Iter) ->
        do_conc_path_lappend(Iter, getData()).

do_conc_path_lappend(0, _Path) -> ok;
do_conc_path_lappend(Iter, Path) ->

        ?rep20(lists:append(Path)),

        do_conc_path_lappend(Iter-1, Path).




%--------------------------------------
% Which function performs better, unsuprisingly, varies a bit depending on the data.
%--------------------------------------


getData() ->
 ["usr/", "local/", "www/", "some.doc"].

getData2() ->
["/usr/", "local/", "etc"].


getData3() ->
 ["usr/", "local", "/", "etc" , "/", "www/somewhere strange", "/", "SomeUserOrSomething/blah/", "blah/"].


getData4() ->
["/usr/", "local/"].

getData5() ->
["/usr/"].


%--------------------------------------


conc_path([]) ->
    [];
conc_path([H|T]) ->
    H ++ conc_path(T).


conc_path2([]) ->
    [];
conc_path2([H|[]]) ->
        H;
conc_path2([H|T]) ->
    H ++ conc_path2(T).



conc_path_tailrecursive([]) ->
        [];
conc_path_tailrecursive([H|T]) ->
        c2(T,H).

c2([],Acc) ->
        Acc;
c2([H|[]],Acc) ->
        H ++ Acc;
c2([H|T],Acc) ->
        c2(T,Acc ++ H).